Chemistry of Fluorinated Pyrimidines in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

We review developments in fluorine chemistry contributing to the more precise use of fluorinated pyrimidines (FPs) to treat cancer. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most widely used FP and is used to treat > 2 million cancer patients each year. We review methods for 5-FU synthesis, including the incorporation of radioactive and stable isotopes to study 5-FU metabolism and biodistribution. We also review methods for preparing RNA and DNA substituted with FPs for biophysical and mechanistic studies. New insights into how FPs perturb nucleic acid structure and dynamics has resulted from both computational and experimental studies, and we summarize recent results. Beyond the well-established role for inhibiting thymidylate synthase (TS) by the 5-FU metabolite 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-5'-O-monophosphate (FdUMP), recent studies have implicated new roles for RNA modifying enzymes that are inhibited by 5-FU substitution including tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A (TRMT2A) and pseudouridylate synthase in 5-FU cytotoxicity. Furthermore, enzymes not previously implicated in FP activity, including DNA topoisomerase 1 (Top1), were established as mediating FP anti-tumor activity. We review recent literature summarizing the mechanisms by which 5-FU inhibits RNA- and DNA-modifying enzymes and describe the use of polymeric FPs that may enable the more precise use of FPs for cancer treatment in the era of personalized medicine.

Thymidylate Synthase, a New Myoepithelial Biomarker for Breast Lesions.

Background. The identification of myoepithelial cells (MECs) can facilitate the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. We previously found thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in the nuclei of MECs in breast tissues, which prompted us to investigate the usefulness of TS as a sensitive and specific biomarker in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions, similar to other MEC biomarkers (ie, tumor protein [P63] and cluster of differentiation 10 [CD10]). Methods. Immunohistochemistry for TS, P63, and CD10 was performed on paraffin sections from 189 breast specimens. Results. The results showed the intensity of the immunoreactive TS signal to be comparable with that of P63 in the nuclei of MECs. Furthermore, the nuclei of MECs stained strongly for TS and P63 in normal breast tissues (obtained adjacent to invasive breast lesions), benign breast lesions, and carcinoma in situ, whereas the cytoplasm of MECs stained strongly for CD10. The immunoreactive TS signal in the cytoplasm of MECs was variable in 22 out of 32 (65.6%) cases of invasive breast carcinoma and 4 out of 20 cases (20.0%) of ductal carcinoma in situ. We found no immunoreactive TS signal in the nuclei of luminal and stromal cells in breast lesions, although there was a weak positive signal in the cytoplasm of luminal and stromal cells. Conclusions. TS is a sensitive and specific MEC biomarker in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Immunoexpression of TS, p53, COX2, EGFR, MSH6 and MLH1 biomarkers and its correlation with degree of differentiation, tumor staging and prognostic factors in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: There are cases of colorectal tumors that, although small, show more aggressive evolution than large tumors. This motivated us to study whether there are any proteins capable of alerting about these changes. The aim here was to correlate the immunoexpression of the TS, p53, COX2, EGFR, MSH6 and MLH1 biomarkers in tumors in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, with the degree of cell differentiation, tumor staging and clinical-pathological prognostic factors. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study at a public tertiary-level hospital. METHODS: We analyzed tissue-microarray paraffin blocks of tumor tissues that had been resected from 107 patients. We used Fisher's exact test to study associations between tumor differentiation/staging and the immunoexpression of biomarkers. We also used Kaplan-Meier estimation, the log-rank test and the adjusted Cox regression model to investigate the patients' overall survival (in months) according to biomarkers and disease-free interval. RESULTS: The degree of tumor differentiation and tumor staging were not associated with the biomarkers, except in cases of patients in stages III or IV, in which there was a correlation with MLH1 expression (P=0.021). Patient survival and disease-free interval were not associated with the biomarkers. CONCLUSION: There were no associations between the degree of tumor differentiation, staging, length of survival or disease-free interval and the immunoexpression of the TS, p53, COX2, EGFR or MSH6 tumor markers. In advanced cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma (stages III and IV), there was a higher percentage of MLH1-negative results.

Immunoexpression of TS, p53, COX2, EGFR, MSH6 and MLH1 biomarkers and its correlation with degree of differentiation, tumor staging and prognostic factors in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective longitudinal study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: There are cases of colorectal tumors that, although small, show more aggressive evolution than large tumors. This motivated us to study whether there are any proteins capable of alerting about these changes. The aim here was to correlate the immunoexpression of the TS, p53, COX2, EGFR, MSH6 and MLH1 biomarkers in tumors in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, with the degree of cell differentiation, tumor staging and clinical-pathological prognostic factors. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study at a public tertiary-level hospital. METHODS: We analyzed tissue-microarray paraffin blocks of tumor tissues that had been resected from 107 patients. We used Fisher's exact test to study associations between tumor differentiation/staging and the immunoexpression of biomarkers. We also used Kaplan-Meier estimation, the log-rank test and the adjusted Cox regression model to investigate the patients' overall survival (in months) according to biomarkers and disease-free interval. RESULTS: The degree of tumor differentiation and tumor staging were not associated with the biomarkers, except in cases of patients in stages III or IV, in which there was a correlation with MLH1 expression (P=0.021). Patient survival and disease-free interval were not associated with the biomarkers. CONCLUSION: There were no associations between the degree of tumor differentiation, staging, length of survival or disease-free interval and the immunoexpression of the TS, p53, COX2, EGFR or MSH6 tumor markers. In advanced cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma (stages III and IV), there was a higher percentage of MLH1-negative results.

Potential predictive biomarkers in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy.

Fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy represents a standard option for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Randomized clinical trials have shown that fluorouracil concomitant to preoperative radiation enhances tumor shrinkage (with 10% to 15% of the patients showing a complete pathological tumor response) compared with preoperative radiation alone. A high response rate is of clinical importance in rectal cancer, since patients who achieve a complete pathological response may experience improved long-term survival. Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy has no effect on response of the primary rectal tumor and single-agent fluoropyrimidine remains the standard chemotherapy in this setting. Despite novel biological insights and therapeutic advances, little is known about potential biological markers able to predict pathological tumor response before treatment and to subsequently impact patients' prognosis. This review focuses on the current available data on main molecular markers and molecular subtypes and the possible upcoming introduction of such analyses in the clinical setting.

A feasibility and safety study of concurrent chemotherapy based on genetic testing in patients with high-risk salivary gland tumors: Preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and safety of customized chemotherapy regimens based on the gene characteristics of salivary gland tumors. METHODS: Patients were enrolled with histologically confirmed intermediate or high grade, stage T3-4, N1-3 disease, and T1-2, N0 patients with a close (≤1 mm) or microscopically positive surgical margin were also enrolled in the study. All patients received radical surgery and postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. To evaluate the responsiveness of therapies, the chemotherapy regimen was based on gene targets, ß-tubulin III, ABCB1, STMN1, and CYP1B1 (for docetaxel) and TYMS (for pemetrexed). The primary endpoints were treatment compliance and acute toxicities. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were enrolled between September 2013 and January 2016. The median age was 46 years (range: 23-70 years). Genetic testing showed that 8 patients may have been sensitive to docetaxel, 5 patients may have been sensitive to pemetrexed, and 7 patients sensitive to either docetaxel or pemetrexed. All patients received the full dose of radiation. A total of 19 patients (95%) completed 2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT). One patient treated concurrently with pemetrexed experienced grade 3 neutropenia. Three patients experienced grade 3 oral mucositis, and 2 patients experienced grade 3 dermatitis. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that a CCT selecting method based on the gene targets associated with drug sensitivity was clinically feasible and safe. Further studies enrolled more patients with longer follow-up times are needed to confirm the clinical efficacy of this CCT selecting method.

Prognostic Value of c-MET Expression in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic significance of c-MET expression and develop a predictor of distant failure in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used a tissue microarray to study protein expression by immunohistochemistry in 102 patients treated surgically for pancreatic cancer. Two cores per patient were blindly scored from 0 (no staining) to 3 (strong staining) by a single pathologist. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine time to local and distant failure, overall survival, and progression-free survival. P values were calculated with the log-rank test. RESULTS: High tumor expression of c-MET was associated with a shorter time to distant failure in patients receiving neoadjuvant (n=23) or neoadjuvant therapy (n=73) (median 8.9 months vs 22.0 months, P=.0010). We then examined the ability of incorporating 2 known biomarkers, thymidylate synthase and DPC4 (SMAD4), with c-MET to risk-stratify patients. This multi-protein predictor divided our cohort into groups of similar numbers and was predictive of distant failure (median 13.4 months vs 24.2 months, P=.0094) but not of local control. CONCLUSION: c-MET is potentially predictive of distant failure. Using c-MET, DPC4, and thymidylate synthase, we developed a multi-protein predictor that could be used to risk-stratify patients and guide decisions regarding the sequencing of locoregional and systemic therapies in pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic value of p21-activated kinase 4 in resected pancreatic cancer.

Resectable pancreatic cancer has a high recurrence rate after curative surgery. Biomarkers are needed for distinguishing patients who may benefit from curative resection. In this study, we sought to analyze the prognostic value of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1), p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4), human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), and thymidylate synthase (TS) in surgically resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. A total of 160 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgery with curative intent were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue microarrays were constructed and immunohistochemical stains were performed for PAK1, PAK4, hENT1, and TS. The absence of PAK4 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinomas was associated with poorer histologic differentiation (p < 0.001), shorter overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-5.71; p = 0.003], and disease-free survival (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.11-4.74; p = 0.025) on univariate analyses. In addition, more frequent venous invasion and lymph node metastases were seen in PAK4-negative tumors although not statistically significant. PAK1, hENT1, and TS expression status did not have significant influences on patient survival. In conclusion, PAK4 of the markers tested in this study may be a potential prognostic biomarker for pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

Molecular Biomarker Study in a Randomised Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus S-1 versus S-1 for Advanced Gastric Cancer (GC0301/TOP-002).

AIMS: Gastric cancer is a common and heterogeneous disease; however, global standard and biomarkers for selecting chemotherapy regimens have not been established. This study was designed retrospectively to identify molecular biomarkers for irinotecan plus S-1 (IRI-S) and S-1 therapy from subset analyses in GC0301/TOP-002, a randomised phase III trial for advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paraffin-embedded primary tumour specimens were collected from 126 of 326 randomised patients in GC0301/TOP-002. The mRNA was measured for thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, topoisomerase I, excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) and thymidine phosphorylase; categorised into low and high to analyse their association with efficacy end points. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in each mRNA between S-1 and IRI-S groups, whereas there were differences among some clinical characteristics. Multivariate analyses for overall survival showed that mRNA levels were not correlated with prognosis. By comparison, between IRI-S and S-1 arms, low thymidylate synthase, low ERCC1 and high thymidine phosphorylase were associated with better prognosis for IRI-S versus S-1 (hazard ratio = 0.653, 0.702 and 0.709, respectively; P < 0.15 for each interaction). CONCLUSION: Low thymidylate synthase, low ERCC1 and high thymidine phosphorylase are candidates for predictive biomarkers for first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer by IRI-S. Further study is warranted to confirm these results in other clinical trials and cohort studies.

Efficacy of Pemetrexed-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Compared with in Patients Harboring Other Driver Mutations in East Asian Populations.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with novel ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ROS1) oncogenic rearrangement is unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced ROS1-fusion lung adenocarcinoma with its efficacy in those having different driver mutations. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who were screened for epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations, echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4 gene (EML4)-anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) translocation, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog gene (KRAS) mutations, and ROS1 fusion by using multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Patients who received pemetrexed-based therapy were enrolled for further analysis. The demographic data, clinical outcomes, and thymidylate synthase immunostaining (H-score) of patients with ROS1 fusion-positive lung adenocarcinomas were compared with those of patients harboring EGFR mutations, EML4-ALK fusion, KRAS mutations, and quadruple negativity. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma received a pemetrexed-based regimen and were classified on the basis of molecular findings as follows: 102 patients (40.3%) with EGFR mutations, 32 patients (12.6%) with EML4-ALK translocation, three patients (1.2%) with KRAS mutations, 19 patients (7.5%) with ROS1 fusion, and 97 patients (38.3%) with quadruple-negative status. Patients with ROS1 fusion had a better overall response rate (57.9%, p = 0.026), disease control rate (89.5%, p = 0.033), and longer progression-free survival (7.5 months, p = 0.003) compared with patients harboring other driver mutations. However, the H-score of thymidylate synthase was not associated with the response to pemetrexed therapy in patients with different molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: ROS1 fusion positivity is probably a favorable factor of pemetrexed-based therapy for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Phase II Trial of Target-guided Personalized Chemotherapy in First-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of personalizing treatment of patients with advanced untreated colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated metastatic CRC, performance status 0-1, and candidates for systemic chemotherapy were eligible. Tumor tissues were analyzed for KRAS, BRAF, and PI3K mutations and expression of topoisomerase-1 (Topo-1), excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1), thymidylate synthase (TS), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Patients with Topo-1 expression received irinotecan, whereas patients with negative Topo-1 and ERCC1 expression received oxaliplatin. Otherwise, patients received physician's choice of treatment. If TS was positive, no fluoropyrimidine was administered and if negative, 5-flurorouracil if TP was negative, or capecitabine if TP was positive. KRAS-mutated patients were treated with bevacizumab, whereas KRAS-native received cetuximab. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were enrolled and 67 received personalized treatment including irinotecan (n=27), oxaliplatin (n=16), FOLFIRI (n=12), and FOLFOX (n=12). Thirty-eight patients received cetuximab and 29 bevacizumab. With a median follow-up time of 18.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-36), the overall median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-9.7), representing a 12-month PFS rate of 36.5% (95% CI, 25-48). Overall clinical benefit, including response rate and disease stabilization, was 86% (95% CI, 73%-97%). The overall median survival was 21 months (95% CI, 11-40). CONCLUSIONS: Real-time target-guided personalized first-line treatment of patients with advanced CRC is feasible but, with the approached used, did not result in a clear improvement in PFS to warrant phase III testing.

A prognostic analysis of 895 cases of stage III colon cancer in different colon subsites.

PURPOSE: Stage III colon cancer is currently treated as an entity with a unified therapeutic principle. The aim of the retrospective study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of site-specific stage III colon cancers and the influences of tumor location on prognosis. METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-five patients with stage III colon cancer treated with radical operation and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin) were divided into seven groups according to colon segment (cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon, and sigmoid colon). Expression of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) was examined by immunohistochemistry. We assessed if differences exist in patient characteristics and clinic outcomes between the seven groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences in tumor differentiation (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P < 0.001), metachronous liver metastasis (P < 0.001), metachronous lung metastasis (P < 0.001), and ERCCI expression (P < 0.001) between the seven groups. Both 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) exhibited significant differences (both P < 0.001) with survival gradually decreasing from cecum to sigmoid colon. Cox regression analyses identified that tumor location was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Stage III colon cancer located proximally carried a poorer survival than that located distally. Different efficacies of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy may be an important factor affecting survival of site-specific stage III colon cancers.

Can we improve the clinical risk score? The prognostic value of p53, Ki-67 and thymidylate synthase in patients undergoing radical resection of colorectal liver metastases.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether biological markers can provide prognostic information additional to that supplied by the clinical risk score (CRS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted. Patients selected for this study were treated between 1996 and 2011 with potentially curative liver surgery. Expressions of p53, Ki-67 and thymidylate synthase were assayed using immunohistochemical techniques on tissue microarrays. RESULTS: A total of 98 (24%) of 406 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 103 months. Analysis revealed a correlation between p53 protein overexpression and high CRS (P = 0.058). Following multivariate analysis, only high CRS remained as an independent negative prognostic predictor of survival (P = 0.018), as well as an indicator of early recurrence of disease (P = 0.010). Of the biological markers investigated, only Ki-67 overexpression was identified as a positive predictor of survival on multivariate analysis (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 overexpression was a positive predictor of survival. Only high CRS remained an independent negative prognostic predictor.

[Morphological assessment of predictive factors in adenocarcinoma of the colon].

Immunohistochemical investigation of 15 different markers in colon adenocarcinoma was carried out. Prognostic significance showed chemokine receptor CXCR4 and Ki-67. Predictive significance was revealed for thymidylate synthase (TS) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP).

Differential expression and prognostic value of ERCC1 and thymidylate synthase in resected gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Excision repair cross-complementing gene-1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) are key regulatory enzymes whose expression patterns are associated with overall survival (OS) in several malignancies. Their expression patterns and prognostic value in resected gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) are not known. METHODS: In total, 109 patients who underwent resection for GAC between January 2000 and June 2011 had tissue available for analysis. The primary objective was to assess for the differential expression of ERCC1 and TS using immunohistochemistry. The secondary objective was to assess for the association between OS and the expression of ERCC1 and TS. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 21.2 months, and the median OS was 28.8 months. Resected GAC exhibited differential expression of ERCC1 (high expression, 23%; n = 25) and TS (high expression, 43%; n = 47). ERCC1 and TS expression were not associated with OS. In a subset analysis of patients who received chemotherapy (n = 73), high ERCC1 expression was associated with decreased OS (16.7 months vs 53.8 months; P = 0.03). After controlling for known adverse pathologic features, high ERCC1 expression persisted as a negative prognostic factor in multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-6.0; P = .04). Conversely, in patients who underwent resection only (n = 35), high ERCC1 expression demonstrated a trend toward improved OS (40.4 months vs 12.7 months; P = .10); a positive prognostic influence also was present on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.86; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Resected GAC exhibited differential expression of TS and ERCC1. Among all patients, ERCC1 and TS expression levels were not associated with OS. High ERCC1 tumor expression was associated with decreased OS in the patients who received chemotherapy but was associated with increased OS in those who underwent surgery alone. ERCC1 expression had prognostic value in resected gastric cancer, and further investigation is warranted.

Biomarkers as prognostic factors for cN2 or 3 non-small cell lung cancer treated by induction chemoradiotherapy and surgery.

BACKGROUND: We have reported promising results of surgery after induction chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin-taxane, 50 Gy radiation) for cN2,3 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to understand the underlying mechanism, expression of excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), class III ß-tubulin (tubulin), thymidylate synthase (TYMS), and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed in 45 patients with cN2,3 NSCLC, but only in twelve pathologically-complete response cases to evaluate intratumoral expression of these biomarkers. RESULTS: High expression of ERCC1, tubulin, TYMS and RRM1 was observed in 25 (55.6%), 19 (42.2%), 20 (44.4%) and 25 (55.6%) patients, respectively. Low expressions of ERCC1, tubulin, TYMS and RRM1 were favorable prognostic factors (p=0.044, p=0.025, p=0.039 and p=0.037, respectively). The simultaneously low expression of ERCC1 and tubulin was observed to be the most significant prognostic factor, by Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio=2.381; p=0.0059). CONCLUSION: Patients with simultaneous low expression of ERCC1 and tubulin are promising candidates for surgery after carboplatin-taxane chemoradiotherapy. For patients with high expression of ERCC1 and tubulin, uracil-tegafur, pemetrexed, and gemcitabine may be the alternative agents for personalized chemotherapy.

Excision repair cross complementation group 1 and thymidylate synthase expression in patients with mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), high expression of excision repair cross complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and low expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) are associated with prolonged survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing EPP at our institutions were reviewed. Tissue microarrays were constructed using five 1-mm cores per patient. TS and ERCC1 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical techniques. The average percentage scores from evaluable cores were assessed and the median score was used to divide the group. Overall survival (OS) from the time of surgery was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and results were compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included: median age, 58 years; 79% men; 76% epithelial and 24% biphasic subtypes; 25% and pathologic stage I/II and 73% stage III/IV. The median OS was 18.2 months (80% deceased at the censor date). Nineteen patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 2 patients received chemotherapy with adjuvant intent and 28 patients received palliative chemotherapy. The median score was 10.2% for TS and 35% for ERCC1. There was no correlation between TS expression and OS (13.7 vs. 21.6 months for low and high levels, respectively; P = .32). There was a trend between high ERCC1 expression and longer OS (27.6 vs. 10.3 months; P = .06). CONCLUSION: In this series of patients with MPM undergoing EPP, TS expression was not associated with prolonged survival, but there was a trend for longer survival in patients with high ERCC1 expression.

Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important public health problem; it is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the industrialized world, second to lung cancer: each year there are nearly one million new cases of CRC diagnosed worldwide and half a million deaths (1). This review aims to summarise the most important currently available markers for CRC that provide prognostic or predictive information. Amongst others, it covers serum markers such as CEA and CA19-9, markers expressed by tumour tissues, such as thymidylate synthase, and also the expression/loss of expression of certain oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes such as K-ras and p53. The prognostic value of genomic instability, angiogenesis and proliferative indices, such as the apoptotic index, are discussed. The advent of new therapies created the pathway for a personalized approach of the patient. This will take into consideration the complex genetic mechanisms involved in tumorigenesis, besides the classical clinical and pathological stagings. The growing number of therapeutic agents and known molecular targets in oncology lead to a compulsory study of the clinical use of biomarkers with role in improving response and survival, as well as in reducing toxicity and establishing economic stability. The potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers which have arisen from the study of the genetic basis of colorectal cancer and their therapeutical significance are discussed.

Association between expression of thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase and efficacy of pemetrexed in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed inhibits three key folate enzymes: thymidylate synthetase (TYMS), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT). The relationship between the clinical efficacy of pemetrexed and the expression of folate enzymes in lung cancer cells is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether TYMS, DHFR, and GARFT expression affect the therapeutic efficacy of pemetrexed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants (n=50) were patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with pemetrexed. Samples were obtained by tumor biopsy before treatment. We isolated cancer cells from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues using laser microdissection, and mRNA levels were analyzed using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Protein expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. We assessed the association between TYMS, DHFR, and GARFT expression and the therapeutic efficacy of pemetrexed. RESULTS: The median age was 66.8 years. Compared to healthy tissues, the relative TYMS mRNA expression ranged from 0.001 to 41.613 (mean 4.638 ± 1.357), and was significantly lower in responders compared to non-responders (1.671 ± 0.844 versus 5.978 ± 1.895, p=0.0142). Progression-free survival was prolonged in patients with lower TYMS mRNA expression compared to those with higher TYMS mRNA expression, but the difference was not statistically significant (18.0 versus 13.3 weeks, p=0.3001). DHFR and GARFT mRNA expression did not correlate with the efficacy of pemetrexed. CONCLUSION: We specifically analyzed TYMS, DHFR, and GARFT mRNA expression levels in lung cancer cells from biopsy specimens using laser microdissection. TYMS mRNA expression affected the therapeutic efficacy of pemetrexed and could therefore constitute a useful predictive biomarker for NSCLC patients receiving pemetrexed.

Molecular markers predict distant metastases after adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer are nonuniform among patients with matching prognostic factors. We explored the role of molecular markers for predicting the outcome of adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 68 patients with stages II to III rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiation. Chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin was intravenously administered each month for 6-12 cycles. Radiation therapy consisted of 54 Gy delivered in 30 fractions. Immunostaining of surgical specimens for COX-2, EGFR, VEGF, thymidine synthase (TS), and Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) was performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 65 months. Eight locoregional (11.8%) and 13 distant (19.1%) recurrences occurred. Five-year locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 83.9%, 78.7%, 66.7%, and 73.8%, respectively. LRFFS was not correlated with TNM stage, surgical margin, or any of the molecular markers. VEGF overexpression was significantly correlated with decreased DMFS (P=.045), while RKIP-positive results were correlated with increased DMFS (P=.025). In multivariate analyses, positive findings for COX-2 (COX-2+) and VEGF (VEGF+) and negative findings for RKIP (RKIP-) were independent prognostic factors for DMFS, DFS, and OS (P=.035, .014, and .007 for DMFS; .021, .010, and <.0001 for DFS; and .004, .012, and .001 for OS). The combination of both COX-2+ and VEGF+ (COX-2+/VEGF+) showed a strong correlation with decreased DFS (P=.007), and the combinations of RKIP+/COX-2- and RKIP+/VEGF- showed strong correlations with improved DFS compared with the rest of the patients (P=.001 and <.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular markers can be valuable in predicting treatment outcome of adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer patients.