Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Tongue-Lip Adhesion and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the gastrostomy rates in infants with Pierre Robin sequence treated with tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of symptomatic plastic and reconstructive surgery patients treated over an 8-year period. The primary predictor variable was surgical intervention (tongue-lip adhesion or distraction osteogenesis). Secondary predictor variables were categorized as demographic and clinical factors. The primary outcome was the need for gastrostomy tube placement. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, costs, and length of stay. RESULTS: Thirty-one tongue-lip adhesion and 30 distraction osteogenesis patients were included in the study. The groups were statistically comparable with regard to demographic and clinical factors (p > 0.18). Gastrostomy rates were higher in patients who underwent tongue-lip adhesion (48 percent) versus those who underwent distraction osteogenesis (16.7 percent; p = 0.008). In an adjusted model, subjects undergoing tongue-lip adhesion were more likely to require gastrostomy tube for nutritional support (OR, 6.5; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 25.2; p = 0.007). There were two major complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and none in the distraction osteogenesis group. There were three minor complications in the tongue-lip adhesion group and five in the distraction osteogenesis group. Total operating room costs were higher for distraction osteogenesis (p = 0.05), and total hospital costs and length of stay were higher for tongue-lip adhesion (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among infants with symptomatic Pierre Robin sequence, treatment by distraction osteogenesis is associated with a lower risk for gastrostomy placement for nutritional support. Hospital costs are higher for tongue-lip adhesion. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Cost analysis of mandibular distraction versus tracheostomy in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate costs associated with surgical treatment for neonates with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively studied neonates with PRS treated from 2001 to 2009 with either tracheostomy (Trach), mandibular distraction (MD), or Trach with subsequent MD (Trach+MD). Actual charges over a 3-year period associated with operative costs, hospital stay, imaging and sleep studies, clinic visits, and related emergency room visits were collected. Home tracheostomy care charges were estimated individually for each patient. Charges were compared using regression and appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: Forty-seven neonates were included in the study (MD, n = 26; Trach, n = 12; Trach+MD, n = 9). Trach group patients had 2.6-fold higher charges than the MD group despite no difference in length of hospital stay. This difference increased to 7.3-fold when including home trach care-related costs. Trach+MD group patients had longer hospital lengths of stay and higher operation room (OR) fees, but no increased total charges compared with the Trach only group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with severe PRS, mandibular distraction provides significant cost savings over tracheostomy ($300,000 per patient over 3 years). Increased costs with tracheostomy come from greater hospital-related charges, more frequent airway procedures, a higher incidence of gastrostomy tube feeds, and home trach care costs. A careful examination of long-term outcomes will be critical as mandibular distraction continues to gain acceptance for treatment of PRS.

Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with Robin sequence: a comparative cost analysis.

Many treatments have been described for infants with Robin sequence and severe respiratory distress, but there have not been many comparative studies of outcome and cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the cost and complications of two common interventions - mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tracheostomy. Nine patients with isolated Robin sequence (mandibular distraction osteogenesis, n=5, and tracheostomy, n=4) were included in the analyses. Predetermined costs and complications were obtained retrospectively from medical records and by questionnaires to the parents over a 12-month period. Overall direct costs (admission to hospital, diagnostics, surgery, and homecare) were 3 times higher for tracheostomy (€105.523 compared with €33.482, p=0.02). Overall indirect costs (absence from work) were almost 5 times higher (€2.543 compared with €543, p=0.02). There was a threefold increase in overall total cost/patient (both direct and indirect) for tracheostomy (€108.057 compared with 34.016, p=0.02) and 4 times more complications were encountered. This study shows that mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants diagnosed with Robin sequence costs significantly less and results in fewer complications than tracheostomy, and this contributes to our current knowledge about the ideal approach for infants with Robin sequence and might provide a basis for institutional protocols in the future.