RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Maintenance of Certification (MOC) is a controversial topic in medicine for many different reasons. Studies have suggested that there may be associations between fewer negative outcomes and participation in MOC. However, MOC still remains controversial because of its cost. We sought to determine the estimated cost of MOC to the average orthopaedic surgeon, including fees and time cost, defined as the market value of the physician's time. METHODS: We calculated the total cost of MOC to be the sum of the fees required for applications, examinations, and other miscellaneous fees as well as the time cost to the physician and staff. Costs were calculated for the oral, written, and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Web-based Longitudinal Assessment (ABOS WLA) MOC pathways based on the responses of 33 orthopaedic surgeons to a survey sent to a state orthopaedic society. RESULTS: We calculated the average orthopaedic surgeon's total cost in time and fees over the decade-long period to be $71,440.61 ($7,144.06 per year) for the oral examination MOC pathway and $80,391.55 ($8,039.16 per year) for the written examination pathway. We calculated the cost of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery web-based examination pathway to be $69,721.04 ($6,972.10 per year). CONCLUSIONS: The actual cost of MOC is much higher than just the fees paid to organizations providing services. The majority of the cost comes in the form of time cost to the physician. The ABOS WLA was implemented to alleviate the anxiety of a high-stakes examination and to encourage efficient longitudinal learning. We found that the ABOS WLA pathway does save time and money when compared with the written examination pathway when review courses and study periods are taken. We believe that future policy changes should focus on decreasing physician time spent completing MOC requirements, and decreasing the cost of these requirements, while preserving the model of continued evidence-based medical education.
Assuntos
Certificação/economia , Educação Médica Continuada/economia , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/economia , Ortopedia/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Certificação/normas , Custos e Análise de Custo/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação Médica Continuada/normas , Humanos , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/normas , Ortopedia/economia , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Each guideline recommendation from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology includes an indication of the level of supporting evidence and the associated strength of recommendation with "IA" recommendations representing those with the highest quality supporting evidence and the least amount of uncertainty for benefit. In this analysis, study type and funding sources were systematically tabulated across these IA guideline recommendations over the past 5 years. Nearly half of studies supporting IA guideline recommendations were randomized controlled trials (45%). Overall, about one third of studies supporting IA recommendations were publicly funded (34.9%) with slightly more funded through industry sources (43.5%). Funding sources varied based on the type of intervention being studied with randomized controlled trials of device, diagnostic, and pharmacological interventions reflecting predominantly industry-funded studies. Over time, studies supporting IA cardiology guideline are funded by industry about twice as often as public sources. Thus, data of adequate quality to support cardiovascular guideline recommendations come from a variety of sources.
Assuntos
Cardiologia/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sociedades Médicas/economia , American Heart Association , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The focus of this article is to review the available funding opportunities for the nephrology workforce at all career levels and review the current challenges involved in the career of a physician-scientist. While the scarcity of nephrology fellows for training programs is a continuing challenge, increased funding for the National Institutes of Health is encouraging particularly for early career investigators. In addition to National Institutes of Health funding, other funding sources are also discussed as they provide much needed bridge funding during key transition periods for young careers. Recent initiatives such as the Advancing American Kidney Health, KidneyX, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases' Kidney Precision Medicine Project offer new research opportunities for bringing much needed innovation to improve lives of people with kidney diseases. The time is now for us to seize the opportunity and ensure that a strong workforce will be able to take advantage of these potential game changers for nephrology.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Financiamento Governamental/tendências , Nefropatias , National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U.S.)/economia , Nefrologia , Fundações/economia , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Humanos , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Nefropatias/terapia , Empresa de Pequeno Porte/economia , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economiaRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the political contributions and strategies of the Political Action Committee (PACs) lobbying for the political interests of spine surgeons. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In 2016, a presidential election year, $514,224,628 was spent on health care lobbying. Only 16% ($85,061,148) was on behalf of health professionals providing care. Below we chronicle the overlapping contributions between the three different physician-based Political Action Committee (PAC) lobbying entities as it relates specifically to spine surgery. METHODS: Data were abstracted for the PACs of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS), and the North American Spine Society (NASS). These data were obtained using OpenSecrets (opensecrets.org), and the Federal Election Commission (fec.gov) website. All data points were collected biannually from 2006 to 2018 and statistically analyzed as appropriate. RESULTS: In 2016, the AAOS PAC contributed $2,648,218, the AANS PAC $348,091, and the NASS PAC $183,612. After accounting for respective group size, the AAOS spent >2.34 times that of the AANS. Orthopedists were 3.84 times (95% confidence interval 3.42-4.3) more likely to donate to their PAC than neurosurgeons (Pâ<â0.001) during the 2016 election. The majority of contributions among the three different lobbyist organizations were to federal candidates, followed by fundraising committees, and finally to the national party. Eighty-eight percent of AANS donations went to Republican candidates, whereas AAOS and NASS were 63% and 67%, respectively. From 2008 to 2016, the AAOS PAC had a highest political contributions spend per active member of parent organization ($126.39) as compared to AANS ($80.52) and NASS ($17.81). The AAOS had five surgeons for every donor to the AAOS PAC, whereas the AANS had 14 surgeons and NASS 38 members per each donor. The AANS had a higher percentage of Republican donations with 78.9% of donations going to Republicans as compared to 61.8% of AAOS contributions and 67.9% of NASS contributions. CONCLUSION: Spine surgery is unique in that three different physician-based lobbyist organizations seek to influence legislative priorities with the AAOS having the most substantial fiscal impact and greatest participation. Choreography of donation strategies is essential to maximize physician voice at the policy level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.
Assuntos
Manobras Políticas , Neurocirurgiões/economia , Ativismo Político , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The COVID-19 outbreak has affected cancer research and cancer care. European cancer charities need to reconsider strategies for safeguarding income and supporting cancer researchers, in times when sustaining cancer research funding is more crucial than ever.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Instituições de Caridade , Obtenção de Fundos , Neoplasias , Instituições de Caridade/economia , Instituições de Caridade/organização & administração , Instituições de Caridade/normas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Administração Financeira/economia , Administração Financeira/organização & administração , Administração Financeira/normas , Obtenção de Fundos/organização & administração , Obtenção de Fundos/normas , Humanos , Colaboração Intersetorial , Oncologia/economia , Oncologia/organização & administração , Oncologia/normas , Neoplasias/etiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Inovação Organizacional/economia , Pandemias , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/normasRESUMO
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) play significant roles in most medical fields. However, little is known about the extent of financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOIs) related to pharmaceutical companies (Pharma) selling dermatology prescription products and dermatology CPG authors in Japan. The aims of this study were to elucidate the characteristics and distribution of payments from Pharma to dermatology CPG authors in Japan, and to evaluate the extent of transparency and accuracy in their FCOI disclosures. We analyzed the records of 296 authors from 32 dermatology CPGs published by the Japanese Dermatological Association from the beginning of 2015 to the end of 2018. Using the payment data reported by 79 Pharma between 2016-2017 in Japan, we investigated the characteristics of the CPG authors and the payments from the Pharma to them. Furthermore, we evaluated the transparency and accuracy of the FCOI disclosures of the individual CPG authors. Of the 296 CPGs authors, 269 authors (90.6%) received at least one payment from the Pharma. The total monetary value of payments for the 2-year period was $7,128,762. The median and mean monetary value of payments from the Pharma reporting were $10,281 (interquartile range $2,796 -$34,962) and $26,600 (standard deviation $40,950) for the two years combined. Of the 26 CPG authors who disclosed FCOIs due to the monies received from Pharma, only the atopic dermatitis CPG authors and the acne vulgaris CPG authors published their potential FCOIs. In Japan, most dermatology CPG authors received financial payments from Pharma. The transparency of the CPGs, as reported by the CPG authors, was inadequate, and a more rigorous framework of reporting and monitoring FCOI disclosure is required to improve the accuracy and transparency with relation to possible Conflicts of Interest.
Assuntos
Conflito de Interesses/economia , Dermatologia/economia , Revelação , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Autoria , Dermatologia/ética , Revelação/ética , Indústria Farmacêutica/ética , Feminino , Apoio Financeiro/ética , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/éticaAssuntos
Recall e Retirada de Produto , Retina/cirurgia , Doenças Retinianas/cirurgia , Próteses Visuais , Adulto , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Cegueira/epidemiologia , Cegueira/etiologia , Cegueira/terapia , Aprovação de Equipamentos , França/epidemiologia , Obtenção de Fundos/normas , Obtenção de Fundos/tendências , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Implantes Experimentais/efeitos adversos , Implantes Experimentais/economia , Falha de Prótese/tendências , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/economia , Implantação de Prótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Retina/patologia , Doenças Retinianas/economia , Doenças Retinianas/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Próteses Visuais/efeitos adversos , Próteses Visuais/economia , Próteses Visuais/normas , Próteses Visuais/provisão & distribuiçãoRESUMO
The convergence of advances in medical science, human biology, data science, and technology has enabled the generation of new insights into the phenotype known as "diabetes." Increased knowledge of this condition has emerged from populations around the world, illuminating the differences in how diabetes presents, its variable prevalence, and how best practice in treatment varies between populations. In parallel, focus has been placed on the development of tools for the application of precision medicine to numerous conditions. This Consensus Report presents the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Precision Medicine in Diabetes Initiative in partnership with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), including its mission, the current state of the field, and prospects for the future. Expert opinions are presented on areas of precision diagnostics and precision therapeutics (including prevention and treatment), and key barriers to and opportunities for implementation of precision diabetes medicine, with better care and outcomes around the globe, are highlighted. Cases where precision diagnosis is already feasible and effective (i.e., monogenic forms of diabetes) are presented, while the major hurdles to the global implementation of precision diagnosis of complex forms of diabetes are discussed. The situation is similar for precision therapeutics, in which the appropriate therapy will often change over time owing to the manner in which diabetes evolves within individual patients. This Consensus Report describes a foundation for precision diabetes medicine, while highlighting what remains to be done to realize its potential. This, combined with a subsequent, detailed evidence-based review (due 2022), will provide a roadmap for precision medicine in diabetes that helps improve the quality of life for all those with diabetes.
Assuntos
Consenso , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Endocrinologia/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Medicina de Precisão/normas , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Endocrinologia/economia , Endocrinologia/organização & administração , Europa (Continente) , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Prova Pericial , Administração Financeira , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Medicina de Precisão/economia , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Caproato de 17 alfa-Hidroxiprogesterona/uso terapêutico , Conflito de Interesses/economia , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Sociedades Médicas/ética , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Indústria Farmacêutica , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Morte Fetal , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Obstetrícia/economia , Obstetrícia/ética , Morte Perinatal , Gravidez , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Falha de Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the costs associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and to determine the extent to which ASA status is a predictor of increased cost and LOS following lumbar laminectomy and fusion (LLF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal fusion accounts for the highest hospital costs of any surgical procedure performed in the United States, and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) status is a known risk factor for cost and length of stay (LOS) in the orthopedic literature. There is a paucity of literature that directly addresses the influence of ASA status on cost and LOS following LLF. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of an institutional database of patients undergoing single-level LLF at an academic tertiary care facility from 2006 to 2016. Univariate comparisons were made using χ tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to estimate regression coefficients, and to determine whether ASA status is an independent risk factor for cost and LOS. RESULTS: A total of 1849 patients met inclusion criteria. For every one-point increase in ASA score, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS increased by 0.518 days (Pâ<â0.001), and hospital length of stay increased by 1.93 days (Pâ<â0.001). For every one-point increase in ASA score, direct cost increased by $7474.62 (Pâ<â0.001). CONCLUSION: ASA status is a predictor of hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and direct cost. Consideration of the ways in which ASA status contributes to increased cost and prolonged LOS can allow for more accurate reimbursement adjustment and more precise targeting of efficiency and cost effectiveness initiatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Assuntos
Anestesiologistas/economia , Laminectomia/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesiologistas/tendências , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Laminectomia/tendências , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Inovação Organizacional , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Recessão Econômica , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/economia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/tendências , Previsões , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is unknown to what extent Choosing Wisely recommendations about income-generating treatments apply to members of the society generating the recommendations. The primary aim of this study is to determine the proportion of Choosing Wisely recommendations targeting income-generating treatments, and whether recommendations from professional societies on income-generating treatments are more likely to target members or non-members. The secondary aim is to determine the prevalence of qualified statements, and whether qualified statements are more likely to appear in recommendations targeting income-generating or non-income-generating treatments that apply to members. METHODS: We performed a content analysis of all Choosing Wisely recommendations, with data extracted from Choosing Wisely websites. Two researchers coded recommendations as test or treatment-based, for or against a procedure, containing qualified statements, income-generating and applying to members. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or consultation with a third researcher. A Chi-squared test evaluated whether society recommendations on income-generating treatments were more likely to target members or non-members; and whether qualified statements were more likely to appear in recommendations targeting income-generating or non-income-generating treatments that apply to members. RESULTS: We found 1293 Choosing Wisely recommendations (48.3% tests and 48.6% treatments). Ninety-eight treatment recommendations targeted income-generating treatments (17.8%), and recommendations on income-generating treatments were less likely to target members compared to non-members (15.6% vs. 40.4%, p < 0.001). Nearly half of all recommendations were qualified (41.9%), with a similar proportion of recommendations targeting income-generating and non-income-generating treatments that apply to members containing qualified statements (49.4% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Many societies provide Choosing Wisely recommendations that minimise impact on their own members. Only 20% of treatment recommendations target income-generating treatments, and of these recommendations mostly target non-members. Many recommendations are also qualified. Increasing the number of recommendations from societies that are unqualified and target member clinicians responsible for de-implementation of low-value and costly treatments should be a priority.
Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Renda , Procedimentos Desnecessários/economia , Saúde Global/economia , Política de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Pobreza , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sociedades Médicas/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Professional paediatrics associations play an important role in promoting the highest standard of care for women and children. Education and guidelines must be made in the best interests of patients. Given the importance of breastfeeding for the health, development and survival of infants, children and mothers, paediatric associations have a particular responsibility to avoid conflicts of interest with companies that manufacture breast-milk substitutes (BMSs). The objective of this study was to investigate the extent to which national and regional paediatric associations are sponsored by BMS companies. METHODS: Data were collected on national paediatric associations based on online searches of websites and Facebook pages. Sites were examined for evidence of financial sponsorship by the BMS industry, including funding of journals, newsletters or other publications, conferences and events, scholarships, fellowship, grants and awards. Payment for services, such as exhibitor space at conferences or events and paid advertisements in publications, was also noted. RESULTS: Overall, 68 (60%) of the 114 paediatric associations with a website or Facebook account documented receiving financial support from BMS companies. Sponsorship, particularly of conferences or other events, was the most common type of financial support. The prevalence of conference sponsorship is highest in Europe and the Americas, where about half of the associations have BMS company-sponsored conferences. Thirty-one associations (27%) indicated that they received funding from BMS companies as payment for advertisements or exhibitor space. Only 18 associations (16%) have conflict of interest policies, guidelines, or criteria posted online. CONCLUSION: Despite the well-documented importance of breastfeeding and the widespread recognition that commercial influences can shape the behaviours of healthcare professionals, national and regional paediatric associations commonly accept funding from companies that manufacture and distribute BMS. Paediatric associations should function without the influence of commercial interests.
Assuntos
Apoio Financeiro , Indústria Alimentícia/economia , Pediatria , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Aleitamento Materno , Conflito de Interesses , Humanos , Fórmulas Infantis , Internet , Política OrganizacionalRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In response to rising national health expenditures, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, with major provisions implemented in 2014. Due to increasing concerns about workload and compensation among neurosurgeons, we evaluated trends in neurosurgical reimbursement, productivity and compensation before and after the implementation of the major provisions of the ACA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Results from Neurosurgery Executives' Resource Value and Education Society (NERVES) annual surveys were collected, representing data from 2011 to 2016. Responses from different practice settings across the six years were categorized into groups, and inverse variance-weighted averaging was performed within the frameworks of a one-way ANOVA model with year. Data from 2011 to 2013 and 2014-2016 were analyzed similarly for differences among practice setting and region. RESULTS: The NERVES survey response rates ranged from 20% to 36%. Median values for compensation decreased by 3.66%, 6.42%, and 10.34% within private, hospital, and academic practices respectively after 2014 although these trends did not reach statistical significance. Median work RVUs had a trend to decrease by 5.67%, 13.08%, and 19.44% within private, hospital, and academic practices respectively after 2014. Academic practices showed statistically significant decreases in annual total RVUs, total gross charges and collections. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate neurosurgical reimbursement and productivity have trended down during a time that increases in productivity and reimbursement were predicted. This phenomenon is most notable in academic practices compared to private or hospital based practices. Prospective analyses of the impact of healthcare policy reform on neurosurgical productivity are urgently needed.
Assuntos
Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/tendências , Neurocirurgiões/economia , Neurocirurgiões/tendências , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/economia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/tendênciasAssuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Conflito de Interesses/economia , Saúde Ambiental , Indústria de Petróleo e Gás , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/ética , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Saúde Global , Humanos , Indústria de Petróleo e Gás/economia , Indústria de Petróleo e Gás/ética , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Sociedades Médicas/ética , Indústria do Tabaco/economia , Indústria do Tabaco/éticaRESUMO
Although a substantial literature considers physician advocacy fundamental to medical professionalism, only a minority of physicians actually pursue it. We analyze the characteristics of 6,402 physicians who engaged in political advocacy by signing the Clinician Action Network's 2016 petition objecting to the American Medical Association's endorsement of the nomination of Tom Price as Secretary of Health and Human Services. These physicians were matched to the NPI (all physicians) and PECOS (largely Medicare payment recipients) directories. Physicians in the directories were matched to publicly disclosed campaign contributions. Contributions are used to measure political preferences expressed on a liberal-conservative scale. We document a pronounced generational realignment in the politics of the medical profession, with recent graduates trending sharply Democratic. Petition signing vs. non-signing is responsive to gender, specialty, geographic location, personal liberal-conservative preferences and year of graduation from medical school. Petition signers were more likely to be women (62% of signers versus 34% of non-signers), recent medical school graduates (58% of signers versus 42% of non-signers), and in lower-paying specialties (27% of signers versus 12% of non-signers). The changing face of physician advocacy has important implications for understanding how the medical profession is likely to influence health care policy in coming decades.