Remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Biopsy: A Randomized, Prospective, Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure that has become an important tool in the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal lymph node lesions in lung cancer. Adequate sedation is an important part of the procedure as it provides patient comfort and potentially increases diagnostic yield. The sedation modality varies among centers and includes moderate sedation/conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. The object of this study will be the evaluation of patient's comfort and level of satisfaction with the involved health care providers (bronchoscopist and anesthesiologist) of remifentanil administration in target-controlled infusion (TCI) for conscious sedation in patients undergoing EBUS­TBNA, with a prospective randomized study design versus the of standard sedation protocol with midazolam and/or fentanest and/or propofol. METHODS: This study was carried out at the "Campus Biomedico di Roma" University Hospital between September 2021 and November 2021, with a total number of 30 patients enrolled who met the eligibility criteria, randomly divided into 2 groups: group 1 "REMIFENTANIL TCI" (experimental group) where the patients performed the EBUS-TBNA procedure under conscious sedation with infusion of remifentanil TCI with a target between 3 ng/mL and 6 ng/mL and group 2 "STANDARD" (control group) with patients undergoing conscious sedation with the association of midazolam and/or fentanest and/or propofol in refracted boluses based on clinical needs. Complications, safety, and level of satisfaction of the operator, the anesthesiologist, and the patient were evaluated. RESULTS: The results show that sedation with remifentanil in TCI can improve the comfort level of patients, reducing the risks associated with the procedure (lower frequency of oversedations and hypotension), allowing for greater intraprocedural safety. Furthermore, the level of satisfaction of the anesthesiologist and that of the operator appears to be significantly higher in the Remifentanil group. CONCLUSION: The execution of a mild to moderate sedation with Remifentanil in TCI in patients undergoing EBUS is safe, tolerated, and allows to obtain greater intraprocedural comfort. Further studies and larger and more representative samples are obviously needed to confirm and strengthen the validity of a remifentanil TCI-based sedation in endoscopic diagnostics.

Assessing the clinical advantage of opioid-reduced anesthesia in thoracoscopic sympathectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-reduced multimodal analgesia has been used clinically for many years to decrease the perioperative complications associated with opioid drugs. We aimed to assess the clinical effects of opioid-reduced anesthesia during thoracoscopic sympathectomy. METHODS: Surgical patients (n = 151) with palmar hyperhidrosis were randomly divided into control (Group C, 73 patients) and test (Group T, 78 patients) groups. All patients were administered general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask. In Group C, patients received propofol, fentanyl, and cisatracurium for anesthesia induction, and maintenance was achieved with propofol and remifentanil, along with mechanical ventilation during the operation. In Group T, anesthesia was induced with propofol, dezocine, and dexmedetomidine (DEX) and maintained with propofol, DEX, and an intercostal nerve block, along with spontaneous breathing throughout the operation. Perioperative complications related to opioid use include hypotension, bradycardia, hypertension, tachycardia, hypoxemia, nausea, vomiting, urine retention, itching, and dizziness were observed. To assess the impact of these complications, we recorded and compared vital signs, blood gas indices, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, adverse events, and patient satisfaction between the two groups. RESULTS: Perioperative complications related to opioid use were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in the type of perioperative sedation, analgesia index, respiratory and circulatory indicators, blood gas analysis, postoperative VAS scores, adverse reactions, propofol dosage, postoperative recovery time, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In minimally invasive surgeries such as thoracoscopic sympathectomy, opioid-reduced anesthesia was found to be safe and effective; however, this method did not demonstrate clinical advantages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register: ChiCTR2100055005, on December 30, 2021.

Bispectral index monitoring: Optimizing anesthesia in rigid bronchoscopy.

Introduction: This study investigates the application of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in rigid bronchoscopy to enhance anesthetic delivery and patient outcomes, a topic that remains underexplored. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 155 patients undergoing elective rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia was conducted. Patients were divided into BIS-monitored and conventional anesthesia groups. Inclusion criteria were adults aged over 18 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-IV. Result: No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055). Conclusions: No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055).

The influence of sex on the dosage of remimazolam co-administered with remifentanil for loss of consciousness in adult patients: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the 50% effective dose of remimazolam co-administered with remifentanil for loss of consciousness in men and women as well as to investigate whether there are between-sex differences. METHODS: Using a modified Dixon's up-and-down allocation approach, we sequentially enrolled male and female patients aged 19-60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II who were scheduled for robotic surgery. For both sexes, the starting remimazolam dose was 0.15 mg/kg, with a step size of 0.05 mg/kg. After achievement of a target effect-site concentration 2.0 ng/ml of remifentanil, and administration of a bolus dose of remimazolam, we assessed whether adequate loss of consciousness (defined as a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale score < 2 within 2 min) was achieved. RESULTS: We included 22 male and 22 female patients. Based on Dixon's up-and-down method, the 50% effective dose of remimazolam (mean ± standard error) was 0.13 ± 0.01 mg/kg and 0.17 ± 0.01 mg/kg in the male and female groups, respectively (P = 0.34). Isotonic regression analysis revealed that the 95% effective dose (95% confidence interval) was 0.19 (0.18-0.20) mg/kg in the male group and 0.29 (0.29-0.30) mg/kg in the female group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no between-sex difference in the 50% effective dose of remimazolam for loss of consciousness; however, the 95% effective dose was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered at Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS No. KCT0007951, 02/12/2022).

Opioid-free anesthesia with esketamine-dexmedetomidine versus opioid-based anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: OFA (Opioid-free anesthesia) has the potential to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events and enhance postoperative recovery. Our research aimed to investigate whether OFA, combining esketamine and dexmedetomidine, could serve as an alternative protocol to traditional OBA (opioid-based anesthesia) in shoulder arthroscopy, particularly in terms of reducing PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting). METHODS: A total of 60 patients treated with shoulder arthroscopy from September 2021 to September 2022 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to the OBA group (n = 30) and OFA group (n = 30), receiving propofol-remifentanil TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) and esketamine-dexmedetomidine intravenous anesthesia, respectively. Both groups received ultrasound-guided ISBPB(interscalene brachial plexus block)for postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV on the first postoperative day in the ward (13.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.05) was significantly lower in the OFA group than in the OBA group. Moreover, the severity of PONV was less severe in the OFA group than in the OBA group in PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 3], P<0.05 ) and in the ward 24 h postoperatively ( 0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 2.25], P<0.05). Additionally, the OFA group experienced a significantly shorter length of stay in the PACU compared to the OBA group (39.4 ± 6.76 min vs. 48.7 ± 7.90 min, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the OBA with propofol-remifentanil, the OFA with esketamine- dexmedetomidine proved to be feasible for shoulder arthroscopy, resulting in a reduced incidence of PONV and a shorter duration of stay in the PACU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No: ChiCTR2100047355), 12/06/2021.

Repeated complete atrioventricular block during remifentanil administration in a pediatric patient with brain tumor and acute hydrocephalus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil, an ultra-short-acting µ-opioid receptor agonist, is commonly used for anesthetic management due to excellent adjustability. Remifentanil is known to cause sinus bradycardia, however, because it has a direct negative chronotropic effect on the cardiac conduction system and there is an indirect negative chronotropic effect via the parasympathetic nervous system. CASE PRESENTATION: An 8-year-old Japanese boy was diagnosed with acute hydrocephalus due to a brain tumor in the fourth ventricle and underwent emergency surgery. Imaging examination showed brainstem compression. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery were scheduled. Remifentanil was started during induction of general anesthesia, but electrocardiogram showed sinus bradycardia, then Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block, and then complete atrioventricular block. Remifentanil was immediately discontinued, and we administered atropine sulfate. Complete atrioventricular block was restored to sinus rhythm. When remifentanil was restarted, however, the electrocardiogram again showed sinus bradycardia, Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block, and then complete atrioventricular block. Remifentanil was again immediately discontinued, we administered adrenaline, and then complete atrioventricular block was restored to sinus rhythm. Fentanyl was used instead of remifentanil with continuous infusion of dopamine. There has since been no further occurrence of complete atrioventricular block. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known case of complete atrioventricular block in a pediatric patient with increased intracranial pressure seemingly caused by administration of remifentanil.

The analgesic effects of combined bilateral parasternal block and serratus anterior plane block for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

BACKGROUND: Severe pain occurs after cardiac surgery in the sternum and chest tubes sites. Although analgesia targeting the sternum is often prioritized, the analgesia of the drain site is sometimes overlooked. This study of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) aimed to provide optimized analgesia for both the sternum and the chest tubes area by combining parasternal block (PSB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB). METHODS: Ethics committee approval (E.Kurul-E2-24-6176, 07/02/2024) was received for the study. Then, the trial was registered on www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ) under the identifier NCT05427955 on 17/03/2024. Twenty patients between the ages of 18-80, with ASA physical status classification II-III, undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting CABG with sternotomy, were included. While the patients were under general anesthesia, PSB was performed through the second and fourth intercostal spaces, and SAPB was performed over the sixth rib. The primary outcome was VAS (Visual Analog Scale) during the first 12 h after extubation. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative remifentanil consumption and block-related side effects. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 64 years. Five patients were female, and 15 were male. For the sternum area, only one patient had resting VAS scores of 4, while the VAS scores for resting for the other patients were below 4. For chest tubes area, only two patients had resting VAS scores of 4 or above, while the resting VAS scores for the other patients were below 4. The patients' intraoperative remifentanil consumption averaged 2.05 mg. No side effects related to analgesic protocol were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study where PSB and SAPB were combined in patients undergoing CABG, effective analgesia was achieved for the sternum and chest tubes area.

Effects of Propofol, Low and High Doses of Remimazolam on Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Response in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Background: This study explored the effects of different doses of remimazolam tosilate (RT) and propofol combined with remifentanil anesthesia on hemodynamic and inflammatory responses in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Subjects and Methods: Ninety patients with a BMI of less than 35 kg/m², classified as ASA II-III and scheduled for laparoscopic surgery, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into three groups: low-dose RT group (A), high-dose RT group (B), and propofol group (C). The changes in hemodynamic indices such as SBP, DBP, HR, MAP, and inflammatory response indices such as IL-6, SAA, CRP, and PCT, along with extubation time and doses of sufentanil, remifentanil, urapidil, and phenylephrine, were compared among the three groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in extubation time, doses of sufentanil and remifentanil, or the usage rates and average doses of urapidil and phenylephrine between the three groups. The average dose of phenylephrine in group A was lower than in group B and group C, with a statistically significant difference. There were no statistically significant differences among the groups in SBP, DBP, HR, and MAP from T0 to T2, nor in IL-6, SAA, CRP, or PCT levels. Conclusion: Using RT for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery ensures stable hemodynamic and inflammatory responses in patients. Low-dose RT may reduce the usage rate and dose of vasopressors such as phenylephrine during surgery.

Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Improves the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Liposuction Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: Esketamine have anesthetic and analgesic properties. This study aimed to observe the enhancing effect of subanesthetic doses of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery. Patients and Methods: A total of 155 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to Group E (esketamine-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil, n=78) or Group C (saline-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil group, n=77). The primary outcome was satisfaction of patient and surgical team with the procedure. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, hemodynamic and respiratory changes, drug consumption, adverse event rates, and predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Results: Patient and surgical team satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in Group E than in Group C (4.7 ± 0.6 vs 4.2 ± 0.7, P < 0.001; 4.7 ± 0.5 vs 4.4 ± 0.7, P = 0.005). The postoperative AIS (4 [1, 6] vs 5 [2, 9], P = 0.012) and HADS-A (1 [0, 3] vs 2 [0, 6], P = 0.012) scores were significantly lower in Group E than in Group C. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were more stable in Group E than in Group C, with the lower opioids consumption of sufentanil (0 [0, 4] vs 5 [2.5, 7.7], P < 0.001) and remifentanil (700 [480, 900] vs 800 [500, 1200], P = 0.023) in Group E compared to Group C. On ordinal logistics regression, postoperative sleep quality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79), anxiety level (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95) and recovery time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98) were identified as significant predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Conclusion: A subanesthetic dose of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) as an adjuvant can improves the sedative and analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2400080363.

The EC90 of remifentanil for inhibiting endotracheal intubation responses under anesthesia induction with ciprofol: study protocol for a dose-finding trial with the biased-coin design.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation may cause significant hemodynamic responses. Many drugs have been shown to be effective in modifying these cardiovascular responses, including remifentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil. However, the 90% effect-site concentration (EC90) of remifentanil required to control cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation when combined with ciprofol remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the EC90 of remifentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation during anesthesia induction with ciprofol using biased-coin design up-and-down sequential method (BC-UDM). METHODS: This is a prospective sequential allocation dose-finding study. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I-II elective surgical patients receiving target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil effect-site concentration (Ce), followed by ciprofol and rocuronium for anesthesia, were enrolled. The cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation was defined as positive when mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate (HR) is 15% higher than the baseline value. Using the BC-UDM, the Ce of remifentanil was determined based on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation of the previous patient. The EC90 and 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) were estimated by R-Foundation centered isotonic regression and the pooled adjacent violators algorithm with bootstrapping. DISCUSSION: The results of this study sought to demonstrate EC90 of remifentanil blunting sympathetic responses to tracheal intubation during anesthesia index (Ai)-guided ciprofol anesthesia using BCD-UDM. It may help to minimize the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300078275. Registered on December 3, 2023.

Study of Two Sedative Protocols for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Propofol versus Propofol-Remifentanil Combination, Delivered in Target-Controlled Infusion Mode.

Background and Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-disordered breathing pathology with significant clinical consequences, including increased cardiovascular risk and cognitive decline. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold-standard treatment, but alternative strategies are sometimes needed for patients intolerant to CPAP. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a key diagnostic tool for assessing upper airway obstruction in OSA patients and subsequently tailoring a surgical approach, with sedation protocols playing a crucial role in its efficacy and results accuracy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of adding remifentanil to a propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) regimen on the sedation parameters and procedural outcomes of DISE. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Central University and Emergency Military Hospital "Dr. Carol Davila" and Ria Clinic in Bucharest between July 2021 and October 2023. Thirty-one patients were enrolled and randomised into two groups: a propofol group (P group, n= 11) and a remifentanil-propofol group (R-P group, n = 20). DISE was performed using standardised protocols, sedative drugs were administered in TCI mode, and data on sedation levels, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters, and procedural incidents were collected. Results: The addition of remifentanil at 1 ng/mL effect-site concentration significantly reduced the effect-site concentration of propofol required for adequate sedation (3.4 ± 0.7 µg/mL in the P group vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 µg/mL in the R-P group, p = 0.035). The time to achieve adequate sedation was also shorter in the R-P group (7.1 ± 2.5 min vs. 9.5 ± 2.7 min, p = 0.017). The incidence of cough, hypoxemia, and cardiovascular events did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Adding remifentanil to a propofol TCI regimen for DISE effectively reduces the required propofol effect-site concentration and shortens sedation time without increasing the risk of adverse events. This combination may enhance the safety and efficiency of DISE, offering a promising alternative for patients undergoing this procedure.

Impact of low-dose sevoflurane with propofol-based anaesthesia on motor-evoked potentials in infants: protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) are widely used to mitigate the risk of nerve injury resulting from surgical manipulation. Infants are more susceptible to anaesthetics that suppress MEP because of the immaturity of their nervous structures. Current evidence of the impact of the interaction between a small dose of sevoflurane and propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) on MEP in infants is controversial. This current study aims to evaluate the impact of the coadministration of low-dose sevoflurane with propofol-based TIVA on MEP in infants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled study will be conducted at a single tertiary care children's hospital in Japan between July 2024 and June 2029. Children between 35 and 87 weeks of postconceptual age undergoing spinal surgery requiring MEP under general anaesthesia will be enrolled in this study. The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: propofol+remifentanil with (intervention group) or without (control group) low-dose sevoflurane (0.10-0.15 age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration). MEP top-to-bottom amplitudes will be measured at two chronological points: T1 (first transcranial MEP (TcMEP) recording), T2 (second TcMEP recording) in the same patient. The primary and secondary endpoints will be a reduction in MEP amplitudes (T1-T2) in the right upper and lower extremities between the control and intervention groups, respectively. The sample size was calculated to be a total of 40 based on the preliminary data of 10 infants, which showed a 35% reduction in mean values of MEP amplitudes in the right adductor muscle (SD=31) with a 10% assumed dropout rate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center (2022058). The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal at the relevant academic conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT1041230094.

Comparison of the postoperative effects of the erector spinae plane block and local infiltration analgesia in patients operated with lumbotomy surgery incision: Randomized clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to observe the effects of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) or erector spinae plane block (ESPB) methods, which we applied preemptively in patients who were scheduled for surgery with a lumbotomy surgical incision and on intraoperative remifentanil consumption, and to compare the postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), morphine demand, consumption, and pain degrees. METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III patients aged 18 to 75 years who were due to be operated on with a lumbotomy surgical incision were included in the study. The present study was conducted via prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind trials. After the induction of standard anesthesia, LIA was applied to 30 patients and ESPB was applied to 30 patients preemptively. The dose of remifentanil consumed in the intraoperative period was measured, and the hemodynamic parameters were measured every 5 minutes. Morphine bolus treatment with the postoperative patient-controlled analgesia and rescue analgesia with paracetamol were planned for the patients. Postoperative morphine and additional analgesia consumption, NRS, hemodynamic parameters, and complications were recorded for 48 hours. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic and hemodynamic data. The mean consumption of remifentanil was measured as 455 ±â€…165.23 µg in the intraoperative ESPB group and 296.67 ±â€…110.59 µg in the LIA group, and a statistical difference was observed (P = .001). In the postoperative follow-ups, the ESPB group drug consumption and NRS score averages were significantly lower at all times (P = .01; patient-controlled analgesia-morphine, 41.93 ±â€…14.47 mg vs 57.23 ±â€…15.5 mg and additional analgesic-paracetamol: 2.1 ±â€…1.06 vs 4.27 ±â€…1.14 g). The mean duration of additional analgesic intake of the groups was 10.6 ±â€…8.1 in the LIA group, while it was 19.33 ±â€…8.87 in the ESPB group, a significant difference. The patient satisfaction questionnaire was also significantly in favor of ESPB (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, it has been shown that the intraoperative LIA method is more effective in terms of remifentanil consumption and in controlling pain in operations performed with a flank incision, but the ESPB method provides longer and more effective pain control in postoperative follow-ups.

Comparison of the effects of axillary brachial plexus block, inhalation anesthesia, and total intravenous anesthesia on tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury in upper extremity surgery.

BACKGROUND: Post-ischemia reperfusion can lead to oxidative stress and an increase in oxidative markers. Employing preventive strategies and antioxidant agents may help mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). The use of a tourniquet in extremity surgery has been associated with IRI. This study aims to investigate the impact of three different approaches- brachial plexus block, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), and inhalation anesthesia-on IRI during upper extremity surgery using a tourniquet. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 45 with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II scores were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A received an axillary block with bupivacaine; Group I underwent inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane; and Group T received TIVA with propofol and remifentanil infusion. Blood samples were collected to measure glucose, lactate, total anti-oxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), and ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels at various time points: before anesthesia (t1), 1 minute before tourniquet release (t2), 20 minutes after tourniquet release (t3), and 4 hours after tourniquet release (t4). RESULTS: In Group I, lactate levels at t3, and glucose levels at t2 and t3, were higher compared to the other groups. Group A exhibited lower IMA levels at t2, t3, and t4 than the other groups. Additionally, Group I had lower IMA levels at t2, t3, and t4 compared to Group T. TAS levels were higher in Group I at t2, t3, and t4 compared to the other groups. TOS levels at t2 and t3 were lower in Group A than in Group I. CONCLUSION: Axillary anesthesia results in a sympathetic block, promoting better perfusion of the upper extremity. This study demonstrated lower levels of oxidative stress markers with axillary plexus block. Therefore, these results suggest that the axillary block has the potential to mitigate IRI.

[Comparative analysis of the consistency of anesthesia depth between anesthesia index and Narcotrend index in monitoring pediatric tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy surgery].

Objective: To analyze the consistency of the anesthesia index (AI) and Narcotrend index (NI) in monitoring the depth of anesthesia in pediatric tonsil/adenoidectomy. Methods: A total of 129 children who underwent elective tonsil/adenoidectomy at Xijing Hospital Affiliated to Air Force Medical University from July 2022 to October 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Both AI monitoring by ConView monitor and NI monitoring by Narcotrend monitor were conducted for children after they were admitted to the operating room, while Propofol-remifentanil combined with total intravenous anesthesia was used during the operation and the anesthetic dose was adjusted to maintain the NI value at 40-60. In addition, the AI and NI values were recorded at following time points: quiet eyes closing (T1), the beginning of induction (T2), loss of consciousness (T3), tracheal intubation (T4), the beginning of surgery (T5), during tonsil excision (T6), adenoidectomy (T7), the end of surgery (T8), consciousness recovery (T9) and tracheal extubation (T10). Bland-Altman consistency analysis was used to evaluate the consistency of the results of the two types of anesthesia depth monitoring, AI value and NI value. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were used to analyze the predictive efficacy of AI and NI values for the state of consciousness of children. The intraoperative awareness was followed up at 24 hours, 1 week and 1 month after surgery. Results: In 129 cases, there were 78 boys and 51 girls, with an average age of (7.2±3.2) years and an operation time of (72.8±14.0) min. No AI data were missing, but 13 NI data were missing, with a missing rate of 10.1% (13/129). At time points T1-T10, the AI values were 67.5±19.2 and the NI values were 67.2±19.2. Bland-Altman consistency analysis showed that the difference in value between AI and NI was 0.3 (95%CI:-0.1-0.6, P=0.120), with an out-of-consistency range of 4.0% (51/1 290). Before anesthesia induction, AI and NI values were maintained at a high level; with the beginning of anesthesia induction and the disappearance of the children's consciousness, both AI and NI values gradually decreased; after discontinuing the infusion of anesthetics, the values of AI and NI gradually increased, and the change trend of AI and NI in each stage of the perioperative period was consistent, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point (all P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off value for predicting the state of consciousness using AI was 72.5, with an AUC of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.70-0.75), and the cut-off value of NI was 79.5 and the AUC was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.72-0.77). There was no significant difference in AUC between the two indices (P=0.310). None of the children had intraoperative awareness. Conclusion: Both AI and NI can be used to monitor the depth of anesthesia in pediatric tonsil/adenoidectomy with high accuracy.

Effect of nociception level-directed analgesic management on opioid usage in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the importance of appropriate opioid administration methods according to nociceptive monitoring. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 54 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive nociception level (NOL)-directed intraoperative opioid management with a minimum flow of remifentanil (NOL group) or conventional intraoperative analgesic management (control group). The primary outcome was the mean intraoperative remifentanil infusion flow rate (intraoperative remifentanil usage [µg]/ideal body weight [kg]/operation time [min]). The main secondary outcomes were plasma concentrations of three perioperative inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein [CRP], and cortisol levels) and postoperative pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) scores 2 h postoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. RESULTS: Compared with standard analgesia management, NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% ( - 0.038; 95% confidence interval, - 0.059 to - 0.017; p = 0.0007). NOL-directed management did not lead to an increase in IL-6, CRP, or cortisol levels compared with conventional analgesic management. Furthermore, this protocol led to improvements in the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3. CONCLUSION: NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% and the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3 without an increase in inflammatory marker levels. REGISTRY NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, JRCTs052220034.

Perioperative effects of different hypotensive anesthesia techniques in orthognathic surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of combining sevoflurane with remifentanil, esmolol, or nitroglycerin for hypotensive anesthesia and determine the suitable hypotensive anesthesia method for orthognathic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery for developmental malocclusion. They were divided into three groups based on the hypotensive agent preferences: Group 1 (n = 20), sevoflurane and remifentanil; Group 2 (n = 20), sevoflurane and esmolol; Group 3 (n = 20), sevoflurane and nitroglycerin. Bleeding volume, heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure were recorded at certain times during the perioperative period, including at stages with increased stress levels in the body, such as incision and osteotomy. The patients' blood pressure, analgesic consumption and pain level were recorded in the postoperative period. RESULTS: Bleeding volume, surgery satisfaction related to bleeding, and total operation time did not differ significantly between groups. Intraoperatively, heart rates were significantly higher in Group 3 than in Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.001). However, hemodynamic stability was similar in Groups 1 and 2. Postoperatively, analgesic consumption, pain levels, and blood pressure dynamics did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study's results, it was concluded that infusing remifentanil, esmolol, or nitroglycerin with sevoflurane during orthognathic surgery successfully achieved the targeted hypotensive anesthesia and can be considered alternative methods. The decision on which method to use should consider the patient's overall health status and additional medical conditions.

Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in major spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Major spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and increased opioid consumption. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is thought to provide adequate intraoperative analgesia with reduced postoperative opioid consumption. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of intraoperative OFA approach to the conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and related side effects in patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: Forty-eight patients undergoing elective major spine surgery were randomly allocated to either receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine and lidocaine (OFA group) or fentanyl during induction and intraoperative remifentanil (OBA group). All patients received intraoperative sevoflurane, propofol, rocuronium, ketamine, dexamethasone, ondansetron and postoperative paracetamol and patient-controlled analgesia device set to deliver intravenous morphine for 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was measured using numerical rating scale. Opioid side effects were documented, when present. RESULTS: OFA group required less morphine in the first 24 hours post-surgery (17.28±12.25 mg versus 27.96±19.75 mg, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in the OFA group. More patients in the OFA group required antihypertensive medications compared to patients in the OBA group (P<0.05). In the post anesthesia care unit, OFA patients had a significantly longer stay than OBA patients (114.1±49.33 min versus 89.96±30.71 min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: OFA can be an alternative to OBA in patients undergoing multilevel spine fusion surgery. OFA reduces opioids consumption in the first 24 hours and PONV.

Serotonin Syndrome After Prolonged Remifentanil and Propofol Infusion for Craniotomy: A Case Report.

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a life-threatening condition caused by serotonergic medications. We describe a unique case of SS likely caused by prolonged exposure to propofol and remifentanil alone. A young male presented for vestibular schwannoma resection. Several hours into the case, the patient demonstrated hyperthermia and hemodynamic instability, followed by clonus, rigidity, shivering, and tachycardia after emergence. SS was diagnosed using Hunter's criteria and improved with supportive measures. While the patient endorsed a history of methamphetamine use, his urine drug screen was negative. The possibility of SS should be considered when administering propofol and remifentanil, particularly with prolonged infusions.

Influence of psychological factors and pain sensitivity on the efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in laparoscopic gastrectomy and identify the psychological factors that could influence the efficacy of OFA. METHOD: 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy were allocated to either the opioid-based anesthesia group (OA) (n = 60) or the OFA (n = 60) group. Remifentanil was administered to the OA group intraoperatively, whereas dexmedetomidine and lidocaine were administered to the OFA group. The interaction effect of the psychological factors on OFA was analyzed using the aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses. RESULTS: The opioid requirement for 24 h after surgery was lower in the OFA group than in the OA group (fentanyl equivalent dose 727 vs. 650 µg, p = 0.036). The effect of OFA was influenced by the pain catastrophizing scale (p = 0.041), temporal pain summation (p = 0.046), and pressure pain tolerance (p = 0.034). This indicates that patients with pain catastrophizing or high pain sensitivity significantly benefited from OFA, whereas patients without these characteristics did not. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that OFA with dexmedetomidine and lidocaine effectively reduced the postoperative 24-h opioid requirements following laparoscopic gastrectomy, which was modified by baseline pain catastrophizing and pain sensitivity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System Gangnam Severance Hospital (#3-2021-0295) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05076903).