Surgical stabilization of rib fractures for flail chest: Analysis of center-based variability in practice and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Given the lack of high-quality data on patient selection for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), significant variability in practice likely exists across trauma centers. We aimed to determine whether centers with a more liberal approach to SSRF had improved outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with flail chest admitted to Level I or II trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program. The primary outcome was hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included discharge status, tracheostomy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay. Logistic regression was performed to calculate center-level observed/expected rates of SSRF and centers were grouped into quintiles from "most liberal" to "most restrictive." Multivariable regression was used to determine the association between these quintiles and outcomes. We also used an instrumental variable analysis to evaluate the association between SSRF and mortality at the patient level. RESULTS: Among 23,619 patients with flail chest across 354 centers, 22% underwent SSRF. Center rates of fixation ranged from 0% to 88%. Higher rates of SSRF were not associated with lower mortality overall (highest vs. lowest quintile: odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.17). However, centers with a more liberal approach to SSRF had lower rates of independent status at discharge, higher tracheostomy rates, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and longer hospital and ICU length of stay. The patient level analysis demonstrated that SSRF as was associated with a 25% lower risk of death. CONCLUSION: Overall, centers with a liberal approach to SSRF do not show improved outcomes among patients with a flail chest, but have higher resource utilization. Results at the patient level suggest that there is a population likely to benefit but these patients remain to be identified through further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Métodos de tratamiento del tórax batiente y su correlación con los índices pronósticos / Methods of flail chest treatment and their correlation with predictive indexes

Se revisaron 24 historias clínicas de pacientes politraumatizados con diagnóstico de tórax batiente en los hospitales "Dr. Carlos J. Finlay" y "Dr. Luis Díaz Soto", correspondientes al período entre enero de 1989 y diciembre de 1994, con el objetivo de analizar de forma comparativa distintos métodos de tratamiento. Se aplicó el índice predictivo TRISS para obtener la probabilidad de sobrevida de cada lesionado. No hubo predominio en el empleo de uno u otro métodos de tratamiento, y mostraron mayor eficiencia la estabilización de la pared torácica con alambres de Kirscnner, la estabilización neumática interna y la combinación de ambos métodos de tratamientos. No se encontraron fallecidos a pesar de existir una probabilidad de supervivencia del 83,4, 81,7 y 87,8 porciento respectivamente en los diferentes grupos de tratamiento. En esta entidad traumática la mortalidad y las complicaciones dependen del grado de contusión pulmonar y de la severidad de las lesiones asociadas y no solamente del método de tratamiento empleado