Does the Rule of Thirds Adequately Detect Deficient and Excessive Acetabular Coverage?

BACKGROUND: Assessment of AP acetabular coverage is crucial for choosing the right surgery indication and for obtaining a good outcome after hip-preserving surgery. The quantification of anterior and posterior coverage is challenging and requires either other conventional projections, CT, MRI, or special measurement software, which is cumbersome, not widely available and implies additional radiation. We introduce the "rule of thirds" as a promising alternative to provide a more applicable and easy method to detect an excessive or deficient AP coverage. This method attributes the intersection point of the anterior (posterior) wall to thirds of the femoral head radius (diameter), the medial third suggesting deficient and the lateral third excessive coverage. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What is the validity (area under the curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios [LR(+)/LR(-)], positive/negative predictive values [PPV, NPV]) for the rule of thirds to detect (1) excessive and (2) deficient anterior and posterior coverages compared with previously established radiographic values of under-/overcoverage using Hip2Norm as the gold standard? METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients between 2003 and 2015 from our institutional database who were referred to our hospital for hip pain and were potentially eligible for joint-preserving hip surgery. We divided the study group into six specific subgroups based on the respective acetabular pathomorphology to cover the entire range of anterior and posterior femoral coverage (dysplasia, overcoverage, severe overcoverage, excessive acetabular anteversion, acetabular retroversion, total acetabular retroversion). From this patient cohort, 161 hips were randomly selected for analysis. Anterior and posterior coverage was determined with Hip2Norm, a validated computer software program for evaluating acetabular morphology. The anterior and posterior wall indices were measured on standardized AP pelvis radiographs, and the rule of thirds was applied by one observer. RESULTS: The detection of excessive anterior and posterior acetabular wall using the rule of thirds revealed an AUC of 0.945 and 0.933, respectively. Also the detection of a deficient anterior and posterior acetabular wall by applying the rule of thirds revealed an AUC of 0.962 and 0.876, respectively. For both excessive and deficient anterior and posterior acetabular coverage, we found high specificities and PPVs but low sensitivities and NPVs. CONCLUSION: We found a high probability for an excessive (deficient) acetabular wall when this intersection point lies in the lateral (medial) third, which would qualify for surgical correction. On the other hand, if this point is not in the lateral (medial) third, an excessive (deficient) acetabular wall cannot be categorically excluded. Thus, the rule of thirds is very specific but not as sensitive as we had expected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study.

Should 15° of valgus coronal-plane deformity be the upper limit for a total ankle arthroplasty?

AIMS: Preoperative talar valgus deformity ≥ 15° is considered a contraindication for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). We compared operative procedures and clinical outcomes of TAA in patients with talar valgus deformity ≥ 15° and < 15°. METHODS: A matched cohort of patients similar for demographics and components used but differing in preoperative coronal-plane tibiotalar valgus deformity ≥ 15° (valgus, n = 50; 52% male, mean age 65.8 years (SD 10.3), mean body mass index (BMI) 29.4 (SD 5.2)) or < 15° (control, n = 50; 58% male, mean age 65.6 years (SD 9.8), mean BMI 28.7 (SD 4.2)), underwent TAA by one surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) pain and disability and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) version 2 scores were collected prospectively. Ancillary procedures, secondary procedures, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: At mean 5.1 years follow-up (SD 2.6) (valgus) and 6.6 years (SD 3.3) (controls), mean AOS scores decreased and SF-36 scores increased significantly in both groups. Improvements in scores were similar for both groups - AOS pain: valgus, mean 26.2 points (SD 24.2), controls, mean 22.3 points (SD 26.4); AOS disability: valgus, mean 41.2 points (SD 25.6); controls, mean 34.6 points (SD 24.3); and SF-36 PCS: valgus, mean 9.1 points (SD 14.1), controls, mean 7.4 points (SD 9.8). Valgus ankles underwent more ancillary procedures during TAA (40 (80%) vs 13 (26%)) and more secondary procedures postoperatively (18 (36%) vs 7 (14%)) than controls. Tibiotalar deformity improved significantly (p < 0.001) towards a normal weightbearing axis in valgus ankles. Three valgus and four control ankles required subsequent fusion, including two for deep infections (one in each group). CONCLUSION: Satisfactory mid-term results were achieved in patients with preoperative valgus malalignment ≥ 15°, but they required more adjunctive procedures during and after TAA. Valgus coronal-plane deformity ≥ 15° is not an absolute contraindication for TAA if associated deformities are addressed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1689-1696.

Proximal Femoral Rotational Osteotomy for Symptomatic Femoral Retroversion†:†A Case Report.

The Rotational osteotomy for femoral retroversion has been extremely rare despite the known association between femoral neck retroversion, hip pain, and osteoarthritis. Here, we describe a case of femoral neck retroversion for which proximal femoral rotation osteotomy. A 16-year-old boy with a past history of developmental dysplasia of the both hip treated conservatively presented with a complaint of pain in left hips. On physical examination, flexion of the left hip was limited to 90° with terminal pain. Internal rotation was also limited to 10°. Computed tomography (CT) showed -7.1° anteversion of the left femur. We performed rotational osteotomy to increase femoral anteversion because conservative treatment was not effective. The postoperative course was uneventful. At 12 postoperative months, his left hip pain was completely disappeared and femoral anteversion was 34° on CT scans. Retroversion of the femur is a distinct dynamic factor that should be considered in the evaluation of mechanical causes of hip pain. Restoring the normal rotational alignment of the hip resulted in cure of the impingement due to femoral retroversion. J. Med. Invest. 67 : 214-216, February, 2020.

Medial closing wedge high tibial osteotomy for valgus tibial deformities: good clinical results and survival with a mean 4.5 years of follow-up in 113 patients.

PURPOSE: A varus-producing medial closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (MCWHTO) is an uncommon procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the survivorship and prevalence of post-operative subjective knee laxity and satisfaction in a large cohort of patients with a MCWHTO performed without a MCL-reefing procedure. METHODS: All patients (n = 176) who underwent a MCWHTO in our clinic between 2008 and 2016 were approached to participate. After review of patient charts, questionnaires were sent to willingly patients. Primary outcome was the survivorship of the MCWHTO; secondary outcome was patient-reported instability and satisfaction. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirteen patients participated in the study. The 5-year survival rate of the MCWHTO was almost 80%. A total of 77% of the patients was satisfied with the treatment. With regard to post-operative subjective knee laxity, 26% of the patients experienced instability of the knee post-operation. Instability was significantly correlated with the KOOS domains, the Lysholm score, the IKDC knee function score and the Physical and Mental Health Domains of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: Medial closing wedge high tibial osteotomy provides good results regarding survivorship and patient satisfaction for patients with a valgus deformity which is located in the proximal tibia. Clinically relevant is that in the surgical technique without MCL-reefplasty instability is significantly correlated with worse patient-reported outcome measures. The addition of a MCL reefing procedure will improve outcome in selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pelvic Compensation in Sagittal Malalignment: How Much Retroversion Can the Pelvis Accommodate?

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Investigate how differing degrees of pelvic incidence (PI) modulate the recruitment of pelvic tilt (PT) in response to similar amounts of sagittal malalignment as measured by T1-Pelvic Angle (TPA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Past research has shown that some patients do not recruit PT in response to sagittal malalignment. Given the anatomic relationship between PI and PT, we sought to determine whether differing PI is associated with variable recruitment of PT. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of 2077 patients undergoing full body radiographs and TPA>10°. Five groups of patients (Very Low, Low, Average, High, and Very High PI) were defined utilizing PI ranges on a Gaussian distribution. Linear regression (LR) evaluated correlation of TPA to PT within each PI group. Multivariate LR evaluated whether correlation between TPA and PT differed between each PI group. RESULTS: Mean PT increased with increasing levels of PI (P < 0.05). Within the full cohort, PT correlated with TPA (r = 0.80, P < 0.001). Multivariate LR revealed significant differences between slopes and intercepts of the linear relationship between PT and TPA within the PI groups. Compared with patients with an average PI, patients with Very Low PI had 3.4° lower PT while holding TPA constant (P < 0.001). Further, patients with Very High PI displayed a PT of 1.9° higher than patients with an Average PI while holding TPA constant (P = 0.01). A similar difference of -1.8°, and 1.2° with respect to the Average PI group was observed in the Low and High PI groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Means and standard deviations of PT at varying levels of TPA were defined for PI groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first study which demonstrated that PI is associated with varied recruitment of PT while maintaining constant sagittal malalignment. The results reported herein are intended to allow surgeons to assess a patient's magnitude of compensatory PT for an individual patient's PI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Medial femoral epicondyle upsliding osteotomy with posterior stabilized arthroplasty provided good clinical outcomes such as constrained arthroplasty in primary total knee arthroplasty with severe valgus deformity.

PURPOSE: A modified technique referred to as a medial femoral epicondyle upsliding osteotomy was proposed to address severe valgus deformity with unconstrained posterior stabilized (PS) arthroplasty. The study compared the effectiveness of the technique and PS arthroplasty with constrained arthroplasty during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Fifty-three patients presenting with valgus knees with a mean valgus angle (VA) greater than 30° were prospectively randomized and divided into two groups, and both groups received primary TKA. Upsliding osteotomy with PS arthroplasty was performed on the knees of 27 patients (group A), while the remaining 26 patients (group B) received a constrained arthroplasty. The Knee Society function score (KSF), Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS), range of motion (ROM), mediolateral stability and hospitalization expenses were recorded. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femorotibial angle (FTA) and VA were analysed. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS: The patients received follow-up care for more than 50 months. The postoperative KSF, HSS and ROM showed marked improvement in both groups (p < 0.05). Radiological assessments showed that HKA, FTA and VA for group A were restored to (179.9 ± 3.0)°, (173.0 ± 2.4)° and (7.0 ± 2.4)°, respectively. For group B, the HKA, FTA and VA were restored to (181.5 ± 2.3)°, (172.5 ± 2.3)° and (7.5 ± 2.3)°, respectively. Only two patients from group A demonstrated mild medial laxity in their knees, and the remaining patients from both groups were stable medially and laterally. However, the total hospitalization expenses and material expenses of group A were less than those of group B because of the more expensive constrained prosthesis and stems. No late-onset loosening or recurrent valgus deformity was displayed. CONCLUSIONS: Both medial femoral epicondyle upsliding osteotomy with PS arthroplasty and constrained arthroplasty showed good outcomes for the restoration of neutral limb alignment and soft tissue balance, which are demonstrated to be safe and effective techniques for correcting severely valgus knees. Therefore, the clinically important finding of this study is that medial femoral epicondyle upsliding osteotomy with PS arthroplasty can be an alternative method for correcting severe valgus knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Risk of Perforation Is High During Corrective Reaming of Retroverted Glenoids: A Computer Simulation Study.

BACKGROUND: Corrective anterior reaming is an accepted method for addressing retroversion in a biconcave retroverted (Walch classification, type B2) glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. However, concern still exists regarding early glenoid component failure in the setting of severe retroversion, which may be related to loss of component containment and/or violation of subchondral bone resulting from reaming. The goal of this study was to determine what characteristics of B2 glenoids are less amenable to corrective reaming by virtually implanting anatomic glenoid components. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How much medial reaming is required to correct the version of a B2 glenoid to an acceptable position? (2) Are glenoids with more severe retroversion (> 25°) at higher risk of component perforation than less retroverted glenoids? (3) Is correcting to 10° of retroversion associated with greater risk as compared with reaming to 15°? (4) How does corrective reaming affect the underlying bone density on the glenoid face of B2 glenoids? METHODS: A series of 71 patients with B2 glenoids (posterior subluxation of the humeral head with posterior bone loss) with CT scans who were indicated for shoulder arthroplasty were reviewed. Forty-four of 71 glenoids (62.5%) had < 25° of native retroversion. Anatomic glenoid implants were then virtually implanted using three-dimensional CT software that allows for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning to correct native retroversion to 15° or 10° of retroversion using both a central peg with an inverted triangle peg configuration or a keel. The amount of reaming of the anterior glenoid required to correct retroversion, perforation of peripheral pegs, or keel was compared. Additionally, assessment of the surface area of the glenoid that had poor bone density (defined as cancellous bone under the subchondral plate) was analyzed by the software after correction. RESULTS: Correction to 15° of retroversion required 5 ± 3 mm of reaming, and correction to 10° of retroversion required 8 ± 3 mm of reaming to obtain at least 80% seating. Peripheral peg perforation with correction to 15° occurred in 15 of 27 (56%) glenoids with > 25° of retroversion compared with 10 of 44 (23%) of glenoids with < 25° of retroversion (relative risk [RR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.6; p = 0.006). There was no difference in perforation with keeled components. Increased correction to 10° did not increase the risk of component perforation. When correction to 15°, glenoids with higher native version (> 25°) had a greater risk of poor bone quality support (10 of 27 [37%]) when compared with glenoids with less version (four of 44 [9%]; RR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-12.8; p = 0.006). Increased correction resulted in 13 of 27 (48%) glenoids with version > 25° having poor bone density versus 10 of 44 (23%) with ≤ 25° of version (RR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high risk of vault perforation after corrective reaming. Glenoid retroversions > 25° are at a higher risk of having poor bone quality supporting the component. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When contemplating options for patients with severe retroversion, surgeons should consider alternatives other than corrective reaming if achieving normal glenoid version is desired.

Under-corrected knees do not fail more than aligned knees at 8 years in fixed severe valgus total knee replacement.

PURPOSES: A fixed severe valgus knee is a surgical challenge. A safe post-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) range of 180° ± 4 was recommended, but recent studies mentioned equal results from outliers of this range. Nevertheless, no distinction was made between varus and valgus knees, as well as over-corrected or under-corrected knees. Did post-operative nonaligned total knee replacements (TKR) from fixed severe valgus knees behave differently from the properly aligned population? Did over-corrected knees behave differently from under-corrected knees? METHODS: Through a multi-center retrospective cohort study, we provided 557 knees of at least 10° of minimal pre-operative valgus; in this population 75 presented a post-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) outside of the 180° ± 4 range; 23 of them had at least 5° of varus; 52 of them had at least 5° of valgus. Median pre-operative HKA of the entire cohort was 194° (range 190-198). Median follow-up was 8 years (range 5-11); Knee Society Score (KSS) results, HKA, Femoral and Tibial Mechanical Angles (FMA, TMA) and complication rates were obtained. The outlier group (HKA ≤ 175 or ≥ 185) was compared to the control group (HKA 180 ± 4); over-corrected (HKA ≤ 175) and under-corrected (HKA ≥ 185) sub-groups were individually tested against the control group. RESULTS: The outlier group had a lower Final Knee Score than the aligned group (p = 0.023). In the over-corrected sub-group, median post-operative FMA was 88° (SD 4°) and median TMA was 87° (SD 4°). The complication rate was higher (p = 0.019). Knee (p = 0.018), Function (p = 0.034) and Final Knee Scores (p = 0.03) were statistically lower than in the control group. In the under-corrected sub-group, mean post-operative FMA was 93° (SD 2°) and mean TMA was 91° (SD 2°). The complication rate was lower (p = 0.019) and there was no difference with the control group concerning KSS. CONCLUSIONS: In case of pre-operative fixed severe valgus knee, one should avoid over-correcting HKA angle and especially the TMA. Over-correction of a severe preoperative valgus in a post-operative varus was prejudicial for TKA survival. Keeping a severe valgus knee in low valgus to avoid using a more constrained implant and/or ligament releases will not decrease the 5-10 year implant survival and functional scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Case series.

Should Acetabular Retroversion Be Treated Arthroscopically? A Systematic Review of Open Versus Arthroscopic Techniques.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes, progression of radiographic arthritis, revision rates, and complications for hips with acetabular retroversion treated by open versus arthroscopic methods. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched in August 2016 for literature on the open and arthroscopic techniques using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) method. All studies published in the English language that focused on the surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement caused by retroversion were included. All arthroscopic procedures, such as acetabuloplasty and labral repair, and open procedures, including anteverting periacetabular osteotomy and surgical dislocation with osteoplasty, were included. Articles that did not describe how retroversion was defined were excluded, as were studies with less than 6 months' follow-up and fewer than 5 patients. Two authors screened the results and selected articles for this review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All results were scored using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: There were 386 results returned and 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria of this study. Among the studies, 11 reviewed arthroscopic techniques and 4 reviewed open surgical procedures. Both techniques yield good results based on patient-reported outcomes with minimal progression of osteoarthritis and low complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: This review showed statistically and clinically significant improvements for the treatment of acetabular retroversion based on patient-reported outcomes, with low progression of radiographic arthritis, revision rates, and complications using both open and arthroscopic methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Femoral head retroposition as a potential compensatory mechanism in patients with a severe mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis.

OBJECTIVE: Severe mismatch between pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) leads to extra anterior displacement of the gravity line. The objective of this study is to investigate whether femoral head retroposition is a separate compensatory mechanism responsible for the extra anterior displacement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Based on the values of PI and LL, 94 patients were divided into the PI-LL match group (PI-LL ≤ 0°), the mild PI-LL mismatch group (20°> PI-LL >0°), and the severe PI-LL mismatch group (PI-LL ≥ 20°). A series of parameters including PI, LL, PI-LL, thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), knee flexion angle (KFA), tibial obliquity angle (TOA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), S1 overhang, femoral head shift (FHS), and pelvic shift (PS) were measured and compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The severe PI-LL mismatch group exhibited significantly greater PI, PI-LL, PT, KFA, SVA, PS, and FHS, and less LL and TK, compared with the control and mild PI-LL mismatch group. The mild PI-LL mismatch group had significantly greater PI-LL, PT, KFA, TOA, and S1 overhang, and less LL and SS than the control group. SS, TOA, and S1 overhang in the severe PI-LL mismatch group differed significantly from that in the control group, but did not differ significantly from that in the mild PI-LL mismatch group. CONCLUSION: Femoral head retroposition is an entirely separate compensatory mechanism and, in this study, participated in the compensation for the anterior displacement of the gravity line induced by extra-sagittal spinal malalignment in patients with severe PI-LL mismatch.

Posterior glenoid bone grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe posterior glenoid wear.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in cases with posterior wear can be addressed by eccentric reaming of the anterior glenoid or by augmenting the posterior glenoid with bone grafting or augmented glenoid implants. We report the results of TSA with posterior glenoid bone grafting (PGBG) with humeral head autograft in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and severe posterior glenoid wear. METHODS: A retrospective review of cases from 2004 to 2014 revealed 34 patients. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were evaluated for glenoid version and humeral head subluxation as well as component loosening. Patient-reported outcomes were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Complications and reoperations were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients, 28 (82.4%) were available at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. PGBG corrected glenoid retroversion from -28° ± 4° preoperatively to -4° ± 2° (P < .001). Humeral head subluxation also improved after PGBG with respect to the scapular axis and to the midglenoid face (P < .001). Radiographic analysis revealed all PGBGs had incorporated. Radiographically, 3 patients (10.7%) had a total of 5 broken or displaced screws. In addition, 3 patients (10.7%) had a broken metal marker in the center peg of the glenoid component. No patients required component revision surgery by final follow-up. Only 1 reoperation occurred for capsular release. Patients showed significant improvements in all patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing primary TSA with humeral head autograft PGBG showed significant improvements in glenoid version, humeral head subluxation, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion at an average of 4 years' follow-up. There was a low revision rate and a high rate of graft incorporation.

Management of severe valgus knee by total unconstrained arthroplasty: A comparative study with long-term follow-up. / Tratamiento de valgos severos de rodilla mediante artroplastia total no constreñida: estudio comparativo con seguimiento a largo plazo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of unconstrained implants in the correction of large valgus deformities using total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 817 primary TKA operated between 1998 and 2006 were retrospectively assessed. 50 TKA were selected (group A) in 49 patients, with a minimum deformity of 15° of valgus, 41 cases were included. Another 50 ATR were selected (group B), with a maximum deformity of 15° of varus, finally including 44 cases in 42 patients. The same surgeon performed every operation. The minimum follow-up time was 10 years. The Knee Society Score (KS and FS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Range of Mobility (ROM), both preoperative and postoperative at 1,.5 and 10 years, as well as radiographic evolution and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperative values of KS, FS and OKS were lower in group A (P<.0001, P<.01 and P<.05, respectively), but not ROM. Postoperatively, KS, FS, OKS and ROM were not different between the groups, neither year, nor 5, nor 10 years. There were also no radiological or complications between the two groups. DISCUSSION: The use of non-constricted implants in severe valgus was not inferior to the mild varus, implying, in addition, a saving in economic terms, with excellent postoperative results. CONCLUSIONS: Correction of severe valgus deformities can be performed with non-constrained primary implants, without obtaining worse results than those obtained in mild deformities.

Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Higher Survivorship Than Rim Trimming for Acetabular Retroversion.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular retroversion can cause impaction-type femoroacetabular impingement leading to hip pain and osteoarthritis. It can be treated by anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) or acetabular rim trimming with refixation of the labrum. There is increasing evidence that acetabular retroversion is a rotational abnormality of the entire hemipelvis and not a focal overgrowth of the anterior acetabular wall, which favors an anteverting PAO. However, it is unknown if this larger procedure would be beneficial in terms of survivorship and Merle d'Aubigné scores in a midterm followup compared with rim trimming. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked if anteverting PAO results in increased survivorship of the hip compared with rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, comparative study evaluating the midterm survivorship of two matched patient groups with symptomatic acetabular retroversion undergoing either anteverting PAO or acetabular rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation. Acetabular retroversion was defined by a concomitantly present positive crossover, posterior wall, and ischial spine sign. A total of 279 hips underwent a surgical intervention for acetabular retroversion at our center between 1997 and 2012 (166 periacetabular osteotomies, 113 rim trimmings through surgical hip dislocation). A total of 99 patients (60%) were excluded from the PAO group and 56 patients (50%) from the rim trimming group because they had any of several prespecified conditions (eg, dysplasia or pediatric conditions 61 [37%] for the PAO group and two [2%] for the rim trimming group), matching (10 [6%]/10 [9%] hips), deficient records (10 [6%]/13 [12%] hips), or the patient declined or was lost to followup (18 [11%]/31 [27%] hips). This left 67 hips (57 patients) that underwent anteverting PAO and 57 hips (52 patients) that had acetabular rim trimming. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, body mass index, preoperative ROM, preoperative Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score, radiographic morphology of the acetabulum (except total and anterior acetabular coverage), alpha angle, Tönnis grade of osteoarthritis, and labral and chondral lesions on the preoperative MRI. During the period in question, we generally performed PAO from 1997 to 2003. With the availability of surgical hip dislocation and labral refixation, we generally performed rim trimming from 2004 to 2010. With growing knowledge of the underlying pathomorphology, anteverting PAOs became more common again around 2007 to 2008. A minimum followup of 2 years was required for this study. Failures were included at any time. The median followup for the anteverting PAO group was 9.5 years (range, 2-17.4 years) and 6.8 years (range, 2.2-10.5 years) for the rim trimming group (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the following endpoints at 5 and 10 years: THA, radiographic progression of osteoarthritis by one Tönnis grade, and/or Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score < 15 points. RESULTS: Although the 5-year survivorship of the two groups was not different with the numbers available (86% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 76%-94%] for anteverting PAO versus 86% [95% CI, 76%-96%] for acetabular rim trimming), we found increased survivorship at 10 years in hips undergoing anteverting PAO for acetabular retroversion (79% [95% CI, 68%-90%]) compared with acetabular rim trimming (23% [95% CI, 6%-40%]) at 10 years (p < 0.001). The drop in the survivorship curve for the acetabular rim trimming through surgical hip dislocation group started at Year 6. The main reason for failure was a decreased Merle d'Aubigné score. CONCLUSIONS: Anteverting PAO may be the more appropriate treatment for hips with substantial acetabular retroversion. This may be the result of reduction of an already smaller lunate surface of hips with acetabular retroversion through rim trimming. However, rim trimming may still benefit hips with acetabular retroversion in which only one or two of the three signs are positive. Future randomized studies should compare these treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Humeral Retroversion in Children with Shoulder Internal Rotation Contractures Secondary to Upper-Trunk Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy.

BACKGROUND: The most common sequela of neonatal brachial plexus palsy is an internal rotation contracture of the shoulder that impairs function and leads to skeletal deformation of the glenohumeral joint. Treatment options include release, transfers, and humeral osteotomy, all ultimately striving for better function through increased external rotation. Prior studies have shown that neonatal brachial plexus palsy alters humeral retroversion but with conflicting findings. We studied retroversion in children with internal rotation contractures from neonatal brachial plexus palsy to clarify its effect on version and surgical planning. METHODS: Bilateral shoulder and elbow magnetic resonance imaging scans of 21 children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy were retrospectively analyzed. Retroversion referenced to the transepicondylar line at the elbow was measured with respect to 2 different proximal reference axes, the longest diameter of an axial cut of the proximal part of the humerus (the skew axis) and the line perpendicular to the articular surface (the humeral center line). Glenoid version and glenohumeral morphology type (concentric glenoid, posterior-concentric glenoid, biconcave, or pseudoglenoid) were also determined. All geometric variables were assessed for correlation with patient age and the severity of the internal rotation contracture. RESULTS: Retroversion on the involved side was decreased at 6° compared with 19° (p = 0.003), as measured between the skew axis and transepicondylar line. Retroversion referenced to the humeral center line was also decreased at -2° (anteversion) compared with 20° (p < 0.001). Patient age was inversely correlated with retroversion, but was only significant for the skew axis (r = -0.497, p = 0.022), decreasing in linear regression by 2.4° per year (p = 0.038). Humeral retroversion did not correlate with the severity of the internal rotation contracture, glenoid version, or glenoid morphology type. CONCLUSIONS: Humeral retroversion is likely to be less on the affected side in children with internal rotation contractures from upper trunk neonatal brachial plexus palsy and merits consideration in surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total shoulder arthroplasty using trabecular metal augments to address glenoid retroversion: the preliminary result of 10 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Options to address glenoid retroversion include eccentric reaming, bone grafting, modifications to component shape, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Trabecular metal (TM) augments have been used extensively in the hip and knee to address bone deficiency in arthroplasty as part of a hybrid combination of high-density polyethylene, polymethyl methacrylate, and TM. This study presents the initial results of the use of specifically designed augments in the shoulder to address glenoid retroversion as part of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). MATERIALS: Ten patients (4 women and 6 men; aged 60 to 79 years) with Walch grade B2 or C glenoids have undergone TM glenoid augment insertion as part of a TSA, with a longer than 24-month follow-up. Patients received a 15° or 30° TM wedge to correct excessive glenoid retroversion before the glenoid component was cemented. Outcome analysis was performed preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: All patients have been satisfied, and all scores have improved. There have been no complications and no hardware failures or displacement. All glenoid components were implanted to within 10° of neutral glenoid version. Radiographs at 24 months show good incorporation of the TM augment and the glenoid component. CONCLUSIONS: The TM augments have the advantage of immediate secure fixation, no tendency to collapse, and the ability to correct retroversion of 25° or more. This study confirms the successful short-term outcome of wedge-shaped TM augments to correct glenoid retroversion as part of TSA.

Posterior augmented glenoid implants require less bone removal and generate lower stresses: a finite element analysis.

HYPOTHESIS: Glenoid retroversion can be corrected with standard glenoid implants after anterior-side asymmetric reaming or by using posterior augmented glenoid implants with built-in corrections. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 augmented glenoid designs with a standard glenoid design, measure the amount of bone removed, and compute the stresses generated in the cement and bone. METHODS: Finite element models of 3 arthritic scapulae with varying severities of posterior glenoid wear were each implanted with 4 different implant configurations: standard glenoid implant in neutral alignment with asymmetric reaming, standard glenoid implant in retroversion, glenoid implant augmented with a posterior wedge in neutral alignment, and glenoid implant augmented with a posterior step in neutral alignment. The volume of cortical and cancellous bone removed and the percentage of implant back surface supported by cortical bone were measured. Stresses and strains in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone were computed. RESULTS: Asymmetric reaming for the standard implant in neutral version required the most bone removal, resulted in the lowest percentage of back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to the most bone volume. The wedged implant removed less bone, had a significantly greater percentage of the back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to significantly less bone volume. CONCLUSIONS: The wedged glenoid implants appear to have various advantages over the standard implant for the correction of retroversion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling.

Effect of femoral anteversion on clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy of patients with femoral retroversion, normal femoral version, and excessive femoral anteversion. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy from August 2008 to April 2011 and underwent femoral anteversion measurement by magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance arthrogram were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups: retroversion, normal version, and excessive anteversion. The normal-version group was considered to have a value within 1 SD of the mean femoral version value. Four patient-reported outcome scores and the visual analog pain score were prospectively collected with analysis performed retrospectively. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Among these patients, mean anteversion was 8.2° ± 9.3°, creating a retroversion group defined as -2° or less and an anteversion group defined as 18° or greater. There were 25 patients in the retroversion group, 219 in the normal-version group, and 34 in the excessive-anteversion group. Most labral tears were noted in the 12- to 2-o'clock range, with the main difference at the anterior 3-o'clock position, where the excessive-anteversion group showed a lower incidence of tearing (30%) than the retroversion group (73%) and normal-anteversion group (78%). Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant improvement from preoperative scores in all 3 groups and for all scores (P < .001). When the postoperative scores were compared for the 3 groups, although all scores were higher in the retroversion group than in the other 2 groups, this was not statistically significant and there were no significant differences in scores among the 3 groups (modified Harris Hip Score, P = .104; Non-Arthritic Hip Score, P = .177; Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, P = .152; Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale, P = .276; visual analog scale score, P = .508). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of patient-reported outcome scores without accounting for diagnoses and treatments, the amount of femoral anteversion does not appear to affect the clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Guidelines for the selection of optimal glenoid augment size for moderate to severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty is technically demanding in regard to implantation of the glenoid component, especially in the setting of increased glenoid deformity and posterior glenoid wear. Augmented glenoid implants are an important and innovative option; however, there is little evidence accessible to surgeons to guide in the selection of the appropriate size augmented glenoid. METHODS: Solid computer models of commercially available augmented glenoid components (+3, +5, +7) contained within the software allowed placement of the best fit glenoid component within the three-dimensional reconstruct of each patient's scapula. Peg perforation, amount of bone reamed, and amount of medialization were recorded for each augment size. RESULTS: There was strong correlation between the medialization of the joint line and the glenoid retroversion for each augmented component at neutral correction and correction to 6° of retroversion. At neutral, the range of retroversion that restored the anatomic joint line was -3° to -17° with use of the +3 augmented glenoid, -5° to -24° with the +5 augmented glenoid, and -9° to -31° with the +7 augmented glenoid. At 6° of retroversion, the range of retroversion that restored the anatomic joint line was -4° to -21° with use of the +3 augmented glenoid, -7° to -27° with the +5 augmented glenoid, and -9° to -34° with the +7 augmented glenoid. CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong correlation between glenoid retroversion and medialization for all augment sizes, supporting the recommendation for glenoid retroversion as the primary guide in selecting the amount of augmentation.

Correction of acquired glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component.

BACKGROUND: The magnitude and anatomic consequences of pathologic acquired glenoid retroversion and posterior bone loss that can be surgically corrected with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component have not been studied extensively in a surgical patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, acquired posterior bone loss, and increased retroversion were studied by use of a three-dimensional computer surgical simulation. For each case, amount of medialization was measured as the linear distance from the lateral aspect of the glenoid vault model to the center of the articular implant surface. Simulation of implant placement at 0° or 6° was performed with use of a standard glenoid having a uniform thickness and an asymmetric thickness augmented component. RESULTS: An increased amount of medialization was seen with the standard glenoid, 8.3 ± 4.1 mm, compared with 3.8 ± 3.3 mm with use of the augmented glenoid implant (P < .001). When glenoid retroversion was corrected to 0°, pathologic version was shown to have strong and significant relationship to the amount of medialization for both the standard (R(2) = 0.825) and augmented (R(2) = -0.68) glenoid implant. There was an increased ability to correct greater amounts of pathologic version with less medialization by use of an augmented step glenoid compared with a standard anchor peg glenoid. DISCUSSION: Correction of moderate to severe glenoid retroversion by asymmetric reaming cannot always be done with use of a standard component, and if it is done, it will result in greater medialization of the joint line. Use of an augmented component can allow complete correction of retroversion and minimize the effect of medialization.