Empirical superior vena cava electrical isolation guided by quantitative ablation index improves outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The value of empirical superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to improve the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of quantitative ablation index (AI)-guided empirical SVCI, in addition to PVI, for patients with PAF. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic PAF who underwent RFCA between October 2021 and May 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into PVI-only group and PVI+SVCI group based on the intraoperative ablation strategy. RFCA was guided by quantitative AI in both groups. Regular clinical follow-ups were conducted to detect AF recurrence, defined as any episode of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia lasting >30 s. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were enrolled, with 108 patients in the PVI group and 138 patients in the PVI+SVCI group. Compared with the PVI group, patients in the PVI+SVCI group had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (p=0.04), stroke (p=0.02) and a smaller left atrial diameter (p<0.01). After a follow-up period of 16±6 months, the ablation success rate was significantly higher in the SVCI+PVI group compared with the PVI group (91.3% vs 81.5%, p=0.02). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that SVCI was an independent predictor of reduced AF recurrence postablation (Relative Risk [RR] 0.4, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.90, p=0.026). No significant difference in complication rates was observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: Quantitative AI-guided empirical SVCI, in addition to PVI, improves the success rate of RFCA for PAF without increasing the risk of complications.

Mechanistic Insights From Trials of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Charting a Course for the Future.

Success rates for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly persistent AF, remain suboptimal. Pulmonary vein isolation has been the cornerstone for catheter ablation of AF for over a decade. While successful for most patients, pulmonary vein isolation alone is still insufficient for a substantial minority. Frustratingly, multiple clinical trials testing a diverse array of additional ablation approaches have led to mixed results, with no current strategy that improves AF outcomes beyond pulmonary vein isolation in all patients. Nevertheless, this large collection of data could be used to extract important insights regarding AF mechanisms and the diversity of the AF syndrome. Mechanistically, the general model for arrhythmogenesis prompts the need for tools to individually assess triggers, drivers, and substrates in individual patients. A key goal is to identify those who will not respond to pulmonary vein isolation, with novel approaches to phenotyping that may include mapping to identify alternative drivers or critical substrates. This, in turn, can allow for the implementation of phenotype-based, targeted approaches that may categorize patients into groups who would or would not be likely to respond to catheter ablation, pharmacological therapy, and risk factor modification programs. One major goal is to predict individuals in whom additional empirical ablation, while feasible, may be futile or lead to atrial scarring or proarrhythmia. This work attempts to integrate key lessons from successful and failed trials of catheter ablation, as well as models of AF, to suggest future paradigms for AF treatment.

Pulsed field vs very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of a multicenter, real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency ablation are the most recently introduced technologies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The procedural performance, safety, and effectiveness of PFA vs vHPSD are currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare PFA with vHPSD for the treatment of paroxysmal or persistent AF. METHODS: We conducted an observational, multicenter study enrolling 534 consecutive patients (63 ± 9 years; 36% female) with paroxysmal (n = 368 [69%]) or persistent (n = 166 [31%]) AF undergoing ablation by either PFA (Farapulse; n = 192) or vHPSD (90 W/4 seconds; QDOT Micro; n = 342) between 2020 and 2023. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after a 1-month blanking period was the primary efficacy end point and was assessed both overall and in propensity score-matched patients. The primary safety end point was a composite of procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Successful pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients, with shorter procedure duration (PFA,70 minutes; vHPSD, 100 minutes; P < .001) but longer fluoroscopy time (PFA, 15 minutes; vHPSD, 7 minutes; P < .001) in the PFA group. PFA was associated with more frequent use of general anesthesia (P < .001). Primary safety outcome events occurred in 19 patients (3.5%), with similar prevalence in both groups (PFA, 4%; vHPSD, 3%; P = .745). After a median follow-up of 12 (9-12) months, survival free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar between the PFA and vHPSD groups, both overall (12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 76%; log-rank P = .73) and in propensity score-matched patients (n = 342; 12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 77%; log-rank P = .980). CONCLUSION: In a large, multicenter experience, PFA was associated with more common use of general anesthesia, shorter procedural times, and longer fluoroscopy exposure compared with vHPSD ablation, with both techniques displaying superimposable safety and efficacy.

Pulsed-field vs cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation: Outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has shown promising data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), with similar long-term outcomes compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the procedural and long-term outcomes in patients with persistent AF undergoing PVI using PFA, CBA, or RFA. METHODS: Consecutive patients with persistent AF undergoing first PVI with PFA, CBA, or RFA were included. Patients underwent 7-day Holter electrocardiography at 3, 6, and 12 months postablation. The primary outcome was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Safety outcomes included the composite of in-hospital major adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 533 patients with persistent AF underwent PVI using PFA (n = 214, 39%), CBA (n = 190, 36%), or RFA (n = 129, 24%). Procedures with PFA guided by fluoroscopy were shorter than those with CBA (median 60 minutes; interquartile range [IQR] 53-80 minutes vs 84 minutes; IQR 68-101 minutes; P ≤ .001), and procedures with PFA in combination with 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping were shorter than those with RFA (median 101 minutes; IQR 85-126 minutes vs 171 minutes; IQR 141-204 minutes; P < .001). Acute safety events occurred in 2.3%, 2.6%, and 0.8% in the PFA, CBA, and RFA groups, respectively (P = .545). The 1-year confounder-adjusted estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 62.1% for CBA, 55.3% for PFA, and 48.3% for RFA (CBA vs PFA: P = .79; CBA vs RFA: P = .009; PFA vs RFA: P = .010). CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent AF undergoing first PVI, 1-year confounder-adjusted outcomes are better with PFA and CBA than with RFA.

Durability of thermal pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation assessed by mandated repeat invasive study.

BACKGROUND: No study has assessed the durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. These data are especially lacking for those with significantly diseased left atria (LA). OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to assess PVI durability in patients with significant LA disease and to compare reconnection rates between RF and CB. METHODS: Forty-four patients (mean age 63 years; 34 (77%) male; median time since atrial fibrillation diagnosis 22.5 months; median indexed LA volume 36 mL/m2) were randomized 1:1 to RF or CB PVI. A redo procedure using ultra-high-density electroanatomic mapping was mandated at 2 months, where PV reconnections were identified and reisolated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent both procedures (CB n = 17; RF n = 21). Index RF procedures were longer (median 158 minutes vs 97 minutes; P < .001) but required less fluoroscopy (9.5 minutes vs 23 minutes; P < .001). At the index RF procedure, a median of 47% of LA myocardium had voltage < 0.5 mV, suggesting that half of the mapped LA comprised scar. PV reconnection was observed in 73 of 152 PVs (48.0%) and was more frequent with CB (58.8%) than with RF (39.3%) (P = .022). Reconnection of at least 1 PV was detected in >75% of patients. Significantly more ablation was required during the redo procedure to reisolate PVs in the CB arm (median 10.8 minutes vs 1.2 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSION: PVI durability may be poor in those with significant LA scarring and dilatation, even with modern thermal ablation technologies. RF resulted in significantly better PVI durability than did CB in this complex population.

Quantitative comparison of the isolation lesions between conventional- and larger-sized visually guided laser balloon ablation.

BACKGROUND: The importance of a wider circumferential isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV), which includes a large portion of the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW), has been suggested in several studies. However, the extended isolation area using a larger inflated visually guided laser balloon (VGLB) ablation remains to be elucidated. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent VGLB ablation were enrolled in this prospective study. An electroanatomic map of the left atrium was obtained before and after PV isolation (PVI) using a conventional-sized VGLB. The isolation areas were extended by the largest-sized VGLB ablation and remapped in the same manner. After the ablation, isolation areas were calculated with CARTO-3 system. The one-year atrial arrhythmia (Ata) recurrence was assessed.  RESULTS: The largest-sized VGLB ablation yielded statistically greater areas of isolation in left-sided PV antrum (PVA) (11.5 ± 2.3 cm2 vs. 15.9 ± 3.5 cm2, P < .001) and right-sided PVA (14.2 ± 3.3 cm2 vs. 20.6 ± 4.4 cm2, P < .001) than the conventional-sized VGLB. Further, non-ablated LAPW (12.3 ± 4.4 cm2 vs. 7.8 ± 3.9 cm2, P < .001) was significantly reduced after largest-sized VGLB ablation, compared to the conventional-sized VGLB ablation. The one-year Ata freedom was 83.7% in patients with paroxysmal AF and 96.4% in those with persistent AF. CONCLUSION: The largest-sized VGLB ablation technique can create a significantly wider isolation area of PVA and debulk a large amount of LAPW than the conventional-sized VGLB ablation. The one-year outcome was similarly high in paroxysmal and persistent AF.

Subjective identification and ablation of drivers improves rhythm control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. The CHAOS-AF study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal approach for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unknown. In patients with persistent AF, we compared an ablation strategy based on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus ablation of drivers (PVI+D), with a conventional PVI-only approach performed in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. METHODS: Drivers were subjectively identified using conventional high-density mapping catheters (IntellaMap ORION, PentaRay NAV or Advisor HD Grid), without dedicated software, as fractionated continuous or quasicontinuous electrograms on 1 to 2 adjacent bipoles, which were ablated first; and as sites with spatiotemporal dispersion (the entire cycle length comprised within the mapping catheter) plus noncontinuous fractionation, which were only targeted in patients without fractionated continuous electrograms, or without AF conversion after ablation of fractionated continuous electrograms. Ablation included PVI plus focal or linear ablation targeting drivers. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included in each group (61±10 years, 25% women). Fractionated continuous electrograms were found and ablated in 21 patients from the PVI+D group (42%), leading to AF conversion in 7 patients. In the remaining 43 patients, 143 sites with spatiotemporal dispersion plus noncontinuous fractionation were targeted. Globally, AF conversion was achieved in 21 patients (42%). The PVI+D group showed lower atrial arrhythmia recurrences at 1 year of follow-up (30.6% vs 48%; P=.048) and at the last follow-up (46% vs 72%; P=.013), and less progression to permanent AF (10% vs 40%; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective identification and ablation of drivers, added to PVI, increased 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia and decreased long-term recurrences and progression to permanent AF.

Defining the blanking period, using continuous ECG monitoring, after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. A blanking period (BP) of 3 months is used in clinical trials and practice. However, the optimal BP duration after PVI remains undefined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to objectively define, using continuous monitoring by an implantable loop recorder, the optimal BP duration after cryoballoon PVI. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients who had cryoballoon PVI and an implantable loop recorder. We determined the time of the last confirmed episode of AF within the blanking period. This was then correlated with AF recurrence in the first year after ablation. RESULTS: There were 210 patients (66 ± 9 years; 138 [66%] male; 116 [55%] paroxysmal AF; CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.5 ± 1.6). We defined 4 distinct groups based on the last AF episode within the BP: no AF days 0-90 (n = 96 [46%]) and last AF 0-30 days (n = 46 [22%]), 31-60 days (n = 18 [9%]), and 61-90 days (n = 50 [24%]). After the 3-month BP, 101 (48%) patients had AF recurrence at 160 ± 86 days. Compared with patients with no AF in the BP, those with recurrent AF and AF burden >0% 30 days after ablation had a significantly greater AF recurrence during long-term follow-up (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Our data show that the approximately one-third of patients in whom AF occurs and who have a burden of >0% after the first month that follows PVI are at significantly higher risk of long-term recurrent AF. We therefore suggest that the blanking period be limited to a month after cryoballoon PVI.

Paradoxical interatrial conduction recovery after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: A case report.

We present a case of a patient with advanced interatrial block who was admitted for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation as treatment of typical atrial flutter. A baseline advanced interatrial block pattern turned into partial interatrial block pattern and prolonged PR interval after the procedure. We discuss the mechanism underlying that change.

Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of para-Hisian accessory pathway via a direct superior vena cava approach: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of para-Hisian accessory pathways (APs) can be challenging due to proximity to the conduction system. METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive patients with para-Hisian AP were enrolled for ablation in three centers, 12 (40%) of whom had previously failed attempted ablation from the inferior vena cava (IVC) approach. Ablation was preferentially performed using a superior approach from the superior vena cava (SVC) in all patients. RESULTS: The para-Hisian AP was eliminated from the SVC approach in 28 of 30 (93.3%) patients. In the remaining two patients, additional ablation from IVC was required to successfully eliminate the AP. There were two patients experienced reversible complete atrial-ventricular block and PR prolongation during the first RF application. Long-term freedom from recurrent arrhythmia was achieved in 29 (96.7%) patients over a mean follow-up duration of 15.6 ± 4.6 months. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of para-Hisian AP from above using a direct SVC approach is both safe and effective, and should be considered especially in patients who have failed conventional ablation attempts from IVC approach.

Anteroseptal accessory pathways: Killing one bird with two stones.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ablation of anteroseptal accessory pathways (AS-AP) is challenging, with lower success and more complications compared to other APs. AS-APs can be successfully ablated from the right atrium (RA) or the aortic valve's noncoronary cusp (NCC). We report two patients who required a hybrid ablation approach to achieve successful abolition of both anterograde and retrograde AS-AP conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 21-year-old female with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and pre-excitation on electrocardiogram (ECG) underwent electrophysiology study (EPS) confirming an AS-AP with anterograde and retrograde conduction. Ablation in the NCC achieved immediate and persistent anterograde conduction block. Electrophysiological maneuvers showed persistent retrograde AP conduction and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) remained easily inducible. Additional ablation in the NCC did not eliminate retrograde conduction. Further ablation in the RA opposite the NCC at the site of earliest retrograde atrial activation during ORT restored sinus and eliminated retrograde AP conduction. A 52-year-old male with SVT and ECG with pre-excitation underwent EPS that confirmed an AS-AP with anterograde and retrograde conduction. Ablation was performed in the NCC resulting in immediate elimination of pre-excitation. Retrograde conduction was still present and confirmed by repeating electrophysiological maneuvers. Ablation was performed in the RA opposite the successful ablation site in the NCC, eliminating retrograde AP conduction. CONCLUSION: Two cases of AS-AP with anterograde and retrograde conduction and successful elimination of pathway conduction required a hybrid ablation approach from the NCC and RA. This approach may be helpful in other cases to improve success rates without using excessive ablation near the normal conduction system.

Catheter-induced right bundle branch block: Practical implications for the cardiac electrophysiologist.

The right bundle branch (RBB), due to its endocardial course, is susceptible to traumatic block caused by "bumping" during right-heart catheterization. In the era of cardiac electrophysiology, catheter-induced RBB block (CI-RBBB) has become a common phenomenon observed during electrophysiological studies and catheter ablation procedures. While typically transient, it may persist for the entire procedure time. Compared to pre-existing RBBB, the transient nature of CI-RBBB allows for comparative analysis relative to the baseline rhythm. Furthermore, unlike functional RBBB, it occurs at similar heart rates, making the comparison of conduction intervals more reliable. While CI-RBBB can provide valuable diagnostic information in various conditions, it is often overlooked by cardiac electrophysiologists. Though it is usually a benign and self-limiting conduction defect, it may occasionally lead to diagnostic difficulties, pitfalls, or undesired consequences. Avoidance of CI-RBBB is advised in the presence of baseline complete left bundle branch block and when approaching arrhythmic substrates linked to the right His-Purkinje-System, such as fasciculo-ventricular pathways, bundle branch reentry, and right-Purkinje focal ventricular arrhythmias. This article aims to provide a comprehensive practical review of the electrophysiological phenomena related to CI-RBBB and its impact on the intrinsic conduction system and various arrhythmic substrates.

Delineation of conduction gaps of linear lesions during atrial fibrillation ablation using ultra-high-density mapping.

AIMS: Linear lesions are routinely created by radiofrequency catheter ablation. Unwanted electrical conduction gaps can be produced and are often difficult to ablate. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of conduction gaps during atrial fibrillation ablation by analysing bidirectional activation maps using a high-density mapping system (RHYTHMIA). METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 31 patients who had conduction gaps along pulmonary vein (PV) isolation or box ablation lesions. Activation maps were sequentially created during pacing from the coronary sinus and PV to reveal the earliest activation site, defined by the entrance and exit. The locations, length between the entrance and exit (gap length), and direction were analysed. Thirty-four bidirectional activation maps were drawn: 21 were box isolation lesions (box group), and 13 were PV isolation lesions (PVI group). Among the box group, nine conduction gaps were present in the roof region and 12 in the bottom region, while nine in right PV and four in left PV among the PVI group. Gap lengths in the roof region were longer than those in the bottom region (26.8 ± 11.8 vs. 14.5 ± 9.8 mm; P = 0.022), while those in right PV tended to longer than those in left PV (28.0 ± 15.3 vs. 16.8 ± 8.0 mm, P = 0.201). CONCLUSION: The entrances and exits of electrical conduction gaps were separated, especially in the roof region, indicating that epicardial conduction might contribute to gap formation. Identifying the bidirectional conduction gap might indicate the location and direction of epicardial conduction.

Septal Substrate Ablation Guided by Delayed Transmural Conduction Times: A Novel Ablation Approach to Target Intramural Substrates.

BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural identification of intramural septal substrate for ventricular tachycardia (ISS-VT) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is challenging. Delayed (>40 ms) transmural conduction time (DCT) with right ventricular basal septal pacing has been previously shown to identify ISS-VT. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether substrate catheter ablation incorporating areas of DCT may improve acute and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We included patients with NICM and ISS-VT referred for catheter ablation between 2016 and 2020. ISS-VT was defined by the following: 1) confluent septal areas of low unipolar voltage (<8.3 mV) in the presence of normal or minimal bipolar abnormalities; and 2) presence of abnormal electrograms in the septum. Substrate ablation was guided by the following: 1) activation and/or entrainment mapping for tolerated VT and pace mapping with ablation of abnormal septal electrograms for unmappable VTs (n = 57, Group 1); and 2) empirically extended to target areas of DCT during right ventricular basal septal pacing regardless of their participation in inducible VT(s) but sparing the conduction system when possible (n = 24, Group 2). RESULTS: There were no significant baseline differences between Groups 1 and 2. Noninducibility of any VT programmed stimulation at the end of ablation was higher in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (80% vs 53%; P = 0.03). At 12-month follow-up, single-procedure VT-free survival was significantly higher (79% vs 46%; P = 0.006) and the time to VT recurrence was longer (mean 10 ± 3 months vs 7 ± 4 months; P = 0.02) in Group 2 compared with Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM and ISS-VT, a substrate ablation strategy that incorporates areas of DCT appears to improve freedom from recurrent VT.