RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The organisational care needs involved in accessing kidney transplant have not been described in the literature and therefore a detailed analysis thereof could help to establish a framework (including appropriate timing, investment, and costs) for the management of this population. The main objective of this study is to analyse the profile and care needs of kidney transplant candidates in a tertiary hospital and the direct costs of studying them. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using data on a range of variables (sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, study duration, and investment in visits and supplementary tests) from 489 kidney transplant candidates evaluated in 2020. RESULTS: The comorbidity index was high (> 4 in 64.3%), with a mean of 5.6 ± 2.4. Part of the study population had certain characteristics that could hinder their access a kidney transplant: physical dependence (9.4%), emotional distress (33.5%), non-adherent behaviours (25.2%), or language barriers (9.4%). The median study duration was 6.6[3.4;14] months. The ratio of required visits to patients was 5.97:1, meaning an investment of 237.10 per patient, and the ratio of supplementary tests to patients was 3.5:1, meaning an investment of 402.96 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The study population can be characterised as complex due to their profile and their investment in terms of time, visits, supplementary tests, and direct costs. Management based on our results involves designing work-adaptation strategies to the needs of the study population, which can lead to increased patient satisfaction, shorter waiting times, and reduced costs.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Custos e Análise de Custo , Idoso , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Aim: To determine the economic feasibility of using kidney transplantation compared to hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease in the long term in countries with a low and medium level of economic development using the example of Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The cost effectiveness analysis method was used. Conducted Markov modeling and comparison of the consequences of kidney transplantation and hemodialysis in terms of treatment costs and the number of added years of life for a cohort of 1,675 patients were carried out. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is defined. RESULTS: Results: Based on the results of modeling, it was determined that among 1,675 patients with end-stage kidney disease in Ukraine, 1,248 (74.5%) will remain alive after 10 years of treatment when kidney transplantation technology is used. The highest costs will be in the first year ($25,864), and in subsequent years - about $5,769. With the use of hemodialysis technology, only 728 patients (43.5%) will be alive after 10 years, the cost of treating one patient per year is $11,351. The use of kidney transplantation adds 3191 years of quality life for 1675 patients compared with hemodialysis (1.9 years per patient). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Kidney transplantation is an economically feasible technology for Ukraine, as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $4694, which is 1.04 times higher than Ukraine's GDP per capita. The results of the study allow us to recommend that decision-makers in countries with a low and medium level of economic development give priority in financing to renal transplantation.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Rim , Diálise Renal , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Ucrânia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal/economia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent efforts to increase access to kidney transplant (KTx) in the United States include increasing referrals to transplant programs, leading to more pretransplant services. Transplant programs reconcile the costs of these services through the Organ Acquisition Cost Center (OACC). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the costs associated with pretransplant services by applying microeconomic methods to OACC costs reported by transplant hospitals. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: For all US adult kidney transplant hospitals from 2013 through 2018 (n=193), we crosslinked the total OACC costs (at the hospital-fiscal year level) to proxy measures of volumes of pretransplant services. We used a multiple-output cost function, regressing total OACC costs against proxy measures for volumes of pretransplant services and adjusting for patient characteristics, to calculate the marginal cost of each pretransplant service. RESULTS: Over 1015 adult hospital-years, median OACC costs attributable to the pretransplant services were $5 million. Marginal costs for the pretransplant services were: initial transplant evaluation, $9k per waitlist addition; waitlist management, $2k per patient-year on the waitlist; deceased donor offer management, $1k per offer; living donor evaluation, procurement and follow-up: $26k per living donor. Longer time on dialysis among patients added to the waitlist was associated with higher OACC costs at the transplant hospital. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve the policy goals of more access to KTx, sufficient funding is needed to support the increase in volume of pretransplant services. Future studies should assess the relative value of each service and explore ways to enhance efficiency.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Definição da Elegibilidade , Adulto , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ureteral stent removal (SR) using a grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope (giFC-Isiris ®, Coloplast ®) after kidney transplantation (KT), with a focus on feasibility, safety, patient experience, and costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive KT undergoing SR through giFC were prospectively enrolled from January 2020 to June 2023. Patient characteristics, KT and SR details, urine culture results, antimicrobial prescriptions, and the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) within 1 month were recorded. A micro-cost analysis was conducted, making a comparison with the costs of SR with a reusable FC and grasper. RESULTS: A total of 136 KT patients were enrolled, including both single and double KT, with 148 stents removed in total. The median indwelling time was 34 days [26, 47]. SR was successfully performed in all cases. The median preparation and procedure times were 4 min [3,5]. and 45 s[30, 60], respectively. The median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was 3 [1, 5], and 98.2% of patients expressed willingness to undergo the procedure again. Only one episode of UTI involving the graft (0.7%) was recorded. Overall, the estimated cost per SR procedure with Isiris ® and the reusable FC was 289.2 and 151,4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective series evaluated the use of Isiris ® for SR in a cohort of KT patients, demonstrating feasibility and high tolerance. The UTI incidence was 0.7% within 1 month. Based on the micro-cost analysis, estimated cost per procedure favored the reusable FC.
Assuntos
Cistoscopia , Remoção de Dispositivo , Equipamentos Descartáveis , Estudos de Viabilidade , Transplante de Rim , Stents , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Transplante de Rim/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Stents/economia , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Seguimentos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Cistoscopia/economia , Cistoscopia/métodos , Cistoscopia/instrumentação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Prognóstico , Adulto , Ureter/cirurgia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/economia , Custos e Análise de CustoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effective pharmacological treatment in adult kidney transplant recipients from the perspective of the Colombian health system. METHODS: A decision tree model for the induction phase and a Markov model for the maintenance phase were built. A review of the clinical literature was conducted to extract probabilities, and the life-years were used as the outcome. Costs were calculated using the administrative databases. The evaluating treatment schemes are organized by groups of evidence with direct comparisons. RESULTS: In the induction phase, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin+ methylprednisolone is dominant, more effective, and less expensive, compared with basiliximab+methylprednisolone. In the maintenance phase, azathioprine (AZA) is dominant in contrast to mycophenolate mofetil (MFM) both with cyclosporine (CIC)+ corticosteroids (CE); CIC is dominant relative to sirolimus (SIR) and tacrolimus (TAC) (both with MFM+CE or AZA+CE), and TAC is dominant compared with SIR (in addition with MFM+CE or mycophenolate sodium [MFS]+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to MFS and everolimus, and SIR is more effective MFM but it does not exceed the threshold (in sum with TAC+CE); MFS and MFM are dominant relative to everolimus, and SIR is more effective than MFM, but it does not exceed the threshold (in addiction with CIC+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to TAC (in sum with SIR+CE), and CIC+AZA+CE is dominant in relation to TAC+MFM+CE. CONCLUSIONS: The base-case results for all evidence groups are consistent with the different sensitivity analyses.
Assuntos
Imunossupressores , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Humanos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/economia , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Azatioprina/economia , Colômbia , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/economia , Árvores de Decisões , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Rejeição de Enxerto/economia , Imunossupressores/economia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Ácido Micofenólico/economia , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Sirolimo/economia , Tacrolimo/economia , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The disparity between the demand for and supply of kidney transplants has resulted in prolonged waiting times for patients with kidney failure. A potential approach to address this shortage is to consider kidneys from donors with a history of common cancers, such as breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. METHODS: We used a patient-level Markov model to evaluate the outcomes of accepting kidneys from deceased donors with a perceived history of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer characterized by minimal to intermediate transmission risk. Data from the Australian transplant registry were used in this analysis. The study compared the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system between the proposed practice of accepting these donors and the conservative practice of declining them. The model simulated outcomes for 1500 individuals waitlisted for a deceased donor kidney transplant for a 25-y horizon. RESULTS: Under the proposed practice, when an additional 15 donors with minimal to intermediate cancer transmission risk were accepted, QALY gains ranged from 7.32 to 20.12. This translates to an approximate increase of 7 to 20 additional years of perfect health. The shift in practice also led to substantial cost savings, ranging between $1.06 and $2.3 million. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed practice of accepting kidneys from deceased donors with a history of common cancers with minimal to intermediate transmission risk offers a promising solution to bridge the gap between demand and supply. This approach likely results in QALY gains for recipients and significant cost savings for the health system.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Transplante de Rim , Cadeias de Markov , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Doadores de Tecidos , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Austrália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Adulto , Sistema de Registros , Seleção do Doador/economia , Fatores de Risco , Listas de Espera , Modelos Econômicos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: At our institution, we switched from hand-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HRN) to hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HTN); we later switched to standard retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (SRN). This study was performed to evaluate outcomes and hospital costs among the 3 techniques. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, single-center, inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis study compared the outcomes among 551 cases of living donor kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2022. RESULTS: After the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, there were 114 cases in the HRN group, 204 cases in the HTN group, and 213 cases in the SRN group. Donor complication rates were lowest in the SRN group but did not differ between the HRN and HTN groups (1.1 vs 4.4 and 5.9%, P = .021). Donors in the SRN group had the lowest serum C-reactive protein concentrations on postoperative day 1 (4.3 vs 10.5 and 7.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and the shortest postoperative stay (4.3 vs 7.4 and 8.4 days, P < .001). Donors in the SRN group had the lowest total cost among the 3 groups (8868 vs 9709 and 10,592 USD, P < .0001). Donors in the SRN group also had the lowest costs in terms of "basic medical fees," "medication and injection fees," "Intraoperative drug and material costs," and "testing fees." Furthermore, the presence of complications was significantly correlated with higher total hospital costs (P < .001). CONCLUSION: SRN appeared to have the least invasive and complication, and a potential cost savings compared with the HRN and HTN.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Laparoscopia , Doadores Vivos , Nefrectomia , Humanos , Nefrectomia/economia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Custos Hospitalares , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/economia , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Tempo de Internação/economiaRESUMO
The cost of kidney transplantation (KT) and its follow-up care greatly exceeds the mean annual family income. Governmental support during the post-transplant period is needed. This study aimed to identify the drivers of cost during the 1st year after KT. The records of 129 adult Filipino KT recipients over 2 years in a single center were reviewed to determine the total cost for the 1st year after KT, such as diagnostics, medications, supplies, and professional fees. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the economic impact of the baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and events after KT. The direct costs of care were significantly higher among patients aged >40 years (P = 0.009), those with diabetic kidney disease as the primary renal disease (P <0.0001), and those with a high Charlson comorbidity index (P = 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that patients with diabetes mellitus paid US$ 6813.6 more, and those hospitalized for any infection spent US$ 3877.4 more than those without comorbid conditions or complications. The results showed that diabetes mellitus and hospitalization for any infection significantly impacted the cost of follow-up care. Health-care policies that can aid patients after KT are needed to minimize expenditures and avoid complications.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Filipinas/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Importance: Care of adults at profit vs nonprofit dialysis facilities has been associated with lower access to transplant. Whether profit status is associated with transplant access for pediatric patients with end-stage kidney disease is unknown. Objective: To determine whether profit status of dialysis facilities is associated with placement on the kidney transplant waiting list or receipt of kidney transplant among pediatric patients receiving maintenance dialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study reviewed the US Renal Data System records of 13â¯333 patients younger than 18 years who started dialysis from 2000 through 2018 in US dialysis facilities (followed up through June 30, 2019). Exposures: Time-updated profit status of dialysis facilities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cox models, adjusted for clinical and demographic factors, were used to examine time to wait-listing and receipt of kidney transplant by profit status of dialysis facilities. Results: A total of 13â¯333 pediatric patients who started receiving maintenance dialysis were included in the analysis (median age, 12 years [IQR, 3-15 years]; 6054 females [45%]; 3321 non-Hispanic Black patients [25%]; 3695 Hispanic patients [28%]). During a median follow-up of 0.87 years (IQR, 0.39-1.85 years), the incidence of wait-listing was lower at profit facilities than at nonprofit facilities, 36.2 vs 49.8 per 100 person-years, respectively (absolute risk difference, -13.6 (95% CI, -15.4 to -11.8 per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for wait-listing at profit vs nonprofit facilities, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.83). During a median follow-up of 1.52 years (IQR, 0.75-2.87 years), the incidence of kidney transplant (living or deceased donor) was also lower at profit facilities than at nonprofit facilities, 21.5 vs 31.3 per 100 person-years, respectively; absolute risk difference, -9.8 (95% CI, -10.9 to -8.6 per 100 person-years) adjusted HR for kidney transplant at profit vs nonprofit facilities, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74). Conclusions and Relevance: Among a cohort of pediatric patients receiving dialysis in the US from 2000 through 2018, profit facility status was associated with longer time to wait-listing and longer time to kidney transplant.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Rim , Diálise Renal , Listas de Espera , Adolescente , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Administração de Instituições de Saúde/economia , Administração de Instituições de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/economia , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/organização & administração , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Propriedade/economia , Propriedade/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Importance: Persons with kidney failure require treatment (ie, dialysis or transplantation) for survival. The burden of the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related disruptions in care have disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minority and socially disadvantaged populations, raising the importance of understanding disparities in treatment initiation for kidney failure during the pandemic. Objective: To examine changes in the number and demographic characteristics of patients initiating treatment for incident kidney failure following the COVID-19 pandemic by race and ethnicity, county-level COVID-19 mortality rate, and neighborhood-level social disadvantage. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional time-trend study used data from US patients who developed kidney failure between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2020. Data were analyzed between January and July 2021. Exposures: COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of patients initiating treatment for incident kidney failure and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at treatment initiation. Results: The study population included 127â¯149 patients with incident kidney failure between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2020 (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [15.3] years; 53â¯021 [41.7%] female, 32â¯932 [25.9%] non-Hispanic Black, and 19â¯835 [15.6%] Hispanic/Latino patients). Compared with the pre-COVID-19 period, in the first 4 months of the pandemic (ie, March 1 through June 30, 2020), there were significant decreases in the proportion of patients with incident kidney failure receiving preemptive transplantation (1805 [2.1%] pre-COVID-19 vs 551 [1.4%] during COVID-19; P < .001) and initiating hemodialysis treatment with an arteriovenous fistula (2430 [15.8%] pre-COVID-19 vs 914 [13.4%] during COVID-19; P < .001). The mean (SD) eGFR at initiation declined from 9.6 (5.0) mL/min/1.73 m2 to 9.5 (4.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 during the pandemic (P < .001). In stratified analyses by race/ethnicity, these declines were exclusively observed among non-Hispanic Black patients (mean [SD] eGFR: 8.4 [4.6] mL/min/1.73 m2 pre-COVID-19 vs 8.1 [4.5] mL/min/1.73 m2 during COVID-19; P < .001). There were significant declines in eGFR at initiation for patients residing in counties in the highest quintile of COVID-19 mortality rates (9.5 [5.0] mL/min/1.73 m2 pre-COVID-19 vs 9.2 [5.0] mL/min/1.73 m2 during COVID-19; P < .001), but not for patients residing in other counties. The number of patients initiating treatment for incident kidney failure was approximately 30% lower than projected in April 2020. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US adults, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a substantially lower number of patients initiating treatment for incident kidney failure and treatment initiation at lower levels of kidney function during the first 4 months, particularly for Black patients and people living in counties with high COVID-19 mortality rates.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Etnicidade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Grupos Minoritários , Insuficiência Renal/terapia , Classe Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/mortalidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Distribuição de Poisson , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/tendências , Insuficiência Renal/economia , Insuficiência Renal/etnologia , Características de Residência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess outcomes of delivery hospitalizations, including acute kidney injury (AKI), obstetric and foetal events and resource utilization among pregnant women with kidney transplants compared with pregnant women with no known kidney disease and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages 3-5. METHOD: Hospitalizations for delivery in the US were identified using the enhanced delivery identification method in the National Inpatient Sample dataset from the years 2009 to 2014. Diagnoses of CKD Stages 3-5, kidney transplantation, along with obstetric events, delivery methods and foetal events were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Patients with no known kidney disease group were identified by excluding any diagnoses of CKD, end stage kidney disease, and kidney transplant. Multivariable logistic regression accounting for the survey weights and matched regression was conducted to investigate the risk of maternal and foetal complications in women with kidney transplants, compared with women with no kidney transplants and no known kidney disease, and to women with CKD Stages 3-5. RESULT: A total of 5, 408, 215 hospitalizations resulting in deliveries were identified from 2009 to 2014, including 405 women with CKD Stages 3-5, 295 women with functioning kidney transplants, and 5, 405, 499 women with no known kidney disease. Compared with pregnant women with no known kidney disease, pregnant kidney transplant recipients were at higher odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR = 3.11, 95% CI [2.26, 4.28]), preeclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome (OR = 3.42, 95% CI [2.54, 4.60]), preterm delivery (OR = 2.46, 95% CI [1.75, 3.45]), foetal growth restriction (OR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.01, 3.00]) and AKI (OR = 10.46, 95% CI [5.33, 20.56]). There were no significant differences in rates of gestational diabetes or caesarean section. Pregnant women with kidney transplants had 1.30-times longer lengths of stay and 1.28-times higher costs of hospitalization. However, pregnant women with CKD Stages 3-5 were at higher odds of AKI (OR = 5.29, 95% CI [2.41, 11.59]), preeclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome (OR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.07, 2.76]) and foetal deaths (OR = 3.20, 95% CI [1.06, 10.24]), and had 1.28-times longer hospital stays and 1.37-times higher costs of hospitalization compared with pregnant women with kidney transplant. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with kidney transplant were more likely to experience adverse events during delivery and had longer lengths of stay and higher total charges when compared with women with no known kidney disease. However, pregnant women with moderate to severe CKD were more likely to experience serious complications than kidney transplant recipients.
Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Recursos em Saúde , Hospitalização , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Parto Obstétrico/economia , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Preços Hospitalares , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Transplante de Rim/economia , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Gestantes , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/economia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Transplantados , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Transplante de Rim , Motivação , Doadores de Tecidos/psicologia , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Altruísmo , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/legislação & jurisprudência , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/economia , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines mandate organ donation to be financially neutral such that it neither rewards nor exploits donors. This systematic review was conducted to assess the magnitude and type of costs incurred by adult living kidney donors and to identify those at risk of financial hardship. METHODS: We searched English-language journal articles and working papers assessing direct and indirect costs incurred by donors on PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, the National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Research Papers in Economics, and EconLit in 2005 and thereafter. Estimates of total costs, types of costs, and characteristics of donors who incurred the financial burden were extracted. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified involving 6158 donors. Average donor-borne costs ranged from US$900 to US$19 900 (2019 values) over the period from predonation evaluation to the end of the first postoperative year. Less than half of donors sought financial assistance and 80% had financial loss. Out-of-pocket payments for travel and health services were the most reported items where lost income accounted for the largest proportion (23.2%-83.7%) of total costs. New indirect cost items were identified to be insurance difficulty, exercise impairment, and caregiver income loss. Donors from lower-income households and those who traveled long distances reported the greatest financial hardship. CONCLUSIONS: Most kidney donors are undercompensated. Our findings highlight gaps in donor compensation for predonation evaluation, long-distance donations, and lifetime insurance protection. Additional studies outside of North America are needed to gain a global prospective on how to provide for financial neutrality for kidney donors.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/economia , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/economia , Adulto , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Rim/cirurgia , Doadores Vivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The burden of chronic kidney disease in Africa is three to four times higher compared to high-income countries and the cost of treatment is beyond the reach of most affected persons. The best treatment for end stage renal disease is kidney transplantation which is not available in most African countries. As kidney transplantation surgery is emerging in Ghana, this study assessed factors which could influence the willingness of patients with chronic kidney disease to accept it as a mode of treatment. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was carried out among patients with chronic kidney disease in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. A consecutive sampling method was used to recruit consenting patients. A structured questionnaire and standardized research instruments were used to obtain information on demographic, socio-economic characteristics, knowledge about transplantation, perception of transplantation, religiosity and spirituality. Logistic regression model was used to assess the determinants of willingness to accept a kidney transplant. RESULTS: 342 CKD patients participated in the study of which 56.7% (n = 194) were male. The mean age of the participants was 50.24 ± 17.08 years. The proportion of participants who were willing to accept a kidney transplant was 67.3% (95%CI: 62.0-72.2%). The factors which influenced participants' willingness to accept this treatment included; willingness to attend a class on kidney transplantation (p < 0.016), willingness to donate a kidney if they had the chance (p < 0.005), perception that a living person could donate a kidney (p < 0.001) and perceived improvement in quality of life after transplantation (p < 0.005). The barriers for accepting kidney transplantation were anticipated complications of transplant surgery and financial constraints. CONCLUSION: More than two-thirds of CKD patients were willing to accept a kidney transplant and this is influenced by multiple factors. Government health agencies must consider full or partial coverage of kidney transplantation through the existing national health insurance scheme. Further, efficient educational programmes are required to improve both patients' and physicians' knowledge on the importance of kidney transplantation in the management of end stage renal disease in Ghana.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Gana , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Previous research shows that countries with opt-out consent systems for organ donation conduct significantly more deceased-donor organ transplantations than those with opt-in systems. This paper investigates whether the higher transplantation rates in opt-out systems translate into equally lower death rates among organ patients registered on a waiting list (i.e., organ-patient mortality rates). We show that the difference between consent systems regarding kidney- and liver-patient mortality rates is significantly smaller than the difference in deceased-donor transplantation rates. This is likely due to different incentives between the consent systems. We find empirical evidence that opt-out systems reduce incentives for living donations, which explains our findings for kidneys. The results imply that focusing on deceased-donor transplantation rates alone paints an incomplete picture of opt-out systems' benefits, and that there are important differences between organs in this respect.
Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Transplante de Rim/ética , Transplante de Fígado/ética , Modelos Estatísticos , Motivação/ética , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/ética , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Transplante de Fígado/economia , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Países Baixos , Análise de Sobrevida , Doadores de Tecidos/estatística & dados numéricos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/economia , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de Espera/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Living kidney donors incur donation-related expenses, but how these expenses impact postdonation mental health is unknown. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the association between mental health and donor-incurred expenses (both out-of-pocket costs and lost wages) was examined in 821 people who donated a kidney at one of the 12 transplant centers in Canada between 2009 and 2014. Mental health was measured by the RAND Short Form-36 Health Survey along with Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory. RESULTS: A total of 209 donors (25%) reported expenses of >5500 Canadian dollars. Compared with donors who incurred lower expenses, those who incurred higher expenses demonstrated significantly worse mental health-related quality of life 3 months after donation, with a trend towards worse anxiety and depression, after controlling for predonation mental health-related quality of life and other risk factors for psychological distress. Between-group differences for donors with lower and higher expenses on these measures were no longer significant 12 months after donation. CONCLUSIONS: Living kidney donor transplant programs should ensure that adequate psychosocial support is available to all donors who need it, based on known and unknown risk factors. Efforts to minimize donor-incurred expenses and to better support the mental well-being of donors need to continue. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of donor reimbursement programs, which mitigate donor expenses, on postdonation mental health.
Assuntos
Estresse Financeiro/psicologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Transplante de Rim/economia , Doadores Vivos/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Nefrectomia/economia , Salários e Benefícios , Adulto , Canadá , Feminino , Estresse Financeiro/economia , Estresse Financeiro/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nationwide studies on the effects of wealth inequality on kidney transplantation are rare, particularly in a country with an expanded National Health Insurance Service and in Asian countries. METHODS: In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, we reviewed the national claims database of Korea in which details of nationwide health insurance are provided. From 2007 to 2015, 9 annual cohorts of end-stage renal disease patients were included. The annual financial statuses were collected and stratified into 5 subgroups in each year: the aided group in which insurance fee was waived and the 4 other groups divided by quartiles of their medical insurance fee. Time trends of incidence proportion of kidney transplantation among end-stage renal disease patients in each year were initially assessed. The risk of graft failure, both including death-censored graft failure and death with a functioning graft, was analyzed as a prognostic outcome within the transplant recipients. RESULTS: Significant disparity in the accessibility of kidney transplantation was present, and it was further widening, particularly from 2009 in which the National Health Insurance Service started to cover desensitized kidney transplantation. Desensitized or preemptive transplantation was less common in the poorest group who were more frequently receiving transplantation after 5 years of dialysis in the latter years. The prognosis of kidney transplantation was significantly worse in the poorer people, and this disparity also worsened during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Prominent disparity regarding accessibility to and prognosis of kidney transplantation was observed in Korea according to wealth inequality, and this disparity was worsening.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Renda , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2006, Northwestern Medicine implemented a culturally targeted and linguistically congruent Hispanic Kidney Transplant Program (HKTP). The HKTP has been associated with a reduction in Hispanic/Latino disparities in live donor kidney transplantation. This article assessed the financial feasibility of implementing the HKTP intervention at 2 other transplant centers. METHODS: We examined the impact of the HKTP on staffing costs compared with the total transplant center costs using data from monthly time studies conducted among transplant staff involved in the HKTP. Time studies were conducted during the HKTP preimplementation (2016) and implementation (2017) phases. Labor costs were estimated using data from the time studies and mean salaries from the Department of Labor. We retrospectively examined kidney acquisition and transplant costs at both centers in 2016 and 2017 using data from the Medicare cost reports. RESULTS: During preimplementation, center A staff (n = 21) committed 764 hours ($44 607), and center B staff (n = 15) committed 800 hours ($45 193) to establish the HKTP. During implementation, center A staff (n = 19) committed 1125 hours ($55 594), and center B staff (n = 24) committed 1396 hours ($64 170), in delivering the HKTP. Overall, the total costs from the staffing time involved in the HKTP encompassed <1.0% per year (2016 and 2017) of each center's annual total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the financial feasibility of implementing the HKTP and present a potential business case for the HKTP's implementation at other transplant centers to reduce health disparities in live donor kidney transplantation.
Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino , Transplante de Rim/economia , Doadores Vivos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether history of kidney transplant is a risk factor for increased complications in patients who undergo abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. BACKGROUND: The incidence of renal failure and subsequent kidney transplant is steadily rising. Many risk factors leading to AAA overlap with those of renal disease. Due to these similarities, a rising incidence of kidney transplant patients undergoing AAA repair is expected. We surmised a notable difference in AAA surgical repair outcomes in renal transplant recipients compared to the general population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 59,836 adult patients with history of AAA repair and kidney transplant from 2008 to 2015. Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database developed for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. RESULTS: Significant differences in age, race, hospital characteristics, and complications were identified. The results suggest that patients with prior transplant generally have AAA repair at a significantly younger age (P < .001). A difference in race (P = .017), with 75% vs 87.4% non-Hispanic whites and 5% vs 1.5% Asian/Pacific Islander in the transplant and nontransplant groups, respectively, was shown. Procedures at transplant centers had significantly longer lengths of stay (P < .001) and higher total charges (P < .001). In addition, transplant recipients exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality index (P < .001) than the nontransplanted population. CONCLUSION: A history of kidney transplant significantly influences multiple aspects of care and complications regarding future AAA repair and is associated with increased in-hospital mortality index. Significant findings include increased total charges, longer lengths of stay, postoperative complications, and differences in age and race.