Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 293
Filtrar
1.
Vet Dermatol ; 35(1): 71-80, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37770410

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intradermal (IDT) and prick (PT) tests are used to select allergens for allergen-specific immunotherapy in dogs with atopic dermatitis (cAD). However, the use of antipruritic drugs before performing these tests may influence the results. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the drugs oclacitinib and prednisolone on the immediate-phase reactions of IDT and PT. ANIMALS: Thirty client-owned dogs with cAD with positive reactions to at least one allergen extract on IDT or PT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to receive oclacitinib 0.4-0.58 mg/kg per os, every 12 h (n = 14), or prednisolone 0.37-0.65 mg/kg p.o., every 12 h (n = 16) for 14 days. IDT and PT were performed on Day (D)0 before treatment and on D14. RESULTS: At D14 there was no significant reduction in the means of the orthogonal diameters of the positive immediate-phase reactions of the IDT (p = 0.064) in the oclacitinib group; however, in the PT, the diameter of the positive reactions reduced significantly (p = 0.048). In both tests, there was no significant reduction in the total number of positive reactions (IDT, p > 0.999; PT, p = 0.735). In the prednisolone group, the means of the orthogonal diameters of positive immediate-phase reactions were significantly reduced in both tests (IDT, p = 0.001; PT, p ≤ 0.001) and there also was a reduction in the total number of positive reactions (IDT, p = 0.022; PT, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of oclacitinib 0.4-0.58 mg/kg twice daily for 14 days does not interfere with IDT results in dogs with cAD. However, oclacitinib may reduce PT reactivity. The use of prednisolone 0.37-0.65 mg/kg twice daily results in a reduction in both IDT and PT results.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Doenças do Cão , Testes Intradérmicos , Animais , Cães , Alérgenos , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/veterinária , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Testes Intradérmicos/veterinária , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Prednisolona/farmacologia
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38056477

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: While feline asthma (FA) is considered to be of allergic origin, the etiology of feline chronic bronchitis (CB) to date is unknown. Aim of the study was to compare the results of intradermal testing (IDT) and serum testing for allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (SAT) in cats diagnosed with FA and CB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven client-owned cats with clinical signs, suggestive of feline inflammatory bronchial disease (FBD) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned to 3 groups based on results of bronchoalveolar-lavage-fluid (BALF)-cytology: FA (n=8), CB (n=10), or cats with a physiological BALF cytology (PB; n=9). A standardized IDT for 27 allergens was performed in all cats. In addition, allergen-specific IgE was measured in serum samples using an FcεRIα-ELISA. The number of positive reactions in both tests was compared between groups, and agreement between test results of both tests was evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding the number of positive reactions, no statistically significant difference was detected between groups in IDT (p=0.65) and SAT (p=0.51). When comparing the 2 test systems, a weak correlation was found for the allergens Tyrophagus putrescentiae (k=0.256), Dermatophagoides farinae (k=0.276), and rye (k=0.273). The most commonly observed reactions were to house dust mites, storage mites, rye and nettle in IDT and to sheep sorrel, storage mites, and house dust mites in SAT. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: IDT and SAT in cats with feline inflammatory bronchial disease (FBD) cannot be used interchangeably for allergen detection. Sensitization to environmental allergens can occur in cats with and without airway inflammation. Therefore, a positive test result should always be assessed in context with clinical signs and allergen exposure.


Assuntos
Broncopatias , Doenças do Gato , Doenças dos Ovinos , Ovinos , Gatos , Animais , Alérgenos , Imunoglobulina E , Testes Intradérmicos/veterinária , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Broncopatias/veterinária , Pyroglyphidae , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico
3.
Vet Dermatol ; 34(6): 505-513, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37382082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prick testing is widely used as the first-line in vivo test for environmental allergens in people owing to its noninvasive nature and speed of performance. OBJECTIVES: To determine concordance between skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal testing (IDT) reactivity to environmental allergen mixes in dogs with atopic dermatitis (cAD). ANIMALS: Forty client-owned dogs with cAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Skin prick testing (GREER Pick System; Stallergenes Greer) and IDT were performed on 40 dogs using seven glycerinated and aqueous environmental allergen mixes, respectively (tree, grass and weed pollens, house dust mites and three mould mixes). Reactions for IDT and SPT were evaluated both subjectively and objectively (mean wheal diameter; MWD) and compared to saline and histamine controls. RESULTS: Using IDT as the gold standard, with subjective scoring, SPT was 47.0% sensitive [95% confidence interval (CI) 36.0%-58.7%], 92.1% specific (95% CI 87.6%-95.3%) and agreement was moderate (79%, Cohen's kappa = 0.424). The positive predictive value of SPT was 36% and negative predictive value was 95%. Objective and subjective scores had only fair agreement. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Skin prick testing with allergen mixes was specific yet poorly sensitive as compared to IDT. For both IDT and SPT, 95% (38 of 40) dogs failed to react to an allergen mix, despite showing a positive reaction to at least one component. Future studies comparing SPT and IDT should test individual allergens rather than mixes to prevent the dilution of individual components, which may have resulted in false negatives.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Dermatite Atópica , Humanos , Animais , Cães , Projetos Piloto , Testes Intradérmicos/veterinária , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Testes Cutâneos/veterinária , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/veterinária
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(2): 481-491.e5, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36154897

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Determination of culprit drug in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is crucial. Skin tests have been used, although it remains unclear how sensitive these are. OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of skin tests in the assessment of drug causality in DRESS. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for publications from 1996 onward of skin tests (skin prick test = SPT, patch test = PT, intradermal test = IDT) performed in clearly defined DRESS cases. Outcomes of testing, drug culpability assessments, and challenge test data were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles met inclusion criteria. In 290 patients with DRESS, patch testing was most frequent (PT = 97.2% [n = 282], IDT = 12.4% [n = 36], SPT = 3.1% [n = 9]). Positive results were noted in 58.4% (n = 160 of 282) of PTs, 66.5% of IDTs, and 25% of SPTs. When confidence of drug causality was high (n = 73 of 194), testing did not correlate well with clinical suspicion: PTs, 37.6%; IDTs, 36.5%. Direct comparison of skin testing with provocation testing (n = 12) showed 83.3% correlation. Positive IDT results were reported in 8 negative PT cases. CONCLUSIONS: Skin tests, particularly PTs and IDTs, have been reported as tools for diagnosis of causal drugs in DRESS. Heterogeneity in methodology, results analysis, and reporting of cohorts make meta-analysis to determine sensitivity and specificity of published literature impossible and highlight weaknesses in the field. We propose that international collaboration is essential to harmonize the methodology and reporting measures from hypersensitivity testing studies in larger cohorts.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos , Eosinofilia , Humanos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/etiologia , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia/complicações , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos
5.
Vet Dermatol ; 34(1): 46-52, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are no studies investigating the correlation between prick test (PT) and intradermal test (IDT) with environmental allergens in dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between PT and IDT for two environmental allergens, and to calculate the sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of PT, using IDT as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two dogs with AD were selected. PT was performed with glycerinated allergen extracts, along with negative and positive controls, using the Greer Prick System. Reactions were interpreted (positive/negative) subjectively and by using seven objective criteria, by an examiner blinded to the IDT results. IDT reactions to the same allergens were interpreted, subjectively and objectively, by another masked investigator. The agreement between PT and IDT, the sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of PT, using IDT as gold standard, were calculated. RESULTS: On subjective evaluation, the correlation between PT and IDT was poor and sensitivity of PT was 0%. Of the seven criteria for the objective evaluation of PT, the best diagnostic performance was attained when allergen-induced wheals were considered positive if their longest diameter was ≥8.5 mm. However, even then, the correlation with IDT was moderate, and the sensitivity of PT, albeit based on few positive IDT reactions, was low. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At least as performed herein, PT has a poor-to-moderate correlation with IDT, mainly as a consequence of the lack of positive PT reactions. Further studies are needed to improve PT technique, yet, meanwhile, it cannot be recommended as a substitute for IDT.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Doenças do Cão , Cães , Animais , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/veterinária , Alérgenos , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Testes Intradérmicos/veterinária , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Testes Cutâneos/veterinária
6.
Vet Dermatol ; 33(6): 527-533, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36336575

RESUMO

Background - There is lack of studies evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility of the interpretation of intradermal testing in dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives - To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the interpretation of intradermal test results in dogs with AD. For comparison, the repeatability of allergen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E serology also was examined. Materials and methods - Twenty dogs with AD were used. Intradermal test included injections of known negative and positive controls, and of 25 masked injections of 10 allergens/controls, that were selected randomly and injected at random positions. Reactions to the 25 masked allergens/controls were scored (positive/negative) subjectively by three independent examiners followed by an objective assessment. Allergen-specific IgE serology was performed in blinded duplicate samples collected from all dogs for nine of 10 of the same allergens. Results - Kappa values of intraobserver repeatability (≥2 injections of the same allergen to different positions of the same dog) varied between -0.53 and 0.8 (subjective evaluations), and between 0.03 and 1 (objective evaluation). When the repeatability of the serological test was examined k = 0.91. Kappa values for the interobserver reproducibility (objective and three subjective evaluations of the same allergen injected at the same position of the same dog) varied between 0.6 and 0.74 (overall 0.67). Conclusions and clinical relevance - Intraobserver repeatability of the subjective and objective evaluation of IDT results varied from good to poor and depended on the number of times the same allergen was injected, whereas interobserver reproducibility varied from substantial to moderate. Further studies are needed to optimise the repeatability and reproducibility of IDT in dogs.


Contexte - Il existe un manque d'études évaluant la répétabilité et la reproductibilité de l'interprétation des tests intradermiques chez les chiens atteints de dermatite atopique (DA). Objectifs - Évaluer la répétabilité et la reproductibilité de l'interprétation des résultats des tests intradermiques chez les chiens atteints de MA. À des fins de comparaison, la répétabilité de la sérologie de l'immunoglobuline (Ig)E spécifique de l'allergène a également été examinée. Matériels et méthodes - Vingt chiens atteints de MA ont été utilisés. Le test intradermique comprenait des injections de contrôles négatifs et positifs connus, et de 25 injections masquées de 10 allergènes/contrôles, qui ont été sélectionnés au hasard et injectés à des positions aléatoires. Les réactions aux 25 allergènes/contrôles masqués ont été notées (positives/négatives) subjectivement par trois examinateurs indépendants, suivies d'une évaluation objective. La sérologie IgE spécifique de l'allergène a été réalisée dans des échantillons en double en aveugle prélevés sur tous les chiens pour neuf des 10 allergènes identiques. Résultats - Les valeurs kappa de répétabilité intra-observateur (≥2 injections du même allergène à différentes positions du même chien) variaient entre -0,53 et 0,8 (évaluations subjectives), et entre 0,03 et 1 (évaluation objective). Lorsque la répétabilité du test sérologique a été examinée, k = 0,91. Les valeurs de Kappa pour la reproductibilité interobservateur (évaluations objective et trois évaluations subjectives du même allergène injecté au même endroit du même chien) variaient entre 0,6 et 0,74 (globalement 0,67). Conclusions et pertinence clinique - La répétabilité intra-observateur de l'évaluation subjective et objective des résultats IDT variait de bonne à mauvaise et dépendait du nombre d'injections d'un même allergène, alors que la reproductibilité inter-observateur variait de substantielle à modérée. D'autres études sont nécessaires pour optimiser la répétabilité et la reproductibilité de l'IDT chez le chien.


Introducción- faltan estudios que evalúen la repetibilidad y la reproducibilidad de la interpretación de las pruebas intradérmicas en perros con dermatitis atópica (AD). Objetivos- evaluar la repetibilidad y reproducibilidad de la interpretación de los resultados de las pruebas intradérmicas en perros con AD. A modo de comparación, también se examinó la repetibilidad de la serología de inmunoglobulina (Ig)E específica de alérgeno. Materiales y métodos - Se utilizaron 20 perros con AD. La prueba intradérmica incluyó inyecciones de controles positivos y negativos conocidos, y de 25 inyecciones enmascaradas de 10 alérgenos/controles, que se seleccionaron al azar y se inyectaron en posiciones aleatorias. Las reacciones a los 25 alérgenos/controles enmascarados fueron calificadas (positivas/negativas) subjetivamente por tres examinadores independientes seguido de una evaluación objetiva. La serología de IgE específica para alérgenos se realizó en muestras duplicadas ciegas recolectadas de todos los perros para nueve de 10 de los mismos alérgenos. Resultados - Los valores Kappa de repetibilidad intraobservador (≥2 inyecciones del mismo alérgeno en diferentes posiciones del mismo perro) variaron entre -0,53 y 0,8 (evaluaciones subjetivas) y entre 0,03 y 1 (evaluación objetiva). Cuando se examinó la repetibilidad de la prueba serológica k = 0,91. Los valores de Kappa para la reproducibilidad interobservador (objetivo y tres evaluaciones subjetivas del mismo alérgeno inyectado en la misma posición del mismo perro) variaron entre 0,6 y 0,74 (en general, 0,67). Conclusiones y relevancia clínica- la repetibilidad intraobservador de la evaluación subjetiva y objetiva de los resultados de la IDT varió de buena a mala y dependió del número de veces que se inyectó el mismo alérgeno, mientras que la reproducibilidad interobservador varió de sustancial a moderada. Se necesitan más estudios para optimizar la repetibilidad y reproducibilidad de IDT en perros.


Contexto - Há poucos estudos avaliando a repetibilidade e reprodutibilidade da interpretação do teste intradérmico em cães com dermatite atópica (DA). Objetivos - Avaliar a repetibilidade e reprodutibilidade da interpretação dos resultados de testes intradérmicos em cães com DA. Para comparação, a repetibilidade da sorologia com imunoglobulinas (Ig)E alérgeno-específicas foi também avaliada. Materiais e métodos - Foram utilizados 20 cães com DA. O teste intradérmico incluiu injeções de controles negativos e positivos conhecidos e de 25 injeções mascaradas de 10 alérgenos/controles, que foram selecionados aleatoriamente e injetadas em posições aleatórias. As reações aos 25 alérgenos/controles mascarados foram pontuadas (positiva/negativa) subjetivamente por três examinadores independentes, seguidas de uma avaliação objetiva. A sorologia de IgE específica para alérgenos foi realizada em amostras duplicadas cegas coletadas de todos os cães para nove de 10 dos mesmos alérgenos. Resultados - Os valores Kappa de repetibilidade intraobservador (≥2 injeções do mesmo alérgeno em diferentes posições do mesmo cão) variaram entre -0,53 e 0,8 (avaliação subjetiva) e entre 0,03 e 1 (avaliação objetiva). Quando examinada a repetibilidade do teste sorológico k=0,91. Os valores de Kappa para a reprodutibilidade interobservador (objetiva e três avaliações subjetivas do mesmo alérgeno injetado na mesma posição do mesmo cão) variaram entre 0,6 e 0,74 (total 0,67). Conclusões e relevância clínica - A repetibilidade intraobservador da avaliação subjetiva e objetiva dos resultados do IDT variou de boa a ruim e dependeu do número de vezes que o mesmo alérgeno foi injetado, enquanto a reprodutibilidade interobservador variou de substancial a moderada. Mais estudos são necessários para otimizar a repetibilidade e reprodutibilidade do IDT em cães.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Doenças do Cão , Cães , Animais , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/veterinária , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Testes Intradérmicos/veterinária , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Imunoglobulina E , Alérgenos
7.
Dermatitis ; 33(1): 31-35, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH) 10.0% petrolatum (pet) was recommended for patch testing to detect aluminum contact allergy. Aluminum lactate (AL) may be as reliable a test substance as ACH. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the frequencies of aluminum allergy when ACH and AL were used in patch testing consecutive patients. METHODS: Petrolatum preparations of ACH 10.0% and AL 12.0% were added to the baseline series in 2010-2017. Aluminum chloride hexahydrate 10.0% pet was added to the children baseline series from July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. RESULTS: A total of 5448 patients were patch tested with the extended baseline series and 196 children with the extended children baseline series. Forty-eight of the 5448 adults (0.9%) and 10 of the 196 children (5.1%) were diagnosed with aluminum contact allergy. A significant difference was found between the aluminum allergy frequencies in children and adults patch tested with ACH in 2013-2017 (P < 0.001). The difference between the frequencies of contact allergies for the 2 aluminum salts is not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patch testing with ACH and AL demonstrated similar contact allergy frequencies. To detect aluminum allergy, patch testing with ACH 10.0% pet is recommended. Aluminum chloride hexahydrate 10.0% pet should be considered for inclusion in baseline series for patch testing adults and children.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Cloreto de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Cloreto de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Criança , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco
9.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 46(5): 906-909, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33811662

RESUMO

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (APD) is a rare skin disorder with varying presentations, resulting from hypersensitivity to endogenous progesterone during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The diagnosis has been traditionally confirmed with intradermal progesterone testing (IPT) or intramuscular challenge with progesterone or its derivatives. We present a case of a 31-year-old woman with suspected APD who underwent IPT to progesterone. The patient's cyclical symptoms, positive skin reaction and symptoms following IPT were sufficient to make a diagnosis of APD. However, we also tested 10 healthy female controls without symptoms of APD, and found that 9 of these also developed positive skin reactions to intradermal progesterone at 15 min, 24 and 48 h, albeit to a lesser extent. Therefore, these results raise doubts about the validity of using IPT to make a diagnosis of APD. Further research on appropriate testing is needed.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/diagnóstico , Dermatite/diagnóstico , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Progesterona/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/patologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Fase Luteal/imunologia , Ciclo Menstrual/imunologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Progesterona/imunologia , Dermatopatias/imunologia
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(5): 361-371, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32462721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Beta-lactam (BL)-antibiotics are the most frequent reason for drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Because they are more efficient, less toxic, and less costly than other antibiotics, confirmation or exclusion of BL allergy is worthwhile. However, allergy tests for drug allergies are often false-negative. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the components of a stepwise diagnostic algorithm for immediate BL hypersensitivity with regard to sensitivity (SENS). METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected allergy to BL antibiotics were retrospectively analyzed with regard to increasing sensitivity (plausible history of immediate BL hypersensitivity serving as external criterion) of (i) skin prick test (SPT) by adding a second reading (n = 746), (ii) BL-specific IgE-determination in vitro at two cut-offs (n = 539), and (iii) adding in vivo testing of minor and major BL determinants (n = 288). RESULTS: In the history-based population indicative of immediate BL hypersensitivity (n = 457), SPT with a sole 20-minute reading identified 99 (SENS: 0.21) and SPT with 20- and 40-minute-reading identified 133 cases (SENS: 0.29). in vitro specific IgE-examination identified 31 positives at a cut-off ≥0.35 kUA/L (5.8% of tested) and 99 at cut-off ≥0.11 kUA/L (18.4% of tested). In 203 SPT-negative individuals, immediate BL hypersensitivity was identified by additional tests: in 79 by specific IgE (cut-off ≥0.11 kUA/L) (thereof 53 identified solely by this test) and in 150 by in vivo testing of BL determinants in combination with Penicillin and Ampicillin intradermally (thereof 124 solely by this test); in 26 individuals both additional tests were positive. The combination of the three outpatient-based test modalities-(i) optimized SPT, (ii) specific IgE at optimized cut-off, and (iii) in vivo testing of BL determinants/Penicillin/Ampicillin-identified altogether 336/457 individuals with immediate BL-hypersensitivity (SENS: 0.73), whereas the combination of the two (i) + (ii) identified 212/457 (SENS: 0.46); (i) + (iii) 283/457 (SENS: 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: To overcome the low sensitivity of allergological tests, optimized reading times of the SPT of BL, a lower cut-off for in vitro detection of BL-specific IgE, and intradermal testing of Penicillin, Ampicillin, and BL-determinants contribute to overall sensitivity under real life conditions to diagnose immediate BL-hypersensitivity.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/imunologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , beta-Lactamas/imunologia , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Cutâneos
11.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ; 53: e20190433, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32348430

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: As highly specific molecular biology-based techniques may not be sensitive enough for the diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL), clinicians frequently rely on immunological tests before treatment initiation. Hence, the correct combination of diagnostic tests is imperative for ATL diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Montenegro (Leishmanin) skin test (MST) in polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative patients to accurately detect ATL. METHODS: Patients with a clinical picture compatible with ATL were divided into ATL (confirmed by lesion smear, culture indirect immunofluorescence, and/or histopathology) and no-ATL (diseases that can mimic leishmaniasis) groups. Conventional PCR for the minicircle kDNA of Leishmania was performed, and the MST was carried out for PCR-negative patients. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included in this study, including 79 diagnosed with ATL (6 with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis) and 20 without ATL (no-ATL group). The MST showed a high sensitivity of 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69.90-97.21) in PCR-negative patients that was 10% higher than the sensitivity reported in PCR-positive population (79.66%; 95% CI = 67.73-87.96). CONCLUSIONS: One of the most important reasons for PCR negativity among patients with active ATL is the presence of a strong cellular immunological response, especially in chronic and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. This reinforces the considerable utility of the tests that detect cellular responses against Leishmania antigens such as the MST in PCR-negative patients when the performance in screening situations is questionable.


Assuntos
Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Leishmania braziliensis/imunologia , Leishmaniose Cutânea/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , DNA de Protozoário/genética , Feminino , Técnica Indireta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Humanos , Leishmania braziliensis/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Polimorfismo de Fragmento de Restrição , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
12.
J Vet Sci ; 20(6): e60, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775187

RESUMO

Although intradermal testing (IDT) is commonly used in the etiological diagnosis of allergies, in vitro testing for specific IgE (sIgE) is an attractive alternative. Currently, new laboratory techniques in veterinary allergological practice, including multiple allergen simultaneous tests (MASTs), gradually supersede in vivo tests. Both, serological (sIgE) and IDTs in fourteen atopic Malopolski horses were performed. Correlation and agreement between test results were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that sIgE to Acarus siro had the best diagnostic performance (Area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.969), followed by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (AUC = 0.844), Dermatophagoides farinae (AUC = 0.813) and Tyrophagus putrescentiae (AUC = 0.803). A significant positive correlation between IDT and MAST was found for A. siro (rS = 0.870; p = 0.00005), and D. farinae (rS = 0.657; p = 0.011). There was significant moderate agreement for 2 of 5 allergens, A. siro (κ = 0.569) and D. farinae (κ = 0.485) in semiquantitative assessment and significant fair to substantial agreement for 3 of 5 allergens, D. pteronyssinus (κ = 0.689), A. siro (κ = 0.569), D. farinae (κ = 0.432) in dichotomic assessment. Sensitivity ranged from 44% to 89%, depending on the allergen, while specificity was significantly higher for all allergens in MAST (60%-100%); the mean accuracy was 73% (manufacturer cut-off) and 77.4% (optimal cut-off) based on the Youden index. Compared with IDT, serological MAST showed good detection performance for 60% allergen sIgE in dichotomic assessment with substantial diagnostic capability, but careful clinical interpretation is needed for some allergens.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/análise , Dermatite Atópica/veterinária , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Doenças dos Cavalos/diagnóstico , Testes Intradérmicos/veterinária , Animais , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Feminino , Cavalos , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Masculino , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
13.
Clin Dermatol ; 37(3): 200-212, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31178103

RESUMO

In recent years, advances in medical diagnosis and treatment have greatly attracted our attention, whereas some rare diseases, such as leprosy, have not found a place in the medical education curriculum; their existence may even be forgotten. Although the prevalence and incidence rates for leprosy have been significantly reduced as a result of the control strategies of the World Health Organization, new cases still appear. A total of 214,783 new cases were reported from 143 countries during 2016, corresponding to the global new-case detection rate of 2.9 per 100,000 population. Leprosy proves to be a very interesting model due to its immunologic properties. It joins with syphilis, mycosis fungoides, cutaneous tuberculosis, and sarcoidosis as one of the great imitators. The diagnosis of leprosy can be simple and practical, but considering the diagnosis of leprosy in the differential diagnosis is the first requisite again.


Assuntos
Hanseníase , Animais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Quimioterapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Infecções por HIV , Humanos , Período de Incubação de Doenças Infecciosas , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Antígeno de Mitsuda , Hansenostáticos/uso terapêutico , Hanseníase/diagnóstico , Hanseníase/tratamento farmacológico , Hanseníase/imunologia , Hanseníase/patologia , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Gravidez , Testes Sorológicos , Pele/microbiologia , Pele/patologia
14.
Vet Dermatol ; 30(3): 195-e61, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30908739

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tests for allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) are used to select allergens for immunotherapy in atopic dogs. Antibodies against cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (anti-CCD IgE) have been identified in serum samples of atopic dogs. Their presence in humans is a known cause of clinically irrelevant polysensitization to plant allergens. OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of an intradermal test (IDT) and a serum test for allergen-specific IgE, with and without blocking anti-CCD IgE, before testing in dogs. ANIMALS: Thirty-one privately owned dogs with atopic dermatitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dogs were prospectively skin tested and their serum samples were analysed for anti-CCD IgE. An Fc-ε receptor-based serum test for allergen-specific IgE was performed with and without blocking anti-CCD IgE. RESULTS: In dogs with negative anti-CCD IgE samples, the agreement between the results of the serum test and the IDT was substantial (κ = 0.71). Dogs with positive anti-CCD IgE samples (38.7%) showed no agreement between serum and skin testing (κ = -0.35), blocking anti-CCD IgE in those samples resulted in a fair agreement (κ = 0.43). Anti-CCD IgE positive sera had multiple positive results for grass and weed allergens, and blocking decreased them markedly. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Intradermal testing agreed best with serum testing in dogs with no detectable anti-CCD IgE. Sera containing anti-CCD IgE had no agreement with IDT. Test agreement was improved by blocking the anti-CCD IgE. Apparent serum test polysensitization to plant allergens was associated with anti-CCD IgE.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Carboidratos/imunologia , Dermatite Atópica/veterinária , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Testes Intradérmicos/veterinária , Testes Cutâneos/veterinária , Animais , Reações Cruzadas , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Doenças do Cão/imunologia , Cães , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Testes Sorológicos/veterinária
15.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ; 61: e5, 2019 Feb 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785559

RESUMO

The Mitsuda test is a skin test based on the individual's immune response through late and highly specific hypersensitivity reaction to the Mycobacterium leprae bacillus. A negative reaction identifies individuals who present a higher risk of becoming ill if exposed to M. leprae and, if they become ill, to develop the virchowian form of disease. The Mitsuda test reading is performed by means of a millimeter ruler. The dermatoscopy is a method that has not been used in the evaluation of cutaneous tests, although its use has increased in several areas. The study aimed to compare the results between the standardized reading and the total area of the Mitsuda test obtained by a computerized method which was structured by the association of digital dermatoscopy, the Dermatology Web system and the Image Tool 3.0 software. Data collection was performed at the Dermatology Outpatient Clinic of the Eduardo de Menezes Hospital, in Belo Horizonte, from November 2015 to August 2016. The sample consisted of 100 leprosy domiciliary contacts. There was an excellent agreement between the Mitsuda test (diameter and area), with a coefficient greater than 80%, and an excellent correlation with the Spearman's correlation coefficient (0.936). The intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a low (0.219) but significant agreement between the two measurements. In conclusion, there is a significant correlation between the standardized reading and the total area of the Mitsuda test. Digital dermoscopy can be an alternative instrument of evaluation, allowing the computerization and recording of the Mitsuda test.


Assuntos
Busca de Comunicante , Dermoscopia , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Hanseníase/transmissão , Assistência Ambulatorial , Diagnóstico por Computador , Humanos , Hanseníase/diagnóstico , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
16.
J Dermatol ; 46(3): 263-266, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30628111

RESUMO

Many women experience some skin reaction or trouble in their monthly menstrual cycle, including the exacerbation of pre-existing diseases and skin eruptions directly associated with sex hormones. We herein report a Japanese woman who experienced repeated systemic urticaria in her premenstrual period, and was diagnosed as having estrogen dermatitis based on a positive result of intradermal estrogen skin test. Of note, the expression of estrogen receptor-ß was increased in small dermal vessels of this case as well as in those of patients with other inflammatory skin diseases. These results suggest that inflammation may induce estrogen receptor-ß expression in small dermal vessels, which potentially modifies the pathological skin inflammation during the menstrual period, leading to the development of estrogen dermatitis.


Assuntos
Dermatite/imunologia , Receptor beta de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Estrogênios/imunologia , Ciclo Menstrual/imunologia , Urticária/imunologia , Dermatite/diagnóstico , Dermatite/patologia , Receptor beta de Estrogênio/análise , Estrogênios/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pele/patologia , Urticária/diagnóstico , Urticária/patologia
17.
Hum Antibodies ; 27(1): 63-68, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30223394

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The hypersensitivity reaction to penicillin is a public health problem. Immunological responses to penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics can be classified into immediate and non-immediate responses. The immediate hypersensitivity is mediated by IgE; however, the non-immediate sensitivity is facilitated by other isotypes of antibody or T lymphocytes. OBJECTIVE: This research detected the non-IgE antibody value against penicillin in allergic and normal people. METHODS: Thirty-eight samples from patients with positive or negative intradermal skin testing results of penicillin allergy were included in this study. The total antibody and IgM levels against penicillin G were defined by in-house ELISA test. RESULTS: The results showed a significant (P< 0.05) elevation in total immunoglobulin and non-IgM anti-penicillin antibody of sensitive groups; however, the anti-penicillin IgM was significantly greater in non-sensitive peoples. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sensitized people to penicillin cannot be certainly detected with the total antibody, specific IgG and IgM value against penicillin, these values are good indicators for prediction of immediate and late response of the immune system to penicillin.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/imunologia , Anticorpos/análise , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Penicilinas/imunologia , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacillus anthracis , Eletroforese em Gel de Poliacrilamida , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Imunoglobulina G/análise , Imunoglobulina M/análise , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Penicilina G/imunologia , Penicilinas/farmacologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Coelhos
19.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 99(3): 291-297, 2019 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30393818

RESUMO

Chronic pruritus can be a diagnostic sign of an underlying disease. In the intracutaneous histamine test, histamine (one of the best-known inducers of pruritus) may cause different reaction patterns depending on the underlying disease. The aim of this study was to determine if an intracutaneous injection of histamine can differentiate between the causes of chronic pruritus and thus be used as a diagnostic test in chronic pruritus of unknown aetiology. A total of 140 subjects with chronic pruritus with various dermatological, systemic or neurological diseases were included. The intracutaneous histamine test was performed once on each subject. Erythema, wheal and pruritus intensity were measured and analysed. Significantly greater wheal size was observed in patients with systemic or multifactorial causes. In general, there was a significant correlation between age and wheal size. Also, noticeable differences were found between males and females regarding pruritus and wheal size. In summary, the exact type of chronic pruritus could not be clearly determined based on the results of the intracutaneous histamine test. However, the results provide valuable insights into specific reaction patterns to experimental histamine-induced itch, e.g. sex-specific differences in the neurophysiology of pruritus, which should be considered in future studies.


Assuntos
Histamina/administração & dosagem , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Prurido/diagnóstico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doença Crônica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intradérmicas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prurido/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
20.
J Immunol Methods ; 459: 29-34, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802879

RESUMO

Murine models are readily used to investigate mechanisms potentially involved in anaphylaxis. Determining successful sensitization with current methods remain potentially lethal, invasive, expensive and/or cumbersome. Here we describe the use of thermography to read intradermal testing to detect peanut allergic sensitization in the murine model and as a first time sensitive tool for anaphylaxis stratification. The relative wheal size in the thermal image can be used to stratify anaphylaxis severity risk groups prior to a challenge. This screening method is nonlethal, inexpensive, minimally invasive and can be carried out expeditiously.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Arachis/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/diagnóstico , Termografia/métodos , Urticária/diagnóstico , Alérgenos , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Histamina/administração & dosagem , Testes Intradérmicos/métodos , Camundongos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Urticária/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA