Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT.

ABSTRACT: We retrospectively compared the central corneal thickness (CCT) obtained by ultrasound pachymetry (USP; SP-3000, Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan), non-contact tonopachy (TP) (NT-530P, Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), and RTVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) in 78 eyes of 78 healthy subjects with myopia. Agreement between the measurement methods was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals for the limits of agreement (LoA). The mean CCT values were 546.9 ± 34.7, 548.1 ±â€Š33.5, 559.2 ±â€Š34.0, and 547.2 ±â€Š34.8 µm for USP, non-contact TP, Pentacam, and RTVue, respectively. The thickest and the thinnest mean CCT values corresponded to those obtained by Pentacam HR and USP, respectively. Plots of the differences against the means showed the best agreement between USP and RTVue (LoA, 10.14-10.70 µm), while the largest discrepancy was observed between RTVue and Pentacam systems (LoA, -25.47-1.44 µm). Our data showed that CCT measurements using these 4 instruments were well correlated. However, the results from Pentacam differed significantly from those of the other instruments.

Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of various anatomical structures on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST), Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and noncontact tonometer (NCT), as well as to assess the interchangeability among the four types of IOP measurement: IOP-GAT, IOP-NCT, IOP-Corvis, and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP-Corvis), with a particular focus on bIOP-Corvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 71 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and assessed their IOP measurements obtained with the GAT, NCT, and Corvis ST using a repeated measures ANOVA, a paired t-test with Bonferroni correction, stepwise multiple regression analyses and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: IOP-GAT showed the highest values (13.5 ± 2.1 mmHg [mean ± standard deviation]), followed by IOP-NCT (13.2 ± 2.7 mmHg), IOP-Corvis (10.6 ± 2.8 mmHg), and bIOP-Corvis (10.0 ± 2.3 mmHg). With exceptions of bIOP-Corvis and IOP-GAT, all IOP variations were explained by regression coefficients involving the central corneal thickness. Bland-Altman plots showed a mean difference between IOP-GAT and the other IOP measurements (IOP-Corvis, bIOP-Corvis, and IOP-NCT), which were -2.90, -3.48, and -0.29 mmHg, respectively. The widths of the 95% limits of agreement between all pairs of IOP measurements were greater than 3 mmHg. CONCLUSION: IOP values obtained with the Corvis ST, NCT, and GAT were not interchangeable. The bIOP-Corvis measurement corrected for the ocular structure.

The Outcomes of a Comprehensive Program for Maintenance of Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.

PRECIS: We checked 190 tonometers every month and repaired faulty ones. Calibration error (CE) frequency reduced from 23% to 0.6% at 1 year. Tonometers needing one or >1 CE repair differed in survival but not in age. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of a comprehensive program to maintain calibration status of the Goldmann applanation tonometer. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was carried out at 2 tertiary eye care referral centers. We included 190 slit-lamp mounted Goldmann applanation tonometers (Model AT 900 C/M). Health care providers (error checking and reporting) and clinical engineers (maintenance) participated. The team carried out CE check once a month, and repair of faulty tonometers, if any, within 24 hours. Failure of tonometer was defined as development of unacceptable CE beyond the third repair. The main outcome measures were the frequency of CE and survival function of the tonometer over 1 year. RESULTS: The median age of the tonometers was 10.7 (range, 0.2 to 25.1) years. The total number of repairs was 86. The proportion (95% confidence interval) of faulty tonometers reduced from 23.1% (17.7, 29.6) in the first month to 0.6% (0.1, 3.3) at 1 year (P<0.01). The median age of the tonometer did not differ between those needing (n=63, 9.4 y) and not needing (n=127, 10.7 y; P=0.24) repair. All tonometers requiring 1 CE repair (n=49, 25.7%) survived until 1 year. The survival of tonometers requiring >1 CE repair (n=14, 7.3%) was 40% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Our in-house program maintained 92.6% tonometers error free. Number of repairs rather than age determined the need for replacement/sending back the tonometer to the manufacturer. Our simple and easy to follow maintenance program has the potential for wide application.

Utility of Goldmann applanation tonometry for monitoring intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients with a history of laser refractive surgery.

The utility of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) for monitoring intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients with a history of laser refractive surgery was investigated by comparing IOP fluctuations measured using GAT and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) on the same day. In this retrospective study, patients were divided into one of two subgroups according to IOP fluctuation values using GAT: 43 eyes in the low IOP fluctuation group (LIFG [GAT fluctuation ≤1.7 mmHg]); and 55 eyes in the high IOP fluctuation group (HIFG [GAT fluctuation >1.7 mmHg]). IOP fluctuation was defined as the standard deviation of all IOP values during follow-up. IOP parameters using GAT were compared with those of DCT. Correlation analyses were performed among IOP parameters, and between IOP fluctuation and associated factors including central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length. All IOP parameters demonstrated significantly high values in the HIFG compared with those in the LIFG. Mean and peak IOP using DCT were significantly higher than those using GAT in both groups. However, there were no significant differences in IOP fluctuation and reduction using both tonometry methods in the HIFG (p = 0.946 and p = 0.986, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis revealed similar fluctuations using GAT and DCT. In multivariate analyses, there was a significant correlation between fluctuations using GAT and DCT in the HIFG (p = 0.043). These results suggest that IOP monitoring using GAT is a reliable method of monitoring IOP change in glaucoma patients with a history of laser refractive surgery, especially those exhibiting high IOP fluctuation. Nevertheless, several factors, including central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length, should be considered when using GAT for IOP monitoring.

Measurement repeatability of the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of corneal deformation parameters measured using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer and the impact of baseline clinical factors on the repeatability of each parameter. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. METHODS: Forty-eight eyes (48 healthy subjects; mean age, 49.0 ± 19.5 years) underwent repeated examinations with the Scheimpflug analyzer to evaluate the test-retest variability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and repeatability coefficient as indicators of variability were computed for 35 parameters measured with the Scheimpflug analyzer. The associations between the magnitude of the test-retest variability and baseline factors, such as age, axial length (AL), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT), were analyzed. RESULTS: The test-retest repeatability was excellent for 22 (62.9%) of 35 parameters (ICC ≥ 0.75), good for seven (20%), (ICC ≥ 0.6), fair for four (11.4%), (ICC ≥ 0.4), and poor for two (5.7%) parameters (ICC < 0.4). Age was associated positively with the magnitude of variability in 13 (37.1%) parameters; measurement variability was affected significantly by AL (5 parameters, 14.3%) and CCT (7 parameters, 20%) but, except for one parameter not by IOP. CONCLUSION: Most parameters of the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer showed favorable measurement reliability in healthy subjects. However, six parameters showed poor-to-fair repeatability. Age, AL, and CCT significantly affected the repeatability of several parameters. These results should be considered when clinicians use this device in clinical practice.

Glaucoma and intraocular pressure in EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study: cross sectional study.

Objectives To report the distribution of intraocular pressure (IOP) by age and sex and the prevalence of glaucoma.Design Community based cross sectional observational study.Setting EPIC-Norfolk cohort in Norwich and the surrounding rural and urban areas.Participants 8623 participants aged 48-92 recruited from the community who underwent ocular examination to identify glaucoma.Main outcome measures Prevalence and characteristics of glaucoma, distribution of IOP, and the sensitivity and specificity of IOP for case finding for glaucoma.Results The mean IOP in 8401 participants was 16.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 16.2 mm Hg to 16.3 mm Hg; SD 3.6 mm Hg). In 363 participants (4%), glaucoma was present in either eye; 314 (87%) had primary open angle glaucoma. In the remaining participants, glaucoma was suspected in 607 (7%), and 863 (10.0%) had ocular hypertension. Two thirds (242) of those with glaucoma had previously already received the diagnosis. In 76% of patients with newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma (83/107), the mean IOP was under the threshold for ocular hypertension (21 mm Hg). No one IOP threshold provided adequately high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of glaucoma.Conclusions In this British community, cases of glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and ocular hypertension represent a large number of potential referrals to the hospital eye service. The use of IOP for detection of those with glaucoma is inaccurate and probably not viable.

Comparison of self-measured diurnal intraocular pressure profiles using rebound tonometry between primary angle closure glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To document the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) profile with rebound tonometry performed by primary glaucoma patients in non-clinic environment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three medically-treated eyes of 31 primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and 22 primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients with no previous eye surgery were recruited. Diurnal IOP was measured 5 times per day at four-hourly intervals from 08:00 to 24:00 for 1 week in patients' study eye using rebound tonometry in a non-clinic environment. The diurnal IOP profiles were compared between PACG and POAG eyes. RESULTS: For both PACG and POAG eyes, mean patient-measured IOP was highest in the morning, gradually decreased over the course of a day, and was lowest by midnight (p < 0.001). The diurnal IOP fluctuation ± 1 standard deviation (SD), as documented by SD in daily IOP values, was lower in PACG group (1.6 ± 1.1 mmHg) than in POAG group (2.0 ± 1.2 mmHg; p = 0.049). The mean trough IOP ± 1 SD was higher in PACG group (12.9 ± 2.8 mmHg), compared to POAG group (11.5 ± 3.8 mmHg; p = 0.041). The mean IOP level at midnight ± 1 SD in PACG group (14.0 ± 3.2 mmHg) was higher than that in POAG group (12.1 ± 3.7 mmHg; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: IOP in primary glaucoma patients was highest in the morning, and decreased over the course of a day in non-clinic environment. Treated diurnal IOP fluctuation seemed to be greater in POAG than PACG eyes.

[The questionnaire survey on glaucoma diagnosis and treatment in China (2016)].

Objective: To investigate the present situation of diagnosis and treatment for primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and awareness of the relevant progress among Chinese ophthalmologists. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional, non-randomized sampling survey. Participants were ophthalmologists who attended the 11st Chinese Glaucoma Society Congress during November 11 to 12, 2016. They were invited to fill out a questionnaire. The questionnaire included participants' basic information and their knowledge about glaucoma diagnosis and treatment. The data collected through questionnaire were analyzed with SAS9.4. Results: A total of 450 questionnaires were distributed and 372 valid questionnaires were retrieved, with a response rate of 82. 7%(372/450). ISGEO classification system was adopted by 58.9% (219/372) of the participants as the diagnostic criteria for PACG. Of the respondents, 48.1% (179/372) of the participants believed that "anterior chamber angle closure mechanism-based PACG classification system" was more instructive for treatment, the percentage was higher than ISGEO classification system (42.2%, 157/372). Most (72.3%, 269/372) of the participants knew the 3-minute dark room prone test, but only 27.7%(103/372) of them applied it in clinical practice. A total of 83.4%(310/372) of the participants believed that low cerebrospinal fluid pressure is a risk factor for POAG. In all, 71.8% (267/372) of the participants reported that their institutes had applied compound trabeculectomy with adjustable suture, with 76.9%(286/372) of the participants agreeing that the adjustable suture reduced the rate of complications after trabeculectomy. Conclusions: Currently, both ISGEO classification system and anterior chamber angle closure mechanism-based PACG classification system were adopted in the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma. Low cerebrospinal fluid pressure as new risk factors for POAG has been widely acknowledged and given attentions by Chinese ophthalmologists. The 3-minute darkroom prone test and compound trabeculectomy with adjustable suture still need to be promoted. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2017, 53: 115-120).

Five year changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness: The Shahroud Eye Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To determine five year changes in corneal thickness from the apex to the 8mm periphery and related factors through a longitudinal population-based study of middle-aged Iranians. METHODS: In the first phase, 4670 of the 5190 participants, and in the second phase, 4666 of the 4737 participants were examined with the Pentacam. In this report, analysis was done on right eye data of 2509 people who had no diabetes, pterygium, or history of eye surgery, and their image quality was displayed as "ok". Thickness changes in different parts of the cornea and their relation with age, gender, refractive error, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed using repeated measures analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Corneal thickness reduced by 1.5±11.7µm in the apex, 2.6±11.7µm in the thinnest point, and 5.3±12.2, 7.7±14.3, and 11.4±18.6µm in peripheral rings of 2, 3, and 4mm radius, respectively (all p<0.001 with and without adjusting for baseline thickness). Of the studied thickness variables, only changes in the 4mm ring significantly related with age (p<0.001) and gender (p<0.001); there was less change in older age and in men. Thickness changes were not related to refractive error or IOP (all p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Corneal thickness decreased with age in this sample of 40-64year olds. There was significantly greater thinning in the periphery compared to the corneal center even after controlling for baseline thickness. Results of this longitudinal study can be helpful in understanding age-related changes in the cornea and the eye.

Uso da tonometria de ar em pesquisas populacionais - comparação com o tonômetro de Goldmann em indivíduos com suspeita de hipertensão ocular / Air-Puff Tonometry in population research - a comparison with Goldmann tonometer in individuals with suspected ocular hypertension

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a utilidade do tonômetro de ar (TA) em estudos populacionais em indivíduos suspeitos de hipertensão ocular, comparando os valores com os fornecidos pelo tonômetro de aplanação de Goldmann (TG). Métodos: Estudo transversal, de amostra probabilística, composta por 11.452 indivíduos e"20 anos, compondo-se uma subamostra dos que apresentaram valores de pressão intraocular (PIO) obtidos com o TA e"20mmHg, nos quais a PIO foi repetida com o TG. Os resultados dos dois tonmetros foram comparados considerando sexo, cor da pele referida, lateralidade, relação escavação/disco (Â0,6; entre e"0,6 e <0,8; e"0,8) e diagnóstico. Foram consideradas três situações: não-portadores de glaucoma (NG), suspeitos (SG) e portadores de glaucoma (CG). Para comparação entre as medidas foi utilizado o teste t de Student para amostras pareadas e o teste de correlação de Pearson para avaliar a associação entre PIO, idade e tonometria. Resultados: Foram detectados 198 indivíduos (339 olhos) com PIOe"20mmHg com o TA, que tiveram a medida repetida com o TG. Foram considerados 233 olhos como NG, 47 olhos como SG e 19 olhos como CG. Em olhos com escavação e"0,8, a medida com TA e TG foram semelhantes. Nos NG e SG, o TA superestimou os valores. Houve associação entre aumento da PIO e aumento da idade com os dois tonmetros. Conclusão: Valores de PIO são superiores com TA comparados ao TG, principalmente quando a PIO é normal. Há concordância entre os métodos quando a PIO é alta e a escavação do nervo óptico é aumentada, o que valida a aplicação do TA em campanhas populacionais.

ABSTRACT Purpose: to evaluate the use of air tonometer (TA) in population studies in individuals suspected of ocular hypertension, comparing values with those provided by the Goldmann Tonometer (GT). Methods: a cross-sectional study was done using a probabilistic sample consisting of 11,452 individuals e"20 years old.A subsample composed by the individuals with IOP values obtained with TA e"20 mmHg was selected, in which IOP was repeated with the GT. The results of both tonometers were compared considering gender, referred color of skin, laterality, cup-to-disc ratio (Â0.6; e"0.6 and <0.8; e"0.8) and diagnosis, considering three situations: without glaucoma (NG), suspected glaucoma (SG) and patients with glaucoma (CG). The Student t test was used for paired samples and the Pearson correlation test to evaluate the association between IOP, age and tonometry. Results: we identified 198 individuals (339 eyes) with IOP e"20mmHg with the TA, who had the measures repeated with the GT. Two hundred and thirty-three eyes were considered as NG, 47 eyes as SG and 19 eyes as CG. In eyes with cup-to-disc ratio e"0.8, the TA and GT measurements were similar. In NG and SG, the TA overestimated values. There was an association between increased IOP and increasing age with both tonometers. Conclusion: IOP values are higher with TA compared to GT, especially when IOP is normal.There is agreement between the methods when IOP is high and the optic nerve excavation is increased, which validates the application of TA in population campaigns.

[Ease of handling of first and second generation rebound tonometers]. / Handhabung von Reboundselbsttonometern der ersten und zweiten Generation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ease of handling of two rebound tonometers, which are designed for self-measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in a clinical setting by untrained patients. METHODS: After self-measurement of the IOP with the rebound tonometers iCare ONE and iCare HOME, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire containing different subitems concerning ease of operation using a visual analog scale (1 = very good to 5 = very poor). Moreover, the feasibility and duration of measurement were tested. RESULTS: A total of 147 subjects participated in this study. The mean score for general handling ability was 2.79 ± 1.01 for the iCare ONE and 1.85 ± 0.87 for the iCare HOME (p < 0.001). The evaluation of the subitems sense of safety (iCare ONE: 2.71 ± 1.03 and iCare HOME: 1.87 ± 0.81, p < 0.001) and comfort of measurement (iCare ONE: 2.07 ± 1.01 and iCare HOME: 1.66 ± 0.72, p < 0.001) also showed a significant discrepancy between the two tonometers. Participants needed significantly less time for a single valid measurement when using the iCare HOME tonometer (mean 66.14 ± 61.54 s) compared to the iCare ONE tonometer (mean 81.54 ± 69.51 s, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A better handling of the iCare HOME rebound tonometer in comparison to the iCare ONE tonometer can be deduced on the basis of the subjective assessments of patients and the shorter duration of measurements. Moreover, the iCare HOME received a significantly better evaluation for all subitems. The accuracy of measurements using the iCare HOME still needs to be clarified.

Open source software for the analysis of corneal deformation parameters on the images from the Corvis tonometer.

BACKGROUND: The software supplied with the Corvis tonometer (which is designed to measure intraocular pressure with the use of the air-puff method) is limited to providing basic numerical data. These data relate to the values of the measured intraocular pressure and, for example, applanation amplitudes. However, on the basis of a sequence of images obtained from the Corvis tonometer, it is possible to obtain much more information which is not available in its original software. This will be presented in this paper. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The proposed software has been tested on 1400 images from the Corvis tonometer. The number of analysed 2D images (with a resolution of 200 × 576 pixels) in a sequence is arbitrary. However, in typical cases there are 140 images. The proposed software has been written in Matlab (Version 7.11.0.584, R2010b). The methods of image analysis and processing and in particular edge detection and the fast Fourier transform have been applied. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The software allows for fully automatic (1) acquisition of 12 new parameters previously unavailable in the original software of the Corvis tonometer. It also enables off-line (2) manual and (3) automatic browsing of images in a sequence; 3D graph visualization of: (4) the corneal deformation and (5) eyeball response; 6) change of the colour palette; (7) filtration and (8) visualization of selected measured values on individual 2D images. In addition, the proposed software enables (9) to save the obtained results for further analysis and processing. CONCLUSIONS: The dedicated software described in this paper enables to obtain additional new features of corneal deformations during intraocular pressure measurement. The software can be applied in the diagnosis of corneal deformation vibrations, glaucoma diagnosis, evaluation of measurement repeatability and others. The software has no licensing restrictions and can be used both commercially and non-commercially without any limitations.

[Prevalence of glaucoma in obstructive sleep apnea]. / Glaukomprävalenz bei obstruktiver Schlafapnoe.

BACKGROUND: A causal relationship between glaucoma and obstructive sleep apnea has been postulated in several clinical studies but also refuted by others. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of glaucoma in a cohort of patients with well-established obstructive sleep apnea in comparison to the published data on this topic. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients (male:female 80:20, mean age 59 ± 11 years SD) with polysomnographically established obstructive sleep apnea underwent an ophthalmological examination including tonometry, static perimetry and dilated fundus photography. Visual fields and fundus photographs of the patients were classified as glaucomatous or non-glaucomatous by two independent examiners. RESULTS: The prevalence of glaucoma in the study patients was 2 % which corresponded to the published prevalence of glaucoma in the normal population. Intraocular pressure did not correlate with the respiratory index, body mass index or sex. CONCLUSION: The data from this study shed doubt on a causal relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and glaucoma.

A pilot study on providing ophthalmic training to medical students while initiating a sustainable eye care effort for the underserved.

IMPORTANCE: We present a method to reintroduce ophthalmic training into the medical school curriculum. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate knowledge and skills acquired when participating in a service project, the Community Vision Project, and to develop a quantitative method for testing skills with the direct ophthalmoscope in patients. DESIGN: Second-year medical students participated in the study. After 1 month, their knowledge was compared with that of peers and graduates (internal medicine residents). Also at 1 month, their direct ophthalmoscope skills were compared with those of upperclassmen who had completed all core clerkships. One year later, after the participants had completed their core clerkships, long-term ophthalmoscope skills retention was tested, and their performance was compared with that of their classmates. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Training occurred in mobile eye clinics. Knowledge and skills assessments were performed in the hospital eye clinic among students and residents at The University of New Mexico School of Medicine. Patients were recruited from the hospital eye clinic. Participants attended a 3-hour training session held by an attending physician in the hospital eye clinic and took part in at least 1 mobile eye clinic. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A knowledge assessment quiz was administered to participants (n = 12), their classmates (n = 18), and internal medicine residents (n = 33). Skills assessment with the direct ophthalmoscope was performed at 1 month and at 1 year in 5 participants and 5 nonparticipants. Tonometer skills were assessed by comparing participants' readings with those of an ophthalmologist's obtained in patients at the mobile eye clinics. RESULTS Participants' median knowledge assessment scores were 48% higher than those of their classmates and 37% higher than those of internal medicine residents (P < .001 for both). Short-term (1 month) direct ophthalmoscopy median scores were 60% (quartile 1 to quartile 3 range, 40%-80%) for participants and 40% (quartile 1 to quartile 3 range, 20%-60%) for nonparticipating upperclassmen (P = .24). Long-term direct ophthalmoscopy median scores were 100% (quartile 1 to quartile 3 range, 75%-100%) for participants and 0% (quartile 1 to quartile 3 range, 0%-25%) for nonparticipating classmates (P = .11). Participants' tonometer readings were similar to those of the ophthalmologist's; their median reading was 2 mm Hg (quartile 1 to quartile 3 range, 0-4 mm Hg) higher than that of the ophthalmologist's (P = .05, sign test). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Service-based learning offered an efficient model for incorporating ophthalmic training into the medical school curriculum. A viable tool for quantitatively testing ophthalmoscope skills is presented.

Clinical evaluation of multiparameter correction equations for Goldmann applanation tonometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the multiparameter equations in correcting intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (IOPG) for the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature (R), and age in different ethnic populations. METHODS: Data of IOPG, CCT, R, and age were collected from three clinical centers. The sample size consisted of 945 eyes of 945 glaucoma patients or suspects (669 Europeans, 127 African Americans, and 149 Indians). The 'corrected IOP' was calculated using five multiparameter equations to decrease the association of CCT, R, and age with measured IOP. Regression analyses were performed to calculate variance (r(2)) and determine the association of CCT, R, and age with IOPG and corrected IOP (residual association). RESULTS: Overall, CCT accounted for the majority of variance in IOPG, while R and age had a much smaller effect, with the combined effect on IOPG ranging from 4.7 to 7.5% in the three data sets. The residual association of CCT, R, and age with corrected IOP in the three groups ranged from 0.2 to 1.3% and 0.5 to 1.8% with the application of the Elsheikh and the Chihara equations, respectively. The residual association of CCT, R, and age with corrected IOP calculated using the Ehlers, Orssengo and Pye, and Shimmoyo equations were 7-11.5, 1.8-11.7, and 4.6-8.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Elsheikh and the Chihara equations better decreased the association of CCT, R, and age with measured IOP than the Ehlers, Orssengo and Pye, and Shimmoyo equations.

The range of the waveform score of the ocular response analyzer (ora) in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: The waveform score (WS) indicates the reliability of each intraocular pressure (lOP) measurement signal performed with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert). We aimed to assess i) the range of waveform score in IOP measurements with ORA in healthy subjects and to ii) identify a cut-off WS value under which an ORA measurement should be discarded. METHODS: Prospective study including three ORA IOP measurements performed in the right eye of 80 healthy normal subjects. The different WS were recorded and the highest WS of the three measurements was analysed. ANOVA test was used to assess variance in repeated measurements. RESULTS: Mean age of 80 subjects was 46.7+/-15.6 years. Mean WS of the first IOP measurement was 4.8+/-2.0 and 4.8+/-1.7 and 5.0+/-1.9 respectively for the second and third measurements (p= 0.74). Mean WS of the analysed 240 signals (3 measurements per eye) was 4.9+/-1.9 (range: 1.2-9.5). The mean value of all the highest values per eye was 6.2+/-1.8 (range: 2.9 -9.5 and was significantly higher than the mean WS of the 240 signals together (p <0.001). The 10th percentile of all the best values was 3.7 and the 75th percentile 7.5. CONCLUSION: ORA measurements with WS <3.7 should be discarded in healthy normal subjects. As much as that the corresponding quality of the waveform ORA scan is satisfying, one single measurement with a WS >7.5 could be considered as sufficient. If this score cannot be reached after three consecutive measurements, the signal with the highest WS should be selected.

Noncontact intraocular pressure reading prediction after Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis by the finite element method.

The finite element method with linear elastic assumption for predicting the intraocular pressure (IOP) readings after reshaping of the corneal structure is demonstrated in the present study. Twelve effective eye measurements in seven subjects were examined using the TOPCON LX-10, a noncontact intraocular pressure measurement technique, before and after laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis surgery. A linear elastic model was introduced to reduce possible errors from a complicated anisotropic model with uncertain tissue parameters. Linear relationship between the simplified removal depth of laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis and predicted IOP was expected, and the comparisons between measurements and the predicted model were made. The results indicated that the expected IOP readings are close to the measurement IOP values, while larger errors occur at smaller IOP conditions. In conclusion, the linear elastic finite element approach can already reveal parameters that influence measurement data the most, and the interaction between parameters was higher than we had expected. This helps us to build the confidence on implementing the anisotropic model.

Repeatability of measurements of effectiveness of glaucoma medication.

AIMS: To determine short-term repeatability of the effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) reducing medication and the number of repeated measurements necessary to estimate therapeutic effect with a given degree of precision. METHODS: IOP was measured at 8:00, 11:00 and 16:00 h at each of three weekly visits in untreated patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After starting travaprost (0.004%) to both eyes, the measurements were repeated for a further three weekly visits. Repeatability of the change in IOP 1, 2 and 3 weeks after starting treatment was reported as the coefficient of repeatability (CR) and coefficient of variability (CV). RESULTS: Mean reduction in IOP was 7.5 mm Hg (29.9%). CR and CV between visits were 7.8 mm Hg and 37.2%, respectively. Repeated estimates of the effectiveness of treatment in the same subject at the same time of day would, therefore, be expected to lie within a range of 7.8 mm Hg and within ±73.2% of the mean effect with 95% confidence. A reduction in IOP less than 7.8 mm Hg over a single pair of measurements would be indistinguishable from measurement error. Precision improves from ±73.2% for a single pair of readings to ±25.9% for eight pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Day-to-day repeatability in the estimation of medication effectiveness is poor even for time-of-day standardised measurements and the number of IOP measurements required to achieve precision adequate for use in clinical practice is large.