Effectiveness of the Practice of Standardized Handover Process Using a Checklist in the Postanesthesia Care Unit: An Observational Study.

CONTEXT: Patient handovers without any structured checklist may omit essential information that might have undesirable consequences for patients. AIM: We sought to determine the effectiveness of a structured postanesthesia care handover (PACH) checklist in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to reduce adverse clinical outcomes. SETTING AND DESIGN: A single-center, prospective, pre-postimplementation study was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Moreover, post-PACH checklist implementation data were collected from 130 participants ( n = 65 in each group) by an independent observer. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS (25.0) version (IBM SPSS statistics). The Chi-square test was used to compare the dichotomous response. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction in hypoxemia (21.5% vs. 0; P < 0.001) was observed in the postimplementation group. There were significant improvements in patient information ( P < 0.01), reduction in variations in hemodynamic parameters ( P < 0.01), and improvement in the quality of information transferred concerning surgical procedures ( P < 0.01). The number of phone calls to consultants was significantly lower in the PACH group. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the PACH checklist was associated with no hypoxemic events in PACU by improving the quality of communication. The implementation of a structured checklist in PACU should be mandatory in the postoperative intensive care unit.

Résumé Contexte:Les transferts de patients sans liste de contrôle structurée peuvent omettre des informations essentielles qui pourraient avoir des conséquences indésirables pour les patients. But; Nous avons cherché à déterminer l'efficacité d'une liste de contrôle structurée du transfert des soins post-anesthésiques (PACH) dans l'unité de soins post-anesthésiques pour réduire les résultats cliniques indésirables.Cadre et conception:Une étude prospective monocentrique pré-post-mise en œuvre a été menée.Matériels et méthodes:et les données de mise en œuvre de la liste de contrôle post-PACH ont été collectées auprès de 130 participants (N = 65 dans chaque groupe) par un observateur indépendant. L'analyse des données a été effectuée à l'aide de la version SPSS (25.0) (statistiques IBM SPSS). Le test du chi carré a été utilisé pour comparer la réponse dichotomique.Résultats:Une réduction statistiquement significative de l'hypoxémie (21,5 % contre 0; P < 0,001) a été observée dans le groupe post-implantation. Il y avait des améliorations significatives de l'information des patients (P < 0,01), une réduction des variations des paramètres hémodynamiques (P < 0,01) et une amélioration de la qualité des informations transférées concernant les interventions chirurgicales (P < 0,01). Le nombre d'appels téléphoniques aux consultants était nettement inférieur dans le groupe PACH.Conclusion:La mise en œuvre de la liste de contrôle PACH n'a été associée à aucun événement hypoxémique en PACU en améliorant la qualité de la communication. La mise en œuvre d'une liste de contrôle structurée en USPA devrait être obligatoire en USI postopératoire.

Adult cardiac surgery and the COVID-19 pandemic: Aggressive infection mitigation strategies are necessary in the operating room and surgical recovery.

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates aggressive infection mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to patients and healthcare providers. This document is intended to provide a framework for the adult cardiac surgeon to consider in this rapidly changing environment. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative detailed protective measures are outlined. These are guidance recommendations during a pandemic surge to be used for all patients while local COVID-19 disease burden remains elevated.

Use of a Checklist for the Postanesthesia Care Unit Patient Handoff.

PURPOSE: This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate the benefits of implementing a checklist in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) setting to decrease the omission of health information during the handoff from anesthesia to PACU nurses. DESIGN: Patient handoffs from anesthesia providers were anonymously assessed by PACU nurses before and after the implementation of a handoff checklist with the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation format. METHODS: PACU nurses recorded use of the handoff checklist and if five items of health information were included in the handoff during the preintervention and postintervention phase. FINDINGS: Checklist use increased from 0% to 73% with omitted information decreasing with checklist use: procedure from 19% to 2%, allergies 23% to 4%, input and output 16% to 0%, antiemetic used 21% to 4%, and lines 19% to 11%. Completed handoffs increased from 13% to 82% whereas checklist use remained high, at over 79%, for the 12 weeks after implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The project was successful in implementing a standardized checklist and echoed the success of the articles reviewed. The use of a PACU handoff checklist can improve transfer of care by ensuring the provider receives more pertinent medical information during these transfers.

Enhancing the Quality of the Anesthesia to Postanesthesia Care Unit Patient Transfer Through Use of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Handoff Tool.

PURPOSE: Anesthesia to postanesthesia care unit (PACU) handoffs are often incomplete, imprecise, and highly variable with respect to information transfer, and therefore can jeopardize patient safety. A standardized anesthesia to PACU electronic medical record (EMR)-based patient handoff checklist was implemented and evaluated for its effect on the information transfer. DESIGN: An observational preimplementation and postimplementation design was used. METHODS: Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of information transfer during the PACU handoff was performed for a convenience samples of 100 patients preimplementation, 3 weeks postimplementation, and 3 months postimplementation. FINDINGS: The mean percentage of total handoff checklist items addressed significantly increased 3 weeks and 3 months postimplementation compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a standardized anesthesia to PACU EMR-based handoff checklist significantly increased the percent of accurate information transferred without considerably affecting the duration of the PACU handoff process.

Four-Year Evolution of a Thrombophylaxis Protocol in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: Recent Results in 485 Patients.

"Enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) protocols may reduce morbidity, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs. During the 4-year evolution of a bariatric ERAS protocol, we found that administration of thrombophylaxis selectively to high-risk morbidly obese patients (assessed postoperatively by Caprini score ≥ 3) undergoing omega loop gastric bypass ("mini" gastric bypass) or sleeve gastrectomy resulted in safe outcomes. Both procedures proved equally effective with this protocol. The vast majority of rapidly mobilized, low-risk patients did not appear to require antithrombotic heparin. Similar to other reported ERAS outcomes, our recent year's results in 485 patients included a mean LOS of 1.08 ± 0.64 days (range 1-14), with 460 (95.0%) discharged on day 1 and 99.6% by day 2. There were 13 30-day complications (2.7%), two reinterventions (0.4%), and no hemorrhages.

Patients' Perceptions of Perioperative Quality of Care in Relation to Self-rated Health.

PURPOSE: To explore (1) associations between patient and perioperative factors and dimensions of quality of care and (2) perioperative patients' self-rated physical health in relation to information, encouragement, and participation. DESIGN: A nonexperimental descriptive exploratory design (n = 170 participants). METHODS: Analyses were performed using quantitative techniques; collected data were quantitative in nature. Multiple logistic regression and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data. FINDINGS: The factor associated with patients' satisfaction within the dimension of "identity-oriented approach of the caregivers," including the quality of information, encouragement, and participation, was self-estimated physical health. Those who estimated their physical health as being good were generally more satisfied. Patients who rated their physical health as being less than good were significantly less satisfied with the information provided before surgery about their stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). CONCLUSIONS: Nurses should chart patients' estimations of their physical health initially in care to provide reinforced support for patients who estimate their physical health is less than good. Before surgery, patients who have estimated their physical health as being less than good should be given realistic information about their stay in the PACU-that they will be in a PACU after surgery, what that stay means, and why it is necessary.

Improving care for patients with dementia in the recovery room.

Caring for patients with dementia emerging from general anaesthesia in the recovery room can be very challenging. Sedation is sometimes necessary in order to nurse patients effectively and avoid any negative consequences of poor post-anaesthetic care. No local or national guidelines could be found to suggest best nursing practice in this situation. Three small-scale innovations were introduced into the recovery room in one hospital as part of a quality improvement project to give alternatives to chemical restraint. These were: music and distraction therapy, maximising the use of the 'About Me' document and improved access to staff training. The simple innovations were well received by recovery room staff. Further research is needed to quantify the benefits of these innovations and further work is needed to develop use of the carer's passport in recovery.

Capnography standards for outside the operating room.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Standards for capnography inside operating theatres in high and middle-income countries are well recognized and implemented. This review examines recent standards and recommendations for the use of capnography outside the operating room and their rationale and development. RECENT FINDINGS: The landmark publication of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society's National Audit Project 4 report provided compelling evidence of airway deaths and a significant patient harm occurring outside the operating room, particularly in ICUs and to a lesser extent in emergency departments. Up to 74% of these ICU deaths could have been prevented by capnography. This provided a serious wake up call for relevant clinicians. As a result, there have recently been new standards published for the use of capnography in these and other areas of the hospital. Waveform capnography can also reflect cardiac output, as the 2015 resuscitation guidelines emphasized. Work still needs to be done on implementing all of these new standards. SUMMARY: Established standards for using capnography within the operating theatre have significantly improved patient safety and it is hoped that the recent publication of new but similar capnography standards for application outside the operating theatre will do the same there. The reasons for the current low levels of implementation of some of these standards outside the operating room are worthy of further research.

Implementing situation-background-assessment-recommendation in an anaesthetic clinic and subsequent information retention among receivers: A prospective interventional study of postoperative handovers.

BACKGROUND: Communication errors cause clinical incidents and adverse events in relation to surgery. To ensure proper postoperative patient care, it is essential that personnel remember and recall information given during the handover from the operating theatre to the postanaesthesia care unit. Formalizing the handover may improve communication and aid memory, but research in this area is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether implementing the communication tool Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) affects receivers' information retention after postoperative handover. DESIGN: A prospective intervention study with an intervention group and comparison nonintervention group, with assessments before and after the intervention. SETTING: The postanaesthesia care units of two hospitals in Sweden during 2011 and 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Staff involved in the handover between the operating theatre and the postanaesthesia care units within each hospital. INTERVENTION: Implementation of the communication tool SBAR in one hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the percentage of recalled information sequences among receivers after the handover. Data were collected using both audio-recordings and observations recorded on a study-specific protocol form. RESULTS: Preintervention, 73 handovers were observed (intervention group, n = 40; comparison group, n = 33) involving 72 personnel (intervention group, n = 40; comparison group, n = 32). Postintervention, 91 handovers were observed (intervention group, n = 44; comparison group, n = 47) involving 57 personnel (intervention group, n = 31; comparison group, n = 26). In the intervention group, the percentage of recalled information sequences by the receivers increased from 43.4% preintervention to 52.6% postintervention (P = 0.004) and the SBAR structure improved significantly (P = 0.028). In the comparison group, the corresponding figures were 51.3 and 52.6% (P = 0.725) with no difference in SBAR structure. When a linear regression generalised estimating equation model was used to account for confounding influences, we were unable to show a significant difference in the information recalled between the intervention group and the nonintervention group over time. CONCLUSION: Compared with the comparison group with no intervention, when SBAR was implemented in an anaesthetic clinic, we were unable to show any improvement in recalled information among receivers following postoperative handover. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials http://www.controlled-trials.com Identifier: ISRCTN37251313.

Quality of post-operative patient handover in the post-anaesthesia care unit: a prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anaesthesiology plays a key role in promoting safe perioperative care. This includes the perioperative phase in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) where problems with incomplete information transfer may have a negative impact on patient safety and can lead to patient harm. The objective of this study was to analyse information transfer during post-operative handovers in the PACU. METHODS: With a self-developed checklist including 59 items the information transfer during post-operative handovers was documented and subsequently compared with patient information in anaesthesia records during a 2-month period. RESULTS: A total number of 790 handovers with duration of 73 ± 49 s was analysed. Few items were transferred in most of the cases such as type of surgery (97% of the cases), regional anaesthesia (94% of the cases) and cardiac instability (93% of the cases). However, some items were rarely transferred, such as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (7% of the cases), initiation of post-operative pain management (12% of the cases), antibiotic therapy (14% of the cases) and fluid management (15% of the cases). There was a slight correlation between amount of information transferred and duration of post-operative handovers (r = 0.5). CONCLUSION: The study shows that post-operative handovers in the PACU are in most cases incomplete. It appears useful to optimise the post-operative handover process, for example by implementing a standardised handover checklist.

Chinese whispers in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU).

We audited verbal handover of information by anaesthetists to recovery room nurses based on Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation. In Audit A, 100 handovers for elective procedures were included. For audit B, a second cohort of 100 patients was examined post educational session. There was an improvement in handover of medical background (46.15% Audit A, 77% Audit B, p < 0.001) and allergy status (42% Audit A, 56% Audit B, p = 0.048). Handing over immediate postoperative instructions remained unchanged (58% Audit A, 59% Audit B) and there was a 4% decline in verbal handover of instructions for ward care. Nurse satisfaction with handovers improved by 12%. We conclude that a structured process of information transfer, led to improved handover of immediate care. Further education focussed on the importance of instructions for the ward to maintain continuity of care is recommended.

Air quality monitoring of the post-operative recovery room and locations surrounding operating theaters in a medical center in Taiwan.

To prevent surgical site infection (SSI), the airborne microbial concentration in operating theaters must be reduced. The air quality in operating theaters and nearby areas is also important to healthcare workers. Therefore, this study assessed air quality in the post-operative recovery room, locations surrounding the operating theater area, and operating theaters in a medical center. Temperature, relative humidity (RH), and carbon dioxide (CO2), suspended particulate matter (PM), and bacterial concentrations were monitored weekly over one year. Measurement results reveal clear differences in air quality in different operating theater areas. The post-operative recovery room had significantly higher CO2 and bacterial concentrations than other locations. Bacillus spp., Micrococcus spp., and Staphylococcus spp. bacteria often existed in the operating theater area. Furthermore, Acinetobacter spp. was the main pathogen in the post-operative recovery room (18%) and traumatic surgery room (8%). The mixed effect models reveal a strong correlation between number of people in a space and high CO2 concentration after adjusting for sampling locations. In conclusion, air quality in the post-operative recovery room and operating theaters warrants attention, and merits long-term surveillance to protect both surgical patients and healthcare workers.

Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures.

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed at examining team communication during postoperative handover and its relationship to clinicians' self-ratings of handover quality. BACKGROUND: Adverse events can often be traced back to inadequate communication during patient handover. Research and improvement efforts have mostly focused on the information transfer function of patient handover. However, the specific mechanisms between handover communication processes among teams of transferring and receiving clinicians and handover quality are poorly understood. METHOD: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional observation study using a taxonomy for handover behaviors developed on the basis of established approaches for analyzing teamwork in health care. Immediately after the observation, transferring and receiving clinicians rated the quality of the handover using a structured tool for handover quality assessment. Handover communication during 117 handovers in three postoperative settings and its relationship to clinicians' self-ratings of handover quality were analyzed with the use of correlation analyses and analyses of variance. RESULTS: We identified significantly different patterns of handover communication between clinical settings and across handover roles. Assessments provided during handover were related to higher ratings of handover quality overall and to all four dimensions of handover quality identified in this study. If assessment was lacking, we observed compensatory information seeking by the receiving team. CONCLUSION: Handover quality is more than the correct, complete transmission of patient information. Assessments, including predictions or anticipated problems, are critical to the quality of postoperative handover. APPLICATION: The identification of communication behaviors related to high-quality handovers is necessary to effectively support the design and evaluation of handover improvement efforts.

Multitasking during patient handover in the recovery room.

BACKGROUND: Loss of information occurs frequently during handover and affects the continuity of care. Improving handovers is therefore a key patient safety goal. After surgery, the patient is transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and handover to the nurse includes both handover of monitoring equipment (connecting electrocardiogram, calibrating arterial lines, infusion pumps, etc.) and patient/procedure-specific information. Multitasking is likely to increase the risk of information loss during handover. It is unknown to what extent the transfer of equipment and information occurs simultaneously or sequentially in daily practice. METHODS: A nationwide questionnaire on the subject of patient handover was returned by 494 health care practitioners concerned with handovers from operating room (OR) to PACU. In addition, 101 handovers from the OR to the PACU were videotaped in 2 academic hospitals (n = 20), 3 teaching hospitals (n = 43) and 1 community hospital (n = 38). The occurrence of simultaneous or sequential transfer of equipment and information was recorded by two independent observers. RESULTS: Simultaneous handover of equipment and information was the preference for a minority of respondents to the national survey (11%, 95% confidence interval, 8% to 14%). Self-reported simultaneous handover was 43% (39% to 47%). In the videotaped handovers, simultaneous handover was used for 65% (56% to 74%), which was even higher in the academic centers. The simultaneous handovers were no more than 0.2 minute faster than sequential handovers (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: In most videotaped handovers from OR to the PACU, there was simultaneous transfer of equipment and information. Although most health care providers are unaware of it, this form of multitasking during patient handover in the PACU is common. Future studies should evaluate whether this multitasking also leads to loss of critical patient information and reduced patient safety.

Quality and safety on an acute surgical ward: an exploratory cohort study of process and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient safety in an emergency surgical unit using process and outcome measures in parallel. BACKGROUND: Patient harm from errors in care is common in modern surgical practice. Measurement of the problem is essential to any solution, but current methods of evaluating patient harm are either impractical or inadequate. We have therefore analyzed compliance with safety-relevant care processes, with the aim of developing a process-based system for evaluating ward safety. METHODS: Adverse events (AE), potential adverse events (PAE), and 7 safety-relevant processes were measured on a 38-bed surgical emergency unit over a 16-week period. AE, PAE, and process measures were studied by prospective direct observation in large convenience samples, using objective measures. Possible influences on AE and PAE risk were analyzed. RESULTS: Compliance with the 7 processes studied ranged from 23% to 89%. The AE and PAE rates were 11.9% and 13.8% in a 63% sample of admissions (n = 607). Length of stay was significantly associated with both AE (P < 0.001) and PAE (P < 0.001). Having an operation was also associated with AE (P = 0.001) but not with PAE. No other factors appeared to influence AE/PAE rates. Delays were the commonest causes of both AE and PAE. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with individual care processes on a ward with average levels of patient harm is poor. Length of hospital stay increases the risk of both AE and PAE, suggesting a system defect. A bundle of care processes may be useful for monitoring safety improvement.

A survey of obstetric perianesthesia care unit standards.

BACKGROUND: Although obstetric patients are generally healthy, population risk is increasing because of increases in maternal age, obesity, and rates of multifetal pregnancies, and complications may occur in the immediate postoperative period. In this study, we sought to identify the current level of recovery care for obstetric patients in North American academic institutions after either general or major neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. METHODS: A survey of obstetric anesthesia recovery practices was delivered electronically to 135 obstetric anesthesiology directors of North American academic institutions from June to October, 2007. Surveys were completed electronically and anonymously. RESULTS: The response rate was 54.8% (74 of 135). Respondents reported a median of 2550 deliveries per year (interquartile range [IQR] 2000, 4000), with 30% delivered by cesarean delivery (IQR 25.5%, 32.5%) and 5% of cesarean deliveries performed under general anesthesia (IQR 4%, 8%). Most institutions recovered postcesarean patients in either an obstetric perianesthesia care unit or a labor, delivery, and recovery room. Recovery care was staffed solely by perinatal nurses, rather than dedicated perianesthesia care unit nurses in most institutions. Forty-five percent (28 of 62) of institutions had no specific postanesthesia recovery training for nursing staff providing postcesarean care for patients recovering from neuraxial or general anesthesia. Forty-three percent (29 of 67) of respondents rated the recovery care provided to cesarean delivery patients as lower quality than care given to general surgical patients. Respondents who relied solely on perinatal nurses to provide postanesthesia care were most likely to perceive that postanesthetic care for cesarean delivery was of lower quality than that given to general surgery patients (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines put forth by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care and the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses apply to all postoperative patients regardless of their recovery locations. Results from this survey suggest that the level of care provided for postanesthesia recovery from cesarean delivery in North American academic institutions may not meet these guidelines.