Characterizing high-burden rosacea subjects: a multivariate risk factor analysis from a global survey.

Objective: To characterize rosacea features suitable for identification of high-burden (HB) subjects in clinical practice.Design: Global online survey with subjects recruited using an online panel from the United States, Canada, Italy, United Kingdom, Germany and France. Subjects self-reported a physician's diagnosis of rosacea.Measurements: HB subjects were defined as those with ≥3/4 domains (quality of life, lifestyle adaptation, time trade-off, willingness to pay) greater than the median. Group characteristics were analyzed and multivariate-logistic modeling used to investigate factors most associated with HB.Results: 710 subjects completed the survey, including 158 HB subjects. HB was observed in all self-declared rosacea severities. HB subjects were more likely to spend more time daily on skin care and experienced approximately double the impact of health problems on work productivity in the past 7 days (p < .01). In the past 12 months, HB subjects were more likely to have at least one visit to the emergency room (41.8% vs 11.2%; p < .01). In the multivariate risk analysis, factors most associated with HB included rosacea severity, impact of health problems on regular daily activities and age at first symptoms.Conclusion: Rosacea has a distinct subset of HB subjects who can be successfully characterized.

The mental health burden in acne vulgaris and rosacea: an analysis of the US National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the mental health (MH) hospitalization among patients with acne and rosacea. AIMS: To determine the MH disorders and cost burden associated with acne and rosacea. METHODS: Data were examined from the 2002-2012 US National Inpatient Sample, comprising a sample of ~20% of all US paediatric and adult hospitalizations (n = 87 053 155 admissions). RESULTS: A diagnosis of ≥ 1 MH disorder was much more common among all inpatients with vs. those without a diagnosis of acne (43.7% vs. 20.0%, respectively) and rosacea (35.1% vs. 20.0%, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression models controlling for sex, age, race/ethnicity and insurance status, acne (adjusted OR = 13.02; 95% CI 11.75-14.42) and rosacea (adjusted OR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.56-1.95) were associated with significantly higher odds of a primary admission for an MH disorder (13 and 8, respectively, of 15 MH disorders examined). Both acne and rosacea were associated with higher risk of mood, anxiety, impulse control and personality disorders, and with > $2 million of excess mean annual costs of hospitalization for MH disorders in the USA. CONCLUSION: In this study, inpatients with acne or rosacea had increased odds of comorbid MH disorders. In particular, there was an increased number of hospital admissions secondary to a primary MH disorder with coexistent acne/rosacea. MH comorbidities were associated with considerable excess costs among inpatients with acne or rosacea.

Fifteen Minute Test May Save 15% or More on Rosacea Treatment.

Rosacea is a common inflammatory skin condition that impacts a large portion of fair-skinned populations. The redness associated with rosacea can be a significant challenge. Brimonidine sulfate and oxymetazoline HCL were both recently approved by the FDA for the management of facial redness. These agents, however, are costly, and not all patients respond to the medication. Herein, we describe a clinical pearl that helps to optimize patient selection for the medications. This saves the patient and the health care system both time and money. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(5):692-693.

Psychosocial Burden and Other Impacts of Rosacea on Patients' Quality of Life.

Rosacea is a common and chronic skin disorder with substantial impact on a patients' quality of life. Its varying phenotypic features and facial localization can adversely affect the mental health and socialization of those affected. Although there are no curative interventions, certain therapies have greater effect in improving patient quality of life. This article summarizes the associated psychosocial implications of rosacea. Several skin disease and rosacea-specific quality-of-life measures and their application in clinical care and research studies are also summarized. The recognition and management of the psychosocial impact of rosacea is critical to improving patient outcomes.

Patient Costs Associated with Rosacea.

The recalcitrance of rosacea to many treatment options may prompt patients to spend exorbitant amounts of money on unsubstantiated treatment regimens in an effort to achieve relief. The authors examine the relationship between disease severity and treatment cost across several demographic and socioeconomic strata. Familiarization of evidence-based clinical recommendations and consensus guidelines may equip physicians to educate patients about the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment options to assist patients in making cost-conscious decisions in the management of their rosacea.

Role of Topical Oxymetazoline for Management of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea.

OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize topical oxymetazoline's pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, cost, and place in therapy for persistent redness associated with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. DATA SOURCES: Literature searches of MEDLINE (1975 to September 2017), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1975 to September 2017), and Cochrane Database (publications through September 2017) using the terms rosacea, persistent redness, α -agonist, and oxymetazoline. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Results were limited to studies of human subjects, English-language publications, and topical use of oxymetazoline. Relevant materials from government sources, industry, and reviews were also included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data support the efficacy of oxymetazoline for persistent facial redness. Little study beyond clinical trials cited in the drug approval process has been conducted. Current data suggest that oxymetazoline is similar in safety and efficacy to brimonidine. Head-to-head comparisons of topical α-agonists for erythema caused by rosacea are needed. CONCLUSION: The topical α-agonist, oxymetazoline, is safe and effective for reducing persistent facial redness associated with erythematotelangiectatic subtype of rosacea. Health care practitioners selecting among treatments should consider not only the subtype of rosacea but also individual patient response, preference, and cost.

Cost of diagnosing psoriasis and rosacea for dermatologists versus primary care physicians.

Growing incentives to control health care costs may cause accountable care organizations (ACOs) to reconsider how skin disease is best managed. Limited data have suggested that disease management by a primary care physician (PCP) may be less costly than seeing a specialist, though it is not clear if the same is true for the management of skin disease. This study assessed the cost of seeing a dermatologist versus a PCP for diagnosis of psoriasis and rosacea.

Cost-Effectiveness of Ivermectin 1% Cream in Adults with Papulopustular Rosacea in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rosacea is a chronic skin disease involving central facial erythema in combination with papules and pustules. Papulopustular rosacea is treated with topical, systemic, or a combination of topical and systemic therapies. Currently approved topical therapies include azelaic acid gel/cream/foam twice daily (BID) and metronidazole cream/gel/lotion BID. Ivermectin 1% cream once daily (QD) is a new topical agent for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea that has been approved for the management of inflammatory lesions of rosacea and offers an alternative to current treatments. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ivermectin 1% cream QD compared with current topical treatments in order to understand the cost of adding ivermectin as a treatment option that would bring additional clinical benefit for adults with papulopustular rosacea in the United States. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of ivermectin 1% cream QD was compared with metronidazole 0.75% cream BID and azelaic acid 15% gel BID for adults in the United States with moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea using a Markov cohort state transition structure with 2 mutually exclusive health states (rosacea and no rosacea) and 5 phases. Patients could succeed or fail to respond to treatment and experience a relapse after treatment success. The model took a health care payer perspective (direct medical costs of topical and/or systemic therapy plus health care costs for physician and specialist visits) and used a 3-year time horizon. The model was run for a cohort of 1,000 patients. Costs (2014 U.S. dollars) and benefits (disease-free days and quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were discounted at a rate of 3% per annum. Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and measured in terms of incremental cost per QALY gained (estimated from health state utilities for patients with and without rosacea). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to assess the robustness of model outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with metronidazole 0.75% cream BID, ivermectin 1% cream QD was associated with higher costs but provided greater clinical benefit, with an ICER of $13,211 per QALY gained. For a cohort of 1,000 patients, ivermectin 1% cream QD provided an additional 72,922 disease-free days (200 years) over a 3-year period compared with metronidazole 0.75% cream BID, leading to a lower cost per disease-free day for ivermectin 1% cream QD ($4.54) compared with metronidazole 0.75% cream BID ($4.85). Ivermectin 1% cream QD was associated with lower total costs and greater clinical benefit compared with azelaic acid 15% gel BID at year 3 and dominated this treatment. After 3 years, ivermectin 1% cream QD was associated with the lowest health care costs ($62,767 compared with $73,284 for metronidazole 0.75% cream BID and $77,208 for azelaic acid 15% gel BID), reflecting a 15% reduction in physician visit costs, when compared with metronidazole 0.75% cream BID, and almost a 20% reduction, when compared with azelaic acid 15% gel BID. The univariate sensitivity analyses indicated that the results are sensitive to the time horizon selected: the longer the time horizon, the more beneficial the results for ivermectin 1% cream QD relative to the comparators, although even at 1 year, ivermectin 1% cream QD dominated azelaic acid 15% gel BID. The PSA suggested that ivermectin 1% cream QD was the most likely treatment to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $15,000 and above. CONCLUSIONS: Ivermectin 1% cream QD had favorable incremental cost-effectiveness when compared with metronidazole 0.75% cream BID and dominated azelaic acid 15% gel BID in the treatment of papulopustular rosacea in the United States. Therefore, ivermectin 1% cream QD may be a good first-line treatment for papulopustular rosacea, providing additional clinical benefit at no or low additional cost. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Galderma Laboratories. The sponsor was involved in the design of the model structure but not in the collection of the data used to populate the model. Manuscript preparation was also funded by Galderma. Taieb is an investigator and advisor for Galderma. Gold is an investigator for Galderma. Feldman is a consultant and speaker for Galderma and has received grants from Galderma. Dansk and Bertranou received a research grant from Galderma to conduct this study. Dansk and Bertranou contributed to the design of the model structure, the sourcing and inputting of the data, and the interpretation of the results. Taieb, Feldman, and Gold contributed to the interpretation of the results. All authors reviewed draft versions of the manuscript and gave permission for the submission of the final version.

The psychological impact of rosacea and the influence of current management options.

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a common problem that is underdiagnosed; if left untreated can result in physical disfigurement and emotional distress. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the current literature to determine the degree of psychosocial impact of rosacea and the importance of treatment. We also reviewed the current treatment options. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and psycINFO databases from 1946 to present was performed to identify previous articles regarding the psychosocial and quality-of-life (QoL) impact of rosacea. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were found that focused on the following areas: impact of disease on QoL, improvement of QoL with treatment, and willingness to pay. LIMITATIONS: Reviewed articles used different measurement systems to quantify impact on QoL making comparisons between studies difficult to interpret. CONCLUSION: Patients with rosacea have higher incidences of embarrassment, social anxiety, depression, and decreased QoL compared with the rest of the population. Adequate treatment of symptoms results in improvement of QoL in patients with rosacea. New options that target the facial erythema of rosacea may help mitigate the negative psychological impact of rosacea.

The quality of life impact of acne and rosacea compared to other major medical conditions.

BACKGROUND: Acne and rosacea cause significant negative impact on quality of life. There is limited information comparing the health-related quality of life (HRQL) impact associated with acne and rosacea to other patient populations. PURPOSE: We review available literature to assess the HRQL impact of acne and rosacea and compare them with major medical conditions. METHODS: A PubMed search identified studies that utilized the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and the willingness-to-pay (WTP) metric to assess the HRQL impact of acne and rosacea. These data were compared to HRQL values for other diseases. RESULTS: The HRQL impact of acne is similar to asthma, epilepsy, diabetes, back pain, arthritis, and coronary heart disease using SF-36 data. DLQI scores for acne ranged from 2 to 17.7 and for rosacea ranged from 4.3 to 17.3; the DLQI scores for psoriasis ranged from 1.7 to 18.2. WTP data identified ranged widely for both acne and rosacea. LIMITATIONS: There was limited broadly generalizable data for acne and rosacea. CONCLUSIONS: Acne and rosacea impact HRQL to a similar degree as other major medical conditions by indirect comparison to psoriasis, a skin condition causing significant disability, and by direct comparison for acne. In the setting of limited health care resources, allocation should be grounded in the evidence that acne and rosacea are not trivial in their effects.

Willingness to pay and quality of life in patients with rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis affecting >2% of the population. Willingness to pay (WTP) is a well established method which reflects the individual burden of disease. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of WTP and quality of life (QoL) in patients with rosacea. METHODS: Nationwide postal survey on adult patients with rosacea affiliated with the German rosacea patient advocacy group. WTP was evaluated by three standardized items and compared to historical data on vitiligo (n = 1023). QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). RESULTS: Data from n = 475 rosacea patients (79.9% women, mean age 56.3, range 26-90) were analysed. On average, patients were willing to pay € 2880 (median € 500) for complete healing compared with € 7360 (median € 3000) in vitiligo. Relative WTP was higher in women; the highest sums were registered for the age group 21-30 years. The extent of facial involvement predicted a higher relative WTP, whereas WTP decreased with the duration of symptoms and age. Mean DLQI total score was 4.3 compared to 7.0 in vitiligo. In rosacea, the highest values were observed in patients <30 years. Severe QoL reductions (DLQI>10) were less frequent (11%) than in vitiligo (24.6%). The correlation between WTP and DLQI was significant (e.g. r = 0.249, P = 0.000 for relative WTP). CONCLUSION: Rosacea patients show a moderate WTP and average QoL reduction is mild. WTP proved to be a valid tool to assess patients' burden of disease. Patient education and the development of effective treatment options might still improve patients' satisfaction.

The cost-effectiveness of rosacea treatments.

BACKGROUND: Topical and oral antibiotic/anti-inflammatory agents are mainstays of therapy for rosacea. However, costs and efficacies of these therapies vary widely. OBJECTIVE: To determine relative cost-effectiveness of common therapeutic regimens using published data. METHODS: Average daily costs (ADC) were determined based on treatment frequency and estimated gram usage for facial application of topical regimens of metronidazole (0.75%, 1%), azelaic acid (15%, 20%), sodium sulfacetamide and sulfur 10%/5%, and oral regimens of tetracycline, doxycycline, and isotretinoin. The ADC was compared with published efficacy rates from clinical trials, with efforts to standardize outcome measures. Based on these efficacy rates, costs per success were calculated and combined with office visit costs to estimate the total cost for each treatment for a 15-week period. RESULTS: The medication cost per treatment success of topical regimens ranged from $60.90 ($205.40, total, including office visits) for metronidazole 1% gel once daily, to $152.25 ($296.75, total) for azelaic acid 20% cream twice daily. Tetracycline 250 mg/day was the least costly oral agent at $6.30 per treatment success, or $150.80 total. CONCLUSION: Based on our best assessments of retrospective data from the literature, metronidazole 1% gel, once daily, was considerably less costly than several other branded and generic alternatives.

Healthcare utilization and costs of patients with rosacea in an insured population.

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a chronic, relapsing dermatologic condition that affects an estimated 14 million people in the U.S. However, there is little data in the literature on the healthcare utilization and costs of patients with rosacea in insured populations. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, cohort study used the MarketScan databases to identify a rosacea cohort of patients with medical and prescription drug claims between 2002 and 2005. Inclusion criteria were (1) age 30 years and older, (2) at least one medical claim with a primary or secondary diagnosis of rosacea (ICD-9-CM 695.3), (3) at least one pharmacy claim for a rosacea topical or systemic prescription drug, (4) a 6-month clean period prior to index drug and 12 months continuous enrollment after the index drug. Propensity score matching was used to match the rosacea cohort to a control group of patients without rosacea. Disease severity during the 6-month preperiod was assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Chronic Disease Score (CDS), and the Elixhauser Index (EI). Healthcare utilization rates and costs were determined by the type of care for the 12-month postperiod. Costs were calculated for the 12-month post-period and adjusted to reflect 2005 costs. Healthcare utilization rates and costs were reported for inpatient hospital admissions, physician office visits, emergency room visits, other outpatient services, and outpatient pharmacy prescriptions. Both total healthcare and rosacea-related rates and costs were reported. RESULTS: There were no rosacea-related inpatient admissions and very few emergency department visits. More rosacea patients had a specialist visit than a primary care physician visit. The average number of rosacea-related prescriptions, for all patients, was 3.4 (SD 2.7) per year. Total annual healthcare expenditures for the rosacea patient cohort were $735 more than for the matched controls ($6,458 vs. $5,723). Of the total healthcare costs, annual rosacea-related expenditures were $276; approximately 70% of rosacea-related expenditures were due to prescription drugs. Topical drugs were the index drugs for 77% of rosacea patients with branded metronidazole, which is the most common topical drug. Of the 23% of rosacea patients with an oral index drug, generic antibiotic dosage forms of tetracyclines were the most common oral index drug therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first extensive study of rosacea and its impact on healthcare utilization and costs in an insured population. Although rosacea is a common illness that does not have much financial impact on its sufferers, rosacea patients incurred slightly higher direct total healthcare costs than matched controls.

Prescription refills and healthcare costs associated with topical metronidazole in Medicaid enrolled patients with rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Refill adherence to medications and healthcare costs are important factors to consider while making informed decisions regarding the treatment of rosacea patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine predictors of number of refills related to topical metronidazole and total healthcare costs in rosacea patients. METHODS: This study utilized a longitudinal cohort design and followed rosacea patients enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid and who were prescribed at least one study medication (topical metronidazole, adapalene, azelaic acid, permethrin, and sulfacetamide). Patients' demographic characteristics, number of metronidazole refills, and different components of healthcare costs were examined. RESULTS: Out of the total 2587 rosacea patients, the majority (approximately 69%, n=1771) had one or more prescriptions for topical metronidazole. Most of the patients in this study were white (73%). After controlling for other variables, increasing age was associated with a higher number of metronidazole refills and healthcare costs (both p<0.001). Compared with white patients, African American patients had a significantly lower number of metronidazole refills (p<0.001). Compared with white patients, African American patients and 'other' races were associated with an 8.6% and 10.3% decrease in total healthcare costs respectively (both p<0.001). An increase in the number of metronidazole refills was not associated with an increase in healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: Patients' race is significantly associated with the number of topical metronidazole refills. Patients' healthcare costs increased with increasing age and charges paid for prescriptions. Topical metronidazole seems to be an economically feasible treatment option for Medicaid-enrolled patients with rosacea.