[Effects of a multifactorial intervention for improving frailty on risk of long-term care insurance certification, death, and long-term care cost among community-dwelling older adults: A quasi-experimental study using propensity score matching].

Objectives　To examine the effects of a multifactorial intervention for improving frailty-comprising resistance exercise and nutritional and psychosocial programs-on the risk of long-term care insurance (LTCI) certification, death, and long-term care (LTC) cost among community-dwelling older adults.Methods　Seventy-seven individuals (47 in 2011 and 30 in 2013) from the Hatoyama Cohort Study (742 individuals) participated in a multifactorial intervention. Non-participants were from the same cohort (including people who were invited to participate in the multifactorial intervention but declined). We performed propensity score matching with a ratio of 1 : 2 (intervention group vs. non-participant group). Afterward, 70 individuals undergoing the multifactorial intervention and 140 non-participants were selected. The risk of LTCI certification and/or death and the mean LTC cost during the follow-up period (32 months) were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model and generalized linear model (gamma regression model).Results　The incidence of new LTCI certification (per 1,000 person-years) tended to be lower in the intervention group than in the non-participant group (1.8 vs. 3.6), but this was not statistically significant as per the Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio=0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.17-1.54). Although the incidence of LTC cost was not significant, the mean cumulative LTC cost during the 32 months and the mean LTC cost per unit during the follow-up period (1 month) were 375,308 JPY and 11,906 JPY/month, respectively, in the intervention group and 1,040,727 JPY and 33,460 JPY/month, respectively, in the non-participant group. Cost tended to be lower in the intervention group than in the non-participant group as per the gamma regression model (cumulative LTC cost: cost ratio=0.36, 95%CI=0.11-1.21, P=0.099; LTC cost per unit follow-up period: cost ratio=0.36, 95%CI=0.11-1.12, P=0.076).Conclusions　These results suggest that a multifactorial intervention comprising resistance exercise, nutritional, and psychosocial programs is effective in lowering the incidence of LTCI certification, consequently saving LTC cost, although the results were not statistically significant. Further research with a stricter study design is needed.

Incidence of hip fracture among long-term care insurance beneficiaries with dementia: comparison of home care and institutional care services.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture among older adults is not only a major health issue but also preventable by providing proper care, but there is a lack of studies on the association between type of long-term care (LTC) service and hip fracture. This study aimed to investigate the association between the type of LTC service and the incidence of hip fracture among older adults with dementia receiving long-term care insurance (LTCI), and to investigate how such association differs according to characteristics of beneficiaries and structural characteristic of institutional care. METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study, data from 2008 to 2013 were collected from 7112 LTCI beneficiaries having benefit level 1 or 2 with dementia aged 60 years or over in the Korean elderly cohort data set. Type of LTC service was categorized into institutional or home care using the LTCI Claims Database, and the incidence of hip fracture was used as the outcome variable. A survival analysis using a time-dependent Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the association between time-varying LTC service type and hip fracture. RESULTS: Of the 7112 older adults, 115 (1.6%) had hip fracture during a total of 16,540 person-years. Compared to LTC beneficiaries with home care, those with institutional care had a higher adjusted hazards ratio of incidence of hip fracture (hazards ratio = 4.33, 95% confidence interval, 2.84-6.59). This association was particularly strong among beneficiaries who did not have a danger of hip fracture during the mandatory assessment for benefit eligibility, who were partially ambulatory, who were from rural areas, and females. CONCLUSIONS: Institutional care was more likely associated with a higher incidence of hip fracture than home care. The government need to watch the institutional LTC services quality and promote improvements of the institutional care quality.

The 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands: Getting the financial incentives right?

In 2015 the system of long-term care (LTC) financing and provision in the Netherlands was profoundly reformed. The benefits covered by the former comprehensive public LTC insurance scheme were split up and allocated to three different financing regimes. The objectives of the reform were to improve the coordination between LTC, medical care and social care, and to reinforce incentives for an efficient provision of care by making risk-bearing health insurers and municipalities responsible for procurement. Unintentionally, the reform also created a number of major incentive problems, however, resulting from the way: (i) LTC benefits were split up across the three financing regimes; (ii) the various third party purchasers were compensated; and (iii) co-payments for the beneficiaries were designed. These incentive problems may result in cost shifting, lack of coordination between various LTC providers, inefficient use of LTC services and quality skimping. We discuss several options to get the financial incentives better aligned with the objectives of the reform.

Long-term care insurance: buy it or not!

Subscribing to a long-term care (LTC) insurance plan for future health care and services is one of the most difficult decisions aging Americans need to make today. Although it may be difficult to predict who will need an LTC plan and for how long, various factors play an important role in determining whether to purchase LTC insurance. This article provides general information about LTC plans including private insurance, their coverage, and implications for gerontologic nurses.

Care-needs certification in the long-term care insurance system of Japan.

The introduction of Japan's long-term care insurance (LTCI) system in April 2000 has made long-term care an explicit and universal entitlement for every Japanese person aged 65 and older based strictly on physical and mental status. At the start of the program, more than two million seniors were expected to apply for services to approximately 3,000 municipal governments, which are the LTCI insurers. The LTCI implementation required a nationally standardized needs-certification system to determine service eligibility objectively, fairly, and efficiently. The current computer-aided initial needs-assessment instrument was developed based on data collected in a large-scale time study of professional caregivers in long-term care institutions. The instrument was subsequently tested and validated by assessing data of 175,129 seniors involved in the national model programs before the start of LTCI. The computer-aided initial assessment (an 85-item questionnaire) is used to assign each applicant to one of seven need levels. The Care Needs Certification Board, a committee of medical and other professionals, reviews the results. Three years after implementation, the LTCI system and its needs-assessment/certification system have been well accepted in Japan. Despite the overall successes, there remain challenges, including area variations, growing demands for services, and the difficulty of keeping the needs certification free of politics. The LTCI computer network that links municipalities and the central government is instrumental in continuously improving the needs-certification system. Future challenges include promoting evidence-based system improvements and building incentives into the system for various constituencies to promote seniors' functional independence.

[Geriatric medicine and long-term care insurance].

Long-term care insurance (LCI) started from April 2000 in Japan. LCI now occupies a central position in the health care of the aged. We reviewed all original papers and reports on LCI published in 1996-2002. At the end of 2002, we searched for papers on LCI in a computer database using the keyword of LCI, and found 3,606 papers. Authors and contents of each paper were categorized using 54 kinds of keywords. Frequent authors were government agencies, care managers, physical therapists, and physicians. When we analyzed these papers according to the places where LCI was used, more than 50% of reports concerned LCI at home. Most frequent keywords were Government/LCI system. Regional health, Physician' assessment and grades for care. Care management, Care manager, and Rehabilitation. Care manager was less observed after the start of LCI. In contrast, the use of keywords including Care service. Dementia, Geriatric syndrome, Nurse, Institutional medicine, Hospital care, Medicine for the aged, Terminal care, Dialysis therapy, Abuse of the aged, and Caregiver burden were increased after LCI. At the beginning of LCI, main concerns are on the new LCI system. However, more individual issues in the care of the aged are now discussed. New issues such as Abuse of the aged and Caregiver burden have been recently raised. From these observations, the role of geriatric medicine seems also to be changing after the induction of LCI. We would now contribute actively to crucial aspects of LCI, such as comprehensive assessment of the aged, functional medical network with care staffs, and new therapeutic approaches to each geriatric syndrome.

Are there inequities in the assessment of dementia under Japan's LTC insurance system?

BACKGROUND: Just two years after its inception, Japan's Long-term Care (LTC) insurance system is facing considerable criticism about whether or not it has developed a fair and appropriate way of allocating resources to the nation's disabled elderly population, especially those people with dementia. OBJECTIVE: The present study has investigated: (i) the relation of the Government-Certified Disability Index (GCDI) of the LTC insurance system to characteristics of people with dementia and their family caregivers; and (ii) whether the GCDI scores adequately reflect needs of people with DAT (dementia of Alzheimer's type) and VD (vascular-type dementia). METHODS: Subjects were assessed on their visits to outpatient clinics for their Activities of Daily Living (ADL), behavioural disturbances, MMSE, GCDI, service utilization and caregiver burden. Correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationships among these variables, which were subsequently compared between the DAT and VD patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The GCDI was found to be associated with patients' ADLs and MMSE scores, and not with behavioural disturbances or caregiver burden. Compared to VD patients, people with DAT tended to have more behavioural disturbances but better ADL functioning. As a result, DAT patients were classified as 'less disabled' on their GCDI than VD patients, even though their caregivers felt as much burden as the caregivers of VD patients. These results show that the GCDI probably underestimates the impact of behaviour problems. Suggestions are made for a more balanced assessment of demented patients that is more consistent with their needs.

[Factors related to under-utilization of in-home services under the long-term insurance system].

PURPOSES: This study was conducted to examine factors associated with under-utilization of in-home services covered by the long-term care insurance. Under-utilization was measured in terms of the discrepancy rate between benefits limits and service costs for individuals. Based on the behavioral model, possible predictors were chosen; the level of nursing care as the need factor, living arrangements and income as enabling factors, and family caregiving consciousness as a predisposing factor. Both direct and interaction effects of those factors were examined. METHODS: 1,500 people were randomly selected from all people certified as needing long-term care in one ward, Tokyo to be interviewed. People categorized as "requires assistance" or "requires nursing care level 1" were interviewed directly. With people categorized as "level 2" to "level 5", their primary caregivers were interviewed. Information about in-home service utilization was collected from the insurer. RESULTS: People who were categorized as requiring a lower level of nursing care, lived with others, had a low income, or had high family caregiving consciousness demonstrated significantly greater under-utilization rate as compared with others. An interaction between living arrangements and the level of nursing was observed in this regard. While people who lived alone exhibited low a level of under-utilization rate without regard of the level of nursing care, the rate changed by those who lived with other. CONCLUSIONS: Under the new system, informal support might have a significant impact on under-utilization of in-home services. The responsibility for paying 10% of total care costs might be related to under-utilization by people with low income, though reduction of individual co-payments has been introduced for individuals in difficult financial conditions.

Questions of distributive justice: public health nurses' perceptions of long-term care insurance for elderly Japanese people.

This study examines public health nurses' perceptions and concerns about the implications of Japan's new long-term care insurance law concerning care provision for elderly people and their families. Respondents voiced their primary concern about this law as access to services for all elderly people needing care, and defined their major responsibility as strengthening health promotion and illness prevention programmes. Although wanting to expand their roles to meet the health care, social and public policy advocacy needs of elderly persons and their families, respondents also stated their concern for the possible lack of enough resources for this expansion to support family caregivers adequately. They viewed their first function as developing collaborative relationships with local government officials to help to assure sufficient resources to provide the necessary foundation for long-term care programmes to deliver services to all those in need. These concerns fall within the larger ethical issue of distributive justice in a society based on the obligations of the state to citizens and the family to its members, especially elderly relatives, who, according to traditional Japanese values, retain respect.

Are the care levels of people with dementia correctly assessed for eligibility of the Japanese long-term care insurance?

BACKGROUND: A new long-term care insurance system was launched in Japan in April 2000. OBJECTIVES: We performed the first national survey on special units of psychiatric hospitals for dementia patients to examine whether their disabilities were well reflected in the eligibility assessment. METHODS: Of all 248 dementia special units of psychiatric hospitals in Japan, 180 units (72.6%) participated in the survey. Five patients were randomly selected in each unit, and we used data of 802 (89.1%) of 900 patients whose care levels were obtained by the primary computer assessment. These patients were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), dementia rating scale by Gottfries et al. (1982) (GBS), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The mean score (SD) of the MMSE was 9.3 (6.9). RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis revealed that the scores of motor function in GBS, ADL, MMSE, and the degree of bedridden explained 73% of the variation of care level. The higher care levels were inversely related to lower MMSE scores. In the group of people who were not bedridden, the MMSE score sharply decreased even though their physical functions were maintained. There were no significant differences in the MMSE scores among the care level 1 and 5 groups except between care level 1 and 3 after controlling for the motor function scores in GBS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that care level and cognitive impairment are generally correlated in the primary assessment, but some adjustment measure for cognitive impairment is needed in mildly or moderately physically disabled patients.

Changing systems in health and social care for older people in Japan: observations and implications for interprofessional working.

The impact of a rapidly ageing population on the development of insurance policies and health and social care services of older people is a major concern in Japan. The discussion in this paper draws on information gained from recent visits to leaders of these services in Japan. The paper briefly reviews the policy and demographic background to recent legislative changes in the long-term care insurance system, models of care management and assessment and outstanding challenges for health and social care professionals. Some key issues have emerged with implications for interprofessional working, such as the lack of integrated care systems, contradictions within the scope and responsibilities of care management, and the absence of quality and ethical frameworks to safeguard the interests of the service user and carer.