The use of the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in isolated and multiligament knee injuries: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in isolated PCL injuries and multiligament knee injuries, analysing clinical, radiographic, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed through Embase via Ovid, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies reviewing LARS use for PCL reconstruction. The methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: From 225 results screened, 13 studies were included published between 2004 and 2020, analysing LARS use for PCL reconstruction. Mean follow-up was 21 months to 11.9 years, however only four studies had follow-up of over five years. Results in isolated PCL reconstruction utilising LARS demonstrated scores that were consistent with good function and minimal limitation in daily or sporting activities, in addition to a significant improvement in knee laxity and low complication rates. Symptomatic rupture and synovitis rates were both 1.7% in this group. LARS use in complex multiligament injuries demonstrated satisfactory PROMs, although there was concern regarding residual laxity on stress radiography. CONCLUSIONS: LARS demonstrates good outcomes in PCL injury reconstruction in the short to mid-term, particularly in isolated PCL injuries, achieving equivocal or improved results compared to autograft reconstruction using hamstring tendon in the three comparative studies included. LARS has a quicker recovery time and no donor-site morbidity, however long-term data is lacking. Utilising LARS for reconstruction of the PCL in multiligament injuries revealed more variable results.

Postoperative Rehabilitation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries can be debilitating knee injuries, having involvement in up to 44% of traumatic knee injuries. However, isolated PCL injuries are relatively infrequent. Therefore, effective evidence-based rehabilitation protocols have proven to be elusive. This systematic review aims to summarize the latest evidence on postoperative rehabilitation protocols for patients undergoing PCL reconstruction. Studies included in this paper included those published from 1991 to 2019 with a grade 1 to 5 level of evidence discussing the postoperative PCL rehabilitation. A multidatabase search using largely PubMed and Ovid was conducted using relevant keywords such as "PCL," "postoperative," and "rehabilitation," initially leading to 955 papers, which were narrowed by relevance to 12 final published studies used in the analysis. Through careful review of the evidence, crucial principles of rehabilitation, such as an initial focus on protecting the graft during strengthening, as well as an optimized PCL reconstruction protocol are presented here. Rehabilitation following PCL reconstruction continues to be limited by a lack of high-quality evidence-based publications.

No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the optimal treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) -based multi-ligamentous injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the subjective and objective clinical outcomes of arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction and tibial inlay reconstruction. METHODS: From 2005 to 2013, a total of 135 patients with PCL-based multi-ligamentous injuries were consecutively identified. Patients were operated with the arthroscopic transtibial technique or the open tibial inlay technique group. Other injured structures were reconstructed or repaired simultaneously. All of the patients underwent a preoperative and postoperative physical examination, KT-1000 measurement, stress radiography under anesthesia and subjective evaluations including Tegner score, Lysholm score, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) score. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (64.8%) underwent arthroscopic transtibial PCL reconstruction, and 31 patients (35.2%) underwent PCL reconstruction with the tibial inlay technique. The average follow up period was 45.9 ± 17.0 months (24-77 months). At the final follow up, for the arthroscopic transtibial group, the side-to-side difference of KT-1000 decreased from 13.5 ± 4.8 mm to 2.4 ± 3.4 mm (P < 0.001); the tibial posterior translation by stress radiograph decreased from 14.9 ± 7.1 mm to 4.6 ± 4.0 mm (P < 0.001). For the open inlay group, the side-to-side difference of KT-1000 decreased from 13.7 ± 5.2 mm to 2.2 ± 3.6 mm (P < 0.001) and the posterior translation by stress radiograph decreased from 14.9 ± 5.9 mm to 4.3 ± 3.9 mm (P < 0.001) at the final follow up. The inter-group clinical outcomes pre- and postoperatively were not significantly different at any time point. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in objective and subjective outcome between the arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay PCL reconstruction in patients with multi-ligamentous injuries.

All-Inside PCL Reconstruction.

Many different techniques with multiple graft types have been described for the reconstruction of the injured posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); autograft versus allograft, single- versus double-bundle, open inlay versus arthroscopic inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial, and recently described the arthroscopic "all-inside" socket technique. Reported clinical outcomes have demonstrated no significant difference in any of these PCL reconstruction techniques, likely because of the heterogeneity in injury characteristics and patient population. The ideal surgical technique should be safe, simple, and reproducible while allowing treatment of concomitant knee injuries resulting and return to function.

Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

The keys to successful posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction are to identify and treat all pathology, utilize strong graft material, accurately place tunnels in anatomic insertion sites, minimize graft bending, mechanical graft tensioning, secure graft fixation, and the appropriate postoperative rehabilitation program. Adherence to these technical principles results in successful single- and double-bundle arthroscopic transtibial tunnel PCL reconstruction based upon stress radiography, arthrometer, knee ligament rating scales, and patient satisfaction measurements. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the arthroscopic transtibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgical technique.

All-inside Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Outcome.

Several reconstructive techniques exist to treat posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency. The purpose of this study is to report knee function and clinical stability after PCL reconstruction (PCLR) using an all-inside technique. Thirty-two patients with isolated or combined PCL injuries treated with all-inside PCLR using soft tissue allograft were included. Documented physical examination findings including ligamentous stability examination were recorded. All-inside, single-bundle PCLR demonstrated satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes comparable with previous other PCLR techniques. The advantages of this technique include bone preservation, minimizing risk of tunnel convergence, and allowing for sequential graft tensioning.

Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes after Multiligament Knee Reconstruction.

We aimed to determine factors that affect the quality of life of patients undergoing a standardized surgical and postoperative management protocol for knee dislocations. A total of 31 patients (33 knees) were included in this study. We contacted patients at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively (mean: 38 months; range, 12-111 months) and administered the previously validated Multiligament Quality of Life questionnaire (ML-QOL), 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. We performed independent two-sample t-tests and age-adjusted multivariable linear regression analysis to examine the difference in these scores. Patients who underwent previous knee ligament surgery had significantly worse mean ML-QOL scores relative to patients who did not undergo previous knee ligament surgery (114.3 versus 80.4; p = 0.004) (higher score indicates worse quality of life). All other differences in the ML-QOL scores were not statistically significant. IKDC and Lysholm scores did not differ significantly with regards to the studied variables. Among patients with no previous knee ligament surgery, patients undergoing surgery within 3 weeks of injury had significantly worse mean ML-QOL scores relative to patients undergoing surgery greater than 3 weeks after their injury (98.7 versus 74.7; p = 0.042) and patients with Schenck classification of III or IV had significantly worse mean ML-QOL scores relative to patient with a Schenck classification of I or II (88.7 versus 62.9; p = 0.015). We found that patients with a previous history of knee ligament surgery had a significantly worse quality of life relative to those with no history of knee ligament surgery. This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.

Revision Posterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery.

Successful posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction surgery results from identification and treatment of associated pathology such as posterolateral instability, posteromedial instability, and lower extremity malalignment. The use of strong graft material, properly placed tunnels to as closely as possible approximate the PCL insertion sites, and minimization of graft bending also enhance the probability of PCL reconstruction success. In addition, mechanical graft tensioning, primary and back-up PCL graft fixation, and the appropriate postoperative rehabilitation program are also necessary ingredients for PCL reconstruction success. Both single-bundle and double-bundle PCL reconstruction surgical techniques are successful when evaluated with stress radiography, KT 1000 arthrometer measurements, and knee ligament rating scales. PCL reconstruction failure may result when any or all of these surgical principles are violated. The purpose of this manuscript was to discuss revision PCL surgery. This presentation will include causes of unsuccessful PCL reconstruction, surgical indications and goals, patient evaluation, surgical decision making, graft selection, surgical technique, associated surgical procedures, postoperative rehabilitation, and revision PCL reconstruction results.

Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis of simulated early motion and partial and full weightbearing on common reconstruction grafts.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical effects of simulated immediate motion and weightbearing during rehabilitation on different double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-PCLR) graft options. METHODS: Nine each of commercially prepared (allograft) Achilles tendon allografts, fresh-frozen (autograft) bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, and fresh-frozen quadriceps tendon grafts were paired with commercially prepared anterior tibialis allografts, fresh-frozen semitendinosus grafts, and fresh-frozen semitendinosus grafts, respectively. Graft pairs were loaded to simulate early range of motion on a stationary bicycle, partial weightbearing (30 %), and full weightbearing. RESULTS: Acquired laxity (displacement, mm) between graft pairs was not significantly different during simulated early range of motion. However, during simulated partial weightbearing, the median acquired laxity of the patellar tendon/semitendinosus pair (1.06 mm) was significantly less than that of the quadriceps tendon/semitendinosus (1.50 mm, p = 0.01) and Achilles/anterior tibialis (1.44 mm, p = 0.003) graft pairs. During simulated full weightbearing, significantly less acquired laxity was observed for the patellar tendon/semitendinosus graft pair (2.38 mm) compared to the Achilles/anterior tibialis pair (4.85 mm, p = 0.04), but a significant difference was not observed compared to the QT/semitendinosus graft pair (3.91 mm, n.s.). There were no significant differences in the ultimate loads between any of the graft pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Simulated early range of motion and early partial weightbearing did not result in clinically significant acquired graft laxity in common graft options utilized for DB-PCLR. However, simulated full weightbearing did result in clinically significant acquired graft laxity, and therefore, early rehabilitation protocols should avoid implementing full weightbearing that could contribute to graft failure.

Comparison Of Isokinetic Muscle Strength And Clinical Outcomebetween Isolated And Combined PCL Reconstruction.

The purposes of this study was to 1) compare the functional result and muscle strength between patients who underwent reconstruction by isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and combined PCLposeterolateral corner sling (PLCS) reconstruction. Nineteen (Group I: isolated PCL reconstruction) and 30 (Group II: combined PCL-PLCS reconstruction) were compared. The clinical results and isokinetic muscle strength were compared between groups. The clinical results were comparable between groups and posterior stability was not different between the two groups, either. The isokinetic strength test result was not significantly different between the two groups, although absolute values of the flexion strength in Group I was higher than those in Group II. The HQ ratio of the affected side in Group I was similar to that of the contralateral side. Isokinetic muscle strength, especially flexion, was not fully recovered as compared with the contralateral side in both groups, although clinical and stability results were improved. However, the isolated PCL reconstruction group that was managed with the accelerated rehabilitation protocol showed an HQ ratio similar to that of the contralateral side. Therefore, an earlier active strengthening program would be also necessary in PCL-PLCS reconstructed groups, and justification for prevention of early weight bearing in PCL-PLCS reconstruction should be re-evaluated because weight bearing is helpful for muscle strengthening.

Arthroscopic popliteus bypass graft for posterolateral instabilities of the knee : A new surgical technique.

OBJECTIVE: An arthroscopic technique for the reconstruction of the posterolateral corner combined with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction was developed. INDICATIONS: Posterolateral rotational instabilities of the knee. Combined lesions of the PCL, the popliteus complex (PLT) and the posterolateral corner. Isolated PLT lesions lacking static stabilizing function. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Neuromuscular disorders; knee deformities or fractures; severe posterolateral soft tissue damage. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Six arthroscopic portals are necessary. Using the posteromedial portal, resect dorsal septum with a shaver. Visualize the PCL, the lateral femoral condyle and the posterolateral recessus with the PLT. Dissect the popliteomeniscal fibers; retract PLT until sulcus popliteus is visualized. Drill a 6-mm tunnel anteriorly into the distal third of the sulcus popliteus. Visualize femoral footprint of the PLT and place an anatomical drill tunnel. Pull the popliteus bypass graft into the knee and fix with bioscrews. Fix the reconstructed PCL. In cases of additional LCL injury, reconstruct LCL with autologous graft. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight-bearing for 6 weeks, range of motion exercises, quadriceps-strengthening exercises on postoperative day 1. Full extension allowed immediately with flexion limited to 20° for 2 weeks, to 45° for up to week 4, and to 60° up to week 6. Use a PCL brace for 3 months, running and squatting exercises allowed after 3 months. RESULTS: In the 35 patients treated, no technique-related complications. After 1 year, 12 patients had a mean Lysholm Score of 88.6 (± 8.7) points and a side-to-side difference in the posterior drawer test of 2.9 (± 2.2) mm (preoperative 13.3 [± 1.9] mm). CONCLUSION: Low complication risk and good and excellent clinical results after arthroscopic posterolateral corner reconstruction.