Contemporary Trends in Cardiac Surgical Care for Trisomy 13 and 18 Patients Admitted to Hospitals in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of cardiac surgery and the clinical and demographic features that influence surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of congenital heart disease (CHD) in patients with trisomy 13 (T13) and trisomy 18 (T18) in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed using the Pediatric Health Information System. All hospital admissions of children (<18 years of age) with T13 and T18 in the United States were identified from 2003 through 2022. International Classifications of Disease (ICD) codes were used to identify presence of CHD, extracardiac comorbidities/malformations, and performance of cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Seven thousand one hundred thirteen patients were identified. CHD was present in 62% (1625/2610) of patients with T13 and 73% (3288/4503) of patients with T18. The most common CHD morphologies were isolated atrial/ventricular septal defects (T13 40%, T18 42%) and aortic hypoplasia/coarctation (T13 21%, T18 23%). Single-ventricle morphologies comprised 6% (100/1625) of the T13 and 5% (167/3288) of the T18 CHD cohorts. Surgery was performed in 12% of patients with T13 plus CHD and 17% of patients with T18 plus CHD. For all cardiac diagnoses, <50% of patients received surgery. Nonsurgical patients were more likely to be born prematurely (P < .05 for T13 and T18). The number of extracardiac comorbidities was similar between surgical/nonsurgical patients with T13 (median 2 vs 2, P = .215) and greater in surgical vs nonsurgical patients with T18 (median 3 vs 2, P < .001). Hospital mortality was <10% for both surgical cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T13 or T18 and CHD receive surgical palliation, but at a low prevalence (≤17%) nationally. Given operative mortality <10%, opportunity exists perhaps for quality improvement in the performance of cardiac surgery for these vulnerable patient populations.

Otolaryngologic Manifestations of Trisomy 13 and Trisomy 18 in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The survival rate of patients with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 has increased dramatically over the past two decades. We sought to comprehensively describe the otolaryngologic clinical characteristics and procedures required for these patients at our institution. METHODS: We performed algorithmic identification of patients with a diagnosis of trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 for whom the otolaryngology service provided inpatient or outpatient care at our institution between the dates of February 1997 and March 2021. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients studied, 18 patients had a diagnosis of trisomy 13, and 29 had a diagnosis of trisomy 18. Complete trisomy was present in 44% (8/18) of trisomy 13 patients and 55% (16/29) of trisomy 18 patients. 81% of patients were living at the time of the study. About 94% (44/47) of patients required consultation with another specialty in addition to Otolaryngology. Overall, the most common diagnoses among this cohort were gastroesophageal reflux disease (47%), dysphagia (40%), otitis media (38%), and obstructive sleep apnea (34%). Nearly three-quarters (74%) of patients studied required an otolaryngologic procedure. The most common surgical procedure was tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. Patients with trisomy 18 were significantly more likely to have external auditory canal stenosis and obstructive sleep apnea whereas patients with trisomy 13 were more likely to have cleft lip and palate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18 often require multidisciplinary management and the range of required care spans the breadth of otolaryngology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:1501-1506, 2023.

Trisomy 18: disparities of care and outcomes in the State of Texas between 2009 and 2019.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a statewide characteristics and outcomes analysis of the Trisomy 18 (T18) population and explore the potential impact of associated congenital heart disease (CHD) and congenital heart surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File between 2009 and 2019, analysing discharges of patients with T18 identified using ICD-9/10 codes. Discharges were linked to analyse patients. Demographic characteristics and available outcomes were evaluated. The population was divided into groups for comparison: patients with no documentation of CHD (T18NoCHD), patients with CHD without congenital heart surgery (T18CHD), and patients who underwent congenital heart surgery (T18CHS). RESULTS: One thousand one hundred fifty-six eligible patients were identified: 443 (38%) T18NoCHD, 669 (58%) T18CHD, and 44 (4%) T18CHS. T18CHS had a lower proportion of Hispanic patients (n = 9 (20.45%)) compared to T18CHD (n = 315 (47.09%)), and T18NoCHD (n = 219 (49.44%)) (p < 0.001 for both). Patients with Medicare/Medicaid insurance had a 0.42 odds ratio (95%CI: 0.20-0.86, p = 0.020) of undergoing congenital heart surgery compared to private insurance. T18CHS had a higher median total days in-hospital (47.5 [IQR: 12.25-113.25] vs. 9 [IQR: 3-24] and 2 [IQR: 1-5], p < 0.001); and a higher median number of admissions (n = 2 [IQR: 1-4]) vs. 1 [IQR: 1-2] and 1 [IQR: 1-1], (p < 0.001 for both). However, the post-operative median number of admissions for T18CHS was 0 [IQR: 0-2]. After the first month of life, T18CHS had freedom from in-hospital mortality similar to T18NoCHD and superior to T18CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes for T18CHS patients are encouraging, suggesting a freedom from in-hospital mortality that resembles the T18NoCHD. The highlighted socio-economic differences between the groups warrant further investigation. Development of a prospective registry for T18 patients should be a priority for better understanding of longer-term outcomes.

Trisomy 18 Trends over the Last 20 Years.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trends in hospitalizations for children with trisomy 18 over time and to determine the rate of invasive procedures on these children, using a large inpatient database. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis using the Kids' Inpatient Database from 1997 to 2016 was performed for trisomy 18. We evaluated survival to discharge as well as the presence of pulmonary, skeletal, neurologic, gastrointestinal, renal, and hematologic/bleeding problems. We also searched for the following interventions, if performed: gastrostomy tube placement, tracheostomy, or cardiac procedure. RESULTS: Over this period 10 151 admissions occurred in children with a diagnosis of trisomy 18. Between 1997 and 2016, the number of children admitted annually with trisomy 18 increased 74% from 1036 to 1798. The proportion of patients born prematurely remained stable at 14%-16% throughout the study. Gastrostomy tube placement increased 12-fold during the study period, tracheostomy increased 11-fold, and cardiac intervention increased 5-fold. The overall mortality rate decreased in those with trisomy 18 from 32% in 1997 to 21% in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: We highlight a decreased inpatient mortality rate during the study period. The number of children undergoing interventions such as gastrostomy tube and tracheostomy increased, as did the number of children undergoing cardiac intervention. Although the number of procedures has increased with the mortality rate decreasing, it is unclear at present whether the 2 are related.

Survival Outcomes of Two-Stage Intracardiac Repair in Large Ventricular Septal Defect and Trisomy 18.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management has not been encouraged in patients with trisomy 18 (T18) and congenital heart diseases due to poor survival. This study aimed to investigate (1) the appropriateness of palliative surgeries followed by intracardiac repair (ICR) (i.e., two-stage ICR) for patients with a large ventricular septal defect (VSD) and T18, and (2) its impact on their long-term outcomes. METHODS: Medical charts of patients with VSD and T18 who underwent two-stage ICR at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between January 2005 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, timing, and types of palliative surgeries, information related to ICR, peri- and postoperative clinical information, postoperative survival, and cause of death were collected. The long-term prognosis of patients treated with two-stage ICR was compared with that of patients treated with primary ICR and palliative surgery without ICR. RESULTS: Overall, 18 (2 male, 16 female) patients underwent two-stage ICR. Pulmonary artery banding was the initial palliative surgery in all patients after a median duration of 19.5 (range 6-194) days of life. The median age and the mean body weight at the time of ICR were 18.2 (7.6-50.7) months and 6.0 ± 1.0 kg, respectively. The mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance index before ICR were 19.1 ± 7.3 mmHg and 3.4 ± 2.0 U m2, respectively. Overall, 17/18 (94%) patients were discharged after ICR. Fourteen (78%) patients were alive during data collection. None of the patients died of cardiac insufficiency, and the median duration of survival was 46.3 (14.3-186.4) months since birth. Most patients required cardiac medications rather than pulmonary vasodilators at the last follow-up. During the study period, three patients underwent primary ICR, and 46 underwent palliative surgery without ICR. Of those who underwent primary ICR, two died in the hospital on the first and 48th day following ICR, and the third died 179 days after the ICR. The Log-rank test revealed a significantly longer survival for the patients treated with two-stage ICR compared with those treated with palliative surgery without ICR (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Two-stage ICR improves the long-term survival of patients with VSDs and T18. This safe surgical strategy can also prevent pulmonary hypertension in such patients.

A validated model for prediction of survival to 6 months in patients with trisomy 13 and 18.

Congenital heart disease is exceedingly prevalent in trisomy 13 and 18. Improved survival following congenital heart surgery has been reported, however, mortality remains significantly elevated. Utilizing inpatient data on trisomy 13 and 18 from the 2003-2016 Pediatric Health Information System database, a survival model was developed and validated using data from the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative and the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. The study cohort included 1,761 infants with trisomy 13 and 18. Two models predicting survival to 6 months of age were developed and tested. The initial model performed excellently, with a c-statistic of 0.87 and a c-statistic of 0.76 in the validation cohort. After excluding procedures performed on the day of death, the revised model's c-statistic was 0.76. Certain variables, including cardiac surgery, gastrostomy, parenteral nutrition, and mechanical ventilation, are predictive of survival to 6 months of age. This study presents a model, which potentially can inform decision-making regarding congenital heart surgery.

To operate or not to operate? Assessing NSQIP surgical outcomes in trisomy 18 patients.

BACKGROUND: Trisomy 18 is associated with a wide range of potentially fatal congenital conditions. Historically, clinical attitudes on treatment have been ambiguous, with palliative care as the standard of care. The aim of our study was to provide a descriptive analysis of surgical outcomes in patients with trisomy 18. STUDY DESIGN: We identified patients with trisomy 18 aged 0-18 years using the NSQIP-Pediatric database from 2012 to 2017 and analyzed demographics, surgery types, and perioperative characteristics of patients with trisomy 18 patients undergoing surgical intervention. Additionally, a case-match analysis was performed to assess surgical outcome differences. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients with trisomy 18 were identified. Thirty-one percent were >5 years of age and 73% were female. The most common surgical types were general surgery procedures (57.4%), followed by orthopedics (18.1%) and ENT (10.3%). Operations performed increased from 8% (2012) to 26% (2017), and only 23% of patients had previous cardiac surgery. Majority of patients had no prior history of malignancy (95%) and 5% had a tracheostomy placed. Discharge to home was achieved in 74% of patients, with a median total hospital length of stay of 5 days (IQR 17). Furthermore, 90% survived over 30 days from the operation. Thirty-two patients had readmissions and the most common reasons were dehydration, gastrostomy infection or malfunction. Surgical site infections occurred in <3% of patients. No differences in complications, length of stay, reoperations, and readmissions were identified by case-match analysis. CONCLUSION: In this data set, patients with trisomy 18 undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures experience excellent surgical outcomes with minimal morbidity and low mortality. Most patients more than a year of age will experience similar outcomes to patients without trisomy 18. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study (retrospective comparative study) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Disagreement About Surgical Intervention in Trisomy 18.

In this case, we explore physician conflict with performing surgery (tracheostomy) for long-term ventilation in a term infant with trisomy 18 and respiratory failure. Experts in neonatal-perinatal medicine, pediatric bioethics, and pediatric palliative care have provided comments on this case. An additional commentary was written by the parent of another infant with trisomy 18, who is also a medical provider (physical therapist).

Cardiac Surgery in Trisomy 13 and 18: A Guide to Clinical Decision-Making.

There has been substantial controversy regarding treatment of congenital heart defects in infants with trisomies 13 and 18. Most reports have focused on surgical outcomes versus expectant treatment, and rarely there has been an effort to consolidate existing evidence into a more coherent way to help clinicians with decision-making and counseling families. An extensive review of the existing literature on cardiac surgery in patients with these trisomies was conducted from 2004 to 2020. The effects of preoperative and perioperative factors on in-hospital and long-term mortality were analyzed, as well as possible predictors for postoperative chronic care needs such as tracheostomy and gastrostomy. Patients with minimal or no preoperative pulmonary hypertension and mechanical ventilation undergoing corrective surgery at a weight greater than 2.5 kg suffer from lower postoperative mortality. Infants with lower-complexity cardiac defects are likely to benefit the most from surgery, although their expected mortality is higher than that of infants without trisomy. Omphalocele confers an increased mortality risk regardless of cardiac surgery. Gastrointestinal comorbidities increased the risk of gastrostomy tube placement, while those with prolonged mechanical ventilation and respiratory comorbidities are more likely to require tracheostomy. Cardiac surgery is feasible in children with trisomies 13 and 18 and can provide improved long-term results. However, this is a clinically complex population, and both physicians and caretakers should be aware of the long-term challenges these patients face following surgery when discussing treatment options.

Mixed method study of quality of life for children with trisomy 18 and 13 after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiac surgical interventions for children with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 remain controversial, despite growing evidence that definitive cardiac repair prolongs survival. Understanding quality of life for survivors and their families therefore becomes crucial. Study objective was to generate a descriptive summary of parental perspectives on quality of life, family impact, functional status, and hopes for children with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 who have undergone heart surgery. METHODS: A concurrent mixed method approach utilising PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Parent Report for Toddlers or the PedsQL™ Infant Scale, PedsQL™ 2.0 Family Impact Module, Functional Status Scale, quality of life visual analogue scale, and narrative responses for 10 children whose families travelled out of state to access cardiac surgery denied to them in their home state due to genetic diagnoses. RESULTS: Parents rated their child's quality of life as 80/100, and their own quality of life as 78/100 using validated scales. Functional status was rated 11 by parents and 11.6 by providers (correlation 0.89). On quality of life visual analogue scale, all parents rated their child's quality of life as "high" with mean response 92.7/100. Parental hopes were informed by realistic perspective on prognosis while striving to ensure their children had access to reaching their full potential. Qualitative analysis revealed a profound sense of the child's relationality and valued life meaning. CONCLUSION: Understanding parental motivations and perceptions on the child's quality of life has potential to inform care teams in considering cardiac interventions for children with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13.

Factors related to survival discharge in trisomy 18: A retrospective multicenter study.

Infants with trisomy 18 (T18) previously had a poor prognosis; however, the intensive care of these patients has markedly diversified the prognosis. We investigated the current situation of patients with T18, clarified factors for survival discharge, and surveyed actual home healthcare. A total of 117 patients with T18 admitted to nine institutions between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively investigated. After excluding four patients whose outcomes were unclear, we divided 113 patients into two groups-the survival discharge group (n = 52) and the death discharge group (n = 61)-and compared maternal factors, perinatal factors, neonatal factors, and therapeutic factors between the groups. In addition, home healthcare, readmission, utilization of respite care and home nursing, and cause of death among the survival group were surveyed. Fifty-two (44%) patients with T18 survived at discharge and their 1-year survival rate was 29%. The survival group had a longer gestation period, larger physique, and longer survival time, compared to the death group. Independent factors associated with survival discharge were the absence of an extremely low birthweight infant (ELBWI), the absence of esophageal atresia and patent ductus arteriosus, and cardiovascular surgery. All surviving patients required some home healthcare. The most frequent cause of death was a respiratory disorder. We recommend discussing the treatment strategy with families in the presence of neonatologists or pediatric surgeons, who can explain differences in prognosis, based on the gestation period, birthweight, severity of cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular surgery.

Infant With Trisomy 18 and Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome.

We present a case in which a fetal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease and trisomy 18 led to a series of decisions for an infant who was critically ill. The parents wanted everything done. The surgeons believed that surgery would be futile. The parents publicized the case on social media, which led to publicity and pressure on the hospital. The case reveals the intersection of parental values, clinical judgments, ethics consultation, insurance company decisions about reimbursement, and social media publicity. Together, these factors complicate the already delicate ethical deliberations and decisions.

Surgical and anesthetic management for hepatectomy in two pediatric patients with trisomy 18, pulmonary hypertension, and hepatoblastoma.

Children with trisomy 18 are surviving longer and undergoing more aggressive life-sustaining therapy. This report describes two patients with trisomy 18 and hepatoblastoma (HB) successfully resected in the setting of significant pulmonary hypertension. Forty-four previously published cases of the association between HB and trisomy 18 are reviewed. With careful multidisciplinary preoperative planning, successful resection of HB in children with trisomy 18 who have significant pulmonary hypertension is feasible. Because HB and trisomy 18 are increasing in prevalence, the need for timely liver tumor resection in the setting of pulmonary hypertension will be more common.

Mortality and Resource Use Following Cardiac Interventions in Children with Trisomy 13 and Trisomy 18 and Congenital Heart Disease.

We sought to evaluate the mortality, risk factors for mortality, and resource utilization following cardiac interventions in trisomy 13 (T13) and 18 (T18) children. All T13 and T18 children who underwent a cardiac intervention from January 1999 to March 2015 were identified from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Data collected included demographics, type of congenital heart disease (CHD), cardiac interventions, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, and deaths (within 30 days). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with mortality. There were 49 (47% females) T13 and 140 (67% females) T18 subjects. The two cohorts were similar in distribution for race, geographic region, insurance type, and median household income. The most common CHD in both groups was a shunt lesion followed by conotruncal defects. Compared to T18, the T13 cohort had higher mortality (29% vs. 12%), tracheostomies (12% vs. 4%), gastrostomies (18% vs. 6%), and overall resource use (P < 0.05 for all). White race (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.81) in T13 and older age (in weeks) at surgery in T18 (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.86) were associated with lower mortality. A select group of T13 and T18 CHD patients can undergo successful cardiac interventions, albeit with a higher mortality and resource use. T13 patients have higher mortality and resource use compared to T18. In T13 and T18 patients, interventions for CHD may be an acceptable and ethical option following a careful individualized selection and counseling by a team of experts.

Congenital Heart Surgical Admissions in Patients with Trisomy 13 and 18: Frequency, Morbidity, and Mortality.

Congenital heart defects are common among patients with trisomy 13 and 18; surgical repair has been controversial and rarely studied. We aimed to assess the frequency of cardiac surgery among admissions with trisomy 13 and 18, and evaluate their associations with resource use, complications, and mortality compared to admissions without these diagnoses. We evaluated congenital heart surgery admissions of ages < 18 years in the 1997, 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009 Kids' Inpatient Database. Bivariate and multivariate analyses examined the adjusted association of trisomy 13 and 18 on resource use, complications, and inpatient death following congenital heart surgery. Among the 73,107 congenital heart surgery admissions, trisomy 13 represented 0.03% (n = 22) and trisomy 18 represented 0.08% (n = 58). Trisomy 13 and 18 admissions were longer; trisomy 13: 27 days vs. 8 days, p = 0.003; trisomy 18: 16 days vs. 8 days, p = 0.001. Hospital charges were higher for trisomy 13 and 18 admissions; trisomy 13: $160,890 vs. $87,007, p = 0.010; trisomy 18: $160,616 vs. $86,999, p < 0.001. Trisomy 18 had a higher complication rate: 52% vs. 34%, p < 0.006. For all cardiac surgery admissions, mortality was 4.5%; trisomy 13: 14% and trisomy 18: 12%. In multivariate analysis, trisomy 18 was an independent predictor of death: OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.35-12.82, p = 0.013. Patients with trisomy 13 and 18 represent 0.11% of pediatric congenital heart surgery admissions. These patients have a 2- to 3.4-fold longer hospital stay and double hospital charges. Patients with trisomy 18 have more complications and four times greater adjusted odds for inpatient death.

Eliciting Narratives to Inform Care for Infants With Trisomy 18.

: media-1vid110.1542/5804913218001PEDS-VA_2018-0321Video Abstract.

Trisomy 18 and Congenital Heart Disease: Single-Center Review of Outcomes and Parental Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: In patients with trisomy 18, congenital heart surgery is controversial due to anticipated poor patient outcome. Data are lacking regarding clinical outcomes and family opinions about care received. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with trisomy 18 and congenital heart disease from 2005 to 2017 was performed. Patients were grouped into those receiving cardiac intervention (surgery or cardiac catheterization) versus medical management. A telephone survey was used to assess completeness of family counseling provided prior to treatment selection and parental opinions on the care received. RESULTS: Seventeen infants were assessed. In the medical management group (n = 7), there were five deaths at a median age of 1.5 months (range: 1.2-4.1 months) and two survivors aged 29 and 44 months at latest follow-up. In the intervention group (n = 10), cardiac surgery was performed in nine patients at a median age of 4.3 months (0.2-23.4 months) and weight of 3.2 kg (1.5-12.2 kg); catheter intervention was performed in one patient at one week of age. At latest follow-up, seven intervention patients are alive at a median age of 50 months (5-91 months). Survey respondents (n = 12) unanimously stated that their child's quality of life was improved by their specific treatment strategy, that the experience of the parents was enhanced, and that they would choose the same treatment course again. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair may be associated with favorable early outcomes and may be judiciously offered in selected circumstances. In this limited experience, parental perceptions were positive regarding the quality of care and overall experience independent of the chosen treatment strategy or eventual outcome.

Obstetricians' views on the ethics of cardiac surgery for newborns with common aneuploidies.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether obstetricians think that cardiac surgery is ethical in babies with common aneuploidies and whether insurance companies should be required to pay for these surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was e-mailed to 2897 OB-GYNs, and 898 (31%) actively practicing obstetricians responded to the survey. Respondents were asked whether it is ethical to offer cardiac surgery for babies with heart defects diagnosed with trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Turner syndrome and whether insurance companies should be required to pay for such surgeries in cases of trisomy 18 or 13. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare responses by using an alpha level of .05. RESULTS: Most obstetricians thought that offering cardiac surgery was ethical if the baby had trisomy 21 or Turner syndrome (94%), but not trisomy 18 or 13 (75%). Most obstetricians (69%) thought that insurance companies should not be legally required to pay for cardiac surgery for the latter group. CONCLUSION: Obstetricians were more likely to think cardiac surgery was ethical if the prognosis or the outcome was good. Most respondents did not think that insurance companies should be required to subsidize the cost of cardiac surgeries for all babies with trisomy 18 or 13.

Hypoxia due to positive pressure ventilation in Edwards' syndrome: A case report.

Edwards' syndrome also known as trisomy 18 is a congenital disorder associated with cardiovascular issues including ventricular septal defect (VSD), atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent duct arteriosus (PDA). An emergency colostomy was performed on a neonate born with an imperforate anus. Pre-operative transthoracic echocardiography showed presence of VSD, a patent foramen ovale (PFO) or ASD. Even though the baby had a good general condition and optimal peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), during positive pressure ventilation, she suffered severe hypoxia (50% SpO2). The cause of the hypoxia was thought to be the right-left shunt and so during a second attempt at anaesthesia a vasopressor (noradrenaline 0.03 µg/kg/min) was infused to increase systemic vascular resistance. Thereafter, SpO2 increased to 80-90% and the surgery was completed. The baby recovered without any neurological complications. Genetic testing post-partum showed she had Edwards' syndrome.

Factors Influencing Outcomes After Cardiac Intervention in Infants with Trisomy 13 and 18.

Cardiac intervention remains controversial in patients with trisomy 13 and 18 and little is known about factors that may affect outcomes. The goal of this study was to evaluate preoperative factors and surgical approach with respect to outcomes in these patients. Patients with congenital heart disease and trisomy 13 or 18 presenting to our institution from 2004 through 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into complete intervention, palliated intervention, and non-intervention. Pre-intervention variables, timing and type of intervention, post-intervention outcomes, and survival were recorded and comparisons were made between the groups. Of 34 patients, 18 cardiac interventions were performed. Complete repair was performed in 11(61%) and palliation in 7(39%). Median age for complete repair was 9.2 vs. 1.7 months in palliated patients (p < 0.001) and palliated patients were smaller (median 2.5 vs. 5.2 kg, p < 0.001). All patients who underwent complete repair survived to discharge compared to only 57% of patients that were palliated (p = 0.04). Palliated patients had longer intubation and time to discharge (p < 0.05). Survival at last follow-up was greater in the complete repair group compared with palliated patients and non-intervention patients (72, 14, and 18%, p = 0.009) with a longer median length of survival in the complete repair group (p = 0.002). In our group of trisomy 13 and 18 patients, those able to undergo complete repair had improved outcomes. Patients undergoing complete repair were older and bigger; this suggests that delaying intervention and optimizing the likelihood of complete repair may be beneficial.