Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Child Neurol ; 37(1): 89-97, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34816766

RESUMO

AIM: To determine the long-term probability of remission without antiepileptic treatment of common epileptic syndromes and of children without a specific syndromic diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All children less than 14 years old with 2 or more unprovoked seizures seen at our hospital between June 1, 1994, and March 1, 2011 (n = 680), were included and prospectively followed up until August 15, 2020. Syndromic diagnosis was made retrospectively but blinded to subsequent evolution, employing the data available at 6 months after diagnosis and under predefined operational criteria. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of achieving a remission period of at least 5 years, with neither seizures nor antiepileptic treatment at 14 years was 97% for well-defined childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, 82% for uncertain childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, 85% for well-defined Panayiotopoulos syndrome, 88% for uncertain Panayiotopoulos syndrome, 93% for nonfamilial self-limited infantile epilepsy, 100% for familial self-limited infantile epilepsy, 86% for absence epilepsy, 6% for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, 71% for cryptogenic West syndrome, 72% for patients with no associated neurologic deficits and no specific syndromic diagnosis, 65% for symptomatic West syndrome, and 40% for patients with associated neurologic deficits and no specific syndromic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The study results highlight the long-term outcomes of the main epileptic syndromes and also of the patients with no syndromic diagnosis.


Assuntos
Síndromes Epilépticas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Remissão Espontânea , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Epileptic Disord ; 23(1): 40-52, 2021 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33632673

RESUMO

The term "developmental and epileptic encephalopathy" (DEE) refers to when cognitive functions are influenced by both seizure and interictal epileptiform activity and the neurobiological process behind the epilepsy. Many DEEs are related to gene variants and the onset is typically during early childhood. In this setting, neurocognition, whilst not improved by seizure control, may benefit from some precision therapies. In patients with non-progressive diseases with cognitive impairment and co-existing epilepsy, in whom the epileptiform activity does not affect or has minimal effect on function, the term "developmental encephalopathy" (DE) can be used. In contrast, for those patients with direct impact on cognition due to epileptic or epileptiform activity, the term "epileptic encephalopathy" (EE) is preferred, as most can revert to their normal or near normal baseline cognitive state with appropriate intervention. These children need aggressive treatment. Clinicians must tailor care towards individual needs and realistic expectations for each affected person; those with DE are unlikely to gain from aggressive antiseizure medication whilst those with EE will gain. Patients with DEE might benefit from a precision medicine approach in order to reduce the overall burden of epilepsy.


Assuntos
Síndromes Epilépticas , Transtornos Neurocognitivos , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento , Pré-Escolar , Síndromes Epilépticas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/etiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/terapia , Humanos , Lactente , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/etiologia , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/terapia , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/etiologia , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/terapia
3.
Epilepsia ; 62(2): 358-370, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33475165

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the epilepsy syndromes among the severe epilepsies of infancy and assess their incidence, etiologies, and outcomes. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was undertaken of severe epilepsies with onset before age 18 months in Victoria, Australia. Two epileptologists reviewed clinical features, seizure videos, and electroencephalograms to diagnose International League Against Epilepsy epilepsy syndromes. Incidence, etiologies, and outcomes at age 2 years were determined. RESULTS: Seventy-three of 114 (64%) infants fulfilled diagnostic criteria for epilepsy syndromes at presentation, and 16 (14%) had "variants" of epilepsy syndromes in which there was one missing or different feature, or where all classical features had not yet emerged. West syndrome (WS) and "WS-like" epilepsy (infantile spasms without hypsarrhythmia or modified hypsarrhythmia) were the most common syndromes, with a combined incidence of 32.7/100 000 live births/year. The incidence of epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures (EIMFS) was 4.5/100 000 and of early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (EIEE) was 3.6/100 000. Structural etiologies were common in "WS-like" epilepsy (100%), unifocal epilepsy (83%), and WS (39%), whereas single gene disorders predominated in EIMFS, EIEE, and Dravet syndrome. Eighteen (16%) infants died before age 2 years. Development was delayed or borderline in 85 of 96 (89%) survivors, being severe-profound in 40 of 96 (42%). All infants with EIEE or EIMFS had severe-profound delay or were deceased, but only 19 of 64 (30%) infants with WS, "WS-like," or "unifocal epilepsy" had severe-profound delay, and only two of 64 (3%) were deceased. SIGNIFICANCE: Three quarters of severe epilepsies of infancy could be assigned an epilepsy syndrome or "variant syndrome" at presentation. In this era of genomic testing and advanced brain imaging, diagnosing epilepsy syndromes at presentation remains clinically useful for guiding etiologic investigation, initial treatment, and prognostication.


Assuntos
Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/epidemiologia , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/epidemiologia , Espasmos Infantis/epidemiologia , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/etiologia , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Eletroencefalografia , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/etiologia , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/fisiopatologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/etiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/etiologia , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Malformações do Desenvolvimento Cortical/complicações , Malformações do Desenvolvimento Cortical/epidemiologia , Malformações do Desenvolvimento Cortical/cirurgia , Mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espasmos Infantis/tratamento farmacológico , Espasmos Infantis/etiologia , Espasmos Infantis/fisiopatologia , Vitória/epidemiologia
5.
Seizure ; 79: 61-68, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32417686

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. No systematic review of demographics, aetiologies, good treatment options, and causes of deaths has been performed. Thus, we aimed to focus on these factors to provide a structure for patient management and research. METHODS: A deep literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase of all years until May 2019. RESULTS: We retrieved 45 aSrticles: 3 multicentre cohort studies, 13 single-centre cohorts, 1 case series, and 28 case reports. We identified 229 cases: most were from Asia; 53% were males; 11.4% had several types of antibodies, and the most common was anti-glutamate receptor epsilon 2; 30% (69 cases) had good treatment outcomes; 12.2% died; and 56% remained with drug-resistant epilepsies. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant association between positive outcomes in Japan and China, the use of the ketogenic diet either acutely or chronically, and the use of steroids acutely or chronically. Taiwan showed a statistically significant association with negative outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression revealed the utilisation of the ketogenic diet in the acute phases (P = 0.008, OR = 3.613) and being in Japan (P = 0.003, OR = 3.146) as independent determinants of positive outcomes. Most of the deaths occurred because of the progress of the disease rather than complications of the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Asians are more affected and several cases have antibodies. Positive outcomes are associated with being in Japan and the utilisation of the ketogenic diet in the acute phase.


Assuntos
Doença Aguda , Doença Crônica , Síndromes Epilépticas , Infecções , Convulsões Febris , Doença Aguda/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda/terapia , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/etiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/imunologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/terapia , Humanos , Infecções/complicações , Infecções/epidemiologia , Convulsões Febris/epidemiologia , Convulsões Febris/etiologia , Convulsões Febris/imunologia , Convulsões Febris/terapia
6.
Neurology ; 94(16): e1757-e1763, 2020 04 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32217773

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess relative rates and clinical features of patients with genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), focal epilepsy (FE), and developmental encephalopathic epilepsy (DEE) in the North American SUDEP Registry (NASR). METHODS: We identified all adjudicated definite, definite plus, and probable sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) cases (n = 262) and determined epilepsy type (GGE, FE, or DEE) from medical record review including history, imaging and EEG results, genetics, and next-of-kin interviews. RESULTS: Of the 262 SUDEP cases, 41 occurred in GGE, 95 in FE, 24 in DEE, and 102 were unclassifiable. GGE cases comprised 26% of NASR cases with an epilepsy syndrome diagnosis. The relative frequency of FE:GGE was slightly lower (2.3:1) than in population cohorts (2.1-6:1). Compared to patients with FE, patients with GGE had similar (1) ages at death and epilepsy onset and rates of (2) terminal and historical antiseizure medication adherence; (3) abnormal cardiac pathology; (4) illicit drug/alcohol use histories; and (5) sleep state when SUDEP occurred. CONCLUSIONS: GGE cases were relatively overrepresented in NASR. Because GGEs are less often treatment-resistant than FE or DEE, seizure type rather than frequency may be critical. Many people with GGE predominantly have generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) when they have uncontrolled or breakthrough seizures, whereas patients with FE more commonly experience milder seizures. Future mechanistic SUDEP studies should assess primary and focal-to-bilateral GTCS to identify potential differences in postictal autonomic and arousal disorders and to determine the differential role that lifestyle factors have on breakthrough seizures and seizure types in GGE vs FE to effectively target SUDEP mechanisms and prevention.


Assuntos
Epilepsias Parciais/epidemiologia , Epilepsia Generalizada/epidemiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Inesperada na Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Criança , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Eletroencefalografia , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciais/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/genética , Epilepsia Generalizada/fisiopatologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Epilépticas/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Jovem
7.
Ann Neurol ; 87(1): 132-138, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31637767

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have observed that epilepsy risk is higher among offspring of affected women than offspring of affected men. We tested whether this "maternal effect" was present in familial epilepsies, which are enriched for genetic factors that contribute to epilepsy risk. METHODS: We assessed evidence of a maternal effect in a cohort of families containing ≥3 persons with epilepsy using 3 methods: (1) "downward-looking" analysis, comparing the rate of epilepsy in offspring of affected women versus men; (2) "upward-looking" analysis, comparing the rate of epilepsy among mothers versus fathers of affected individuals; and (3) lineage analysis, comparing the proportion of affected individuals with family history of epilepsy on the maternal versus paternal side. RESULTS: Downward-looking analysis revealed no difference in epilepsy rates among offspring of affected mothers versus fathers (prevalence ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-1.2). Upward-looking analysis revealed more affected mothers than affected fathers; this effect was similar for affected and unaffected sibships (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5-1.2) and was explained by a combination of differential fertility and participation rates. Lineage analysis revealed no significant difference in the likelihood of maternal versus paternal family history of epilepsy. INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence of a maternal effect on epilepsy risk in this familial epilepsy cohort. Confounding sex imbalances can create the appearance of a maternal effect in upward-looking analyses and may have impacted prior studies. We discuss possible explanations for the lack of evidence, in familial epilepsies, of the maternal effect observed in population-based studies. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:132-138.


Assuntos
Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Saúde da Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Herança Materna , Herança Paterna , Síndromes Epilépticas/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Rev Neurol ; 68(9): 369-374, 2019 May 01.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31017289

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Panayiotopoulos syndrome (PS) is an epileptic syndrome of childhood. Until now only a small number of studies have been published about this syndrome. AIM: To study the frequency, semiology and prognosis of PS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: all patients with one or more unprovoked seizures seen at our hospital between 1 June 1994 and 1 March 2011 (n = 827) were included and prospectively followed until 30 April 2018. A diagnosis of PS was made in patients that fulfilled all the following criteria at six month of evolution: seizures with predominantly autonomic symptoms, presence of high amplitude, «functional morphology¼, focal spikes and slow wave complexes in any location, absence of a previous neurological deficit and normal neuroimaging. RESULTS: 27 cases (3,3%) met the diagnostic criteria. Semiology of the seizures was similar to that described by other authors. 88% of these cases attained a 3-year initial remission without antiepileptic treatment (three years both without seizures and without treatment). 62 cases (7,5%) met all the diagnostic criteria with the exception of the presence of the EEG features. Semiology of these cases was similar and 85% attained a 3-year initial remission without antiepileptic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In daily practice, patients with a clinical picture suggestive of PS but without the typical EEG features are common. This group of patients also have a good outcome.


TITLE: Frecuencia, semiologia y pronostico del sindrome de Panayiotopoulos.Introduccion. El sindrome de Panayiotopulos (SP) es un sindrome epileptico sobre el que hasta la fecha se ha publicado unicamente un pequeño numero de estudios. Objetivo. Estudiar la frecuencia, la semiologia y el pronostico del SP. Pacientes y metodos. Todos los pacientes con una o mas crisis epilepticas no provocadas que consultaron en nuestro hospital entre el 1 de junio de 1994 y el 1 de marzo de 2011 (n = 827) fueron incluidos y seguidos prospectivamente hasta el 30 de abril de 2018. Se diagnostico de SP a los pacientes que cumplieron los siguientes criterios a los seis meses de evolucion: una o mas crisis no provocadas con sintomas predominantemente autonomicos, presencia de complejos de puntas y ondas lentas focales de gran amplitud y «morfologia funcional¼, ausencia de deficit neurologico previo y neuroimagen normal. Resultados. Cumplieron los criterios de SP 27 casos (3,3%). La semiologia de las crisis fue similar a la descrita por otros autores. Un 88% de casos alcanzo una remision inicial de tres años sin tratamiento antiepileptico (sin crisis y sin tratamiento durante tres años). Sesenta y dos pacientes (7,5%) cumplieron todos los criterios de SP, a excepcion de la presencia de las tipicas alteraciones en el electroencefalograma. La semiologia de estos casos fue similar, y un 85% alcanzo una remision inicial de tres años sin tratamiento antiepileptico. Conclusiones. En la practica diaria son frecuentes los pacientes con crisis sugestivas de SP, pero sin las tipicas alteraciones en el electroencefalograma. Este grupo de pacientes tambien presenta un buen pronostico.


Assuntos
Síndromes Epilépticas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
9.
Epilepsy Behav ; 90: 252-259, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527252

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Differentiating between Dravet syndrome and non-Dravet SCN1A-related phenotypes is important for prognosis regarding epilepsy severity, cognitive development, and comorbidities. When a child is diagnosed with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) or febrile seizures (FS), accurate prognostic information is essential as well, but detailed information on seizure course, seizure freedom, medication use, and comorbidities is lacking for this milder patient group. In this cross-sectional study, we explore disease characteristics in milder SCN1A-related phenotypes and the nature, occurrence, and relationships of SCN1A-related comorbidities in both patients with Dravet and non-Dravet syndromes. METHODS: A cohort of 164 Dutch participants with SCN1A-related seizures was evaluated, consisting of 116 patients with Dravet syndrome and 48 patients with either GEFS+, febrile seizures plus (FS+), or FS. Clinical data were collected from medical records, semi-structured telephone interviews, and three questionnaires: the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS), the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Measurement Model, and the Child or Adult Behavior Checklists (CBCL/ABCL). RESULTS: Walking disabilities and severe behavioral problems affect 71% and 43% of patients with Dravet syndrome respectively and are almost never present in patients with non-Dravet syndromes. These comorbidities are strongly correlated to lower quality-of-life (QoL) scores. Less severe comorbidities occur in patients with non-Dravet syndromes: learning problems and psychological/behavioral problems are reported for 27% and 38% respectively. The average QoL score of the non-Dravet group was comparable with that of the general population. The majority of patients with non-Dravet syndromes becomes seizure-free after 10 years of age (85%). CONCLUSIONS: Severe behavioral problems and walking disabilities are common in patients with Dravet syndrome and should receive specific attention during clinical management. Although the epilepsy course of patients with non-Dravet syndromes is much more favorable, milder comorbidities frequently occur in this group as well. Our results may be of great value for clinical care and informing newly diagnosed patients and their parents about prognosis.


Assuntos
Epilepsias Mioclônicas/epidemiologia , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/genética , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/genética , Canal de Sódio Disparado por Voltagem NAV1.1/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Síndromes Epilépticas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões Febris/diagnóstico , Convulsões Febris/epidemiologia , Convulsões Febris/genética , Espasmos Infantis/diagnóstico , Espasmos Infantis/epidemiologia , Espasmos Infantis/genética , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
10.
Epilepsia ; 59(2): 431-439, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29318616

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Mood disorders are the most common comorbid conditions in epilepsy, but the cause remains unclear. One possible explanation is a shared genetic susceptibility to epilepsy and mood disorders. We tested this hypothesis by evaluating lifetime prevalence of mood disorders in relatives with and without epilepsy in families containing multiple individuals with epilepsy, and comparing the findings with rates from a general population sample. METHODS: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview was administered to 192 individuals from 60 families, including 110 participants with epilepsy of unknown cause (50 focal epilepsy [FE], 42 generalized epilepsy [GE], 6 FE and GE, 12 unclassifiable) and 82 relatives without epilepsy (RWOE). Odds ratios (ORs) for lifetime prevalence of mood disorders in participants with versus without epilepsy were computed through logistic regression, using generalized estimation equations to account for familial clustering. Standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) were used to compare prevalence in family members with general population rates. RESULTS: Compared with RWOE, ORs for mood disorders were significantly increased in participants with FE (OR = 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-5.2) but not in those with GE (OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.4-2.2). In addition, prevalence of mood disorders was increased in individuals with epilepsy who had ≥1 relative with FE. Compared with general population rates, mood disorders were significantly increased in individuals with FE but not in those with GE. Rates were also increased in RWOE, but not significantly so (SPR = 1.4, P = .14). SIGNIFICANCE: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis of shared genetic susceptibility to epilepsy and mood disorders, but suggest (1) the effect may be restricted to FE, and (2) the shared genetic effect on risk of mood disorders and epilepsy may be restricted to individuals with epilepsy, that is, to those in whom the genetic risk for epilepsy is "penetrant."


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Distímico/epidemiologia , Epilepsias Parciais/epidemiologia , Epilepsia Generalizada/epidemiologia , Síndromes Epilépticas/epidemiologia , Família , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA