Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Accidental Hypothermia: Rewarming Strategies in the Field.

Hypothermic cardiac arrest is rare and poses a challenge to prehospital responders. Standard cardiac arrest protocols advise treating reversible causes of arrest; however, rewarming the cold casualty is not easily achieved in the field. This article aimed to review the literature on hypothermia in order to produce evidence-based recommendations on rewarming that could realistically be applied to hypothermic cardiac arrest patients.

[Prewarming according to the AWMF S3 guidelines on preventing inadvertant perioperative hypothermia 2014 : Retrospective analysis of 7786 patients]. / Vorwärmung entsprechend der "S3 Leitlinie Vermeidung von unbeabsichtigter perioperativer Hypothermie 2014" : Retrospektive Analyse von 7786 Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, which is defined as a core body temperature of less than 36.0 °C, can have serious consequences in surgery patients. These include cardiac complications, increased blood loss, wound infections and postoperative shivering; therefore, the scientific evidence that inadvertent perioperative hypothermia should be avoided is undisputed and several national guidelines have been published summarizing the scientific evidence and recommending specific procedures. The German AWMF guidelines were the first to emphasize the importance of prewarming for surgery patients to avoid inadvertant perioperative hypothermia; however, in contrast to intraoperative warming, prewarming is so far not sufficiently implemented in clinical practice in many hospitals. Furthermore, a recent study has questioned the effectiveness of prewarming. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the hypothermia rates that can be achieved when prewarming in the anesthesia induction room is introduced into the clinical practice and performed in addition to intraoperative warming. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg gave approval for data storage and retrospective data analysis from the anesthesia database. According to the existing local standard operating procedure, prewarming with forced air was performed in addition to intraoperative warming in the anesthesia induction room in 3899 patients receiving general anesthesia with a duration of 30 min or longer from January 2015 to December 2016. The results were compared with a control group of 3887 patients from July 2012 to August 2014 who received intraoperative warming but were not subjected to prewarming. Tracheal intubation was carried out in all patients and temperature measurements after the induction of anesthesia were performed using esophageal, urinary catheter or intra-arterial temperature probes. RESULTS: The mean duration of prewarming was 25 min in the treatment group. Patients subjected to prewarming showed an intraoperative hypothermia rate of 15.8% and a postoperative hypothermia rate of 5.1%. Patients without prewarming showed an intraoperative hypothermia rate of 30.4% and a postoperative hypothermia rate of 12.4%. This means a 52% reduction of the intraoperative hypothermia rate and a 41% reduction of the postoperative hypothermia rate for patients who received prewarmimg (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the lack of prewarming was independently associated with intraoperative hypothermia with an odds ratio of 2.5 (95% confidence interval CI 2.250-2.841; p < 0.0001) and postoperative hypothermia with an odds ratio of 2.8 (95% CI 2.316-3.277; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prewarming, as recommended in the AWMF guidelines, resulted in a significant and clinically relevant reduction in the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia; therefore, prewarming can still be regarded as an effective method to avoid perioperative hypothermia. Hypothermia rates of 15.8% intraoperatively and 5.1% postoperatively can be achieved in clinical practice, when prewarming is performed in addition to intraoperative warming in the anesthesia induction room directly before the start of surgical procedures.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Bypass--Temperature Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

UNLABELLED: In order to improve our understanding of the evidence-based literature supporting temperature management during adult cardiopulmonary bypass, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology and the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology tasked the authors to conduct a review of the peer-reviewed literature, including: 1) optimal site for temperature monitoring, 2) avoidance of hyperthermia, 3) peak cooling temperature gradient and cooling rate, and 4) peak warming temperature gradient and rewarming rate. Authors adopted the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association method for development clinical practice guidelines, and arrived at the following recommendations: CLASS I RECOMMENDATIONS: a)The oxygenator arterial outlet blood temperature is recommended to be utilized as a surrogate for cerebral temperature measurement during CPB. (Class I, Level C) b)To monitor cerebral perfusate temperature during warming, it should be assumed that the oxygenator arterial outlet blood temperature under-estimates cerebral perfusate temperature. (Class I, Level C) c)Surgical teams should limit arterial outlet blood temperature to<37°C to avoid cerebral hyperthermia. (Class 1, Level C) d)Temperature gradients between the arterial outlet and venous inflow on the oxygenator during CPB cooling should not exceed 10°C to avoid generation of gaseous emboli. (Class 1, Level C) e)Temperature gradients between the arterial outlet and venous inflow on the oxygenator during CPB rewarming should not exceed 10°C to avoid out-gassing when blood is returned to the patient. (Class 1, Level C) CLASS IIa RECOMMENDATIONS: a)Pulmonary artery or nasopharyngeal temperature recording is reasonable for weaning and immediate post-bypass temperature measurement. (Class IIa, Level C)b)Rewarming when arterial blood outlet temperature ≥30° C: i.To achieve the desired temperature for separation from bypass, it is reasonable to maintain a temperature gradient between arterial outlet temperature and the venous inflow of≤4°C. (Class IIa, Level B) ii.To achieve the desired temperature for separation from bypass, it is reasonable to maintain a rewarming rate≤0.5°C/min. (Class IIa, Level B) NO RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation for a guideline is provided concerning optimal temperature for weaning from CPB due to insufficient published evidence.

Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia.

BACKGROUND: 25-90% of all patients undergoing elective surgery suffer from inadvertent postoperative hypothermia, i.e., a core body temperature below 36°C. Compared to normothermic patients, these patients have more frequent wound infections (relative risk [RR] 3.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-7.84), cardiac complications (RR 4.49, 95% CI 1.00-20.16), and blood transfusions (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.66). Hypothermic patients feel uncomfortable, and shivering raises oxygen consumption by about 40%. METHODS: This guideline is based on a systematic review of the literature up to and including October 2012 and a further one from November 2012 to August 2014. The recommendations were developed and agreed upon by representatives of five medical specialty societies in a structured consensus process. RESULTS: The patient's core temperature should be measured 1-2 hours before the start of anesthesia, and either continuously or every 15 minutes during surgery. Depending on the nature of the operation, the site of temperature measurement should be oral, naso-/oropharyngeal, esophageal, vesical, or tympanic (direct). The patient should be actively prewarmed 20-30 minutes before surgery to counteract the decline in temperature. Prewarmed patients must be actively warmed intraoperatively as well if the planned duration of anesthesia is longer than 60 minutes (without prewarming, 30 minutes). The ambient temperature in the operating room should be at least 21°C for adult patients and at least 24°C for children. Infusions and blood transfusions that are given at rates of >500 mL/h should be warmed first. Perioperatively, the largest possible area of the body surface should be thermally insulated. Emergence from general anesthesia should take place at normal body temperature. Postoperative hypothermia, if present, should be treated by the administration of convective or conductive heat until normothermia is achieved. Shivering can be treated with medications. CONCLUSION: Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia can adversely affect the outcome of surgery and the patient's postoperative course. It should be actively prevented.

Guidelines for maintenance of adult patients with brain death and potential for multiple organ donations: the Task Force of the Brazilian Association of Intensive Medicine the Brazilian Association of Organs Transplantation, and the Transplantation Center of Santa Catarina.

INTRODUCTION: The organ shortage for transplantation, the principal factor that increases waiting lists, has become a serious public health problem. In this scenario, the intensivist occupies a prominent position as one of the professionals that first has a chance to identify brain death and to be responsible for the maintenance of the potential deceased donor. OBJECTIVE: This report attempts to establish guidelines for care and maintenance of adult deceased donor organs guiding and standardizing care provided to patients with brain death. METHOD: These guidelines were composed by intensivists, transplant coordinators, professionals from various transplant teams, and used transplant center. The formulated questions were forwarded to all members and recommendations were constructed after an extensive literature review selecting articles with the highest degree of evidence. RESULTS: Guidelines were developed in the form of questions reflecting frequent experiences in clinical intensive care practices. The main questions were: Is there an optimal interval for keeping organs of deceased donors viable? What actions are considered essential for maintaining deceased donors in this period? What are the limits of body temperature? How should the patient be warmed? Which laboratory tests should be performed? What is the collection interval? What are the limits in the laboratory and the capture scenario? What are the limits of blood pressure? When and how should one use catecholamines? CONCLUSIONS: This pioneer project involved a multidisciplinary team working in organ transplantation seeking to provide treatment guidance to increase the number of viable organs from deceased adult donors.

Equivalence and noninferiority testing in regression models and repeated-measures designs.

Equivalence and noninferiority designs are useful when the superiority of one intervention over another is neither expected nor required. Equivalence trials test whether a difference between groups falls within a prespecified equivalence region, whereas noninferiority trials test whether a preferred intervention is either better or at least not worse than the comparator, with worse being defined a priori. Special designs and analyses are needed because neither of these conclusions can be reached from a nonsignificant test for superiority. Using the data from a companion article, we demonstrate analyses of basic equivalence and noninferiority designs, along with more complex model-based methods. We first give an overview of methods for design and analysis of data from superiority, equivalence, and noninferiority trials, including how to analyze each type of design using linear regression models. We then show how the analogous hypotheses can be tested in a repeated-measures setting in which there are multiple outcomes per subject. We especially address interactions between the repeated factor, usually time, and treatment. Although we focus on the analysis of continuous outcomes, extensions to other data types as well as sample size consideration are discussed.

Intraoperative hypothermia during vascular neurosurgical procedures.

Increasing evidence in animal models and clinical trials for stroke, hypoxic encephalopathy for children, and traumatic brain injury have shown that mild hypothermia may attenuate ischemic damage and improve neurological outcome. However, it is less clear if mild intraoperative hypothermia during vascular neurosurgical procedures results in improved outcomes for patients. This review examines the scientific evidence behind hypothermia as a treatment and discusses factors that may be important for the use of this adjuvant technique, including cooling temperature, duration of hypothermia, and rate of rewarming.

Posthypothermic rewarming considerations following traumatic brain injury.

To date, considerable attention has been focused upon the use of hypothermia as a therapeutic strategy for attenuating many of the damaging consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite the promise of hypothermic intervention following TBI, many questions remain regarding the optimal use of hypothermic intervention, including, but not limited to, the rewarming rates needed to assure optimal brain protection. In this review, we revisit the relatively limited literature examining the issue of hypothermia and differing rewarming rates following TBI. Considering both experimental and clinical literature, evidence is presented that the rate of posthypothermic rewarming is an important variable for influencing the protective effects of hypothermic intervention following TBI. In the experimental setting, posttraumatic hypothermia followed by slow rewarming appears to provide maximal protection in terms of traumatically induced axonal damage, microvascular damage and dysfunction, and contusional expansion. In contrast, hypothermia followed by rapid rewarming not only reverses the protective effects associated with hypothermic intervention, but in many cases, exacerbates the traumatically induced pathology and its functional consequences. While similar evaluations have not been conducted in the clinical setting, multiple lines of clinical evidence suggest the benefits of posttraumatic hypothermia are optimized through the use of slow rewarming, with the suggestion that such a strategy reduces the potential for rebound vasodilation, elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), and impaired neurocognitive recovery. Collectively, this review highlights not only the benefits of hypothermic intervention, but also the rate of posthypothermic rewarming as an important variable in assuring maximal efficacy following the use of hypothermic intervention.

Current and future role of therapeutic hypothermia.

Therapeutic moderate hypothermia has been advocated for use in traumatic brain injury, stroke, cardiac arrest-induced encephalopathy, neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, and spinal cord injury, and as an adjunct to aneurysm surgery. In this review, we address the trials that have been performed for each of these indications, and review the strength of the evidence to support treatment with mild/moderate hypothermia. We review the data to support an optimal target temperature for each indication, as well as the duration of the cooling, and the rate at which cooling is induced and rewarming instituted. Evidence is strongest for prehospital cardiac arrest and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. For traumatic brain injury, a recent meta-analysis suggests that cooling may increase the likelihood of a good outcome, but does not change mortality rates. For many of the other indications, such as stroke and spinal cord injury, trials are ongoing, but the data are insufficient to recommend routine use of hypothermia at this time.

Management of pitfalls for the successful clinical use of hypothermia treatment.

Therapeutic hypothermia is a promising method for controlling intracranial pressure (ICP) in severely brain-injured patients. However, clinical data regarding the effect of brain hypothermia on overall outcome of these patients is limited. This may be because there are specific pitfalls associated with the clinical management of induced hypothermia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). These pitfalls may be avoided by preventing specific risk factors when cooling is induced and with rewarming. However, these risk factors have not been well systematically discussed in the literature. In this paper, three categories of clinical issues regarding the management of brain hypothermia are discussed: (1) stress-induced secondary brain injury mechanisms; (2) technical aspects of intensive care unit (ICU) cooling management; and (3) rewarming rates and methods. For patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 8, management of stress-induced insulin-resistant hyperglycemia, and unstable systemic circulation due to impaired cardiac contractility are especially important. For example, in our experience, posttraumatic hyperglycemia, exacerbated by cooling, may be ameliorated by the administration of a ketone body with mannitol. Prevention of selective free radical damage to neurons is also an important target for successful brain hypothermia treatment. Taken together, it is clear that several orchestrated steps should be initiated to enhance the protective effects of hypothermia therapy and prevent these possible pitfalls.

Perioperative hypothermia: use and therapeutic implications.

Perioperative cerebral ischemic insults are common in some surgical procedures. The notion that induced hypothermia can be employed to improve outcome in surgical patients has persisted for six decades. Its principal application has been in the context of cardiothoracic and neurosurgery. Mild (32-35 degrees C) and moderate (26-31 degrees C) hypothermia have been utilized for numerous procedures involving the heart, but intensive research has found little or no benefit to outcome. This may, in part, be attributable to confounding effects associated with rewarming and lack of understanding of the mechanisms of injury. Evidence of efficacy of mild hypothermia is absent for cerebral aneurysm clipping and carotid endarterectomy. Deep hypothermia (18-25 degrees C) during circulatory arrest has been practiced in the repair of congenital heart disease, adult thoracic aortas, and giant intracranial aneurysms. There is little doubt of the protective efficacy of deep hypothermia, but continued efforts to refine its application may serve to enhance its utility. Recent evidence that mild hypothermia is efficacious in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has implications for patients incurring anoxic or global ischemic brain insults during anesthesia and surgery, or perioperatively. Advances in preclinical models of ischemic/anoxic injury and cardiopulmonary bypass that allow definition of optimal cooling strategies and study of cellular and subcellular events during perioperative ischemia can add to our understanding of mechanisms of hypothermia efficacy and provide a rationale basis for its implementation in humans.

Resistive polymer versus forced-air warming: comparable heat transfer and core rewarming rates in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Mild perioperative hypothermia increases the risk of several severe complications. Perioperative patient warming to preserve normothermia has thus become routine, with forced-air warming being used most often. In previous studies, various resistive warming systems have shown mixed results in comparison with forced-air. Recently, a polymer-based resistive patient warming system has been developed. We compared the efficacy of a standard forced-air warming system with the resistive polymer system in volunteers. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers participated, each on two separate study days. Unanesthetized volunteers were cooled to a core temperature (tympanic membrane) of 34 degrees C by application of forced-air at 10 degrees C and a circulating-water mattress at 4 degrees C. Meperidine and buspirone were administered to prevent shivering. In a randomly designated order, volunteers were then rewarmed (until their core temperatures reached 36 degrees C) with one of the following active warming systems: (1) forced-air warming (Bair Hugger warming cover #300, blower #750, Arizant, Eden Prairie, MN); or (2) polymer fiber resistive warming (HotDog whole body blanket, HotDog standard controller, Augustine Biomedical, Eden Prairie, MN). The alternate system was used on the second study day. Metabolic heat production, cutaneous heat loss, and core temperature were measured. RESULTS: Metabolic heat production and cutaneous heat loss were similar with each system. After a 30-min delay, core temperature increased nearly linearly by 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.91-1.04) degrees C/h with forced-air and by 0.92 (0.85-1.00) degrees C/h with resistive heating (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Heating efficacy and core rewarming rates were similar with full-body forced-air and full-body resistive polymer heating in healthy volunteers.