Efficacy and Safety of Additional S-1 Chemotherapy to S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Regimen Chemotherapy for Stage III Gastric Carcinoma after Radical Resection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of additional S-1 chemotherapy to S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen chemotherapy for Stage III gastric carcinoma (GC) after radical resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients who were pathologically diagnosed as Stage III GC after D2 gastrectomy and received SOX regimen adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2012 and April 2016 were included in this retrospective study. SOX regimen postoperative chemotherapy was composed of Oxaliplatin and S-1, administrated every 3 weeks for 8 scheduled courses. After SOX chemotherapy, 76 patients preferred additional chemotherapy with S-1 (the ACT group), while additional S-1 chemotherapy was not given to the other 85 patients (control group). The ACT with S-1 was administrated every 3 weeks for 8 scheduled courses. Treatment was terminated in case of life-threatening adverse events or tumor progression, or patients' demand for termination. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: ACT group obtained markedly improved 3-year PFS [p = 0.04; hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression, 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.98] and OS than the control group (p = 0.0469; HR for death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99). No chemotherapy-related mortality occurred. Patients of the ACT group suffered more common and severer hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Additional S-1 chemotherapy may be helpful for improving the disease progression and survival for patients with Stage III GC after radical resection with an acceptable safety profile.

Successful Immunotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer in a Patient With TSC2 and SMAD4 Mutations: A Case Report.

Background: Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis, and it is traditionally treated with chemotherapy. Fortunately, immunotherapy has rapidly changed the landscape of solid tumor treatment, and improving the survival of cancer patients. However, pancreatic cancer is non-immunogenic, and single agent immunotherapies are unfavorable to its prognosis. Case Presentation: Here, we report a case of stage IV pancreatic cancer in a patient with TSC2 and SMAD4 mutations treated with immunotherapy when the disease progressed after multi-line chemotherapy. Next generation sequencing (NGS) confirmed the presence of TSC2 and SMAD4 mutations and microsatellite stability (MSS). When the disease progressed after chemotherapy, a combination strategy was devised consisting of chemotherapy (S-1) and sintilimab. The patient had a partial response to therapy with this regimen, the lesions were significantly reduced and nearly disappeared. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, responses of this magnitude are rarely seen. Conclusions: This outcome reveals that this combination can be effective in treating metastatic pancreatic cancer, especially in pancreatic cancer patients with SMAD4 and TSC2 mutations. This may help increase the use of this therapy in large-scale clinical research.

Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (PerSeUS-RC01).

BACKGROUND/AIM: We report the end results of a study evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histopathologically confirmed locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC; cT3-T4, any N). They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day on days 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, and 29-33) and oxaliplatin by infusion (50 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8, 22, and 29) along with radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day, total dose: 45 Gy/25 fractions). A chemotherapy gap was included in the third week of radiotherapy. The study endpoint was pathological response rate (Grade 2, 3). Secondary endpoints included rates of pathologic complete response (pCR), R0 resection, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), local and distant recurrence, and safety and relative dose intensity. RESULTS: The study enrolled 23 patients at three Centres in Gifu, Japan. All patients received chemoradiotherapy, and 22 underwent surgery. Rates of pathological response, R0 resection, and pathological down-staging were 56.5% (13/23), 95.7% (22/23), and 63.6% (14/22), respectively. There were no grade 4 adverse events, but grade 3 events occurred in 21.7% of patients. The cumulative 3-year local recurrence rate was 8.7%. Distant metastasis occurred in 10 (43.5%) patients, 2 (8.7%) from local recurrence and 2 from secondary pancreatic cancer and lung cancer. There were 8 patients with lung metastasis, 2 with liver metastasis, one with ovarian metastasis, and one with bone metastasis. Three-year rates of DFS and OS were 51.1% (median follow-up 34.3 months) and 91.1% (45.2 months), respectively. CONCLUSION: The study showed high pathological response rate without severe toxicity and good follow-up results. Unexpectedly, however, this regimen could not control local recurrence and distant metastasis. Nevertheless, adding oxaliplatin to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 in patients with LARC appears feasible and may safely result in better local control than standard treatment. The study suggests adding treatment with induction chemotherapy in consideration of CEA level and N factor.

Effect of Concomitant Lafutidine on Adjuvant S-1 for Head and Neck Cancer: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study evaluated the utility of the histamine H2-receptor antagonist lafutidine in patients taking oral fluorouracil (S-1) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), by comparing patients with and without concomitant lafutidine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study subjects comprised 63 patients who received adjuvant S-1 following curative resection of HNSCC at our institutions between August 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of S-1 therapy. RESULTS: For the lafutidine-treated group, the median completion rate was significantly greater (94.4% vs. 24.6%, p=0.01), and progression-free and overall survival were both significantly prolonged compared to the non-lafutidine group. In terms of adverse events, the incidence of diarrhoea was significantly reduced (p<0.00189) in the lafutidine-treated group. CONCLUSION: Taking lafutidine during S-1 treatment appeared to reduce gastrointestinal disturbance and increased the S-1 completion rate, improving both progression-free and overall survival as a result.

Anthracycline-containing regimens or taxane versus S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated S-1 is non-inferior to taxane with respect to overall survival as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to confirm whether S-1 is also non-inferior to anthracycline-containing regimens in the same setting. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, non-inferiority, Phase 3 study. Individuals who had HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, had received no chemotherapy for advanced disease and had endocrine therapy resistance, were randomly assigned to the anthracycline-containing regimens or S-1. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A pre-planned combined analysis of our two Phase 3 studies was also carried out. RESULTS: We enrolled 230 patients (anthracycline, n = 115; S-1, n = 115). Median overall survival was 30.1 months (95% CI 24.9-35.8) with the S-1 group and 33.7 months (95% CI 25.5-36.9) with the anthracycline group. The HR for the anthracycline group was 1.09 (95% CI 0.80-1.48). The combined analysis constituted 814 patients (395 assigned to standard treatment (anthracycline or taxane); 419 assigned to S-1). Median overall survival was 36.3 months in the standard treatment group and 32.7 months in the S-1 group. S-1 was non-inferior to standard treatment in terms of overall survival (HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.90-1.25); P non-inferiority = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: S-1 could be considered a new treatment option for first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan: UMIN000005449. This trial was registered on 15 April, 2011.

Surgery alone, adjuvant tegafur/gimeracil/octeracil (S-1), or platinum-based chemotherapies for resectable gastric cancer: real-world experience and a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy has changed the paradigm in resectable gastric cancer. S-1 is an oral chemotherapeutic with promising efficacy in Asia. However, comparisons with close observation or platinum-based doublets post D2 gastrectomy have been less reported, notably on real-world experiences. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with D2-dissected stage IB-III gastric cancer who received S-1 (S-1, n = 67), platinum-based doublets (P, n = 145) and surgery with close observation (OBS, n = 221) from Jan 2008 to Oct 2018. A propensity score matching was used to compare for recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survivals (OS) in patients who had a locally-advanced disease (T3-4 or lymph node-positive). Adverse reactions, dosage, and associated factors for S-1 are also discussed. RESULTS: In a median follow-up time of 51.9 months, adjuvant S-1 monotherapy was associated with an intermediate survival as compared with P and OBS (median RFS/OS: S-1 vs. P, 20.9/35.8 vs. 31.2/50.5 months, HR = 1.76/2.14, p = 0.021/0.008; S-1 vs. OBS, 24.4/40.2 vs. 20.7/27.0 months, HR = 0.62/0.55, p = 0.041/0.024). The survival differences were more prominent in patients with N2-3 diseases. S-1 was well-tolerated with a relative dose intensity of 73.6%, a median duration of 8.3 months and associated with less adverse reactions as compared with P. S-1 monotherapy was selected by physicians based on age, lymph node stage, serum carcinoembryonic antigen and disease stage. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant S-1 correlated with intermediate survival outcomes between OBS and P but conferred fewer adverse reactions as compared with P. Patients with a moderate risk of recurrence had comparable survivals when treated with S-1 while platinum-based doublets were favored in advanced cases. The study provides additional information about adjuvant S-1 in patients with selected risk of recurrence.

Efficacy of trastuzumab combined with SOX or IP chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of S-1 + oxaliplatin (SOX) chemotherapy regimen combined with trastuzumab and irinotecan + cisplatin (IP) chemotherapy regimen combined with trastuzumab in treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 138 patients with HER-2-positive advanced gastric cancer were divided into SOX group (SOX chemotherapy regimen combined with trastuzumab; n=69) and IP group (IP chemotherapy regimen combined with trastuzumab; n=69). Then, the clinical efficacy, incidence rate of adverse reactions, quality-of-life score and other indicators were compared between the two groups of patients. Additionally, the levels of myeloid-related protein-14 (MRP-14), stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP-1) and CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) in peripheral blood and the changes in neovascularization markers were detected, and the survival of patients was followed up and recorded. RESULTS: The disease control rate (DCR) was clearly better in SOX group than that in IP group. Serum levels of MRP-14, SDF-1, FSP-1 and CXCR4 were obviously lower in SOX group than those in IP group. The scores of physical function, behavioral function, role function and social function were higher in SOX group than those in IP group. Moreover, the follow-up results revealed that the PFS of patients was overtly longer in SOX group than that in IP group. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab combined with SOX chemotherapy regimen has an obvious curative effect in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, which prominently improves the quality of life of patients, lowers the serum tumor marker levels in patients, delays tumor progression, and results in tolerable adverse reactions. Therefore, it is worthy of application in clinical practice.

Short-term survival and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the treatment of unresectable gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with unresectable HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer were selected. All the patients received six cycles of S-1 and oxaliplatin and five cycles of apatinib, which were administered at intervals of three weeks. The surgery was performed after six cycles of drug treatment. The primary endpoints were radical resection (R0) rate and safety. This study was registered with the China Trial Register, number ChiCTR-ONC-17010430  (01/12/2016-01/12/2022). RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled. Efficacy evaluation was feasible for 37 patients. One patient achieved complete response (CR, 2.7%), 26 patients achieved partial response (PR, 70.3%), three patients had stable disease (SD, 8.1%) and seven patients had progressive disease (PD, 18.9%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 73.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81.1%. 22 patients underwent surgery, among which 14 patients underwent radical resection (R0), with a R0 resection rate of 63.6%. The 1-year survival rate of the surgical group (22 patients) was 71.1% and the 2-year survival rate was 41.1%. The median survival time was 21 months. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 100%. Leucopenia (65.3%) and granulocytopenia (69.2%) were the most common hematological AEs. The most common non-hematological AEs were fatigue (51.3%) and oral mucositis (35.9%). CONCLUSION: Apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed good short-term survival and acceptable safety in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer.

Tegafur-uracil-induced pericardial effusion during adjuvant chemotherapy for resected lung adenocarcinoma: A case report.

In Japan, oral administration of tegafur-uracil is recommended as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with primary lung adenocarcinomas of >2 cm size and staged as IA, IB, and IIA. Reports on chemotherapy-induced pericardial effusion are rare. Herein, we report a rare case of tegafur-uracil-induced pericardial effusion during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for primary lung cancer. A 60-year-old man underwent left lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection for left lower lung adenocarcinoma. Lung cancer was staged as IB, and tegafur-uracil was administered as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy from 1 month after the surgery. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a pericardial effusion 5 months after the surgery. A malignant pericardial effusion was suspected, and tegafur-uracil was discontinued. Pericardiocentesis could not be performed owing to a small amount of pericardial effusion. An 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/CT scan revealed no abnormal FDG uptake. During a short follow-up period after discontinuation of tegafur-uracil, a CT scan revealed a decrease in pericardial effusion, suggesting that the pericardial effusion was induced by tegafur-uracil. Follow-up of pericardial effusion is required while administering tegafur-uracil. In cases of pericardial effusion without symptoms and no suspicious metastatic lesions in other organs, we should be concerned about tegafur-uracil-induced pericardial effusion.

A Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Xiaoaiping (XAP) Injection and S-1 Combination Therapy in Inhibiting the Invasion and Metastasis of Human GC Cells.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the effect and mechanism of Xiaoaiping (XAP) injection combined with S-1 in inhibiting the invasion and metastasis of human GC cells. METHODS: BGC-823 and MGC-803 cells were incubated in vitro, and the effects of treatment on the cytotoxicity and proliferation of BGC-823 and MGC-803 cells were evaluated by MTT assay. Cell adhesion tests and Transwell assays were used to detect the effects of Xiaoaiping injection combined with S-1 on the metastatic ability of BGC-823 and MGC-803 cells. The expression of VEGF, Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and proteins related to the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) were detected by Western blotting. Meanwhile, a tumour model was established in nude mice, and the effect of XAP combined with S-1 on BGC-823 cells in vivo was studied. RESULTS: Compared with the single drug group, the combination of XAP with S-1 increased the inhibition rate (P<0.05). The adhesion test showed that the combination group significantly inhibited the adhesion of BGC-823 and MGC-803 cells (P<0.05). The combination of XAP with S-1 reduced the migration and invasion potential of human GC BGC-823 and MGC-803 cells. Western blotting showed that the expression of VEGF, MMP-9, Ncadherin and vimentin was decreased and E-cadherin expression was increased in the combination group compared with these expression values in either the XAP or S-1 alone group (P<0.05). In vivo, we found that XAP combined with S-1 had a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of tumours compared with XAP or S-1 alone. Immunohistochemistry showed that XAP combined with S-1 was able to enhance the levels of E-cadherin and downregulate N-cadherin and vimentin. CONCLUSION: The combination of XAP with S-1 can enhance the inhibitory effect of a single drug on proliferation, invasion and metastasis. The mechanism may be related to the decrease in the expression of VEGF and MMP-9 proteins and the effect on EMT.

Comparison of outcomes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with BMF protocol across 2 decades.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common malignancy of childhood. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with BFM protocol over two decades at our center. We retrospectively examined the files of 421 patients by dividing them into two groups by decade of treatment, 1995-2005 and 2006-2015. After excluding 117 patients, overall, 304 patients were included in the analysis. From the first to the second decade, the proportion of patients over 12 years of age increased from 7.1% to 16.8% (p < 0.04), the high-risk group increased from 15.5% to 19.5% and patients with central nervous system leukemia increased from 5.2% to 11.4%. The relapse rate remained relatively unchanged during this period (from 12.9% to 12.7%), while the mortality rate decreased from 18.7% to 15.4% (p > 0.05) and the death rate during remission induction treatment decreased from 3.9% to 0.7%. The mortality rate of high-risk and standard-risk patients decreased from 62.5% to 34.5% (p < 0.05) and 11.1% to 3.0% (p > 0.05), respectively. The 5-year overall survival and event-free survival rates for standard-, medium- and high-risk patients were 92.7% ± 6.0%, 87.9% ± 4.7%, and 54.7% ± 13.3% and 92.5% ± 6.3%, 83.2% ± 5.5%, and 48.7% ± 14.7%, respectively. For the cohort, the 5-year overall survival rate was 83.2% ± 4.1% and the event-free survival rate was 79.9% ± 4.7%. These results demonstrate the impact of a standard protocol, experience of staff, achieving better risk stratification on treatment success.

Reversible Splenial Lesion Syndrome (RESLES) After Chemotherapy of Oral Tegafur-uracil in a Female With Locally Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

A 42-year-old woman with reversible splenial lesion syndrome (RESLES) and rectal adenocarcinoma presented with sudden-onset delirium after the sixth cycle of her chemotherapy drug, oral tegafur-uracil (300 mg/m/day, days 1-14, with treatment cycle repeated every 21 days). Accompanied by the anti-CV2 antibody, paraphasia, and a loss of bimanual coordination, the patient's etiology and clinical manifestations of RESLES are unlike those of other reported cases of RESLES. Tegafur-uracil is an oral fluoropyrimidine that has a similar effect to 5-fluorouracil as an adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer. The possibility that the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs may play a role in the pathogenesis of cytotoxic edema in the splenium of the corpus callosum and extracallosal white matter should be investigated further.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in previously treated elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is not clear whether its effectiveness and tolerability in elderly patients are equivalent to those in younger patients. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC who had previously received other treatments. METHODS: We included 96 elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with advanced NSCLC treated with S-1 alone as a subsequent-line treatment at 12 medical facilities between January 2005 and March 2018 in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patients, response to S-1 monotherapy, and adverse events (AEs) were investigated, retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 68 male and 28 female patients (median age, 78 [range: 75-86] years) were analyzed. In elderly patients who were treated with S-1 monotherapy as a subsequent-line treatment, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 8.3%, 43.8%, 3.4 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Observed AEs included anorexia, anemia, nausea, fatigue, reduced platelet count, and skin hyperpigmentation. Treatment-related death was observed in one patient because of pneumonitis. In patients who experienced no progressive disease, subsequent-line S-1 alone was associated with longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible as a subsequent-line treatment in elderly patients who were previously treated for NSCLC, and it produces results. S-1 monotherapy could be one of the treatment choices for elderly patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Prediction of Efficacy of Postoperative Chemotherapy by DNA Methylation of CDO1 in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: CDO1 is a presumed tumor suppressor gene in human cancers, the expression of which is silenced by promoter DNA methylation. Moreover, CDO1 harbors functionally oncogenic aspects through modification of mitochondrial membrane potential. We recently proposed that this oncogenic feature allows for the prediction of the efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy in colon cancer. The present study aims to elucidate the efficacy of prediction of success of postoperative chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer to improve the treatment strategy of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forced expression of CDO1 in gastric cancer cell lines was assessed using the JC-1 assay. Promoter DNA methylation was investigated in quantitative TaqMan methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction in 321 pathological stage II/III advanced gastric cancer cases treated by curative gastrectomy with or without postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: (1) Forced expression of CDO1 led to increased mitochondrial membrane potential, accompanied by augmented survival in gastric cancer cells under anaerobic conditions. These results suggest that CDO1-expressing cancer cells survive more easily in anaerobic lesions which are inaccessible to anticancer drugs. (2) Intriguingly, in cases with the highest CDO1 methylation (ranging from 15% to 40%), patients with postoperative chemotherapy showed significantly better survival than those with no postoperative chemotherapy. (3) A robust prognostic difference was observed that was explained by differential recurrences of distant metastasis (P = 0.0031), followed by lymph node (P = 0.0142) and peritoneal dissemination (P = 0.0472). CONCLUSIONS: The oncogenic aspects of CDO1 can be of use to determine patients with gastric cancer who will likely respond to treatment of invisible systemic dissemination by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Efficacy and prognosis analyses of apatinib combined with S-1 in third-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy and safety of apatinib (an anti-angiogenic drug) combined with S-1 (a fluorouracil drug) in the third-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, and to analyze the factors influencing the prognosis. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with advanced gastric cancer, who did not respond to second-line or above chemotherapy and were treated in our hospital were enrolled and divided into Apatinib+S-1 group (n=42) and S-1 group (n=42), based on different treatments applied. Next, the clinical responses and adverse reactions of patients were observed and recorded. The patients were followed up through the outpatient service and telephone to record their survival and disease progression. Additionally, the factors affecting the prognosis of patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in the Apatinib+S-1 group were 9.5% (4/42) and 71.4% (30/42), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the S-1 group. The main adverse reactions after therapy included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, stomatitis, hypertension, proteinuria, hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal reaction, which were mostly of grade I-II. The incidence rates of hypertension, proteinuria and hand-foot syndrome were 42.9%, 26.2%, and 23.8%, respectively, in the Apatinib+S-1 group, which were overtly higher than those in the S-1 group. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival (OS) of patients between two groups (p=0.063), while the progression free survival (PFS) of patients was overtly longer in the Apatinib + S-1 group than that in S-1 group. Univariate analysis of PFS showed that the PFS of patients with high differentiation of tumor or post-treatment proteinuria or hand-foot syndrome was evidently higher than that of patients without high differentiation of tumor or post-treatment proteinuria or hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced gastric cancer achieve relatively satisfactory short-term therapeutic effects after treatment with apatinib combined with S-1 in the third-line therapy, whose PFS is notably better than those treated with S-1 alone, and they are tolerant to adverse reactions. Highly differentiated tumors and post-treatment proteinuria and hand-foot syndrome are predictable factors for the PFS of patients.

Impact of Postoperative Complications on Recurrence in Patients With Stage II/III Gastric Cancer Who Received Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative complications (PCs) in patients with pathological stage (pStage) II or III gastric cancer (GC) who received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Altogether, data for 226 patients were examined retrospectively. The relationship between PCs and clinicopathological features and survival were examined. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival was significantly worse in the group with PCs than in the PC-negative group. On multivariate analysis, having PCs of grade 2 or more was an independent risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio=1.721; 95% confidence intervaI=1.014-2.920; p=0.044). In addition, for each pStage analysis, having PCs of grade 2 or more was a risk factor for recurrence even in patients with pStage II GC. CONCLUSION: PC of grade 2 or more was an independent risk factor for recurrence in patients with pStage II GC who received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative gastrectomy. Thus, for patients with PCs, even for those with pStage II GC, more effective adjuvant chemotherapy, such as S-1 plus docetaxel, may be needed.

Comparison of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II and III gastric cancer after D2 resection: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer (GC) reduces cancer recurrence and improves survival. S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is well-tolerated and effective against advanced GC, and also be used widely in adjuvant treatment. However, data comparing SOX and XELOX as adjuvant treatments are lacking. METHOD: Data on treatment modalities, adverse events, recurrence and metastasis were collected from 180 patients with stage II and III GC, who received SOX or XELOX after D2 gastrectomy between January 2012 and December 2015, and analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate. RESULTS: Median follow was 52.9 months; 3-year DFS rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 75.2% and 67.6% (P = 0.359) and 81.2% and 83.3% (P = 0.77) in the SOX and XELOX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in peritoneal metastasis rates in the SOX and XELOX groups (8.6% vs 15%, respectively; P = 0.232). Compound recurrent disease was associated with significantly shorter OS. Multivariate analysis identified metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.036; hazard ratio = 2.875; 95% confidence interval, 1.069-7.729); the LNR ≥17% group had inferior 3-year OS rate to the LNR <17% group (P = 0.001). The incidence of grades 3 and 4 adverse events was similar in both groups; however, grade ≥2 hand-foot syndrome was significantly less frequent in the SOX group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: SOX has similar survival benefits to XELOX and is well-tolerated in Chinese patients with GC following D2 gastrectomy.

Propensity score-weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L).

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors may confer an improved response for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, potential selection bias in such studies has not been addressed. We therefore applied propensity score analysis to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitor treatment (CAP) compared with chemotherapy alone. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study for patients treated at 47 institutions across Japan between April 1, 2014 and July 31, 2017. Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC who have undergone chemotherapy. Patients subsequently treated with chemotherapy (docetaxel with or without ramucirumab, S-1 or pemetrexed) either after PD-1 inhibitor therapy (CAP cohort) or alone (control cohort) were included. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 1439 patients (243 and 1196 in the CAP and control cohorts, respectively) was available for unadjusted analysis. Several baseline characteristics-including age, histology, EGFR or ALK genetic alterations, and brain metastasis-differed significantly between the two cohorts. After adjustment for patient characteristics with the IPW method, ORR was 18.9% for the CAP cohort and 11.0% for the control cohort (ORR ratio 1.71; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.46; p=0.004). IPW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median progression-free survival (PFS) for the CAP and control cohorts was 2.8 and 2.7 months (IPW-adjusted HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.12; p=0.55), and median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 and 10.4 months (IPW-adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.28; p=0.63), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for selection bias by propensity score analysis, CAP showed a significantly higher ORR compared with chemotherapy alone, with the primary end point of ORR being achieved. However, these results did not translate into a PFS or OS advantage, suggesting that prior administration of PD-1 inhibitors may result in a synergistic antitumor effect with subsequent chemotherapy, but that such an effect is transient. CAP therefore does not appear to achieve durable tumor control or confer a lasting survival benefit.

Methylation of drug resistance-related genes in chemotherapy-sensitive Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (GC) is associated with a high degree of DNA methylation. However, the association between chemotherapy susceptibility and tumor DNA methylation in advanced diseases remains unclear. The comprehensive DNA methylation status of GC cells obtained from an advanced EBV-associated GC (EBVGC) case, in which complete response to S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy was achieved, was analyzed using a DNA methylation microarray. We compared DNA methylation of GC cells with public data and identified genes with higher methylation in EBVGC cell lines than in normal gastric cells, and genes in which methylation was increased by EBV. Of these genes, ABCG2, AHNAK2, BCL2, FZD1, and TP73 are associated with published evidence for resistance to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Silencing of these genes may be associated with hypersensitivity to chemotherapy.

Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 expression is a predictor in patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

The high expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) and the low expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are reported to predict a favorable prognosis in patients treated with gemcitabine (GEM) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as the adjuvant setting, respectively. The expression of hENT1 and DPD were analyzed in patients registered in the JASPAC 01 trial, which showed a better survival of S-1 over GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for pancreatic cancer, and their possible roles for predicting treatment outcomes and selecting a chemotherapeutic agent were investigated. Intensity of hENT1 and DPD expression was categorized into no, weak, moderate or strong by immunohistochemistry staining, and the patients were classified into high (strong/moderate) and low (no/weak) groups. Specimens were available for 326 of 377 (86.5%) patients. High expression of hENT1 and DPD was detected in 100 (30.7%) and 63 (19.3%) of 326 patients, respectively. In the S-1 arm, the median overall survival (OS) with low hENT1, 58.0 months, was significantly better than that with high hENT1, 30.9 months (hazard ratio 1.75, P = 0.007). In contrast, there were no significant differences in OS between DPD low and high groups in the S-1 arm and neither the expression levels of hENT1 nor DPD revealed a relationship with treatment outcomes in the GEM arm. The present study did not show that the DPD and hENT1 are useful biomarkers for choosing S-1 or GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy. However, hENT1 expression is a significant prognostic factor for survival in the S-1 arm.