Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.286
Filtrar
1.
Surgery ; 176(3): 942-948, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971696

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Given the nonelective nature of most trauma admissions, patients who experience trauma are at a particular risk of discharge against medical advice. Despite the risk of unplanned readmission and financial burden on the health care system, discharge against medical advice among hospitalized patients continues to rise. The present study aimed to assess evolving trends and outcomes associated in patients with discharge against medical advice among patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. METHODS: The 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all hospitalizations for traumatic injuries. The patient cohort was stratified into those who had discharge against medical advice and those who did not. Temporal trends of discharge against medical advice and associated costs over time were evaluated using nonparametric tests. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess factors associated with discharge against medical advice. Associations of discharge against medical advice with length of stay, hospitalization costs, and unplanned 30-day readmission were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: Of an estimated 4,969,717 patients, 65,354 (1.3%) had discharge against medical advice after hospitalization for traumatic injury. Over the study period, the incidence of discharge against medical advice increased (nptrend <0.001). After risk adjustment, older age (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98/per year; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.98), female sex (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.67), and management at high-volume trauma center (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.74) were associated with lower odds of discharge against medical advice. Compared with others, discharge against medical advice was associated with decrements in length of stay by 1.3 days (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5 days) and index hospitalization costs by $2,200 (5% confidence interval, $1,600-2,900), while having a greater risk of unplanned 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-2.36). CONCLUSION: The incidence of discharge against medical advice and its associated cost burden have increased in recent years. Community-level interventions and institutional efforts to mitigate discharge against medical advice may improve the quality of care and resource allocation for patients with traumatic injuries.


Assuntos
Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adulto , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Fatores de Risco , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais
2.
Rural Remote Health ; 24(3): 8231, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034629

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to explore, in one remote hospital, emergency department healthcare providers' experience and perceptions of the factors surrounding a patient's decision to discharge against medical advice (DAMA). The secondary objective was to gain insight into staff experiences of the current protocols for managing DAMA cases and explore their recommendations for reducing DAMA incidence. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving a survey and semi-structured interviews exploring healthcare providers' (n=19) perceptions of factors perceived to be influencing DAMA, current practice for managing DAMA and recommendations for practice improvements. Health professionals (doctors, nurses, Aboriginal Health Workers) all worked in the emergency department of a remote community hospital, Queensland, Australia. Responses relating to influencing factors for DAMA were provided on a three-point rating scale from 'no influence/little influence' to 'very strong influence'. DAMA management protocol responses were a three-point rating scale from 'rarely/never' to 'always'. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after the survey and explored participants' perceptions in greater detail and current DAMA management protocol. RESULTS: Feedback from the total of 19 participants across the professions presented four prominent yet interconnected themes: patient, culture, health service and health provider, and health literacy and education-related factors. Factors that were perceived to have a strong influence on DAMA events included alcohol and drug abuse (100%), a lack of culturally sensitive healthcare services (94.7%), and family commitments or obligations (89.5%). Healthcare provider recommendations for preventing DAMA presented themes of right communication, culturally safe care (right place, right time) and the right staff to support DAMA prevention. The healthcare providers described the pivotal role the Indigenous Liaison Officer (ILO) plays and the importance of this position being filled. CONCLUSION: DAMA is a multifaceted issue, influenced by both personal and hospital system-related factors. Participants agreed that the presence of ILO and/or Aboriginal Health Workers in the emergency department may reduce DAMA occurrences for Indigenous Australians who are disproportionately represented in DAMA rates, particularly in rural and remote regions of Australia.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Alta do Paciente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Entrevistas como Assunto , Queensland , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/psicologia , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 162, 2024 Jun 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38926234

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of pediatric Wilms' tumor (WT) is high in Africa, though patients abandon treatment after initial diagnosis. We sought to identify factors associated with WT treatment abandonment in Uganda. METHODS: A cohort study of patients < 18 years with WT in a Ugandan national referral hospital examined clinical and treatment outcomes data, comparing children whose families adhered to and abandoned treatment. Abandonment was defined as the inability to complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for patients with unilateral WT and definitive chemotherapy for patients with bilateral WT. Patient factors were assessed via bivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 137 WT patients were included from 2012 to 2017. The mean age was 3.9 years, 71% (n = 98) were stage III or higher. After diagnosis, 86% (n = 118) started neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 59% (n = 82) completed neoadjuvant therapy, and 55% (n = 75) adhered to treatment through surgery. Treatment abandonment was associated with poor chemotherapy response (odds ratio [OR] 4.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-17.0) and tumor size > 25 cm (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.05-6.81). CONCLUSIONS: Children with WT in Uganda frequently abandon care during neoadjuvant therapy, particularly those with large tumors with poor response. Further investigation into the factors that influence treatment abandonment and a deeper understanding of tumor biology are needed to improve treatment adherence of children with WT in Uganda.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Tumor de Wilms , Humanos , Uganda , Tumor de Wilms/terapia , Tumor de Wilms/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(8): 4882-4893, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861205

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study sought to identify associations between the Yost Index, a geocoded area neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) score, and race/ethnicity with patient refusal of recommended surgery for metastatic bone disease. METHODS: Patients with metastatic bone disease were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The Yost Index was geocoded using factor analysis and categorized into quintiles using census tract-level American Community Service (ACS) 5-year estimates and seven nSES measures. Multivariable logistic regression models calculated odds ratios (ORs) of refusal of recommended surgery and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for clinical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 138,257 patients were included, of which 14,943 (10.8%) were recommended for surgical resection. Patients in the lowest nSES quintile had 57% higher odds of refusing surgical treatment than those in the highest quintile (aOR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.30-1.91, p < 0.001). Patients in the lowest nSES quintile also had a 31.2% higher age-adjusted incidence rate of not being recommended for surgery compared with those in the highest quintile (186.4 vs. 142.1 per 1 million, p < 0.001). Black patients had 34% higher odds of refusing treatment compared with White patients (aOR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.14-1.58, p = 0.003). Advanced age, unmarried status, and patients with aggressive cancer subtypes were associated with higher odds of refusing surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: nSES and race/ethnicity are independent predictors of a patient refusing surgery for metastatic cancer to bone, even after adjusting for various clinical covariates. Effective strategies for addressing these inequalities and improving the access and quality of care of patients with a lower nSES and minority backgrounds are needed.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Programa de SEER , Classe Social , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguimentos , Prognóstico , Adulto , Características da Vizinhança , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 66(1)2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913852

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Unlike the initial plan, some patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cannot or do not receive surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to report the epidemiology of patients not receiving surgery after nCRT and to evaluate the potential risk of refusing surgery. METHODS: We analysed patients with clinical stage T3-T4aN0M0 or T1-T4aN1-N3M0 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent nCRT as an initial treatment intent between January 2005 and March 2020. Patients not receiving surgery were categorized using predefined criteria. To evaluate the risk of refusing surgery, a propensity-matched comparison with those who received surgery was performed. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was compared between groups, according to clinical response to nCRT. RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 715), 105 patients (14.7%) eventually failed to reach surgery. There were three major patterns of not receiving surgery: disease progression before surgery (n = 25), functional deterioration at reassessment (n = 47), and patient's refusal without contraindications (n = 33). After propensity-score matching, the RFS curves of the surgery group and the refusal group were significantly different (P < 0.001), while OS curves were not significantly different (P = 0.069). In patients who achieved clinical complete response on re-evaluation, no significant difference in the RFS curves (P = 0.382) and in the OS curves (P = 0.290) was observed between the surgery group and the refusal group. However, among patients who showed partial response or stable disease on re-evaluation, the RFS and OS curves of the refusal group were overall significantly inferior compared to those of the surgery group (both P < 0.001). The 5-year RFS rates were 10.3% for the refusal group and 48.2% for the surgery group, and the 5-year OS rates were 8.2% for the refusal group and 46.1% for the surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Patient's refusal remains one of the major obstacles in completing the trimodality therapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Refusing surgery when offered may jeopardize oncological outcome, particularly in those with residual disease on re-evaluation after nCRT. These results provide significant implications for consulting patients who are reluctant to oesophagectomy after nCRT.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Esofagectomia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pontuação de Propensão , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimiorradioterapia
7.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e087736, 2024 Jun 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910003

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: What are the Canadian public's understanding of and views toward medical assistance in dying (MAID) in persons refusing recommended treatment or lacking access to standard treatment or resources? DESIGN/SETTING: An online survey assessed knowledge of and support for Canadian MAID law, and views about four specific scenarios in a two (medical or psychiatric) by two (treatment refusal or lack of access) design. PARTICIPANTS: A quota sample (N=2140) matched to the 2021 Canadian census by age, gender, income, education and province. MAIN OUTCOMES: Participants' level of support for MAID in general and in the four specific scenarios. RESULTS: Only 12.1% correctly answered ≥4 of 5 knowledge questions about the MAID law; only 19.2% knew terminal illness is not required and 20.2% knew treatment refusal is compatible with eligibility. 73.3% of participants expressed support for the MAID law in general, matching a nationally representative poll that used the same question. 40.4% of respondents supported MAID for mental illnesses. Support for MAID in the scenarios depicting refusal or lack of access to treatment ranged from 23.2% (lack of access in medical condition) to 32.0% (treatment refusal in medical illness). Older age, more education, higher income, lower religious attendance or being white was associated with greater support for MAID in general but was either negatively associated or not associated with support for MAID in the four refusal or lack of access scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Most Canadians support the current MAID law but appear unaware that MAID cases they do not support are compatible with that law. The lower support for MAID in the four scenarios cuts across sociodemographics. The gap between current policy and public opinion warrants further study. For jurisdictions debating MAID, opinion surveys may need to go beyond assessing general attitudes, and target knowledge and views regarding implications of legalisation.


Assuntos
Opinião Pública , Suicídio Assistido , Humanos , Canadá , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Suicídio Assistido/legislação & jurisprudência , Suicídio Assistido/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9494, 2024 04 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664545

RESUMO

Cancer-directed surgeries (CDS) play a crucial role in prostate cancer (PCa) management along with possible survival and therapeutic benefits. However, barriers such as socioeconomic factors may affect patients' decision of refusing recommended CDS. This study aimed to uncover risk factors and the impact on survival associated with CDS refusal. We retrospectively reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients diagnosed with PCa between 2000 and 2019. Multiple sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were extracted to assess predictors for physicians' surgical recommendations and patients' surgical refusal, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the covariates. The impact of surgical refusal on mortality risk was also investigated. A total of 185,540 patients were included. The physician's recommendation of CDS was significantly influenced by the patient's age, race, income, home location, diagnosis year, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and TNM stage. About 5.6% PCa patients refused CDS, most of whom were older, non-White race, lack of partners, living outside of metropolitan areas, with higher PSA or lower clinical TNM stage. Patients who refused CDS had an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality than those who performed CDS. Physicians may weigh a host of sociodemographic and clinical factors prior to making a CDS recommendation. Patients' refusal of recommended CDS affected survival and was potentially modifiable by certain sociodemographic factors. Physicians should fully consider the hindrances behind patients' CDS refusal to improve patient-doctor shared decision-making, guide patients toward the best alternative and achieve better outcomes.


Assuntos
Pontuação de Propensão , Neoplasias da Próstata , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Idoso , Fatores de Risco , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Programa de SEER , Prostatectomia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fatores Socioeconômicos
10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2340692, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658140

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic required the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, necessitating quick yet representative clinical trial enrollment to evaluate these preventive measures. However, misinformation around the COVID-19 pandemic and general concerns about clinical trial participation in the U.S. hindered clinical trial enrollment. This study assessed awareness of, willingness to participate in, and enrollment in COVID-19 vaccine and treatment clinical trials in Texas. A quota sample of 1,089 Texas residents was collected online from June - July 2022. Respondents were asked if they were aware of, willing to participate in, and had enrolled in clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines or treatments. Overall, 45.8% of respondents reported being aware of clinical trials for COVID-19 treatments or vaccines, but only 21.7% knew how to enroll and only 13.2% had enrolled in a COVID-19 clinical trial. Respondents with bachelor's or graduate degrees were more likely to be aware of clinical trials, more likely to have enrolled in trials, and more willing to participate in treatment trials. Women were less willing to participate and less likely to have enrolled in COVID-19 clinical trials than men. Respondents aged 55 years and older were more willing to participate, but less likely to have enrolled in COVID-19 clinical trials than 18-to-24-year-olds. Common reasons given for not participating in clinical trials included concerns that COVID-19 treatments may not be safe, government distrust, and uncertainty about what clinical trial participation would entail. Substantial progress is needed to build community awareness and increase enrollment in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Tamanho da Amostra , Texas , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Confiança , Segurança do Paciente , Incerteza , Seleção de Pacientes , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
11.
CMAJ ; 196(15): E510-E523, 2024 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our previous research showed that, in Alberta, Canada, a higher proportion of visits to emergency departments and urgent care centres by First Nations patients ended in the patient leaving without being seen or against medical advice, compared with visits by non-First Nations patients. We sought to analyze whether these differences persisted after controlling for patient demographic and visit characteristics, and to explore reasons for leaving care. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study, including a population-based retrospective cohort study for the period of April 2012 to March 2017 using provincial administrative data. We used multivariable logistic regression models to control for demographics, visit characteristics, and facility types. We evaluated models for subgroups of visits with pre-selected illnesses. We also conducted qualitative, in-person sharing circles, a focus group, and 1-on-1 telephone interviews with health directors, emergency care providers, and First Nations patients from 2019 to 2022, during which we reviewed the quantitative results of the cohort study and asked participants to comment on them. We descriptively categorized qualitative data related to reasons that First Nations patients leave care. RESULTS: Our quantitative analysis included 11 686 287 emergency department visits, of which 1 099 424 (9.4%) were by First Nations patients. Visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non-First Nations patients (odds ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.94-1.98). Factors such as diagnosis, visit acuity, geography, or patient demographics other than First Nations status did not explain this finding. First Nations status was associated with greater odds of leaving without being seen or against medical advice in 9 of 10 disease categories or specific diagnoses. In our qualitative analysis, 64 participants discussed First Nations patients' experiences of racism, stereotyping, communication issues, transportation barriers, long waits, and being made to wait longer than others as reasons for leaving. INTERPRETATION: Emergency department visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non-First Nations patients. As leaving early may delay needed care or interfere with continuity of care, providers and departments should work with local First Nations to develop and adopt strategies to retain First Nations patients in care.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Alberta , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadenses Indígenas
12.
AIDS Behav ; 28(6): 1845-1857, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457051

RESUMO

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces sexual risk for HIV transmission by 99% when used appropriately, but remains underutilized among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). In this mixed-method study, we describe reasons for PrEP refusal associated with low self-perceived need for PrEP among MSM who recently declined daily oral PrEP when offered by a provider. Data are from a quantitative behavioral survey of MSM (N = 93) living in Atlanta, Chicago, and Raleigh-Durham, who also either responded to an in-depth interview (n = 51) or participated in one of 12 focus groups (n = 42). Themes of low self-perceived need for PrEP were: low self-perceived risk for HIV acquisition (33% of respondents); confidence in remaining HIV-negative (35%); using condoms (81%); limiting number of partners and choosing partners carefully (48%); asking partners about their HIV status before having sex (45%); engaging in safer sexual positions or oral sex (28%); being in a monogamous relationship or exclusivity with one partner (26%); and regular HIV testing (18%). Low self-perceived risk for HIV acquisition and high confidence in other prevention strategies were important factors related to low self-perceived need in MSM refusing daily oral PrEP when offered. Providers should continue to discuss the benefits of PrEP as a safe and highly effective option for HIV prevention.


RESUMEN: La profilaxis pre-exposición (PrEP) reduce el riesgo de transmisión sexual por el VIH en un 99% cuando se utiliza apropiadamente, pero sigue siendo subutilizada entre hombres gais, bisexuales y otros hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH). En este estudio de método mixto, describimos los motivos del rechazo de la PrEP asociados a la baja necesidad autopercibida de la PrEP entre los HSH que recientemente rechazaron la PrEP oral diaria, cuando fue ofrecida por un proveedor de salud. Los datos provienen de una encuesta cuantitativa de comportamiento de los HSH (N = 93) que viven en Atlanta, Chicago y Raleigh-Durham, quienes también respondieron a una entrevista en profundidad (n = 51) o participaron en uno de los 12 grupos focales (n = 42). Los temas de baja necesidad autopercibida del uso de la PrEP fueron: el bajo riesgo auto percibido de contraer el VIH (33% de los encuestados); la confianza en seguir siendo VIH negativo (35%); utilizar condones (81%); limitar el número de parejas sexuales y elegir las parejas cuidadosamente (48%); preguntar a sus parejas sobre su estado de VIH antes de tener relaciones sexuales (45%); participar en posiciones sexuales más seguras o sexo oral (28%); estar en relación monógama o de exclusividad con una sola pareja (26%); y hacerse pruebas del VIH regularmente (18%). El bajo riesgo autopercibido de contraer el VIH y la alta confianza en otras estrategias de prevención fueron factores importantes relacionados con la baja necesidad autopercibida en los HSH que rechazaron la PrEP oral diaria cuando se les ofreció. Los proveedores de salud deben continuar el diálogo sobre los beneficios de la PrEP como una opción segura y altamente eficaz para la prevención del VIH.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Grupos Focais , Infecções por HIV , Homossexualidade Masculina , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Parceiros Sexuais , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Chicago , Comportamento Sexual , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Entrevistas como Assunto , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/psicologia , Adulto Jovem , Estados Unidos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Assunção de Riscos , Autoimagem
13.
J Surg Oncol ; 129(6): 1131-1138, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396372

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the standard of care for patients with rectal cancer who have an incomplete response to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). A minority of patients will refuse curative intent resection. The aim of this study is to examine the outcomes for these patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of stage 1-3 rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy or TNT at a single institution. Patients either underwent TME, watch-and-wait protocol, or if they refused TME, were counseled and watched (RCW). Clinical outcomes and resource utilization were examined in each group. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients (Male 59%) were included with a median surveillance of 43 months. Twenty-nine patients (17%) refused TME and had shortened overall survival (OS). Twelve patients who refused TME converted to a complete clinical response (cCR) on subsequent staging with a prolonged OS. 92% of these patients had a near cCR at initial staging endoscopy. Increased physician visits and testing was utilized in RCW and WW groups. CONCLUSION: A significant portion of patients convert to cCR and have prolonged OS. Lengthening the time to declare cCR may be considered in select patients, such as those with a near cCR at initial endoscopic staging.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Conduta Expectante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
14.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(1): 24-28, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013485

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the rate at which cochlear implant (CI) candidates decline surgery and identify associated factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Four hundred ninety-three CI candidates from July 1989 to December 2020 with complete demographic and socioeconomic data. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, sex, race, marital and employment status, median household income percentile, distance-to-CI-center, and residence in a medically underserved county. RESULTS: Of the 493 CI candidates included, 80 patients (16.2%) declined surgery. Based on chart checking, the most common reason patients did not receive the implant was due to loss of follow-up (38%). African American patients were 73% less likely to undergo implantation compared with White patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.27 [0.11-0.68]; p = 0.005). Asian patients were 95% less likely to undergo implantation (OR, 0.05 [0.009-0.25]; p = 0.0003) compared with White patients. For every 1-year age increase, patients were 4% less likely to undergo implantation (OR, 0.96 [0.94-0.98]; p < 0.0001) and for every 10-year age increase, the patients were 33% less likely. Compared with their single counterparts, married patients were more likely to undergo implantation (OR, 1.87 [1.12-3.15]; p = 0.02). No differences were observed when comparing implanted and nonimplanted CI candidates in sex, employment status, distance-to-CI-center, or median family income percentile. A χ2 test of independence showed no association between receiving CIs and living in medically underserved counties ( χ2 = 2; N = 493; 0.3891; p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Not infrequently, CI candidates decline surgery. Although demographic factors (race, age, and marital status) were associated with the cochlear implantation decision, socioeconomic factors (median family income and residence in a medically underserved community) were not. Perhaps cultural components of a patient's race have a larger impact on whether or not the patients get implanted.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Surgery ; 174(3): 457-463, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37296055

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Individuals' communities impact cancer disparities and are intimately related to social determinants of health. Studies show that personal factors affect treatment refusals for a potentially curable cancer, but few studies have investigated whether community-based characteristics affect the receipt of surgery. METHODS: We used Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program registries from 2010 to 2015 to examine differences in rates of surgery refusal among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer. The community factor measures were based on county-level factors. Sociodemographic and community differences were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 tests and analysis of variance. Multivariate logistic regression of predictors of surgery refusal and the Cox proportional hazard model of disease-specific mortality were performed. RESULTS: Surgery refusers among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic all races lived in counties with lower rates of educational attainment, median family and household income, and higher rates of poverty, unemployment, foreign-born, language isolation, urban population, and women more than 40 years old having mammography in last 2 years. Multivariate analysis shows surgery refusal rates increased in counties having a high percentage of urban population and declined in counties with an increased percentage of less than high school level education, unemployment, and median household income. Breast cancer-specific mortality increased significantly with surgery refusal. CONCLUSION: Residence in counties with the lowest socioeconomic status and disproportionately populated by racial and ethnic minorities is associated with surgery refusal. Given the high mortality associated with refusing surgery, culturally sensitive education on the benefits of care may be appropriate.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Hispânico ou Latino , Renda , Pobreza , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Brancos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/etnologia , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Gynecol Oncol ; 174: 1-10, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37141816

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess associations between clinico-demographic variables and refusal of surgery. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Trends in refusal over time were evaluated using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: Of 788,164 women included in our analysis, 5875 (0.75%) patients refused surgery recommended by their treating oncologist. Patients who refused surgery were older at diagnosis (72.4 vs 60.3 years, p < 0.001) and more likely Black (OR 1.77 95% CI 1.62-1.92). Refusal of surgery was associated with uninsured status (OR 2.94 95% CI 2.49-3.46), Medicaid coverage (OR 2.79 95% CI 2.46-3.18), low regional high school graduation (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.05-1.33) and treatment at a community hospital (OR 1.59 95% CI 1.42-1.78). Patients who refused surgery had lower median overall survival (1.0 vs 14.0 years, p < 0.01) and this difference persisted across disease sites. Between 2008 and 2017, there was a significant increase in refusal of surgery annually (annual percent change +1.41%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple social determinants of health are independently associated with refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer. Given that patients who refuse surgery are more likely from vulnerable, underserved populations and have inferior survival, refusal of surgery should be considered a surgical healthcare disparity and tackled as such.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0284705, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079548

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Discharge against medical advice (DAMA) is an unexpected event for patients and healthcare personnel. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of DAMA in neonates along with characteristics of neonates who got DAMA and, causes and predictors of DAMA. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This case-control study was carried out in Special Care Newborn Unit (SCANU) at Chittagong Medical College Hospital from July 2017 to December 2017. Clinical and demographic characteristics of neonates with DAMA were compared with that of discharged neonates. The causes of DAMA were identified by a semi-structured questionnaire. Predictors of DAMA were determined using a logistic regression model with a 95% confidence interval. A total of 6167 neonates were admitted and 1588 got DAMA. Most of the DAMA neonates were male (61.3%), term (74.7%), outborn (69.8%), delivered vaginally (65.7%), and had standard weight at admission (54.3%). A significant relationship (p < 0.001) was found between the variables of residence, place of delivery, mode of delivery, gestational age, weight at admission, and day and time of outcome with the type of discharge. False perceptions of wellbeing (28.7%), inadequate facilities for mothers (14.5%), and financial problems (14.1%) were the prevalent causes behind DAMA. Predictors of DAMA were preterm gestation (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.07-1.7, p = 0.013), vaginal delivery (AOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31-1.86, p < 0.001), timing of outcome after office hours (AOR 477.15, 95% CI 236-964.6, p < 0.001), and weekends (AOR 2.55, 95% CI 2.06-3.17, p < 0.001). Neonates suffering from sepsis (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7, p< 0.001), Respiratory Distress Syndrome (AOR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9-5.2, p< 0.001), prematurity without other complications (AOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.45-3.1, p < 0.001) or who were referred from north-western districts (AOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.95, p = 0.004) had higher odds for DAMA. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of predictors and reasons behind DAMA may provide opportunities to improve the hospital environment and service related issues so that such vulnerable neonates can complete their treatment. We should ensure better communication with parents, provide provision for mothers' corner, especially for outborn neonates, maintain a standard ratio of neonates and healthcare providers, and adopt specific DAMA policy by the hospital authority.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Alta do Paciente , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
J Behav Med ; 45(5): 760-770, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35688960

RESUMO

Medical avoidance is common among U.S. adults, and may be emphasized among members of marginalized communities due to discrimination concerns. In the current study, we investigated whether this disparity in avoidance was maintained or exacerbated during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We assessed the likelihood of avoiding medical care due to general-, discrimination-, and COVID-19-related concerns in an online sample (N = 471). As hypothesized, marginalized groups (i.e., non-White race, Latinx/e ethnicity, non-heterosexual sexual orientation, high BMI) endorsed more general- and discrimination-related medical avoidance than majoritized groups. However, marginalized groups were equally likely to seek COVID-19 treatment as majoritized groups. Implications for reducing medical avoidance among marginalized groups are discussed.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Pandemias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Marginalização Social , Populações Vulneráveis , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Sexual , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
Laryngoscope ; 132(2): 339-348, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34254672

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct clinical entity with good prognosis, unique demographics, and a trend toward treatment deintensification. Patients with this disease may opt out of recommended postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for a variety of reasons. The aim of this paper was to examine factors that predict patient refusal of recommended PORT in HPV-associated OPSCC, and the association of refusal with overall survival. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective population-based cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with OPSCC between January 2010 and December 2015. We primarily assessed overall survival and the odds of refusing PORT based on demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. Analysis was conducted using multivariable logistic regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 4229 patients were included in the final analysis, with 156 (3.7%) patients opting out of recommended PORT. On multivariable analysis, patient refusal of PORT was independently associated with a variety of socioeconomic factors such as race, insurance status, comorbidity, treatment at a single facility, and margin status. Lastly, PORT refusal was associated with significantly lower overall survival compared to receipt of recommended PORT (hazard ratio 1.69, confidence interval 1.02-2.82). CONCLUSIONS: Patient refusal of recommended PORT in HPV-associated OPSCC is rare and associated with variety of disease and socioeconomic factors. PORT refusal may decrease overall survival in this population. Our findings may help clinicians when counseling patients and identifying those who may be more likely to opt out of recommended adjuvant therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:339-348, 2022.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
20.
Rev. Fac. Odontol. (B.Aires) ; 37(87): 79-85, 2022. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1551407

RESUMO

La Caries de la Infancia Temprana (CIT) se ha descrito como una patología de origen multifactorial en niños hasta los 71 meses de edad. Se considera como Ca-ries de la Infancia Temprana Severa (CITS) cuando a los 3 años el índice ceod es ≥ 4; a los 4 años, ≥ 5, y a los 5 años ≥ 6. La rehabilitación de las lesiones provo-cadas por esta patología puede ser compleja debido a la calidad y cantidad de estructura remanente y a la edad de los pacientes afectados. Objetivos: Estimar la frecuencia de CIT y CITS en niños menores a 72 me-ses que concurrieron para su atención, e identificar el tipo de práctica realizada, y la adhesión al trata-miento. Métodos: Diseño retrospectivo observacional sobre las historias clínicas de pacientes menores a 72 meses asistidos por los cursantes de la Especiali-zación en Odontopediatría, entre febrero 2021 y julio 2022. Resultados: La muestra quedó constituida por 101 niños, de 46+13,5 meses. El 91% presentó CITS. La totalidad de los pacientes mantuvieron lactancia nocturna prolongada después del año, siendo en el 72,3% a libre demanda durante el sueño, en un perío-do de 23+6 meses. Se registró un total de 1010 lesio-nes de caries. El 29,3% de los pacientes abandonaron el tratamiento. Conclusiones: La mayor parte de los niños presentaron Caries de la Infancia Temprana Severa, con altos valores de patología y lactancia noc-turna prolongada a libre demanda después del año Los tratamientos recomendados en estos casos son muy prolongados y requieren de prácticas invasivas, complejas y de alto costo, lo que provoca el abandono del tratamiento (AU)


Early childhood caries (ECC) is defined as a multifactorial disease in children 71 months of age or younger. When the dmft index is ≥4 (age 3), ≥5 (age 4), or ≥6 (age 5) it is referred to as Severe early childhood caries (SECC). Management of ECC is complex due to the quality and quantity of remaining structure of teeth at an early age. Objectives: To estimate the frequency of ECC and SECC in children < 72 months of age undergoing comprehensive treatment, to identify the type of treatment provided and treatment compliance. Methods: Retrospective observational design on dental records of patients under 72 months of age treated by Pediatric Dentistry Specialty Program students between February 2021 and July 2022. Results: The sample included 101 children, mean age 46+13.5 months, 91% of patients with SECC. All patients were fed nightly for over 1 year, 72.3% of whom were fed nightly on demand over a period of 23±6 months. A total of 1010 caries lesions were detected. 29.3% of children discontinued treatment. Conclusions: Most of the children presented severe early childhood caries with high values of pathology and prolonged nocturnal breastfeeding on demand after one year. The recommended treatments in these cases are very long and require invasive, complex and expensive practices, which causes abandonment of the treatment (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Dente Decíduo/lesões , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças/métodos , Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Argentina/epidemiologia , Faculdades de Odontologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Aleitamento Materno/efeitos adversos , Lactação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Cárie Dentária/terapia , Cooperação e Adesão ao Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA