Pharmacogenetics of antiarrhythmic therapy.

Individuals vary widely in their responses to therapy with most drugs. Indeed, responses to antiarrhythmic drugs are so highly variable that study of the underlying mechanisms has elucidated important lessons for understanding variable responses to drug therapy in general. Variability in drug response may reflect variability in the relationship between a drug dose and the concentrations of the drug and metabolite(s) at relevant target sites; this is termed pharmacokinetic variability. Another mechanism is that individuals vary in their response to identical exposures to a drug (pharmacodynamic variability). In this case, there may be variability in the target molecule(s) with which a drug interacts or, more generally, in the broad biological context in which the drug-target interaction occurs. Variants (polymorphisms and mutations) in the genes that encode proteins that are important for pharmacokinetics or for pharmacodynamics have now been described as important contributors to variable drug actions, including proarrhythmia, and these are described in this review. However, the translation of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice has been slow. To this end, the creation of large, well-characterised DNA databases and appropriate control groups, as well as large prospective trials to evaluate the impact of genetic variation on drug therapy, may hasten the impact of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in terms of delivering personalised drug therapy and to avoid therapeutic failure and serious side effects.

Systemic administration of calmodulin antagonist W-7 or protein kinase A inhibitor H-8 prevents torsade de pointes in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: The ventricular arrhythmia torsade de pointes (TdP) occurs after QT interval prolongation and is associated with sudden cardiac death. The afterdepolarizations that initiate TdP are facilitated by protein kinase A and the multifunctional Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaM kinase). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of suppression of TdP through systemic therapy with kinase inhibitory agents in an established animal model. Under control conditions, TdP was inducible in 6 of 8 rabbits. CaM kinase blockade with the calmodulin antagonist W-7 reduced TdP in a dose-dependent fashion (4 of 7 inducible at 25 micromol/kg and 1 of 7 inducible at 50 micromol/kg). Increased intracellular Ca(2+) has been implicated in the genesis of afterdepolarizations, but pretreatment with high-dose W-7 did not prevent TdP in response to the L-type Ca(2+) channel agonist BAY K 8644 (300 nmol/kg), suggesting that CaM kinase-independent activation of L-type Ca(2+) current was not affected by W-7. Compared with control animals, W-7 reduced TdP inducibility without shortening the QT interval, increasing heart rate, or reducing the blood pressure. The protein kinase A antagonist H-8 also caused a dose-dependent reduction in TdP inducibility (5 of 6 at 1 micromol/kg, 4 of 6 at 5 micromol/kg, and 0 of 6 at 10 micromol/kg), but unlike W-7, H-8 did so by shortening the QT interval. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that the acute systemic application of W-7 and H-8 is hemodynamically tolerated and indicate that kinase inhibition may be a viable antiarrhythmic strategy.