GnRH agonist-only trigger, compared to dual trigger, reduces oocyte retrieval rate in high responders without affecting cumulative live birth rate.

Introduction: This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Materials and methods: A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR. Results: We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group. Conclusion: GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonist-only trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day.

Optimized personalized management approach for moderate/severe OHSS: development and prospective validation of an OHSS risk assessment index.

STUDY QUESTION: Can a simplified ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk assessment index be developed and validated with sufficient discrimination of moderate/severe OHSS from those without OHSS? SUMMARY ANSWER: This easy-to-use OHSS risk assessment index shows good discriminative power and high calibration accuracy in internal and external validation cohorts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: An early alert and risk stratification is critical to prevent the occurrence of OHSS. We have previously developed a multi-stage smartphone app-based prediction model to evaluate the risk of OHSS, but app use might not be so convenient in many primary institutions. A simplified OHSS risk assessment index has been required. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This training and internal validation of an OHSS risk assessment index used retrospective cohort data from January 2016 to December 2020. External validation was performed with a prospective cohort database from January 2021 to May 2022. There were 15 066 cycles in the training cohort, 6502 cycles in the internal validation cohort, and 8097 cycles in the external validation cohort. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was performed in the reproductive medicine center of a tertiary hospital. Infertile women who underwent ovarian stimulation were included. Data were extracted from the local database with detailed medical records. A multi-stage risk assessment index was constructed at multiple stages. The first stage was before the initiation of ovarian stimulation, the second was before the ovulation trigger, the third was after oocyte retrieval, and the last stage was on the embryo transfer day if fresh embryo transfer was scheduled. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We established a simplified multi-stage risk assessment index for moderate/severe OHSS, the performance of which was further evaluated with discrimination and calibration abilities in training and internal and external validation cohorts. The discrimination abilities of the OHSS risk assessment index were determined with C-statistics. C-statistics in training (Stages 1-4: 0.631, 0.692, 0.751, 0.788, respectively) and internal (Stages 1-4: 0.626, 0.642, 0.755, 0.771, respectively) and external validation (Stages 1-4: 0.668, 0.670, 0.754, 0.773, respectively) cohorts were all increased from Stage 1 to 3 with similar trends, and were comparable between Stages 3 and 4. Calibration plots showed high agreement between observed and predicted cases in all three cohorts. Incidences of OHSS based on diverse risk stratification (negligible risk, low risk, medium risk, and high risk) were 0%, 0.6%, 2.7%, and 8.3% in the training cohort, 0%, 0.6%, 3.3%, and 8.5% in the internal validation cohort, and 0.1%, 1.1%, 4.1%, and 7.2% in the external validation cohort. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The influence from clinical interventions including cryopreservation of all embryos cannot be eliminated and thus certain risk factors like estrogen level on trigger day might be assigned with a lower risk score. Another weakness of the study is that several preventive treatments, for instance oral aspirin and letrozole, were not recorded and evaluated in the model. Despite the robust reliability of OHSS assessment index, this tool cannot be used directly for clinical decision-making or as a diagnostic tool. Its value lies in its capacity to evaluate the prognosis of various interventions and to facilitate clinician-patient communication. The combination of this tool and further symptoms and examinations should be all taken into consideration for accurate and personalized management of OHSS. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The OHSS risk assessment index can be implemented to facilitate personalized counseling and management of OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2702504), Medical Research Fund Guangdong Provincial (A2024003), and Xinjiang Support Rural Science and Technology (Special Correspondent) Program in Guangdong Province (KTPYJ 2023014). All authors had nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following sole gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger: a case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report three cases of early severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a), leading to hospitalization and the need for peritoneal drainage. Additionally, a review of the existing literature on this topic is provided. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case series and a literature review. SETTING: This study was conducted at obstetrics and gynecology department of tertiary academic referral hospitals, Israel. PARTICIPANTS: This study included three patients presented with severe OHSS symptoms, including abdominal distension, ascites, and hemoconcentration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main focus of the treatment was to address the symptoms and prevent any further complications. The outcome was the complete recovery of the patients. RESULTS: The presented cases detail instances of severe OHSS following oocyte retrieval, utilizing GnRH-a for triggering. Case 1 involved a 33-year-old patient with a history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), Case 2 featured a 22-year-old patient with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and Case 3 included a 41-year-old patient with a history of depressive disorder. All patients receiving supportive care, including infusions and medications, exhibited gradual improvement during hospitalization, with complete resolution observed during the 20-day post-hospitalization check-up. CONCLUSIONS: These three cases highlight the occurrence of severe early OHSS following a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH-a in the absence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration for trigger or luteal-phase support. Clinicians must be aware that a GnRH-a trigger followed by a freeze-all approach does not guarantee the complete elimination of OHSS in all patients.

[Effect of baseline LH/FSH ratio in PCOS on IVF-ET outcomes: a retrospective cohort study].

Objective: To exlplore the association between the baseline luteinizing hormone/follicle stimulating hormone (LH/FSH) ratio of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 2 868 PCOS patients were enrolled, all of the participants were patients in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hospital from October 2015 to October 2021. Propensity score matching (1∶2.5) was conducted to regulate the non-random allocation of patients. Data were extracted from the hospital's medical records. Patients with baseline LH/FSH ratio>2 were deemed as study group, patients with baseline LH/FSH ratio≤2 were deemed as control group. Single factor analysis was applied to compare the differences of pregnancy outcomes between two groups. Results: After propensity score matching (1∶2.5), there were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05), indicating that the data were comparable. In the study group, the total dose of gonadotropin (Gn) and duration of Gn were lower than those of the control group (t=4.989, P<0.001; t=3.267, P=0.001), the rate of in vitro maturation was higher than that of the control group (χ2=4.938, P=0.026), the number of retrieved oocytes and cleavage were higher than those of the control group (t=-2.305, P=0.021; t=-2.816, P=0.005), but there were no differences in the number and rate of high-quality embryos between the two groups (t=-1.636, P=0.102; t=-0.123, P=0.902). The incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=17.277, P<0.001). Regardless of fresh embryo transfer or frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, the incidences of gestational diabetes mellitus in the study group were higher than those in the control group (χ2=9.174, P=0.002; χ2=4.204, P=0.040) of singleton pregnancy. In the fresh embryo transfer cycle, the clinical pregnancy rate [30.30% (20/66) vs 47.75% (53/111)] and delivery rate [30.30% (20/66) vs 46.85% (52/111)] in the study group were lower than those in the control group (χ2=5.198, P=0.023; χ2=4.695, P=0.030). In the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle, the delivery rate in the study group was higer than that in the control group [59.41% (423/712) vs 55.04% (1 053/1 913); χ2=7.526, P=0.023]. The clinical pregnancy rate and delivery rate of fresh embryo transfer cycle in the study group were significantly lower than those of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle (χ2=21.308, P<0.001; χ2=20.871, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences in the control group (all P>0.05). Conclusions: PCOS patients with a higher basal LH/FSH ratio are more likely to develop moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after controlled ovarian stimulation and have a higher incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Better pregnancy outcome could be obtained by frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

The dark side of random-start ovarian stimulation: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome due to inadvertent pregnancy.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can inadvertent pregnancies go unnoticed when initiating random-start ovarian stimulation (RSOS) despite monitoring? DESIGN: Case series at a university-based tertiary care fertility clinic. RESULTS: Between June 2022 and December 2023, two cases of undetected early pregnancy at the onset of RSOS were identified, both leading to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) with hospitalization. CONCLUSION: RSOS protocols add flexibility in fertility clinics when there is no intention of a fresh embryo transfer, but may be associated with insidious risk of OHSS. The authors advocate for comprehensive consultation and serial monitoring of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, while cautioning against over-reliance on baseline hormone concentrations when initiating RSOS. If the benefits of RSOS seem limited, healthcare providers should consider delaying ovarian stimulation to avert health, but also medicolegal and financial, complications.

Causal relationship between OHSS and immune cells: A Mendelian randomization study.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the causal relationship between immune cells and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. DESIGN: Obtaining data, collecting single nucleotide polymorphisms, detecting instrumental variables heterogeneity, assessing causality, and assessing bidirectional causality. SUBJECTS: A two sample Mendelian study to confirm the causal relationship between immune cells and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. EXPOSURE: Immune cell phenotype (including 22 million SNPs from GWAS on 3757 European individuals). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inverse variance weighting, one-sample analysis, MR-Egger, weighted median and weighted mode are used to assess the causal relationship between 731 immunophenotypes and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. The weighted median and Mendelian Randomization multi-effect residuals and Mendelian Randomization multi-effect residuals and outlier tests are used to assess bidirectional causality between this two. RESULTS: After False Discovery Rate correction, 9 immunophenotypes were found to be significantly associated with the risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. B cell panel: IgD+ AC (OR, 0.90) 、CD19 on CD24+ CD27+ (OR, 0.86) 、BAFF-R on CD20- CD38 (OR, -1.22); Mature T cell group panel: EM DN (CD4 -CD8-) AC (OR, 1.46); Myeloid cell panel: Mo MDSC AC (OR, 1.13) 、CD45 on CD33br HLA-DR+ (OR, 0.87); Monocyte panel: HLA-DR on monocyte (OR, 0.86) 、CCR2 on CD14+ CD16+ monocyte (OR, 1.15) 、cDC panel: HLA-DR on myeloid DC (OR, 0.89). CONCLUSION: This study shows the potential link between OHSS and immune cells by genetic means, providing new ideas for future clinical and basic research.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome without gonadotropin stimulation: an unusual response to a GnRH agonist.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a well-known iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. We present the case of a woman in her 30s who developed OHSS without the administration of gonadotropins. She was due to undergo intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for primary subfertility. After taking a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonist for 3 weeks, she presented with abdominal pain, nausea and bloating. She was diagnosed with moderate to severe OHSS, requiring management as an inpatient.Investigations included a pelvic ultrasound scan showing an enlarged ovary, serum oestradiol >30 000 pmol/L and an MRI of the brain with an incidental finding of a 5 mm pituitary microadenoma.She recovered rapidly and was referred for endocrinology evaluation and multidisciplinary team discussion. The OHSS was felt to be explained by an unusual 'flare' response to a GnRH agonist. A further ICSI cycle with an antagonist protocol is planned.

Calcium versus cabergoline for prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To conduct the first-ever systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating calcium infusion versus cabergoline in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) among high-risk women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. METHODS: Six databases were screened from inception until April 1, 2024. The included randomized and non-randomized controlled studies were assessed for quality. The endpoints included the severity of OHSS and selected pregnancy-related outcomes. Endpoints were summarized as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies were analyzed, including 1687 patients (828 in the calcium group and 859 in the cabergoline group). The quality of the studies varied and reflected low risk and high risk of bias in two and four studies, respectively, according to the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. No significant differences were noted between both groups regarding the rates of overall (n = 5, RR = 0.65, 95 % CI [0.39, 1.07], p = 0.09), mild (n = 4, RR = 1.05, 95 % CI [0.59, 1.89], p = 0.86), moderate (n = 5, RR = 0.41, 95 % CI [0.15, 1.08], p = 0.07), and severe (n = 6, RR = 0.36, 95 % CI [0.11, 1.22], p = 0.1) cases of OHSS. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis of an outlier study revealed that calcium significantly reduced the occurrence of severe OHSS compared with cabergoline (n = 5, RR = 0.16, 95 % CI [0.09, 0.43], p < 0.001, Higgins I2 = 0 %). No significant differences were observed between both groups regarding the rates of clinical pregnancy (n = 4, RR = 0.97, 95 % CI [0.88, 1.07], p = 0.57), ongoing pregnancy, live birth, and spontaneous abortion (Higgins I2 < 50 % for all). CONCLUSION: Both agents yielded similar pregnancy-related outcomes. However, calcium infusion could potentially be more effective than cabergoline in reducing the rate of severe OHSS. Additional high-quality and well-controlled trials are essential to draw firm conclusions.

Effect of aromatase inhibitors for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To summarize the findings of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the potential effect of aromatase inhibitors on preventing moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We searched for relevant RCTs in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to August 2023). In addition, we manually searched the related reviews and reference lists of included studies for further relevant studies. We included RCTs where aromatase inhibitors prescribed either during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in early luteal phase. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS. A descriptive analysis was conducted in cases where a meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity or lack of comparable data. RESULTS: 2858 records were retrieved and 12 RCTs were finally included. Letrozole was administered in the treatment group during COS in seven RCTs, whereas in the early luteal phase in five RCTs. Compared with the control group, the risk of moderate to severe OHSS significantly reduced by 55% in the letrozole group (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64, I2 = 0%, 5 RCTs, 494 patients). Moreover, serum estradiol (E2) levels on hCG trigger day significantly decreased with the administration of letrozole during COS (MD -847.23, 95% CI -1398.00 to -296.47, I2 = 93%, 5 RCTs, 374 patients). And serum E2 levels on the 4th, 5th and 7th to 10th day after hCG trigger were also significantly lower than those in the control group when letrozole was administered in the early luteal phase. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high risk of OHSS probably benefit from letrozole, which has been revealed to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS by this systematic review. However, the very limited number of participants and the quality of the included studies does not allow to recommend letrozole for the prevention of severe OHSS.

[Efficacy analysis of letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in patients with high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome undergoing total embryo freezing].

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH-ant) in patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) who underwent total embryo freezing after oocyte retrieval. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 348 female patients who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January and July 2023. Due to their high risk of OHSS, these patients canceled fresh embryo transfer and opted for total embryo freezing. Based on patients' preferences, those who received GnRH-ant and letrozole after oocyte retrieval were categorized as the intervention group (164 cases), while those who did not receive these medications were categorized as the control group (184 cases). The first luteal phase after oocyte retrieval, OHSS grading, ovarian volume, and estradiol (E2) levels were evaluated in both groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze factors related to moderate-to-severe OHSS among patients at high risk of OHSS who underwent total embryo freezing after oocyte retrieval. Results: The age of the intervention and control groups was (29.3±3.8) and (29.4±4.1) years, respectively (P=0.821). The duration of the first luteal phase post-oocyte retrieval was shorter in the intervention group [(7.16±1.39) days] compared to that in the control group [(13.88±2.11) days] (P<0.001). The incidences of mild, moderate, and severe OHSS in the intervention group were 75.0% (123 cases), 23.8% (39 cases), and 1.2% (2 cases), respectively, whereas in the control group they were 12.5% (23 cases), 60.9% (112 cases), and 26.6% (49 cases) (P<0.001). E2 levels on the 2nd and 6th days after oocyte retrieval [M(Q1,Q3)] in the intervention group were 1 520.0 (1 213.8, 1 884.8) and 108.5 (45.6, 218.0) ng/L, respectively, which were statistically significantly lower than those in the control group [1 666.0 (508.8, 1 702.0) ng/L] and [1 761.0 (826.0, 2 546.5) ng/L] (P<0.001). The abdominal cavity effusion in the intervention group [M(Q1,Q3)] were 19.5 (0, 30) and 0 mm, statistically significantly less than those in the control group [46.0 (0, 61.0) mm] and [54.5 (0, 69.5) mm] (P<0.001). On the 6th day after oocyte retrieval, the bilateral ovarian volumes in the intervention group were smaller than those in the control group (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that no combined treatment with letrozole and GnRH-ant was a risk factor of moderate to severe OHSS. The risk of developing moderate to severe OHSS in the control group was 35.312 times higher than that in the intervention group (OR=35.312, 95%CI: 17.488-71.300). Conclusions: The administration of letrozole combined with GnRH-ant post-oocyte retrieval in patients at high risk of OHSS can prevent the occurrence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, shorten the first luteal phase, accelerate the reduction of serum E2 levels, and promote the recovery of ovarian volume and absorption of abdominal fluid.

Monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF.

Since the inception of in vitro fertilization (IVF), monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has traditionally involved numerous appointments for ultrasound and laboratory testing to guide medication use and dosing, determine trigger timing, and allow for measures to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Recent advances in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have called into question the timing and frequency of COS monitoring appointments, as discussed in this commentary.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Pregnant Ovarian Hypersensitivity Syndrome.

ABSTRACT: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is characterized by cystic enlargement of the ovaries and a fluid retention. This syndrome is sometimes caused after in vitro fertilization. We treated a 37-year-old woman with OHSS after in vitro fertilization, coincidentally complicated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Her clinical course of acute lymphoblastic leukemia was aggressive with the manifestation of OHSS, such as massive pleural effusion and massive ascites. The leukemic cells broadly infiltrated to the peritoneum, ovary, central spine fluid, and pleura. We speculated that this hyperpermeability of leukemic cells could be associated with the cytokine milieu caused by OHSS.

Comparison of luteal support protocols in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles: a network meta-analysis.

Despite the proven superiority of various luteal phase support protocols (LPS) over placebo in view of improved pregnancy rates in fresh cycles of IVF (in vitro fertilization) and ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) cycles, there is ongoing controversy over specific LPS protocol selection, dosage, and duration. The aim of the present study was to identify the optimal LPS under six core aspects of ART success, clinical pregnancy, live birth as primary outcomes and biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) events as secondary outcomes. Twelve databases, namely Embase (OVID), MEDLINE (R) (OVID), GlobalHealth (Archive), GlobalHealth, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Maternity & Infant Care Database (MIDIRS), APA PsycTests, ClinicalTrials.gov, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus and two prospective registers, MedRxiv, Research Square were searched from inception to Aug.1st, 2023, (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022358986). Only Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) were included. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) model was employed for outcome analysis, presenting fixed effects, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credibility intervals (CrIs). Vaginal Progesterone (VP) was considered the reference LPS given its' clinical relevance. Seventy-six RCTs, comparing 22 interventions, and including 26,536 participants were included in the present NMA. Overall CiNeMa risk of bias was deemed moderate, and network inconsistency per outcome was deemed low (Multiple pregnancy χ2: 0.11, OHSS χ2: 0.26), moderate (Clinical Pregnancy: χ2: 7.02, Live birth χ2: 10.95, Biochemical pregnancy: χ2: 6.60, Miscarriage: χ2: 11.305). Combinatorial regimens, with subcutaneous GnRH-a (SCGnRH-a) on a vaginal progesterone base and oral oestrogen (OE) appeared to overall improve clinical pregnancy events; VP + OE + SCGnRH-a [OR 1.57 (95% CrI 1.11 to 2.22)], VP + SCGnRH-a [OR 1.28 (95% CrI 1.05 to 1.55)] as well as live pregnancy events, VP + OE + SCGnRH-a [OR 8.81 (95% CrI 2.35 to 39.1)], VP + SCGnRH-a [OR 1.76 (95% CrI 1.45 to 2.15)]. Equally, the progesterone free LPS, intramuscular human chorionic gonadotrophin, [OR 9.67 (95% CrI 2.34, 73.2)] was also found to increase live birth events, however was also associated with an increased probability of ovarian hyperstimulation, [OR 1.64 (95% CrI 0.75, 3.71)]. The combination of intramuscular and vaginal progesterone was associated with higher multiple pregnancy events, [OR 7.09 (95% CrI 2.49, 31.)]. Of all LPS protocols, VP + SC GnRH-a was found to significantly reduce miscarriage events, OR 0.54 (95% CrI 0.37 to 0.80). Subgroup analysis according to ovarian stimulation (OS) protocol revealed that the optimal LPS across both long and short OS, taking into account increase in live birth and reduction in miscarriage as well as OHSS events, was VP + SCGnRH-a, with an OR 2.89 [95% CrI 1.08, 2.96] and OR 2.84 [95% CrI 1.35, 6.26] respectively. Overall, NMA data suggest that combinatorial treatments, with the addition of SCGnRH-a on a VP base result in improved clinical pregnancy and live birth events in both GnRH-agonist and antagonist ovarian stimulation protocols.

Individualized dosing of follitropin delta affects live birth and safety in in vitro fertilization treatment: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a one-stage meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials comparing individualized dosing of follitropin delta vs. other forms of follitropin (alpha and beta) for live birth (LB) rates (LBR) and safety parameters in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment. DESIGN: Systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment. INTERVENTIONS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science to identify eligible phase 3 trials between January 1, 2000, and February 1, 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All analyses were based on individual participant data. We used a general linear mixed effects logistic regression model using fixed effects for treatment drugs interacting with log (AMH) level, age, and random effects for country and trial to compare the primary efficacy and safety outcomes of LB and early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or the need for OHSS preventative measures, with ovarian stimulation parameters and neonatal outcomes also assessed. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023399711. RESULTS: Three trials met inclusion criteria and included 2,685 women undertaking 2,682 cycles between October 2013 and May 2020, with LB follow-up through to February 1, 2023. For women with an elevated AMH level (≥15 pmol/L), there was high-quality evidence that the use of individualized dosing of follitropin delta was associated with an increased LB rate (adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 2.36). Safety outcomes were also improved with a reduced risk of both early OHSS and/or the need for preventative interventions (adj OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15, 0.49) and early moderate or severe OHSS (adj OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16, 0.58). These improvements in outcomes were obtained with a lower total dose of gonadotropin (-48.7 µg, 95% CI -53.7, -43.8) and no adjustments in the daily dose. In contrast, similar LB rates (adj OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.63, 1.17) and safety outcomes (adj OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.76, 4.87) were observed for women with an AMH level of <15 pmol/L. There were no clinically meaningful differences in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Using follitropin delta in an AMH level and weight-based algorithm rather than conventional licensed dosing of follitropin alpha or beta for ovarian stimulation in women is associated with improved LB rates and safety outcomes for women with elevated AMH levels.

Comparison of stimulation protocols for dose determination of gonadotropins: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: To date, evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of individualized controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) compared with standard dose COS has been inadequate. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the updated evidence from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of individualized COS with different ovarian reserve test biomarkers or clinical experience versus standard dose COS. SEARCH STRATEGY: Terms and descriptors related to COS, individualized or standard, and RCT were combined to search, and only English language studies were included. Conference abstracts and comments were excluded. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs with comparison between different individualized COS strategies and standard starting dose strategy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviews independently assessed the eligibility of retrieved citations in a predefined standardized manner. Relative risk (RRs) and the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model on R software version 4.2.2. MAIN RESULTS: Compared with the standard dose COS strategy in pairwise meta-analysis, the individualized COS strategy was associated with a notable lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS; 174/2384 [7.30%] vs 114/2412 [4.73%], RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.93, I2 = 46%), a significantly lower risk of hyperresponse to stimulation (hyperresponse; 476/2402 [19.82%] vs 331/2437 [13.58%], RR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.90, I2 = 61%), and a slightly longer ovarian stimulation days (duration of stimulation; WMD 0.20, 95% CI: 0.01-0.40, I2 = 66%). Bayesian network meta-analysis also found that biomarker-tailored strategy had a significantly lower risk of OHSS than standard dose strategy (OHSS; RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.97, I2 = 47.5%). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard dose COS strategy, individualized COS strategy could significantly reduce the risks of OHSS and hyperresponse to stimulation, but the duration of stimulation was slightly longer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42023358439.

Ovarian Hyperstimulation syndrome combined with hypothyroidism: a comprehensive review.

Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) is a systemic condition marked by the enlargement of the ovaries and heightened vascular permeability. And hypothyroidism (HT) emerges as a potential risk factor for OHSS occurrence. This review presented a comprehensive summary of pertinent case reports involving patients diagnosed with both HT and OHSS. Detailed exploration was conducted into their clinical presentations, diagnostic methodologies, and treatment modalities. Additionally, the review delved into potential interaction mechanisms between HT and OHSS, encompassing various aspects including hormone levels. Moreover, management strategies for mitigating the risk of OHSS in HT patients were thoroughly reviewed and the importance of monitoring thyroid function in those experiencing OHSS was emphasized. This review indicated that the association between HT and OHSS, underscoring its multifaceted complexity. It could accentuate the ongoing necessity for rigorous research and clinical refinement to deepen our comprehension of this association and to bolster diagnostic and therapeutic methodologies for optimal patient care. In conclusion, this review offered valuable insights for future research directions and clinical practices for patients afflicted with OHSS and HT.