Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 317
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Pediatr ; 175(9): 911-918, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125148

RESUMO

Importance: Establishing stable breathing is a key event for preterm infants after birth. Delivery of pressure-stable continuous positive airway pressure and avoiding face mask use could be of importance in the delivery room. Objective: To determine whether using a new respiratory support system with low imposed work of breathing and short binasal prongs decreases delivery room intubations or death compared with a standard T-piece system with a face mask. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this unblinded randomized clinical trial, mothers threatening preterm delivery before week 28 of gestation were screened. A total of 365 mothers were enrolled, and 250 infants were randomized before birth and 246 liveborn infants were treated. The trial was conducted in 7 neonatal intensive care units in 5 European countries from March 2016 to May 2020. The follow-up period was 72 hours after intervention. Interventions: Infants were randomized to either the new respiratory support system with short binasal prongs (n = 124 infants) or the standard T-piece system with face mask (n = 122 infants). The intervention was providing continuous positive airway pressure for 10 to 30 minutes and positive pressure ventilation, if needed, with the randomized system. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was delivery room intubation or death within 30 minutes of birth. Secondary outcomes included respiratory and safety variables. Results: Of 246 liveborn infants treated, the mean (SD) gestational age was 25.9 (1.3) weeks, and 127 (51.6%) were female. A total of 41 infants (33.1%) receiving the new respiratory support system were intubated or died in the delivery room compared with 55 infants (45.1%) receiving standard care. The adjusted odds ratio was statistically significant after adjusting for stratification variables (adjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.94; P = .03). No significant differences were seen in secondary outcomes or safety variables. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, using the new respiratory support system reduced delivery room intubation in extremely preterm infants. Stabilizing preterm infants with a system that has low imposed work of breathing and binasal prongs as interface is safe and feasible. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02563717.


Assuntos
Idade Gestacional , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/instrumentação , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Terapia Respiratória/estatística & dados numéricos , Suécia
3.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 146(7): 471-473, 2021 04.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33780994

RESUMO

Inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Inhaled bronchodilator therapies consist of long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA). LABA or LAMA treatment is recommended in symptomatic COPD patients. In case of a history of exacerbations LAMA is superior to LABA in the prevention of exacerbations. LABA LAMA combination therapies are used in patients who are highly symptomatic. Adding ICS to bronchodilator treatment is recommended in COPD patients with repeated exacerbations. Recently, fixed triple therapies consisting of LABA, LAMA and ICS in single inhalers became available.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Terapia Respiratória/normas
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 6730, 2021 03 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33762655

RESUMO

The aim was to compare the effect of diaphragmatic breathing exercise (DBE), flow- (FIS) and volume-oriented incentive spirometry (VIS) on pulmonary function- (PFT), functional capacity-6-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) and Functional Difficulties Questionnaire (FDQ) in subjects undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft surgery (CABG). The purpose of incorporating pulmonary ventilator regimes is to improve ventilation and avoid post-operative pulmonary complications. CABG patients (n = 72) were allocated to FIS, VIS and DBE groups (n = 24 each) by block randomization. Preoperative and postoperative values for PFT were taken until day 7 for all three groups. On 7th postoperative day, 6 MWT and FDQ was analyzed using ANOVA and post-hoc analysis. PFT values were found to be decreased on postoperative day 1(Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) = FIS group-65%, VIS group-47%, DBE group-68%) compared to preoperative day (p < 0.001). PFT values for all 3 groups recovered until postoperative day 7 (FVC = FIS group-67%, VIS group-95%, DBE group-59%) but was found to reach the baseline in VIS group (p < 0.001). When compared between 3 groups, statistically significant improvement was observed in VIS group (p < 0.001) in 6 MWT and FDQ assessment. In conclusion, VIS was proven to be more beneficial in improving the pulmonary function (FVC), functional capacity and FDQ when compared to FIS and DBE.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Ventilação Pulmonar , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Idoso , Exercícios Respiratórios , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Função Respiratória/instrumentação , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Terapia Respiratória/efeitos adversos , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Espirometria/instrumentação , Espirometria/métodos
6.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(2): 150-155, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339722

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The treatment applied for children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for severe acute bronchiolitis may differ from general recommendations. The first objective of our study was to describe the treatments offered to these children in a Spanish tertiary PICU. The second objective was to analyse the changes in management derived from the publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) bronchiolitis guideline in 2014. METHODS: This was a retrospective-prospective observational study conducted during two epidemic waves (2014-2015 and 2015-2016). The AAP guidelines were distributed and taught to PICU staff between both epidemic waves. RESULTS: A total of 138 children were enrolled (78 male). In the first period, 78 children were enrolled. The median age was 1.8 months (IQR 1.1-3.6). There were no differences between the management in the two periods, except for the use of high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT); its use increased in the second period. Overall, 83% of patients received non-invasive ventilation or HFOT. Children older than 12 months received HFOT exclusively. In comparison, continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure were used less during the period 2015-2016 (P=0.036). Regarding pharmacological therapy, 70% of patients received antibiotics, 23% steroids, 33% salbutamol, 31% adrenaline, and 7% hypertonic saline. The mortality rate was zero. CONCLUSIONS: Our PICU did not follow the AAP recommendations. There were no differences between the two periods, except in the use of HFOT. All children older than 12 months received HFOT exclusively. The rate of using invasive mechanical ventilation was also low.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Bronquiolite/terapia , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Doença Aguda , Bronquiolite/diagnóstico , Terapia Combinada , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Terapia Respiratória/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha
8.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(4): 498-501, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32578785

RESUMO

The emergence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic shows a rapid increase in cases and deaths. The World Health Organization (WHO) has shown that more than 200.000 confirmed cases have been identified in more than 166 countries/territories. Public health authorities in Brasil have reported 532 confirmed cases by March 19. Approximately 5% of the patients will require intensive care unit treatment with oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation. Limited data are available about rehabilitation protocols for severe illness and intensive care treatment of COVID-19 increase. Thus, we aim to show current information about COVID-19, describing symptoms and the respiratory management for critical patients and preventive care. Physical therapists and all health care professionals need to recognize the challenges they will face in the coming months.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Fisioterapeutas/normas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/normas , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Brasil , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/normas , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Pneumologie ; 74(8): 496-504, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583378

RESUMO

The German Respiratory Society (DGP) has commissioned Assembly 12 "Rehabilitation, Prevention and Tobacco Control" to develop recommendations for the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients. This position paper is based on the current state of knowledge, which develops daily. This position paper describes the health consequences in COVID-19 as well as the indications for pulmonary rehabilitation. Rehabilitative therapies in COVID-19 are already indicated on the ward or intensive care unit, continue as early pulmonary rehabilitation in the acute hospital and as pulmonary rehabilitation in pulmonary rehabilitation centers. The main focus of this position paper is to propose recommendations for the content-related implementation of a multimodal, interdisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/reabilitação , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Pneumonia Viral/reabilitação , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/normas , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Pulmão/virologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas
10.
AJOB Empir Bioeth ; 11(3): 148-159, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32369433

RESUMO

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted health care systems' vulnerabilities. Hospitals face increasing risk of periods of scarcity of life-sustaining resources such as ventilators for mechanical respiratory support, as has been the case in Italy as of March, 2020. The National Academy of Medicine has provided guidance on crisis standards of care, which call for the reallocation of scarce medical resources to those who will benefit most during extreme situations. Given that this will require a departure from the usual fiduciary duty of the bedside clinician, we determined and mapped potential barriers to the implementation of the guidelines from stakeholders using an implementation science framework. Methods: A protocol was created to operationalize national and state guidelines for triaging ventilators during crisis conditions. Focus groups and key informant interviews were conducted from July-September 2018 with clinicians at three acute care hospitals of an urban academic medical center. Respiratory therapists, intensivists, nursing leadership and the palliative care interdisciplinary team participated in focus groups. Key informant interviews were conducted with emergency management, respiratory therapy and emergency medicine. Subjects were presented the protocol and their reflections were elicited using a semi-structured interview guide. Data from transcripts and notes were categorized using a coding strategy based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results: Participants anticipated that implementing this protocol would challenge their roles and identities as clinicians including both their fiduciary duty to the patient and their decision-making autonomy. Despite this, many participants acknowledged the need for such a protocol to standardize care and minimize bias as well as to mitigate potential consequences for individual clinicians. Participants identified the question of considering patient quality of life in triage decisions as an important and unresolved ethical issue in disaster triage. Conclusion: Clinicians' discomfort with shifting roles and obligations could pose implementation barriers for crisis standards of care.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Padrão de Cuidado , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos/ética , Medicina de Emergência/normas , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Respiração Artificial/normas , Terapia Respiratória/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Padrão de Cuidado/ética , Triagem/métodos , Triagem/normas
11.
BMJ Open Qual ; 9(2)2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32423972

RESUMO

Developing respiratory complications postoperatively is one of the major determinants of longer hospital stay, morbidity, mortality and increased healthcare costs. The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications varies from 1% to 23%. Given that postoperative respiratory complications are relatively common and costly, there have been various studies which look at ways to reduce the risk of these occurring. One such protocol is the ICOUGH bundle which stands for Incentive spirometry, Coughing and deep breathing, Oral care, patient Understanding, Getting out of bed and Head of bed elevation. This has been adapted locally to the Coughing and deep breathing, Oral care, patient Understanding, Getting out of bed and Head of bed elevation (COUGH) bundle which consists of these components excluding incentive spirometry. Within our surgical high dependency unit (HDU), the COUGH bundle should be implemented in patients who have a moderate or high risk of developing postoperative respiratory complications with an Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score of 26 or above. Studies have shown that the ICOUGH bundle has reduced rates of pneumonia and unplanned intubation in general surgical and vascular patients. Baseline data taken from surgical HDU showed that the COUGH bundle was not well implemented. One out of eight patients who had an ARISCAT score greater than 26 had the COUGH bundle implemented on admission to the unit. Three out of eight patients had the ARISCAT score documented in their admission medical review. One patient who should have received the bundle, but did not, developed a hospital acquired pneumonia postoperatively. To address this issue, we aimed to increase awareness surrounding the COUGH bundle and to increase the number of patients who had the COUGH bundle started on admission. This quality improvement project had four cycles (plan, do, study, act) and after these, 100% of patients who had an ARISCAT score of 26 or more had the COUGH bundle implemented.


Assuntos
Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Doenças Respiratórias/mortalidade , Tosse , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Terapia Respiratória/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Escócia/epidemiologia
12.
Rev Mal Respir ; 37(6): 505-510, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32410773

RESUMO

The French-language Respiratory Medicine Society (SPLF) proposes a guide for the follow-up of patients who have presented with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The proposals are based on known data from previous epidemics, on acute lesions observed in SARS-CoV-2 patients and on expert opinion. This guide proposes a follow-up based on three categories of patients: (1) patients managed outside hospital for possible or proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred by their physician for persistent dyspnoea; (2) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in a medical unit; (3) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in an intensive care unit. The subsequent follow-up will have to be adapted to the initial assessment. This guide emphasises the possibility of others causes of dyspnoea (cardiac, thromboembolic, hyperventilation syndrome…). These proposals may evolve over time as more knowledge becomes available.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , COVID-19 , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/reabilitação , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Respiratório/normas , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Prioridades em Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/reabilitação , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Avaliação de Sintomas/normas , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Trombofilia/tratamento farmacológico , Trombofilia/etiologia
13.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi ; 43(4): 288-296, 2020 Apr 12.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32294813

RESUMO

Definite evidence has shown that the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) could be transmitted from person to person, so far more than 1 700 bedside clinicians have been infected. A lot of respiratory treatments for critically ill patients are deemed as high-risk factors for nosocomial transmission, such as intubation, manual ventilation by resuscitator, noninvasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, bronchoscopy examination, suction and patient transportation, etc, due to its high possibility to cause or worsen the spread of the virus. As such, we developed this consensus recommendations on all those high-risk treatments, based on the current evidence as well as the resource limitation in some areas, with the aim to reduce the nosocomial transmission and optimize the treatment for the COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Those recommendations include: (1)Standard prevention and protection, and patient isolation; (2)Patient wearing mask during HFNC treatment; (3)Using dual limb ventilator with filters placed at the ventilator outlets, or using heat-moisture exchanger (HME) instead of heated humidification in single limb ventilator with HME placed between exhalation port and mask; avoid using mask with exhalation port on the mask; (4)Placing filter between resuscitator and mask or artificial airway; (5)For spontaneous breathing patients, placing mask for patients during bronchoscopy examination; for patients receiving noninvasive ventilation, using the special mask with bronchoscopy port to perform bronchoscopy; (6)Using sedation and paralytics during intubation, cuff pressure should be maintained between 25-30 cmH(2)O(1 cmH(2)O=0.098 kPa); (7)In-line suction catheter is recommended and it can be used for one week; (8)Dual-limb heated wire circuits are recommended and only changed with visible soiled; (9)For patients who need breathing support during transportation, placing an HME between ventilator and patient; (10)PSV is recommended for implementing spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), avoid using T-piece to do SBT. When tracheotomy patients are weaned from ventilator, HME should be used, avoid using T-piece or tracheostomy mask. (11)Avoid unnecessary bronchial hygiene therapy; (12) For patients who need aerosol therapy, dry powder inhaler metered dose inhaler with spacer is recommended for spontaneous breathing patients; while vibrating mesh nebulizer is recommended for ventilated patients and additional filter is recommended to be placed at the expiratory port of ventilation during nebulization.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Betacoronavirus , Broncoscopia , COVID-19 , Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Estado Terminal , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Filtração , Humanos , Máscaras , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventiladores Mecânicos
14.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi ; 43(4): 308-314, 2020 Apr 12.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32294814

RESUMO

COVID-19 is a highly infectious respiratory infection disease, which leads to dysfunction of respiratory, physical, and psychological of the patients. pulmonary rehabilitation is an important intervention for clinical patients as well as cure patients. With the deeper cognition of COVID-19 and accumulation of clinical experience, we proposed the recommendations for pulmonary rehabilitation of COVID-19 in adults based on the opinions of front-line clinical experts involved in the management of this epidemic and a review of the relevant literature and evidences: (1)for the inpatients with COVID-19, pulmonary rehabilitation would relieve the symptoms of dyspnea, anxiety, and depression; eventually improve physical function and the quality of life; (2)For severe/critical inpatients, the early performance of pulmonary rehabilitation is not suggested. (3)For isolating patients, the pulmonary rehabilitation guidence should be conducted through education video, instruction manual or remote consultation. (4)Assessment and monitor should be performed throughout the entire pulmonary rehabilitation process.(5)Taking proper grading protection following the guideline. These recommendations can serve as a clinical practice guidence and basis for pulmonary rehabilitation of COVID-19.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/reabilitação , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Pneumonia Viral/reabilitação , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 202(6): 795-802, 2020 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32243764

RESUMO

The NHLBI convened a working group on October 23, 2019, to identify the most relevant and urgent research priorities and prevailing challenges in e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI). Experts across multiple disciplines discussed the complexities of the EVALI outbreak, identified research priorities, and recommended strategies to address most effectively its causal factors and improve diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of this disease. Many research priorities were identified, including the need to create national and international registries of patients with EVALI, to track accurately those affected and assess outcomes. The group concluded that biospecimens from subjects with EVALI are urgently needed to help define EVALI pathogenesis and that vaping has disease risks that are disparate from smoking, with the occurrence of EVALI highlighting the importance of broadening e-cigarette research beyond comparators to smoking-related diseases.


Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Lesão Pulmonar/induzido quimicamente , Lesão Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Lesão Pulmonar/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Vaping/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Congressos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.) , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Relatório de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 90(1)2020 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32236089

RESUMO

Respiratory physiotherapy in patients with COVID-19 infection in acute setting: a Position Paper of the Italian Association of Respiratory Physiotherapists (ARIR) On February 2020, Italy, especially the northern regions, was hit by an epidemic of the new SARS-Cov-2 coronavirus that spread from China between December 2019 and January 2020. The entire healthcare system had to respond promptly in a very short time to an exponential growth of the number of subjects affected by COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) with the need of semi-intensive and intensive care units.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Ventilação não Invasiva/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Pneumonia Viral/etiologia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/reabilitação , Cuidados Críticos , Dispneia/etiologia , Humanos , Hipóxia/complicações , Hipóxia/etiologia , Controle de Infecções/normas , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Itália , Ventilação não Invasiva/normas , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/reabilitação , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Pronação , Respiração Artificial/normas , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/reabilitação , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/reabilitação , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória , Terapia Respiratória/normas , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(4): 498-501, 2020. graf
Artigo em Inglês | SES-SP, LILACS | ID: biblio-1136239

RESUMO

SUMMARY The emergence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic shows a rapid increase in cases and deaths. The World Health Organization (WHO) has shown that more than 200.000 confirmed cases have been identified in more than 166 countries/territories. Public health authorities in Brasil have reported 532 confirmed cases by March 19. Approximately 5% of the patients will require intensive care unit treatment with oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation. Limited data are available about rehabilitation protocols for severe illness and intensive care treatment of COVID-19 increase. Thus, we aim to show current information about COVID-19, describing symptoms and the respiratory management for critical patients and preventive care. Physical therapists and all health care professionals need to recognize the challenges they will face in the coming months.


RESUMO O surgimento da pandemia do Coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19) tem demonstrado rápido aumento dos casos e das mortes. A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) apontou que mais de 200.000 casos confirmados foram identificados em mais de 166 países/territórios. As autoridades de saúde pública no Brasil relataram 532 casos confirmados até 19 de março. Aproximadamente 5% dos pacientes necessitarão de tratamento em unidade de terapia intensiva com oxigenoterapia e ventilação mecânica. Temos disponíveis dados limitados sobre protocolos de reabilitação para doenças graves e tratamento em unidade de terapia intensiva de pacientes com COVID-19. Assim, nosso objetivo é mostrar informações atuais sobre o COVID-19, descrevendo sintomas e controle respiratório de pacientes críticos e cuidados preventivos. Fisioterapeutas e todos os profissionais de saúde precisam reconhecer os desafios que enfrentaremos nos próximos meses.


Assuntos
Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/normas , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Fisioterapeutas/normas , Betacoronavirus , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Brasil , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Infecções por Coronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Pandemias/prevenção & controle
20.
Respir Care ; 64(9): 1109-1115, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113858

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung disease is the most common morbidity affecting very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Many of these infants are discharged home on oxygen, placing significant emotional and financial burdens on families. We sought to reduce the proportion of VLBW infants requiring discharge home on oxygen by improving convalescent respiratory practices. METHODS: We performed a prospective quality-improvement project for infants with birth weights ≤ 1,500 g in a single neonatal ICU. Using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, we developed and implemented a room air challenge, oxygen reference chart, and a standardized oxygen delivery guideline. The primary outcome was the proportion of VLBW infants discharged home on oxygen. Secondary outcomes included rate of chronic lung disease and postmenstrual age when off all respiratory support. Balancing measures were postmenstrual age and weight at discharge, as well as unplanned readmissions. Statistical process control charts were used to monitor outcomes and balancing measures. RESULTS: The proportion of VLBW infants discharged home on oxygen decreased from 34.4% to 18.5% and 21.7% in the following two years (P = .044 and P = .01, respectively). G-Chart analysis showed a higher mean number of successes between failures. The rate of chronic lung disease decreased from 31.2% to 25.4% (P = .03). The mean postmenstrual age at discharge, mean weight at discharge, and readmission rate were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Standardization of convalescent respiratory care practices improved respiratory morbidities in VLBW infants. These interventions could be utilized in other NICUs with high incidence of respiratory morbidities despite improvement in delivery room practices.


Assuntos
Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Convalescença , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Respiratórios/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA