Targeting the ß2 -adrenergic receptor increases chemosensitivity in multiple myeloma by induction of apoptosis and modulating cancer cell metabolism.

While multi-drug combinations and continuous treatment have become standard for multiple myeloma, the disease remains incurable. Repurposing drugs that are currently used for other indications could provide a novel approach to improve the therapeutic efficacy of standard multiple myeloma treatments. Here, we assessed the anti-tumor effects of cardiac drugs called ß-blockers as a single agent and in combination with commonly used anti-myeloma therapies. Expression of the ß2 -adrenergic receptor correlated with poor survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Targeting the ß2 -adrenergic receptor (ß2 AR) using either selective or non-selective ß-blockers reduced multiple myeloma cell viability, and induced apoptosis and autophagy. Blockade of the ß2 AR modulated cancer cell metabolism by reducing the mitochondrial respiration as well as the glycolytic activity. These effects were not observed by blockade of ß1 -adrenergic receptors. Combining ß2 AR blockade with the chemotherapy drug melphalan or the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib significantly increased apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells. These data identify the therapeutic potential of ß2 AR-blockers as a complementary or additive approach in multiple myeloma treatment and support the future clinical evaluation of non-selective ß-blockers in a randomized controlled trial. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Impact of polymorphic variants on the molecular pharmacology of the two-agonist conformations of the human ß1-adrenoceptor.

ß-blockers are widely used to improve symptoms and prolong life in heart disease primarily by inhibiting the actions of endogenous catecholamines at the ß1-adrenoceptor. There are two common naturally occurring polymorphisms within the human ß1-adrenoceptor sequence: Ser or Gly at position 49 in the N-terminus and Gly or Arg at position 389 in the C-terminus and some clinical studies have suggested that expression of certain variants may be associated with disease and affect response to treatment with ß-blockers. The ß1-adrenoceptor also exists in two agonist conformations - a high affinity catecholamine conformation and a low affinity secondary agonist conformation. Receptor-effector coupling and intracellular signalling from the different conformations may be affected by the polymorphic variants. Here, we examine in detail the molecular pharmacology of the ß1-adrenoceptor polymorphic variants with respect to ligand affinity, efficacy, activation of the different agonist conformations and signal transduction and determine whether the polymorphic variants do indeed affect this secondary conformation. Stable cell lines expressing the wildtype and polymorphic variants were constructed and receptor pharmacology examined using whole cell binding and intracellular secondary messenger techniques. There was no difference in affinity for agonists and antagonists at the human wildtype ß1-adrenoceptor (Ser49/Gly389) and the polymorphic variants Gly49/Gly389 and Ser49/Arg389. Furthermore, the polymorphic variant receptors both have two active agonist conformations with pharmacological properties similar to the wildtype receptor. Although the polymorphism at position 389 is thought to occur in an intracellular domain important for Gs-coupling, the two agonist conformations of the polymorphic variants stimulate intracellular signalling pathways, including Gs-cAMP intracellular signalling, in a manner very similar to that of the wildtype receptor.

Targeting anti-beta-1-adrenergic receptor antibodies for dilated cardiomyopathy.

Anti-beta-1-adrenergic receptor antibodies (anti-ß1AR Abs) have long been implicated in the pathogenesis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). It is believed that these autoantibodies bind to and constitutively stimulate the ß1AR to promote pathological cardiac remodelling and ß1AR desensitization and downregulation. The prevalence of anti-ß1AR Abs in patients with DCM ranges from 26% to 60%, and the presence of these autoantibodies correlates with a poor prognosis. Several small studies have shown improvements in functional status, haemodynamics, and biomarkers of heart failure upon removal or neutralization of these antibodies from the sera of affected patients. Traditionally, removal of anti-ß1AR Abs required immunoadsorption therapy with apheresis columns directed against human immunoglobulins (Igs) and subsequent i.v. Ig infusion, thereby essentially performing a plasma exchange transfusion. However, recent advances have allowed the development of small peptides and nucleotide sequences that specifically target and neutralize anti-ß1AR Abs, providing a hopeful avenue for future drug development to treat DCM. Herein, we briefly review the clinical literature of therapy directed against anti-ß1AR Abs and highlight the opportunity for further research and development in this area.

Impaired beta-adrenergic control of immune function in patients with chronic heart failure: reversal by beta1-blocker treatment.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and heightened sympathetic activity alterations in immune function have been described. OBJECTIVES: To find out whether, in CHF patients, beta-blocker treatment might beneficially affect immune function. METHODS: We studied activation of circulating lymphocytes (assessed as concanavalin A (CON A)-induced inositol phosphate (IP) formation and proliferation ([3H]-thymidine incorporation) from 8 CHF patients on standard medication (Group A, mean age 54 +/- 6 yrs, NYHA class II - IV, mean 3.1 +/- 0.3) and in 9 CHF patients on standard medication and additional treatment with the beta1-blocker metoprolol (Group B, mean age: 56 +/- 3 yrs, NYHA class II - IV, mean 2.9 +/- 0.2); 8 age-matched healthy volunteers (mean age 49 +/- 3 yrs) served as controls. RESULTS: Compared to controls, in group A isoprenaline-induced lymphocyte cyclic AMP-increase was reduced, CON A-evoked IP formation significantly enhanced and isoprenaline-induced inhibition of CON A-evoked IP formation and proliferation almost abolished. In group B, however, all these parameters were not significantly different from controls. CONCLUSION: In CHF patients lymphocyte cyclic AMP response to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation is blunted and the inhibitory effect of cyclic AMP on lymphocyte activation is almost abolished; this could result in a non-regulated increased production and release of proinflammatory cytokines that might contribute to the progression of the disease. Chronic treatment of CHF patients with the beta1-blocker metoprolol (at least partly) restores lymphocyte cyclic AMP responses to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation and the inhibitory effects of cyclic AMP on lymphocyte activation; the resulting "normalization" of the immune function might contribute to the beneficial effects of beta1-blockers in treatment of CHF.