Development and validation of a new drug-focused predictive risk score for postoperative delirium in orthopaedic and trauma surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is the most common complication following surgery in elderly patients. During pharmacist-led medication reconciliation (PhMR), a predictive risk score considering delirium risk-increasing drugs and other available risk factors could help to identify risk patients. METHODS: Orthopaedic and trauma surgery patients aged ≥ 18 years with PhMR were included in a retrospective observational single-centre study 03/2022-10/2022. The study cohort was randomly split into a development and a validation cohort (6:4 ratio). POD was assessed through the 4 A's test (4AT), delirium diagnosis, and chart review. Potential risk factors available at PhMR were tested via univariable analysis. Significant variables were added to a multivariable logistic regression model. Based on the regression coefficients, a risk score for POD including delirium risk-increasing drugs (DRD score) was established. RESULTS: POD occurred in 42/328 (12.8%) and 30/218 (13.8%) patients in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Of the seven evaluated risk factors, four were ultimately tested in a multivariable logistic regression model. The final DRD score included age (66-75 years, 2 points; > 75 years, 3 points), renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2, 1 point), anticholinergic burden (ACB-score ≥ 3, 1 point), and delirium risk-increasing drugs (n ≥ 2; 2 points). Patients with ≥ 4 points were classified as having a high risk for POD. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the risk score model were 0.89 and 0.81 for the development and the validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DRD score is a predictive risk score assessable during PhMR and can identify patients at risk for POD. Specific preventive measures concerning drug therapy safety and non-pharmacological actions should be implemented for identified risk patients.

Implementation of pharmacy-led preoperative medication reconciliation in surgical oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy-led medication history collection and reconciliation have demonstrated decreased medication errors, increased patient safety, and improved cost-savings. However, literature lacks documented efforts to implement such services in the preoperative space, where having accurate medication lists following complex procedures with high postoperative admission rates is critical. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation of a telephonic pharmacy student and pharmacist-led preoperative medication reconciliation program. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: The service was piloted using third- and fourth-year pharmacy students to conduct telephonic medication histories for urologic surgical oncology patients. Weekly reports identified eligible patients with scheduled procedures within 2 weeks' time. Using standardized methods for patient communication and documentation, students authored telephone encounter notes that were reviewed and signed by pharmacist preceptors. Pharmacist preceptors also reconciled home medication lists based on students' findings. PRACTICE INNOVATION: A standardized preoperative medication reconciliation process was developed and implemented utilizing third- and fourth-year pharmacy students. Resulting notes were available for surgical staff on the day of patients' procedures and upon potential postoperative admission. EVALUATION METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate successfully documented medication histories collected by pharmacy students within the pharmacy-led preoperative medication reconciliation program. RESULTS: Forty-six medication reconciliation notes were identified between August 2021 and February 2022, and 39 met inclusion criteria. Amongst the 177 medication additions, deletions, and edits, deletions were the most common, and 95% of patients had at least 1 medication discrepancy identified. A total of 33 medication classes were represented by the identified discrepancies, and each encounter took an average of 33 minutes to complete. CONCLUSION: Preoperative medication reconciliation services can be successfully accomplished through a telephonic pharmacy student and pharmacist-led workflow. Accurate medication histories aid in minimizing medication errors and increasing patient safety.

Impact of Medication Reconciliation in Oncology Early Phase Studies: A Drug-Drug Interaction Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the impact of medication reconciliation (MR) conducted by pharmacists before patient enrollment and the initiation of investigational treatments. By implementing MR, the primary objective is to evaluate the extent to which the inclusion of patients with prohibited or not recommended concomitant medications in clinical trials can be significantly reduced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included all patients who participated in clinical trials and underwent MR between September 1, 2015, and September 1, 2020. To identify prohibited or monitored drugs, protocols and investigator's brochures provided by the sponsor were meticulously reviewed and taken into consideration. RESULTS: MR was performed for 501 patients, uncovering 35% of the medications they were currently taking. Through the pharmaceutical analysis, a total of 346 drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were identified, of which 188 required monitoring and 158 were strictly prohibited. More than half of the prohibited medications were herbal drugs. A significant portion of these prohibited drugs were discontinued, with only 6% being replaced by suitable alternatives. The implementation of MR played a crucial role in the identification of 51% of the prohibited or monitored drugs that were initially overlooked by oncologists. CONCLUSION: MR is a highly effective measure aimed at reducing the risk of DDIs with investigational drugs, thereby minimizing protocol deviations and enhancing patient care. Sponsors of clinical trials value its implementation and recognize the substantial benefits it brings to the entire trial process. Consequently, many sponsors willingly provide funding to investigational sites that adopt MR as part of their standard practice, acknowledging its critical role in ensuring patient safety and maintaining data integrity throughout the course of clinical research studies.

Medication reconciliation on admission in paediatric chronic patients: A multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: Medication reconciliation (MC) is one of the main strategies to reduce medication errors in care transitions. In Spain, several guidelines have been published with recommendations for the implementation and development of MC aimed at the adult population, although paediatric patients are not included. In 2018, a study was carried out that led to the subsequent publication of a document with criteria for selecting paediatric patients in whom CM should be prioritised. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of paediatric patients most likely to suffer from errors of reconciliation (EC), to confirm whether the results of a previous study can be extrapolated. METHODOLOGY: Prospective, multicentre study of paediatric inpatients. We analysed the CE detected during the performance of the CM on admission. The best possible pharmacotherapeutic history of the patient was obtained using different sources of information and confirmed by an interview with the patient/caregiver. RESULTS: 1043 discrepancies were detected, 544 were identified as CD, affecting 317 patients (43%). Omission of a drug was the most common error (51%). The majority of CD were associated with drugs in groups A (31%), N (23%) and R (11%) of the ATC classification. Polymedication and onco-haematological based disease were the risk factors associated with the presence of CD with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study allow prioritisation of CM in a specific group of paediatric patients, favouring the efficiency of the process. Onco-haematological patients and polymedication are confirmed as the main risk factors for the appearance of CD in the paediatric population.

A Multi-method Exploratory Evaluation of a Service Designed to Improve Medication Safety for Patients with Monitored Dosage Systems Following Hospital Discharge.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medication safety problems are common post-hospital discharge, and an important global healthcare improvement target. The Transfers of Care Around Medicines (TCAM) service was launched by a National Health Service Trust in the North-West of England, initially focusing on patients with new or existing Monitored Dosage Systems (MDS). The TCAM service is designed to enable the prompt transfer of medication information, with referrals made by hospitals at discharge to a named community pharmacy. This study aimed to explore the utilisation and impact of the TCAM service on medication safety. METHODS: The evaluation included a descriptive analysis of 3033 anonymised patient referrals to 71 community pharmacies over a 1-year period alongside an assessment of the impact of the TCAM service on unintentional medication discrepancies and adverse drug events using a retrospective before-and-after study design. Impact data were collected across 18 general practices by 16 trained clinical pharmacists. RESULTS: Most patient referrals (70%, 2126/3033) were marked as 'completed' by community pharmacies, with 15% of completed referrals delayed beyond 30 days. Screening of 411 patient records by clinical pharmacists yielded no statistically significant difference in unintentional medication discrepancies or adverse drug event rates following TCAM implementation using a multivariable regression analysis (unintentional medication discrepancies adjusted odds ratio = 0.79 [95% confidence interval 0.44-1.44, p = 0.46]; and adverse drug events adjusted odds ratio = 1.19 [95% confidence interval 0.57-2.45, p = 0.63]), although there remained considerable uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: The TCAM service facilitated a number of community pharmacy services offered to patients with monitored dosage systems; but the impact of the intervention on unintentional medication discrepancies and adverse drug event rates post-hospital discharge for this patient group was uncertain. The results of this exploratory study can inform the ongoing implementation of the TCAM service at hospital discharge and highlight the need to understand service implementation in different contexts, which may influence its impact on medication safety.

Improving inpatient discharge workflows through pharmacist pending discharge medication orders.

PURPOSE: Hospital discharge represents a difficult care transition for patients, with the potential for medication-related problems (MRPs) and adverse events. Medication reconciliation is widely accepted as a best practice to minimize MRPs at the time of discharge. Pharmacists can play a key role in identification and resolution of MRPs, although pharmacist reconciliation usually occurs after provider medication reconciliation. This workflow is often inefficient and results in duplication of work within the care team. A prospective pharmacist-led pilot program with preparation of discharge medication orders for provider review, also known as pended medication orders, was investigated to determine its impact on MRPs and discharge processing time. SUMMARY: Patient discharges from February through April 2022 were compared for 2 hospital medicine services at a large academic medical center. One group participated in the pilot workflow, while the other used standard discharge workflows. The pilot group had a significant decrease in the average number of clinical interventions made by a pharmacist after provider orders were placed (52.4% decrease; P = 0.03) and a nonsignificant reduction in the time from provider order entry to completion of the final pharmacist medication reconciliation (47.6% reduction; P = 0.18) compared to the group using standard workflows. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-led, prospective discharge medication reconciliation with pending of medication orders for provider review increases overall discharge efficiency. Data from this project and previous studies support an expanded pharmacist role in the discharge process and continued high-level collaboration between pharmacists and providers.

Impact of ambulatory care pharmacist intervention on 30-day readmission rates in high-risk transitions-of-care patients.

BACKGROUND: Care transitions are a challenging and crucial point for many high-risk patients; errors in medication use can result in preventable hospital readmissions, which worsen patient outcomes and result in decreased reimbursement and increased expenses for health systems. Transitions of care (TOC) is an opportunity where pharmacists in the outpatient setting can prevent medication errors and decrease hospital readmissions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-conducted comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) on 30-day hospital readmission rates. Secondary objectives included medication therapy problems (MTPs) identified, recommendations or interventions made, and impact on cost savings. METHODS: Patients discharged from an Intermountain Health hospital with a high readmission risk score, value-based insurance plan, and primary care provider (PCP) at one of 21 primary care clinics were identified using an internal report. Patients were contacted by a pharmacist after discharge for a CMR; pharmacists then relayed any MTPs and therapeutic recommendations to the PCP before the patient's follow-up appointment. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2717 discharges occurred throughout Intermountain Health and affiliate clinics from October 5, 2020, to January 31, 2021; 30-day readmissions rates in the pharmacist intervention group versus the comparator group were 24/191 (12.57%) versus 511/2526, (20.23%), respectively, yielding a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The absolute risk of readmission was reduced by 7.66%, with a number needed to treat of 14. Approximately 14 readmissions were prevented in the pharmacist intervention group, resulting in an estimated cost savings of $212,800 and return on investment of $16.19:1. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist intervention in the outpatient setting in high-risk TOC patients resulted in decreased 30-day readmission rates and increased cost savings. Further investigation is warranted to identify patient factors where pharmacist intervention is most beneficial.

Impact of interdisciplinary case management and pharmacist transitions of care interventions on 30-day readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists and case managers positively impact patient health outcomes during the transition of care from the hospital to the home. However, the combination of both specialties completing post-discharge telephone calls has not been clearly studied. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome of this research was to identify the combined impact of post-discharge telephone calls from both pharmacists and case managers on all cause 30-day hospital readmissions when compared to a call from either group alone. Secondary outcomes included 30-day emergency department visits and types of medication therapy problems identified by pharmacists during the call. METHODS: This retrospective study included high risk patients eligible for a post-discharge telephone call from both pharmacy and case management from January 1, 2021 to September 1, 2021. Patients were excluded if they did not complete a telephone call from either group or were deceased within 30 days of discharge. Results were analyzed using descriptive and chi square analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-five hospital discharges were included in the study, with 24 patients receiving post-discharge telephone calls from both case management and pharmacy, and 61 patients receiving a call from either group alone. Thirty-day all cause readmissions occurred in 13% of the combined group versus 26% in either group alone (p = 0.171). Thirty-day all cause emergency department visits were 8% in the combined group versus 11% in either group alone (p = 0.617). Of the 38 post-discharge encounters completed by pharmacists, 120 medication therapy problems were identified, averaging over 3 medication issues per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration amongst pharmacists and case managers has the potential to positively impact patient outcomes upon discharge from the hospital. Health systems should work to integrate transitions of care services performed across disciplines.

Impact of a pharmacist collaborative drug therapy management protocol on utilization of a discharge prescription program and hospital readmissions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) agreement allowing a pharmacist to automatically prescribe refills of discharge medications to patients' preferred outpatient pharmacy on utilization of a hospital discharge prescription program and hospital readmission rates. METHODS: This was a single-center, quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study. Patients aged 18 years or older discharged from the cardiology services to home were eligible for inclusion in the study. The CDTM agreement was initiated on July 1, 2019. Patients discharged to home from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, were assigned to the historical control group. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients who used the bedside medication delivery service at hospital discharge between the groups. Secondary outcomes included 30-day hospital readmissions and a descriptive analysis of medications prescribed by a pharmacist through the program. A χ2 test was used to assess the primary outcome, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess hospital readmissions. RESULTS: In total, 1,704 and 2,200 patients were discharged in the control and CDTM groups, respectively. The CDTM group had a greater proportion of patients who participated in the discharge prescription program compared to the historical control group (77.8% vs 68.7%; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in 30-day hospital readmission rate between the groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.23; P = 0.94). CONCLUSION: A CDTM protocol to improve the availability of medication refills at a patient's regular outpatient pharmacy improved utilization of a bedside medication delivery service but did not change 30-day readmission rates.

The role of the pharmacist in the hospital discharge of cancer patients: an integrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer need care from a multidisciplinary team due to the complexity of the clinical picture and proposed treatment. Hospital discharge is a critical step, because pharmacotherapy changes may occur during hospitalization, leading to potential medication-related problems at home. OBJECTIVE: To identify publications which describe the activities performed by the pharmacist at the hospital discharge of patients with cancer. METHOD: This is an integrative systematic literature review. A search was carried out in the MEDLINE databases, via Pubmed, Embase, and Virtual Health Library, using the following descriptors: "Patient Discharge", "Pharmacists", "Neoplasms." Studies that reported activities performed by the pharmacist at the hospital discharge of patients with cancer were included. RESULTS: Five hundred and two studies were identified, of which seven met the eligibility criteria. Most were conducted in the United States (n = 3), and the rest in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, and Italy. Among the services provided by the pharmacist at discharge, medication reconciliation was the most widely described. Other activities such as counseling, education, identification, and resolution of drug-related problems were also carried out. CONCLUSION: In the scenario of hospital discharge of patients with cancer, the participation of pharmacists is still to be seen as of significance in regards to publications. Despite this, the results suggest that the actions of this professional contribute to patient orientation and the safe use of prescription drugs for use at home.

Preventing medication history errors in high-risk patients: Impact of California Senate Bill 1254.

PURPOSE: California Senate Bill (SB) 1254 (effective January 1, 2019) requires pharmacy staff at acute hospitals with more than 100 beds to obtain a medication profile for high-risk patients upon hospital admission. This multicenter study sought to evaluate the statewide impact of California SB 1254 by capturing the errors intercepted and harm prevented as a result of the passage of the bill. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted at 11 hospitals in California for 6 consecutive weeks between January 2020 and March 2020. Participating sites captured medication history errors identified among high-risk patients using organization-specific criteria. Errors were categorized by type and ranked for severity of potential or actual harm based on the modified National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) categories. RESULTS: Study sites had an average daily census of 180 to 800 patients. Approximately 94% (n = 2,554) of medication histories conducted disclosed at least 1 error. Approximately 54% (n = 1,474) of histories disclosed at least 1 serious or potentially life-threatening error. Approximately 6 errors were identified and prevented per patient (95% CI, 5.62-6.01 errors per patient), and 1 in 4 errors (25%) was categorized as potentially serious or life-threatening. CONCLUSION: Among high-risk patients, pharmacy-led medication histories significantly reduced medication errors. If not intercepted, these errors would have likely resulted in substantial morbidity and mortality. Future research should evaluate opportunities to standardize high-risk criteria to support patient prioritization and allocation of resources.

Evaluating the role of a hospital pharmacist in a cardiac day ward.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of clinical pharmacists in cardiac day wards. METHODS: A service evaluation was conducted during 24 February 2020-27 March 2020 to assess the role of clinical pharmacists for all patients admitted to an Australian tertiary hospital cardiac day ward. KEY FINDINGS: Overall, 297 patients were included. Medication review occurred for 80% (237/297) and a best possible medication history was obtained for 65% (193/297) of patients. Acceptance of interventions for medication-related problems was 93% (84/90). When compared with medication plans outlined in standard catheterisation laboratory documentation without pharmacist input, a pharmacist medication review resulted in increased documentation of medication plans in the patient's medical record at the time of discharge (20% (1/5) versus 95% (142/150), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pharmacists can optimise the medication management of patients in cardiac day wards by performing medication review, and facilitating implementation and communication of medication changes at hospital discharge to patients and primary healthcare providers.

[Medication reconciliation on admission: One year of practice in health care institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Conciliation médicamenteuse à l'admission : bilan d'une année d'activité en établissement de santé durant la crise COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: Medication reconciliation is a key point of the v2020 certification. The main objective of this study was to evaluate this activity over one year, including the first epidemic wave at COVID-19. The secondary objectives were to identify the obstacles and levers and to evaluate doctor satisfaction. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of drug reconciliations performed on admission during 12 months of the emergence of COVID-19. Patients aged 65 years and older from orthopedic and visceral surgery, acute hospitalization and conventional medicine units were included. Unintentional discrepancies were analyzed. The obstacles and levers were identified by means of a focus group. Doctors' satisfaction was collected using online quiz. RESULTS: A total of 760 patients were conciliated, of which 27% (n=208) by hospital pharmacy technicians. A decrease in activity was observed during the first epidemic wave. An unintentional discrepancy was found in 77% of patients, and only 48% were corrected by the prescriber. These results were impacted by the pandemic. The pharmaceutical team was mobilized in the logistical management of the crisis, but it was able to adapt in order to perpetuate the activity. Doctors are satisfied with the process. CONCLUSIONS: Medication reconciliation on admission is essential for the prevention of iatrogeny, particularly with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare institutions.

The impact of medication reconciliation and review in patients using oral chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Verifying and reviewing a patients medication list can detect and reduce drug related problems (DRPs). However little is known about its effects in patients using oral chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these interventions and the adapted Medication Appropriateness Index (aMAI) as a tool to carry out a medication review. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out. The hospital pharmacist performed a medication reconciliation and medication review, using the aMAI tool, in 54 patients starting oral chemotherapy. Discrepancies, DRP's and associated pharmaceutical interventions were reported via the electronic patient record (EPR). After one month, the acceptance rate was measured and the aMAI score recalculated. Kappa statistics were used to test intra- and interrater reliability. RESULTS: The medication list in the EPR was incomplete in 74,1% of patients with an average of 2.4 errors per patient. After medication review, the aMAI score decreased significantly from 7.2 to 5.4 (SD = 4,7; p <0.001), indicating an improvement in the appropriateness of the drugs patients were taking. Acceptance rates were 41,4% and 53,2% for advices resulting from medication reconciliation and medication review respectively. Kappa values of 0.90 and 0.70 respectively indicate good intra- and interrater reliability. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The study shows that medication reconciliation can identify and address discrepancies. Furthermore, medication review seems to ensure that drug treatment better meets patient needs. The aMAI was a reliable tool. Future research will have to determine the clinical relevance of these interventions.

Incorporation of pharmacist pre-surgical calls to improve medication history completion rates.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy and timeliness of documenting a medication history is an important aspect to ensure appropriate medication reconciliation during transitions of care. Surgical patients often have their medication history recorded just moments before surgery which may be rushed, incomplete or missed entirely. Between January and May 2020, 76.7% of surgical patients admitted to our institution had a medication history completed by a pharmacist prior to surgery. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to improve the pharmacist medication history completion rates for pre-surgical patients before surgery by integrating pharmacist-led medication histories into the pre-operative pathway. METHODS: Through interdisciplinary collaboration, the pre-operative pathway for surgical patients was evaluated for opportunities to complete medication histories days prior to their scheduled procedure. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were utilized to make incremental improvements in practice. INTERVENTIONS: Through an iterative process, the pathway for cardiovascular surgery (CVS) patients was modified to include a scheduled pharmacist phone appointment in the days leading up to their surgical procedure. Utilizing these phone appointments, pharmacists complete patient medication history reviews and share a feedback loop to cardiovascular and peri-operative health care providers. RESULTS: The iterative PDSA cycles revealed challenges to completing pre-surgical medication history calls without advance notice. Patient responsiveness to pre-surgical medication history calls improved with the incorporation of scheduled phone appointments. Between January 18 and May 31, 2021, pharmacists completed 359 of 376 scheduled CVS appointments (95.5%), improving the medication history completion rates for cardiovascular surgery patients from 84.8 to 93.0% (p = 0.000025). The completion rate for all surgical patients also improved from 76.7 to 85.1% (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating scheduled pharmacist medication history appointments as a part of the pre-operative pathway was shown to expand the capacity for pharmacists to complete medication histories for patients prior to surgery. By reducing pharmacist workload on the morning of surgery, fewer patients were admitted to surgery without having their medication history reviewed by pharmacy. Future investigation should be considered to evaluate the impact on patient outcomes.

Use of complete medication history to identify and correct transitions-of-care medication errors at psychiatric hospital admission.

Methods for categorizing the scale and severity of medication errors corrected by pharmacy staff during admission medication reconciliation using complete medication history continue to evolve. We established a rating scale that is effective for generating error reports to health system quality leadership. These reports are needed to quantify the value of investment in transitions-of-care pharmacy staff. All medication errors that were reported by pharmacy staff in the admission medication reconciliation process during a period of 6 months were eligible for inclusion. Complete medication history data source was utilized by admitting providers and all pharmacist staff and a novel medication error scoring methodology was developed. This methodology included: medication error category, medication error type, potential medication error severity, and medication non-adherence. We determined that 82 medication errors were detected from 72 patients and assessed that 74 of these errors may have harmed patients if they were not corrected through pharmacist intervention. Most of these errors were dosage discrepancies and omissions. With hospital system budgets continually becoming leaner, it is important to measure the effectiveness and value of staff resources to optimize patient care. Pharmacists performing admission medication reconciliation can detect subtle medication discrepancies that may be overlooked by other clinician types. This methodology can serve as a foundation for error reporting and predicting the severity of adverse drug events.

Participatory research to improve medication reconciliation for older adults in the community.

INTRODUCTION: Medication reconciliation, a technique that assists in aligning a care team's understanding of an individual's true medication regimen, is vital to optimize medication use and prevent medication errors. Historically, most medication reconciliation research has focused on institutional settings and transitional care, with comparatively little attention given to medication reconciliation in community settings. To optimize medication reconciliation for community-dwelling older adults, healthcare professionals and older adults must be engaged in co-designing processes that create sustainable approaches. METHODS: Academic researchers, older adults, and community- and health system-based healthcare professionals engaged in a participatory process to better understand medication reconciliation barriers and co-design solutions. The initiative consisted of two participatory research approaches: (1) Sparks Innovation Studios, which synthesized professional expertise and opinions, and (2) a Community Consultation Studio with older adults. Input from both groups informed a list of possible solutions and these were ranked based on evaluative criteria of feasibility, person-centeredness, equity, and sustainability. RESULTS: Sparks Innovation Studios identified a lack of ownership, fragmented healthcare systems, and time constraints as the leading barriers to medication reconciliation. The Community Consultation Studio revealed that older adults often feel dismissed in medical encounters and perceive poor communication with and among providers. The Community Consultation Studio and Sparks Innovation Studios resulted in four highly-ranked solutions to improve medication reconciliation: (1) support for older adults to improve health literacy and ownership; (2) ensuring medication indications are included on prescription labels; (3) trainings and incentives for front-line staff in clinic settings to become champions for medication reconciliation; and (4) electronic health record improvements that simplify active medication lists. CONCLUSION: Engaging community representatives with academic partners in the research process enhanced understanding of community priorities and provided a practical roadmap for innovations that have the potential to improve the well-being of community-dwelling older adults.

The impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and interprofessional ward rounds on drug-related problems at hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND: During transitions of care, including hospital discharge, patients are at risk of drug-related problems (DRPs). AIM: To investigate the impact of pharmacist-led services, specifically medication reconciliation at admission and/or interprofessional ward rounds on the number of DRPs at discharge. METHOD: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we analyzed routinely collected data of patients discharged from internal medicine wards of a regional Swiss hospital that filled their discharge prescriptions in the hospital's community pharmacy between June 2016 and May 2019. Patients receiving one of the two or both pharmacist-led services (Study groups: Best Care = both services; MedRec = medication reconciliation at admission; Ward Round = interprofessional ward round), were compared to patients receiving standard care (Standard Care group). Standard care included medication history taken by a physician and regular ward rounds (physicians and nurses). At discharge, pharmacists reviewed discharge prescriptions filled at the hospital's community pharmacy and documented all DRPs. Multivariable Poisson regression analyzed the independent effects of medication reconciliation and interprofessional ward rounds as single or combined service on the frequency of DRPs. RESULTS: Overall, 4545 patients with 6072 hospital stays were included in the analysis (Best Care n = 72 hospital stays, MedRec n = 232, Ward Round n = 1262, and Standard Care n = 4506). In 1352 stays (22.3%) one or more DRPs were detected at hospital discharge. The combination of the two pharmacist-led services was associated with statistically significantly less DRPs compared to standard care (relative risk: 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.65). Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation alone showed a trend towards fewer DRPs (relative risk: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.54, 1.03). CONCLUSION: Our results support the implementation of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at admission in combination with interprofessional ward rounds to reduce the number of DRPs at hospital discharge.

Medication reconciliation-is it possible to speed up without compromising quality? A before-after study in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether it was possible to decrease the time used for medication reconciliation (MR) in the emergency department without compromising quality. A more efficient method will enable more patients to receive MR as early as possible after admission to hospital. METHODS: Potential key factors for improvement of the standard method of MR by clinical pharmacists were identified through an observational period. A revised method was developed, focusing on decreasing time spent on the patient interview by use of a condensed checklist and probing questions based on information from a prescription database. Non-inferior quality (proportion of patients with at least one identified medication discrepancy and number of identified medication discrepancies per patient) of the revised method was evaluated using a before-after study design with 200 individuals in each group. Non-inferiority limit was set at 10%. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical evaluation of the difference in time use per patient in the MR process between the before and after group. RESULTS: Mean age of the included patients was 78 years in both groups. The time used for MR in the after group was 34% shorter (37 min vs 56 min, p<0.0001) compared with the before group. The revised method was shown to be non-inferior compared with the original method with respect to the proportion of patients with at least one identified discrepancy (81%, 95% CI 76% to 86% vs 79%, 95% CI 73% to 84%). Also, non-inferiority was shown for the number of identified discrepancies per patient, where the average number of discrepancies per patient was 1.9 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.1) in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that it was possible to speed up the MR process without compromising its effectiveness in identifying medication discrepancies.

Why medicines are used differently from prescribed: a protocol for a prospective patient-oriented observational case study to investigate reasons for non-adherence in primary care.

INTRODUCTION: Patients do not always tell the physician if they have used medicines differently from prescribed. The challenges that patients experience in medication self-management and adherence have been prioritised globally as among the most crucial factors influencing the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol presents a new patient-oriented method to investigate reasons for non-adherence using pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation in a primary care clinic as data collection point. By interviewing, the pharmacist will learn how the patient has been taking the prescribed medicines and whether any non-prescription medicines and food supplements have been used for self-medication. The pharmacist will document the findings of the conversation to the electronic patient record in a structured format. The pharmacist will collect data related to the characteristics of the patients and outpatient clinics, patients' diseases and medications, and medication discrepancies. These data will be analysed for descriptive statistics to identify (1) the number of discrepancies between the physician's prescription orders and the patient's self-reported use of the medicines, (2) what kind of discrepancies there are, (3) which are high-risk medicines in terms of non-adherence and (4) why medicines were taken differently from prescribed; based on the results, (5) a preliminary conceptual model of patient-reported reasons for non-adherence will be constructed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05167578.