Ticagrelor downregulates the expression of proatherogenic and proinflammatory miR125-b compared to clopidogrel: A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Platelet P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to clopidogrel, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Because activated platelets release proatherogenic and proinflammatory microRNAs, including miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223, we hypothesized that the expression of these miRNAs is lower on ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel. OBJECTIVES: We compared miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223 expression in plasma of patients after AMI treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. METHODS: After percutaneous coronary intervention on acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel, 60 patients with first AMI were randomized to switch to ticagrelor or to continue with clopidogrel. Plasma expression of miR-223, miR-125a-5p, miR-125b was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction at baseline and after 72 h and 6 months of treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in patients and one in 30 healthy volunteers. Multiple electrode aggregometry using ADP test was used to determine platelet reactivity in response to P2Y12 inhibitors. RESULTS: Expression of miR-125b was higher in patients with AMI 72 h and 6 months, compared to healthy volunteers (p = 0.001), whereas expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 were comparable. In patients randomized to ticagrelor, expression of miR-125b decreased at 72 h (p = 0.007) and increased back to baseline at 6 months (p = 0.005). Expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 was not affected by the switch from clopidogrel to ticagrelor. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor treatment leads to lower plasma expression of miR-125b after AMI, compared to clopidogrel. Higher expression of miR-125b might explain recurrent thrombotic events and worse clinical outcomes in patients treated with clopidogrel, compared to ticagrelor.

Time interval of esomeprazole and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiocerebrovascular diseases.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is recommended for preventing secondary ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are suggested as preventive treatment for these patients. Due to clopidogrel-PPI interactions, separating their administration might be considered. However, a paucity of studies has been conducted to investigate the outcome differences between concurrent and interval-based use in ACS and AIS patients. Our study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes based on administration timing. This study included patients with ACS or AIS onset or recurrence of within the last month. Patients who were expected to receive DAPT for at least 6 months and who were currently taking or planning to take esomeprazole were included. Patients were divided into Group 1 (interval administration group, IA group) and Group 2 (concurrent administration group, CA group) according to the interval between esomeprazole and DAPT administration. The time interval was based on 12 hours. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and safety outcomes were defined as major bleeding, minor bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 3600 patients completed this study. The proportions of patients in the 2 groups were as follows: CA group, 99% (n = 3489) and IA group, 1% (n = 111). The primary outcome occurred in 0.9% of patients in the IA group and 1.8% of patients in the CA group (P = .51). There was no significant distinction in the overall bleeding risk of the CA group compared to that of the IA group (2.75% in the CA group and 2.70% in the IA group). Additionally, there was no significant difference observed between the 2 groups for safety outcomes. This multicenter, prospective, observational study that enrolled patients with ACS or AIS demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the occurrence of MACCEs and bleeding issues within 6 months according to the medication administration interval. The majority of patients with DAPT were taking PPIs simultaneously in real-world practice.

The diversity and clinical implications of genetic variants influencing clopidogrel bioactivation and response in the Emirati population.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is a widely prescribed prodrug that requires activation via specific pharmacogenes to exert its anti-platelet function. Genetic variations in the genes encoding its transporter, metabolizing enzymes, and target receptor lead to variability in its activation and platelet inhibition and, consequently, its efficacy. This variability increases the risk of secondary cardiovascular events, and therefore, some variations have been utilized as genetic biomarkers when prescribing clopidogrel. METHODS: Our study examined clopidogrel-related genes (CYP2C19, ABCB1, PON1, and P2Y12R) in a cohort of 298 healthy Emiratis individuals. The study used whole exome sequencing (WES) data to comprehensively analyze pertinent variations of these genes, including their minor allele frequencies, haplotype distribution, and their resulting phenotypes. RESULTS: Our data shows that approximately 37% (n = 119) of the cohort are likely to benefit from the use of alternative anti-platelet drugs due to their classification as intermediate or poor CYP2C19 metabolizers. Additionally, more than 50% of the studied cohort exhibited variants in ABCB1, PON1, and P2YR12 genes, potentially influencing clopidogrel's transport, enzymatic clearance, and receptor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing these alleles and genotype frequencies may explain the clinical differences in medication response across different ethnicities and predict adverse events. Our findings underscore the need to consider genetic variations in prescribing clopidogrel, with potential implications for implementing personalized anti-platelet therapy among Emiratis based on their genetic profiles.

Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether clopidogrel is better suited than aspirin as the long-term antiplatelet monotherapy following dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: This study compared clopidogrel monotherapy following 1 month of DAPT (clopidogrel group) with aspirin monotherapy following 12 months of DAPT (aspirin group) after PCI for 5 years. METHODS: STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy 2) is a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in Japan. Patients who underwent PCI with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized in a 1-to-1 fashion either to clopidogrel or aspirin groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis) or major bleeding (TIMI major or minor bleeding). RESULTS: Among 3,005 study patients (age: 68.6 ± 10.7 years; women: 22.3%; acute coronary syndrome: 38.3%), 2,934 patients (97.6%) completed the 5-year follow-up (adherence to the study drugs at 395 days: 84.7% and 75.9%). The clopidogrel group compared with the aspirin group was noninferior but not superior for the primary endpoint (11.75% and 13.57%, respectively; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70-1.05; Pnoninferiority < 0.001; Psuperiority = 0.13), whereas it was superior for the cardiovascular outcomes (8.61% and 11.05%, respectively; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; P = 0.03) and not superior for major bleeding (4.44% and 4.92%, respectively; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.64-1.25; P = 0.51). By the 1-year landmark analysis, clopidogrel was numerically, but not significantly, superior to aspirin for cardiovascular events (6.79% and 8.68%, respectively; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59-1.01; P = 0.06) without difference in major bleeding (3.99% and 3.32%, respectively; HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.84-1.81; P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel might be an attractive alternative to aspirin with a borderline ischemic benefit beyond 1 year after PCI.

Pharmacogenomic evaluation of CYP2C19 alleles linking low clopidogrel response and the risk of acute coronary syndrome in Indians.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug widely prescribed to prevent atherothrombotic events in coronary artery disease patients. However, there is evidence to suggest that the effectiveness of clopidogrel varies owing to genetic diversity in CYP2C19. This heterogeneity in South Asians, who are also known to have high risk of cardiac events than other population groups, highlights the importance of investigating CYP2C19 variants to estimate the risk proportion in the groups. METHODS: Given the high prevalence and genetic heterogeneity, the population-based case control was conducted in a cohort of 1191 subjects comprising 645 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) cases (unstable angina, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) and 546 healthy controls of South Asian Indian origin. The metabolization status of CYP2C19 was assessed using *2, *3 and *17 variants in the stated cohorts to determine the prevalence of metabolization and its association with phenotypes. RESULTS: The results suggest a possible genetic association between studied CYP2C19 polymorphisms and ACS, since there was a higher proportion of intermediate and poor metabolizers present in the studied cohorts. The association analyses revealed that the *2 allele of CYP2C19 confers a significant risk for ACS, while the *17 allele provides protection. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the understanding of CYP2C19 genetic variants and their impact on clopidogrel response in South Asian Indians. Additionally, they underline the significance of assessing CYP2C19 variations in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy in order to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism and its relation with clopidogrel resistance.

Objectives: To find out the prevalence of CYP2C19*2 genetic polymorphism in ischaemic heart disease patients, and to determine its relation with clopidogrel resistance in different genotype groups. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2015 to December 2019 at the Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and comprised ischaemic heart disease patients of either gender who were on clopidogrel therapy. CYP2C19*2 genotyping of all the patients was carried out through polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Platelet aggregation analysis was done using a light transmission aggregometer. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. RESULTS: Of the 390 patients, 232(59.5%) were males and 158(40.5%) were females. The overall age range was 16-82 years. Clinical indications of clopidogrel were angina 198(50.8%), myocardial infarction 146(37.4%) and acute coronary syndrome 46(11.8%). CYP2C19*2 genotyping showed that 196(50.24%) patients were homozygous wild type carriers (GG or *1/*1), 159(40.8%) were heterozygous carriers (GA or *1/*2), and 35(9%) were homozygous polymorphic allele carriers (AA or *2/*2). Platelet aggregation studies showed that there were 157(80.1%) clopidogrel responders and 39(19.9%) clopidogrel-resistant patients among GG carriers, 118(74.2%) clopidogrel responders and 41(25.8%) clopidogrel-resistant among GA carriers, and 18(51.4%) clopidogrel responders and 17(48.6%) clopidogrel-resistant among AA carriers (p=0.001). Intergroup mean platelet aggregation was significantly different (p=0.025). Allelic frequency of dominant allele *1 and polymorphic variant allele *2 was 0.706(70.6%) and 0.294(29.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygous and heterozygous carriers of CYP2C19 allele *2 was found to have higher prevalence of clopidogrel resistance in the studied population.

Comparative effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy versus monotherapy in patients with ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of aspirin-clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin or clopidogrel antiplatelet monotherapy (AM) in patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: It was a single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study of medical records of ischemic stroke patients admitted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between January 2015 and October 2019. The primary endpoints were ischemic stroke recurrence, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality between DAPT and AM. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were employed in univariate and multivariate time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: The median time to recurrence of ischemic stroke was 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.586-23.01) for DAPT and 20.4 months (95% CI, 9.872-30.928) for the AM. The median survival time until all-cause mortality was 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.893-13.107) for DAPT and 14.1 months (95% CI, 8.173-19.97) for the AM. No statistically significant reductions in the instantaneous risks of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 0.59-2.72; p=0.54), re-hospitalization (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59-1.48; p= 0.77), and mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.48-2.26; p=0.92) were found between the DAPT and AM groups. CONCLUSION: The DAPT was not superior to AM in reducing recurrence and mortality events in patients with ischemic stroke. Rehospitalization due to the sequelae of the composite of stroke, angina, and myocardial infarction was higher in the DAPT group.

Aspirin Dosing for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Treated With P2Y12 Inhibitors.

Background The ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness) was a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that found no difference between high- versus low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Whether concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor therapy modifies the effect of aspirin dose on clinical events remains unclear. Methods and Results Participants in ADAPTABLE were stratified according to baseline use of clopidogrel or prasugrel (P2Y12 group). The primary effectiveness end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and the primary safety end point was major bleeding requiring blood transfusions. We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the relative effectiveness and safety of aspirin dose within P2Y12 and non-P2Y12 groups. Of 13 815 (91.6%) participants with available data, 3051 (22.1%) were receiving clopidogrel (2849 [93.4%]) or prasugrel (203 [6.7%]) at baseline. P2Y12 inhibitor use was associated with higher risk of the primary effectiveness end point (10.86% versus 6.31%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 1.22-1.62]) but was not associated with bleeding (0.95% versus 0.53%; adjusted HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.91-2.22]). We found no interaction in the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Overall, dose switching or discontinuation was more common in the high-dose compared with low-dose aspirin group, but the pattern was not modified by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Conclusions In this prespecified analysis of ADAPTABLE, we found that the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin was not modified by baseline P2Y12 inhibitor use. Registration https://www.clinical.trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02697916.

Differential inhibition of platelet function by cilostazol in combination with clopidogrel.

PURPOSE: To assess the antiplatelet effect of cilostazol clinically, we compared the effects of cilostazol in combination with clopidogrel on various platelet function tests. METHODS: We recruited patients with ischemic stroke at high risk of recurrence who were treated with clopidogrel alone within 180 days after stroke onset. Subjects underwent baseline platelet function tests, and were then randomly assigned to receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) comprising clopidogrel and cilostazol or clopidogrel monotherapy (SAPT). After 6 months, platelet function was measured again and compared to that at baseline in each group, and the rate of change was compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, but 4 patients were excluded for various reasons. In total, 30 subjects (13 in DAPT and 17 in SAPT group) were analyzed. Adenosine diphosphate- and collagen-induced aggregation, VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (platelet reactivity index: PRI) and plasma p-selectin concentration were significantly lower (P = 0.004, 0.042, 0.049, 0.003 and 0.006 respectively), while VerifyNow % inhibition was significantly higher at 6 months compared to baseline (P = 0.003) in the DAPT group only. Comparison of the rate of change in each parameter from baseline to 6 months showed that while PRI decreased at a greater rate (P = 0.012), VerifyNow % inhibition increased at a greater rate (P = 0.003) in the DAPT group than the SAPT group. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibitory effects of adjunctive cilostazol added to clopidogrel on platelet function differed by type of platelet function test. VerifyNow % inhibition and PRI were more inhibited than the other platelet function tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CSPS.com substudy in TWMU (UMIN000026672), registered on April 1, 2017. This study was performed as a substudy of CSPS.com (UMIN000012180, registered on October 31, 2013) and was retrospectively registered.

Effect of Cilostazol on Patients With Diabetes Who Underwent Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Artery Disease.

Background No large-scale study has compared the clinical impact of triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT: aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on adverse limb events in patients with diabetes after endovascular therapy (EVT) for peripheral artery disease. Thus, we investigate the effect of cilostazol added to a DAPT on the clinical outcomes after EVT in patients with diabetes using a nationwide, multicenter, real-world registry. Methods and Results A total of 990 patients with diabetes who underwent EVT were enrolled from the retrospective cohorts of a Korean multicenter EVT registry and were divided according to the antiplatelet regimen (TAPT [n=350; 35.4%] versus DAPT [n=640; 64.6%]). After propensity score matching based on clinical characteristics, a total of 350 pairs were compared for clinical outcomes. The primary end points were major adverse limb events, a composite of major amputation, minor amputation, and reintervention. For the matched study groups, the lesion length was 125.4±102.0 mm, and severe calcification was observed in 47.4%. The technical success rate (96.9% versus 94.0%; P=0.102) and the complication rate (6.9% versus 6.6%; P>0.999) were similar between the TAPT and DAPT groups. At 2-year follow-up, the incidence of major adverse limb events (16.6% versus 19.4%; P=0.260) did not differ between the 2 groups. However, the TAPT group showed less minor amputation than the DAPT group (2.0% versus 6.3%; P=0.004). In multivariate analysis, TAPT was an independent predictor of minor amputation (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.354 [95% CI, 0.158-0.794]; P=0.012). Conclusions In patients with diabetes undergoing EVT for peripheral artery disease, TAPT did not decrease the incidence of major adverse limb events but may be associated with a decreased risk of minor amputation.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator Pharmacodynamic Study of Platelet Inhibition with Crushed and Integral Formulations of Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Crushed formulations of specific antiplatelet agents produce earlier and stronger platelet inhibition. We studied the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its relative efficacy compared with integral clopidogrel, crushed and integral ticagrelor. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Overall, 142 patients with suspected ACS were randomly assigned to receive crushed or integral formulations of clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Platelet inhibition at baseline and 1 and 8 h was assessed using the VerifyNow assay. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) ≥ 235 P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) 1 h after the medication loading dose was also determined. RESULTS: The PRU and percentage inhibition median (interquartile range) at 1 h for the different formulations were as follows: crushed clopidogrel: 196.50 (155.50, 246.50), 9.36 (- 1.79, 25.10); integral clopidogrel: 189.50 (159.00, 214.00), 2.32 (- 2.67, 19.89); crushed ticagrelor: 59.00 (10.00, 96.00), 75.53 (49.12, 95.18); and integral ticagrelor: 126.50 (50.00, 168.00), 40.56 (25.59, 78.69). There was no significant difference in PRU or percentage platelet inhibition between the crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel (p = 0.990, p = 0.479); both formulations of ticagrelor were superior to the clopidogrel formulations (p < 0.05). On paired comparison, crushed ticagrelor showed robust early inhibition of platelets compared with the integral formulation (p = 0.03). Crushed clopidogrel exhibited the maximal HTPR of 34.3%, but was < 3% for both formulations of ticagrelor. CONCLUSIONS: The platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel is not superior to integral preparation in patients with ACS. Crushed ticagrelor produced maximal platelet inhibition acutely. HTPR rates in ACS are similar and very low with both formulations of ticagrelor, and maximal with crushed clopidogrel. Clinical Trials Registry of India identifier number CTRI/2020/06/025647.

Monitoring of Antiplatelet Therapy.

In the late 1990s, the antithrombotic antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced. Around the same time, there was an increase in a number of new methods to measure platelet function (e.g., PFA-100 in 1995), and this has continued. It became evident that not all patients responded to clopidogrel in the same way and that some patients had a relative "resistance" to therapy, termed "high on-treatment platelet reactivity." This then led to some publications to advocate platelet function testing being used for patients on antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing was also suggested for use in patients awaiting cardiac surgery after stopping their antiplatelet therapy as a way of balancing thrombotic risk pre-surgery and bleeding risk perioperatively. This chapter will discuss some of the commonly used platelet function tests used in these settings, particularly those that are sometimes referred to as point-of-care tests or that require minimal laboratory sample manipulation. The latest guidance and recommendations for platelet function testing will be discussed following several clinical trials looking at the usefulness of platelet function testing in these clinical settings.

Decreased platelet miR-199a-5p level might lead to high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease.

Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, while some patients exhibit high platelet activity when receiving the combined treatment. Current environmental and genetic factors could only explain part of the variability in clopidogrel efficacy. Human platelets harbor abundant miRNAs which might affect clopidogrel efficacy by regulating the expression of key proteins in the clopidogrel antiplatelet signaling pathway. This study aimed to investigate the association between platelet miRNA levels and clopidogrel efficacy. Here we recruited 508 CAD patients who underwent clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy and determined the platelet reactivity index (PRI) to evaluate antiplatelet reactivity responses to clopidogrel. Subsequently, 22 patients with extreme clopidogrel response were selected for platelet small RNA sequencing. Another 41 CAD patients taking clopidogrel were collected to verify the differentially expressed candidate miRNAs. We found the metabolic types of the CYP2C19 enzyme (based on CYP2C19 * 2 and * 3 polymorphisms) could significantly affect the PRI of CAD patients with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Chinese. A total of 43 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the platelets from the 22 extreme clopidogrel response samples, and 109 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the 13 CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers with extreme clopidogrel response. Platelet miR-199a-5p levels were correlated negatively with PRI after clopidogrel therapy. Studies in cultured cells revealed that miR-199a-5p inhibited the expression of VASP, a key effector protein downstream of the P2Y12 receptor. In conclusion, we found the expression of VASP could be inhibited by miR-199a-5p, and decreased platelet miR-199a-5p was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in CAD patients.

What is the context?● Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, while some patients exhibit high platelet activity when receiving the combined treatment.● Current environmental and genetic factors could only explain part of the variability in clopidogrel efficacy.● Human platelets harbor abundant miRNAs which might affect clopidogrel efficacy by regulating the expression of key proteins in the clopidogrel antiplatelet signaling pathway.What is new?● We found that decreased platelet miR-199a-5p level was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity.● Overexpression of miR-199a-5p significantly down-regulated the expression of VASP protein in cultured cells.What is the impact?● The current study provided new insights into the exploration of interindividual variability in clopidogrel response from the perspective of miR-199a-5p and VASP interaction.

Efficacy of Treatment with and without Initial Clopidogrel Loading in Branch Atheromatous Disease.

Objective Despite aggressive therapeutic interventions during the acute phase of branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-type cerebral infarction, many patients, even those with a mild condition at the onset, experience neurological deterioration after hospitalization and develop serious deficits. We compared the therapeutic efficacy of multiple antithrombotic therapies for BAD between patients who received a clopidogrel loading dose (loading group; LG) and those without loading (non-loading group; NLG). Patients Between January 2019 and May 2022, patients with BAD-type cerebral infarction in the lenticulostriate artery admitted within 24 h of the onset were recruited. This study included 95 consecutive patients who received combination argatroban and dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel). Methods Patients were classified into the LG and NLG according to whether or not a loading dose of clopidogrel (300 mg) had been administered on admission. Changes in neurological severity [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score] during the acute phase were retrospectively evaluated. Results There were 34 (36%) and 61 (64%) patients in the LG and NLG, respectively. On admission, the median NIHSS score was similar between the groups [LG: 2.5 (2-4) vs. NLG: 3 (2-4), p=0.771]. At 48 h following admission, the median NIHSS scores were 1 (0.25-4), and 2 (1-5) in the LG and NLG, respectively (p=0.045). Early neurological deterioration (END; defined as worsening of the NIHSS score by ≥4 points at 48 h after admission) occurred in 3% of LG and 20% of NLG patients (p=0.028). Conclusion Administration of a clopidogrel loading dose with combination antithrombotic therapy for BAD reduced END.

Roles of light transmission aggregometry and CYP2C19 genotype in predicting ischaemic complications during interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and CYP2C19 genotype analysis are commonly used to evaluate the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel during the interventional treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study was to determine which test can predict ischaemic events during these treatments. METHODS: Patient demographic information, imaging data, laboratory data and ischaemic complications were recorded. LTA and CYP2C19 genotype results were compared, and multiple linear regression was performed to examine factors related to platelet reactivity. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine whether LTA and CYP2C19 could predict ischaemic complications and to identify other clinical risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to calculate the cut-off value for predicting ischaemic complications. A subgroup analysis was also performed for different CYP2C19 genotype metabolisers, as well as for patients with flow diverters and traditional stents. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients were included, of which 22 developed ischaemic events. Maximum platelet aggregation induced by ADP (ADP-MPA) could predict ischaemic events (p<0.001; area under the curve, 0.752 (95% CI 0.663 to 0.842)), and its cut-off value was 41.5%. ADP-MPA (p=0.001) and hypertension duration >10 years (p=0.022) were independent risk factors for ischaemic events, while the CYP2C19 genotype was not associated with ischaemic events. In the subgroup analysis, ADP-MPA could predict ischaemic events in fast metabolisers (p=0.004) and intermediate metabolisers (p=0.003). The cut-off value for ischaemic events was lower in patients with flow diverters (ADP-MPA=36.4%) than in patients with traditional stents (ADP-MPA=42.9%). CONCLUSIONS: ADP-MPA can predict ischaemic complications during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Patients with flow diverters require stronger antiplatelet medication than patients with traditional stents.

Time Course of Death After Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 1 Year.

BACKGROUND: Excess mortality remains the cornerstone concern despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute coronary syndrome. Some data suggest that shorter periods than 12 months of DAPT diminish bleeding risks yet still provide adequate vascular protection and improving survival. However, the precise timing of deaths after acute coronary syndrome has not been mapped in many studies. This knowledge may be critical for defining optimal treatment duration. METHODS: Access was gained to the data set for the Platelet Inhibition and Outcomes (PLATO) trial, which was issued by the Food and Drug Administration, in which post hoc analyses of timing of death events during DAPT (with either aspirin/ticagrelor or aspirin/clopidogrel) were performed. All-cause individual deaths were counted and plotted over time from day 1 to day 365 after the index event. RESULTS: Among 18,624 enrollees, 938 total deaths were reported to the Food and Drug Administration in PLATO. After exclusion of deceased patients with missing dates, randomization errors, and deaths beyond 1 year of follow-up, 913 fatalities (509 after clopidogrel and 404 after ticagrelor) were analyzed. The PLATO records did not indicate where exactly deaths occurred making impossible to triage in the hospital versus outpatient fatalities. Most frequent deaths occurred within the Day 1 (n = 41); Day 2 (n = 48); and Day 3 (n = 33) and overall during the first week (n = 202; 22.1%) after the index acute coronary syndrome, with a gradual decline after Day 10 and Day 60, reaching background counts after Day 220. CONCLUSION: Focusing on mortality reduction, this large data set may support a shorter than 12 months' duration of DAPT.

The impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and fibrinogen levels on ischemic events in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: After treatment, high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is considered as an essential risk factor for recurrent ischemic events. AIM: To evaluate the impact of fibrinogen on HRPR after implantation of emergency drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to explore the predictive values of HRPR and fibrinogen for adverse ischemic events at 12 months. METHOD: This single-center prospective observational study analyzed patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation DES implantation from January 2017 to December 2018. Platelet reactivity was measured by thromboelastography (TEG) at 60-72 h after primary PCI. HRPR was defined as the adenosine diphosphate-induced maximum amplitude (MAADP) > 47 mm. RESULTS: A total of 919 patients were analyzed, of which 512 (55.8%) received aspirin and clopidogrel and 406 (44.2%) received aspirin and ticagrelor. Elevated fibrinogen levels were associated with an increased prevalence of HRPR (P < 0.001). High fibrinogen (quartile IV, ≥ 410 mg/dL) was an independent risk factor for HRPR after multivariate regression (odds ratio 6.556, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.200-13.431, P < 0.001). When analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the combination of high fibrinogen and HRPR was strongly predictive for ischemic major adverse cardiac events at 12 months compared to the group without HRPR and with low fibrinogen (hazard ratio 9.681, 95% CI: 4.467-20.98, log-rank P < 0.001). Similar results were confirmed in subgroups according to different dual antiplatelet therapies. CONCLUSION: A combination of high fibrinogen and HRPR may identify recurrent adverse ischemic events over 12 months. Ticagrelor exhibited more potent platelet inhibition and a better prognosis than clopidogrel.