Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 161
Filtrar
1.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 25(5): 779-787, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30426595

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery is an effective procedure for morbidly obese patients when all else fails. The purpose of this study was to compare the hospital length of stay (LOS) for two surgical procedures, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: This study was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009 to 2014. Patients who received bariatric surgery as indicated by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes were selected (N = 4001). Cases were limited to uncomplicated diabetic patients. Differences in the odds of long vs short (2< and ≥2) stay for a patient receiving LSG were compared with LAGB while adjusting for hospital volume, hospital size, patient age, gender, ethnicity, season, and year using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The odds for LSG (odds ratio [OR] = 0.100, 0.066-0.150, P < 0.001) patients for long LOS are lower when compared with LAGB. In the stratified logistic regression model, both male (OR = 0.157, 0.074-0.333, P < 0.001) and female (OR = 0.077, 0.046-0.127, P < 0.001) had reduced odds of extended LOS for LSG. Discharged patients in the year 2012 (OR = 0.660, 0.536-0.813, P < 0.001) had decreased odds of having a longer LOS when compared with the year 2014. Both government, nonfederal (OR = 0.452, 0.251-0.816, P = 0.008), and private investor-owned (OR = 0.421, 0.244-0.726, P < 0.001) patients had similar odds for long duration of stay when compared with government or private. Urban non-teaching (OR = 1.954, 1.653-2.310, P < 0.001) patients had higher odds for long LOS in comparison with urban teaching. New England patients' (OR = 0.365, 0.232-0.576, P < 0.001) odds for extended LOS were lower when compared with pacific. Both patients who received care in low (OR = 1.330, 1.109-1.595, P = 0.002) and medium (OR = 1.639, 1.130-2.377, P = 0.009) volume hospital had increased odds for long duration of stay. Female patients in the stratified logistic regression model with high (OR = 1.330, 1.109-1.595, P < 0.002) volume had elevated odds of extended LOS when compared with very low volume hospital. CONCLUSION: Among the uncomplicated diabetic patients, LSG provides a substantially low odds of extended LOS after adjusting for covariates when compared with LAGB. The finding of the relative reduction in LOS for LSG suggests opportunities for improvement both for cost reduction for third party insurance payers and greater efficacy and outcomes for patients.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Mórbida , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/classificação , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
2.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 29(4): e394-405, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25244539

RESUMO

This study aimed at estimating the percentage of hospital discharges and days of care accounted for by Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) at Health Insurance Organization (HIO) hospitals in Alexandria, calculating hospitalization rates for ACSCs among HIO population and identifying determinants of hospitalization for those conditions. A sample of 8300 medical records of patients discharged from three hospitals affiliated to HIO at Alexandria was reviewed. The rate of monthly discharges for ACSCs was estimated on the basis of counting number of combined ACSCs detected in the three hospitals and the hospitals' average monthly discharges. ACSCs accounted for about one-fifth of hospitalizations and days of care at HIO hospitals (21.8% and 20.8%, respectively). Annual hospitalization rates for ACSCs were 152.5 per 10,000 insured population. The highest rates were attributed to cellulitis/abscess (47.3 per 10,000 population), followed by diabetes complications and asthma (42.8 and 20.8 per 10,00 population). Logistic regression indicated that age, number of previous admissions, and admission department are significant predictors for hospitalization for an ACSC.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Abscesso/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Celulite (Flegmão)/epidemiologia , Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Egito , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 177(8): 841-51, 2013 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23479344

RESUMO

In this study, we validated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's use of a 10% threshold of median proportion of positive laboratory tests (median proportion positive (MPP)) to identify respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons against a standard based on hospitalization claims. Medicaid fee-for-service recipients under 2 years of age from California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas (1999-2004), continuously eligible since birth, were categorized for each week as high-risk or low-risk with regard to RSV-related hospitalization based on medical and pharmacy claims data and birth certificates. Weeks were categorized as on-season if the RSV hospitalization incidence rate in high-risk children exceeded the seasonal peak of the incidence rate in low-risk children. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to measure the ability of MPP to discriminate between on-season and off-season weeks as determined from hospitalization data. Areas under the ROC curve ranged from 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.83, 0.92) in Illinois to 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.94, 0.98) in California. Requiring at least 5 positive tests in addition to the 10% MPP threshold optimized accuracy, as indicated by minimized root mean square errors. The 10% MPP with the added requirement of at least 5 positive tests is a valid method for identifying clinically significant RSV seasons across geographically diverse states.


Assuntos
Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/diagnóstico , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/isolamento & purificação , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , California/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Incidência , Lactente , Seguro de Hospitalização/economia , Laboratórios/economia , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Palivizumab , Prevalência , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/economia , Estações do Ano , Texas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 156(32): A4887, 2012.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22871252

RESUMO

The relationship between hospital volume and outcome of care after pancreatic surgery, particularly mortality, has been described extensively in the past. Today, this relationship is frequently being used by healthcare providers and/or insurance companies to select hospitals for various surgical procedures. This concept, however, has many limitations. The conceptual model concerning the relationship between how hospital facilities are arranged and the different aspects of the process of providing healthcare is discussed in three case histories describing complicated postoperative courses after pancreatic resections. The conclusion is that, besides hospital volume, the manner in which the various facilities in hospitals are arranged as well as the process of care giving, particularly the effectiveness of multidisciplinary meetings, are of crucial importance to the quality of care. Data per illness, with adequate correction for case mix, are of crucial importance for comparing the differences in quality of care between hospitals.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pancreatectomia/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Neurology ; 78(16): 1200-6, 2012 Apr 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22442428

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine national time trends of resective surgery for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy before and after Class I evidence demonstrating its efficacy and subsequent practice guidelines recommending early surgical evaluation. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study with time trends of patients admitted to US hospitals for medically refractory focal epilepsy between 1990 and 2008 who did or did not undergo lobectomy, as reported in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. RESULTS: Weighted data revealed 112,026 hospitalizations for medically refractory focal epilepsy and 6,653 resective surgeries (lobectomies and partial lobectomies) from 1990 to 2008. A trend of increasing hospitalizations over time was not accompanied by an increase in surgeries, producing an overall trend of decreasing surgery rates (F = 13.6, p < 0.01). Factors associated with this trend included a decrease in epilepsy hospitalizations at the highest-volume epilepsy centers, and increased hospitalizations to lower-volume hospitals that were found to be less likely to perform surgery. White patients were more likely to have surgery than racial minorities (relative risk [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.17), and privately insured individuals were more likely to receive lobectomy than those with Medicaid or Medicare (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25-1.30). CONCLUSION: Despite Class I evidence and subsequent practice guidelines, the utilization of lobectomy has not increased from 1990 to 2008. Surgery continues to be heavily underutilized as a treatment for epilepsy, with significant disparities by race and insurance coverage. Patients who are medically refractory after failing 2 antiepileptic medications should be referred to a comprehensive epilepsy center for surgical evaluation.


Assuntos
Lobectomia Temporal Anterior/tendências , Epilepsia/cirurgia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Adulto , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Ann Fam Med ; 9(6): 489-95, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22084259

RESUMO

PURPOSE Some studies suggest proprietary (for-profit) hospitals are maximizing financial margins from patient care by limiting therapies or decreasing length of stay for uninsured patients. This study examines the role of insurance related to length of stay once the patient is in the hospital and risk for mortality, particularly in a for-profit environment. METHODS We undertook an analysis of hospitalizations in the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) of the 5-year period of 2003 to 2007 for patients aged 18 to 64 years (unweighted n = 849,866; weighted n = 90 million). The analysis included those who were hospitalized with both ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs), hospitalizations considered to be preventable, and non-ACSCs. We analyzed the transformed mean length of stay between individuals who had Medicaid or all other insurance types while hospitalized and those who were hospitalized without insurance. This analysis was stratified by hospital ownership. We also examined the relationship between in-hospital mortality and insurance status. RESULTS After controlling for comorbidities; age, sex, and race/ethnicity; and hospitalizations with either an ACSC or non-ACSC diagnosis, patients without insurance tended to have a significantly shorter length of stay. Across all hospital types, the mean length of stay for ACSCs was significantly shorter for individuals without insurance (2.77 days) than for those with either private insurance (2.89 days, P = .04) or Medicaid (3.19, P <.01). Among hospitalizations for ACSCs, in-hospital mortality rate for individuals with either private insurance or Medicaid was not significantly different from the mortality rate for those without insurance. CONCLUSIONS Patients without insurance have shorter lengths of stay for both ACSCs and non-ACSCs. Future research should examine whether patients without insurance are being discharged prematurely.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais com Fins Lucrativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Religiosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Periodontol ; 82(6): 809-19, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21138352

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The chances of presenting to hospital emergency departments (EDs) are significantly higher in individuals who ignore regular dental care and in those with medical conditions. Little is known about nationwide estimates of hospital-based ED visits caused by periodontal conditions in the United States. The objective of this study is to determine the incidence of ED visits caused by periodontal conditions that occurred in a 2006 nationwide sample and to identify the risk factors for hospitalization during the ED visits. METHODS: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for 2006 was used for this study. Patients who visited the ED with a primary diagnosis of acute gingivitis, chronic gingivitis, gingival recession, aggressive or acute periodontitis, chronic periodontitis, periodontosis, accretions, other specified periodontal disease, or unspecified gingival and periodontal disease were selected for this study. Estimates were projected to the national levels using the discharge weights. The association between patient characteristics and the odds of being hospitalized was examined using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 85,039 visits to hospital-based EDs with a mean charge per visit of $456.31 and total charges close to $33.3 million were primarily attributed to gingival and periodontal conditions in the United States. Close to 36% and 33% of all visits occurred among the lowest income group and uninsured population, respectively. The total ED charges for those covered by Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and other insurance plans were close to $4.95 million, $9.14 million, $8.01 million, and $0.92 million, respectively. The uninsured were charged a total of $10.06 million. Inpatient admission to the same hospital was required for 1,167 visits. The total hospitalization charge for this group was $17.51 million. Patients with comorbid conditions (congestive heart failure, valvular disease, hypertension, paralysis, neurologic disorders, chronic pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, liver disease, AIDS, coagulopathy, deficiency anemia, obesity, alcohol abuse, or drug abuse) were associated with higher odds for hospitalization during an ED visit for periodontal conditions compared to those without comorbid conditions (P <0.05). Patients who had a primary diagnosis of acute or aggressive periodontitis were associated with significantly higher odds of being hospitalized during ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates from the NEDS suggest that a total of 85,039 hospital-based ED visits had a primary diagnosis for periodontal conditions. Close to $33.3 million was charged by hospitals for treating these conditions on an emergency basis. ED visits with a primary diagnosis for acute and aggressive periodontitis, covered by Medicare insurance, and comorbid conditions were more likely to result in hospitalization based on the analysis of the NEDS. However, when interpreting these conclusions, one should keep the limitations inherent to hospital discharge datasets in perspective.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Periodontais/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Comorbidade , Coleta de Dados , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Periodontais/diagnóstico , Características de Residência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 20(4): 344-8, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18852548

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the older adult population. The evidence of the incidence of morbidity and mortality in Mexican Americans compared to other ethnic groups is mixed. This study aims to examine characteristics and utilization patterns of older Mexican Americans compared to Whites and Blacks, hospitalized for hip fracture in the Southwestern United States. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Medicare and Medicaid claims data for the southwestern states of California, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Texas. All Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and above, hospitalized for non-pathologic hip fractures, participated in the study. Mexican Americans were directly identified from the H-EPESE database. The primary outcome measures were length of stay, total charges and number of diagnoses. RESULTS: The total proportion of hospital encounters related to hip fractures within each ethnic group was 3.7% for Whites, 2.0% for Mexican Americans and 1.2% for Blacks. The mean patient age for the hip fracture was 82.5 years while the non-hip fractures encounters had a mean age of 76.6 years. A higher percentage of Mexican Americans who suffered fracture were female. Although length of stay for Mexican Americans was equivalent to Whites, comparative total charges for Mexican Americans were lower. Mexican Americans also have lower mean number of diagnoses at admission than the other groups (MA=5.5, B=6.2, W=5.9: p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mexican American elders in the southwestern United States who are hospitalized for hip fractures are more likely to be female, relatively healthier, and have lower health care costs when compared to Whites and especially to Blacks in the same region.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/etnologia , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare , Americanos Mexicanos/etnologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/classificação , Humanos , Masculino , Sudoeste dos Estados Unidos , Estados Unidos
9.
Surgery ; 144(2): 133-40, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18656618

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A strong volume-outcome relationship has been demonstrated for pancreatic resection, and regionalization of care to high-volume centers (>11 resections/year) has been recommended. However, it is unclear if volume alone should be the sole criteria for regionalization. The objective of this study is to evaluate variability in outcomes among high-volume hospitals (>11 resections/year). METHODS: We used the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Database from 1999 through 2005 to evaluate variability in outcomes after pancreatic resection among high-volume hospitals in Texas. The outcome variables of interest were mortality, length of stay, discharge to a skilled nursing facility, operation within 24 hours of hospital admission, and total hospital charges. Unadjusted and adjusted models were performed. RESULTS: A total of 12 high-volume hospitals were in Texas. The number of resections at each hospital ranged from 78-608 cases for the 7-year time period studied. In unadjusted models, there was significant variability in mortality (range, 0.7%-7.7%, P < .0001), duration of stay (range of medians, 9-21 days, P < .0001), the need for ongoing nursing care at discharge (range, 0.7%-41.4%, P < .0001), operation within 24 hours of admission (range, 41%-96%, P < .0001), and total hospital charges (median range, $38,318-$110,860, P < .0001). There were significant differences in the demographics, risks of mortality, and illness severity among the 12 high-volume hospitals. Therefore, multivariate models were used to control for age group, sex, race/ethnicity, risk of mortality, illness severity, admission status, diagnosis, procedure, and insurance status. In the multivariate models, the particular hospital at which the pancreatic surgery was performed was a significant independent predictor of every outcome variable except mortality. CONCLUSIONS: For pancreatic resection, there is significant variability in outcomes even among high-volume providers. Individual hospitals likely account for much of the variability not explained by hospital volume. Although the structure measure of hospital volume is easy to measure, these data suggest that it is not a reliable single measure of quality or outcomes after pancreatic surgery.


Assuntos
Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
10.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 61(4): 373-9, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18313562

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We have developed and validated an algorithm based on Piedmont hospital discharge abstracts for ascertainment of incident cases of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The algorithm training and validation sets were based on data from 2000 and 2001, respectively. The validation was carried out at an individual level by linkage of cases identified by the algorithm with cases in the Piedmont Cancer Registry diagnosed in 2001. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the algorithm was higher for lung cancer (80.8%) than for breast (76.7%) and colorectal (72.4%) cancers. The positive predictive values were 78.7%, 87.9%, and 92.6% for lung, colorectal, and breast cancer, respectively. The high values for colorectal and breast cancers were due to the model's ability to distinguish prevalent from incident cases and to the accuracy of surgery claims for case identification. CONCLUSIONS: Given its moderate sensitivity, this algorithm is not intended to replace cancer registration, but it is a valuable tool to investigate other aspects of cancer surveillance. This method provides a valid study base for timely monitoring cancer practice and related outcomes, geographic and temporal variations, and costs.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Registro Médico Coordenado/métodos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Masculino , Curva ROC , Sistema de Registros , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
11.
Hepatology ; 45(5): 1282-9, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17464970

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Having complications of portal hypertension is a harbinger of decompensated cirrhosis and warrants consideration for liver transplantation (LT). Racial disparities in LT have been reported. We sought to characterize disparities in the performing of surgical and endoscopic procedures among hospitalized patients with complications of portal hypertension. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2003 to identify patients with cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension. Logistic regression controlling for confounders was used to evaluate race as a predictor of undergoing a portosystemic shunt and LT and of dying in the hospital. Compared to whites, the adjusted odds ratios of receiving a portosystemic shunt were 0.37 (95% CI: 0.27-0.51) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54-0.88) for African Americans (AAs) and Hispanics, respectively. AAs with variceal bleeding were more likely to have endoscopic variceal hemostasis delayed more than 24 hours after admission than were whites (OR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.1). The adjusted odds ratios of undergoing LT were 0.32 (95% CI:0.20-0.52) and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.25-0.83) for AAs and Hispanics, respectively. Compared to whites, AAs experienced higher in-hospital mortality (OR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01-1.24), whereas Hispanics had a lower risk of death (OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.92). Among variceal bleeders, the odds ratio of death for AAs was 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2-2.4) compared to whites. CONCLUSION: AAs and Hispanics hospitalized for complications of portal hypertension were less likely to undergo a palliative shunt or LT than whites, which may contribute to the higher in-hospital mortality of AAs. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms of these exploratory findings.


Assuntos
População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Hipertensão Portal/etnologia , Hipertensão Portal/terapia , Cirrose Hepática/etnologia , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Endoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etnologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Técnicas Hemostáticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/complicações , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Derivação Portossistêmica Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Women Birth ; 20(2): 49-55, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17369116

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine the regional impact of a shift from public to private hospital care on birthing outcomes. PROCEDURES: A retrospective regional cohort study analysed the birth outcomes for 20,826 live singleton births of gestation >or=37 weeks, within one regional area in New South Wales between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2003. Rates of intervention for induction of labour (IOL), epidural pain relief and operative mode of birth were established and analysed according to hospital type. A cascade model was then constructed for total births by hospital type. FINDINGS: Regional birthing outcomes were significantly affected by a shift from public to private hospital care. The introduction of a new private hospital birth facility in the region studied, led to 90% of all privately insured births within the region shifting to the private hospital. During the period 1997-2003, overall regional rates for IOL increased from 38 to 45%, epidural use in labour increased from 10.4 to 21.1% and the caesarean section rate increased from 14.1 to 24.75%. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a new private hospital birthing facility into the regional health area studied and the shift from public to private hospital birth had a profound impact on the overall birthing experiences of women in the region. This suggests that private hospital services are not a direct substitute for public hospital birthing services. The cascade effect was present for women regardless of risk category and more pronounced in the private hospital. Women who are privately insured require better information to assist them in choosing their birthing environment, rather than assuming that they are simply buying a comparable product through private insurance.


Assuntos
Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Privatização/normas , Comportamento de Escolha , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Unidade Hospitalar de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Privatização/economia , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Healthc Financ Manage ; 60(7): 68-70, 72, 74, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16869326

RESUMO

Data warehouses can virtually eliminate claims-related paper and fax transactions for hospitals. Data are accessible electronically, decreasing the need for staff to check on outstanding claims status requests by phone. Data warehouse technology can be used to create analytical reports and identify issues by dollar volume or procedure code. Providers can receive instant reports on both the "front end," as they are submitted, and on the "back end," when claims are denied.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Base de Dados , Processamento Eletrônico de Dados , Centros de Informação , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Serviços Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Técnicas de Planejamento , Software/tendências , Estados Unidos
14.
Z Psychosom Med Psychother ; 52(1): 63-80, 2006.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16740232

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of psychosomatic in-patient treatment was evaluated using patients' subjective health ratings and objective data provided by health insurance companies. Associations between subjective and objective criteria were investigated. METHODS: 318 patients participated in the study. They completed questionnaires on physical complaints, moods and everyday functioning upon hospital admission, at discharge and at one-year follow-up. Insurance companies provided data for 140 of these patients (44 %). Sick leave and the utilization of in-patient treatment were assessed for a period of two years before and two years after psychosomatic treatment. RESULTS: As expected, subjective health status improved. The utilization of in-patient treatment decreased in both years after treatment compared to the year before. Sick leave increased in the first year after treatment but decreased significantly below the base level in the second year after treatment. Self-efficacy expectations and being employed were found to be predictors for long-term reduction in the length of in-patient treatment. Subjective and objective criteria were only slightly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Sick leave and utilization of in-patient treatment were found to increase considerably in the year before psychosomatic treatment. Therefore, pre-post differences over the entire period were only marginal. The change in subjective criteria was more immediate, while changes in some objective parameters were delayed. Both subjective and objective criteria should be included in outcome studies.


Assuntos
Admissão do Paciente , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/terapia , Atividades Cotidianas/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Afeto , Idoso , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/psicologia , Licença Médica , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Crit Care Med ; 34(3 Suppl): S82-7, 2006 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16477209

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the effect of Medicare part A payments (to hospitals) and part B payments (to providers) on critical care in the United States. DATA SOURCE AND SELECTION: Sources included U.S. government data and published literature reviewing the impact of Medicate payments on critical care. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Government data were reviewed to assess the history and status of reimbursement to hospitals and healthcare providers. These data, along with input from published literature, was used to assess the adequacy of current and projected Medicare reimbursements and the implications of these payments. CONCLUSION: Medicare payments to hospitals, particularly for critically ill patients, seem to fall short of the costs of caring for these patients. Reimbursements to providers seem more encouraging, although the opportunity exists to improve in this area as well.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/economia , Medicare Part A/economia , Medicare Part B/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part A/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part B/estatística & dados numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
16.
ED Manag ; 16(12): 140-1, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15605901

RESUMO

Research shows your ED is not necessarily a burden to your hospital's bottom line; take advantage of the data. Use statistics to demonstrate your department should get its fair share of funding. Since ED patients often are sicker than others in the hospital, they should have equal priority for beds. EDs do not treat mainly the "fringes of society." You're entitled to equal consideration when it comes to staffing.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estados Unidos
17.
JAMA ; 292(13): 1563-72, 2004 Oct 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15467058

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Nonwhite patients experience significantly longer times to fibrinolytic therapy (door-to-drug times) and percutaneous coronary intervention (door-to-balloon times) than white patients, raising concerns of health care disparities, but the reasons for these patterns are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To estimate race/ethnicity differences in door-to-drug and door-to-balloon times for patients receiving primary reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; to examine how sociodemographic factors, insurance status, clinical characteristics, and hospital features mediate racial/ethnic differences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective, observational study using admission and treatment data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) for a US cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or left bundle-branch block and receiving reperfusion therapy. Patients (73,032 receiving fibrinolytic therapy; 37,143 receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention) were admitted from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2002, to hospitals participating in NRMI 3 and 4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Minutes between hospital arrival and acute reperfusion therapy. RESULTS: Door-to-drug times were significantly longer for patients identified as African American/black (41.1 minutes), Hispanic (36.1 minutes), and Asian/Pacific Islander (37.4 minutes), compared with patients identified as white (33.8 minutes) (P<.01 for all). Door-to-balloon times for patients identified as African American/black (122.3 minutes) or Hispanic (114.8 minutes) were significantly longer than for patients identified as white (103.4 minutes) (P<.001 for both). Racial/ethnic differences were still significant but were substantially reduced after accounting for differences in mean times to treatment for the hospitals in which patients were treated; significant racial/ethnic differences persisted after further adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, insurance status, and clinical and hospital characteristics (P<.01 for all). CONCLUSION: A substantial portion of the racial/ethnic disparity in time to treatment was accounted for by the specific hospital to which patients were admitted, in contrast to differential treatment by race/ethnicity inside the hospital.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/etnologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Trombolítica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
Health Care Manag (Frederick) ; 22(3): 190-202, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12956220

RESUMO

This study analyzed whether a children's hospital urgent care clinic helped increase market share. Patient demographics and utilization patterns between the suburban clinic and urban emergency department were compared over a three-year period (July 1999 to June 2002). Using data from a standardized billing form, all patient visits (clinic: 36,924; emergency department: 160,888) were analyzed. Variables included patient visitation date, age, gender, race, primary insurance carrier, primary diagnosis, and primary residence Zip code. Differences between the after-hours clinic and emergency department included: more private insurance coverage (83% and 35%, respectively); less no insurance/Medicaid/State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) coverage (16.4% and 55%, respectively); and more Caucasian patients (80% and 35%, respectively) at the off-site clinic; thus usage was more similar with that of a physician's office than an outpatient clinic. Symptoms seen in the after-hours clinic were primarily respiratory, ear, and throat related. In the emergency department, the symptoms were more varied, primarily febrile, respiratory, ear, throat, gastrointestinal, and urinary tract problems. There was a 3.6% increase in the number of visits in the after-hours clinic and a 1.6% decrease in the number of emergency department visits between year one and year three--data combined giving an overall 4.8% increase in the number of visits. Data show that the offsite urgent care clinic located in a suburban area increased the overall number of visits with a large number of well-insured patients. Additionally, this study provided data on where the clinic could expand medical care for the community.


Assuntos
Plantão Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Plantão Médico/organização & administração , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Afiliação Institucional , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
19.
J Health Econ ; 22(3): 331-59, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12683956

RESUMO

The Australian hospital system is characterized by the co-existence of private hospitals, where individuals pay for services and public hospitals, where services are free to all but delivered after a waiting time. The decision to purchase insurance for private hospital treatment depends on the trade-off between the price of treatment, waiting time, and the insurance premium. Clearly, the potential for adverse selection and moral hazard exists. When the endogeneity of the insurance decision is accounted for, the extent of moral hazard can substantially increase the expected length of a hospital stay by a factor of up to 3.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor/economia , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/classificação , Seleção Tendenciosa de Seguro , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Comportamento do Consumidor/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomada de Decisões , Características da Família , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
20.
J Health Care Finance ; 29(3): 11-27, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12635991

RESUMO

Despite expansions in the public insurance coverage of pregnant women, concerns over poor birth outcomes remain. Poor birth outcomes occur among publicly and privately insured women, however, thereby imposing excess costs on employers and their insurers. Data from a large sample of privately insured for 1996 are used to examine these outcomes and costs. Almost one-fourth (24.3 percent) of the infants in our matched sample of 12,020 deliveries was premature or had other problems at birth. Costs for these infants accounted for 82 percent of the total $56 million spent on sample infants. The incremental cost of infants with poor birth outcomes versus those with normal, full-terms was approximately $14,600. We found that these relative costs had increased over time due perhaps to the increased technology and intensity of services used to save infant lives. We also found that factors other than maternal and infant complications affected cost variations. For example, employers located in the Northeast, hiring older mothers, and in unionized sectors have higher prenatal, delivery, and infant costs.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Adulto , Cesárea/economia , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Saúde para o Empregador/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA