[The efficacy of magnetic transcranial stimulation in treating treatment-resistant or prolonged depression in a clinical sample].

INTRODUCTION: Depression is a common, serious and often chronic disorder and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. The annual prevalence of depression is 5-10%, twice as high among women as men and the lifetime prevalence is at least 20%. Up to a third of depressed individuals meet criteria for treatment-resistant depression, where two antidepressants have been tried for at least 6 weeks each at therapeutic doses. As of January 2022 transcranial magnetic stimulation for adults with treatment-resistant depression that has not responded to other forms of treatment has been available by a service that is part of Primary Health Care of the Capital Area in Iceland. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study where participants completed a course of magnetic transcranial treatment for depression in the years 2022 and 2023. Two validated self-rating measures were used to assess depression. Information on previous treatment approaches for depression was collected from electronic health records. RESULTS: 104 individuals completed the treatment in these first two years, 60,6% women. Most had unipolar depression (86,5%), but a small subgroup had bipolar depression (13,5%). The proportion of responders varied according to the measures used, 36,1% and 45,7%, respectively, and the same was true for remission where the proportions were 12,4% and 31,5%, respectively, higher for the longer inventory. The drop-out rate was only 12,5% and no serious adverse events were reported during the treatment. CONCLUSION: The results support that magnetic transcranial stimulation, as provided by this service is effective in treating treatment-resistant or longstanding depression in a real life clinical setting and the low drop-out rate supports that the treatment is generally very well tolerated.

Association between inflammatory joint disease and severe or treatment-resistant depression: population-based cohort and case-control studies in Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the association between depression and inflammatory joint disease (IJD; rheumatoid arthritis [RA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], ankylosing spondylitis/spondyloarthropathies [AS], and juvenile idiopathic arthritis [JIA]) is affected by the severity or treatment-resistance of depression. METHOD: Parallel cohort studies and case-control studies among 600,404 patients with a depressive episode identified in Swedish nationwide administrative registers. Prospective and retrospective risk for IJD in patients with depression was compared to matched population comparators, and the same associations were investigated in severe or treatment-resistant depression. Analyses were adjusted for comorbidities and sociodemographic covariates. RESULTS: Patients with depression had an increased risk for later IJD compared to population comparators (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for any IJD 1.34 [95% CI 1.30-1.39]; for RA 1.27 [1.15-1.41]; PsA 1.45 [1.29-1.63]; AS 1.32 [1.15-1.52]). In case-control studies, patients with depression more frequently had a history of IJD compared to population controls (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for any IJD 1.43 [1.37-1.50]; RA 1.39 [1.29-1.49]; PsA 1.59 [1.46-1.73]; AS 1.49 [1.36-1.64]; JIA 1.52 [1.35-1.71]). These associations were not significantly different for severe depression or TRD. CONCLUSION: IJD and depression are bidirectionally associated, but this association does not seem to be influenced by the severity or treatment resistance of depression.

National trends and correlates of treatment resistance in major depressive episode and associated suicidal ideation and behaviors among adults in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine recent 12-year trends in prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviors (SIBs) among US adults experiencing a past-year treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS: Using data from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health, we estimated the annual percentage of individuals aged ≥18 with TRD who reported past-year SIBs, and estimated linear trends adjusting for potentially confounding factors from 2009 to 2020. RESULTS: Of estimated 237.5 million US adults, 7.1 % met diagnostic criteria for a past-year major depressive episode (MDE) between 2009 and 2020. Of these, 9.7 % met criteria for TRD. The proportion reporting past-year suicidal ideation in TRD ranged from 39.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 32.1-47.3 %) in 2009-2010 to 43.4 % (95 % CI, 36.7-503 %) in 2019-2020, with an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 1.3 % (95 % CI, -0.7 % to 3.3 %). The prevalence of past-year suicide attempts in TRD was 7.3 % across the study period (AAPC, 0.1 %; 95 % CI, -4.3 % to 4.7 %). Past-year SIBs were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of meeting criteria for TRD among adults with MDE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.53; 95 % CI, 1.35-1.75 for suicidal ideation; AOR, 2.17; 95 % CI, 1.79-2.62 for suicide attempts). No significant differences were observed between 2019 and 2020, reflecting the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Among individuals with TRD, proportions of SIBs are high. These findings underscore an urgent need for suicide prevention efforts in this high-risk population, including preventive services across diverse settings and accessibility to evidence-based pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

Susceptibility to Treatment-Resistant Depression Within Families.

Importance: Antidepressant responses and the phenotype of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are believed to have a genetic basis. Genetic susceptibility between the TRD phenotype and other psychiatric disorders has also been established in previous genetic studies, but population-based cohort studies have not yet provided evidence to support these outcomes. Objective: To estimate the TRD susceptibility and the susceptibility between TRD and other psychiatric disorders within families in a nationwide insurance cohort with extremely high coverage and comprehensive health care data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study assessed data from the Taiwan national health insurance database across entire population (N = 26 554 001) between January 2003 and December 2017. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to April 2023. TRD was defined as having experienced at least 3 distinct antidepressant treatments in the current episode, each with adequate dose and duration, based on the prescribing records. Then, we identified the first-degree relatives of individuals with TRD (n = 34 467). A 1:4 comparison group (n = 137 868) of first-degree relatives of individuals without TRD was arranged for the comparison group, matched by birth year, sex, and kinship. Main Outcomes and Measures: Modified Poisson regression analyses were performed and adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% CIs were calculated for the risk of TRD, the risk of other major psychiatric disorders, and different causes of mortality. Results: This study included 172 335 participants (88 330 male and 84 005 female; mean [SD] age at beginning of follow-up, 22.9 [18.1] years). First-degree relatives of individuals with TRD had lower incomes, more physical comorbidities, higher suicide mortality, and increased risk of developing TRD (aRR, 9.16; 95% CI, 7.21-11.63) and higher risk of other psychiatric disorders than matched control individuals, including schizophrenia (aRR, 2.36; 95% CI, 2.10-2.65), bipolar disorder (aRR, 3.74; 95% CI, 3.39-4.13), major depressive disorder (aRR, 3.65; 95% CI, 3.44-3.87), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders (aRR, 2.38; 95% CI, 2.20-2.58), autism spectrum disorder (aRR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.86-2.74), anxiety disorder (aRR, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.59-2.84), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (aRR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.70-3.66). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses validated the robustness of the findings. Conclusions and Relevance: To our knowledge, this study is the largest and perhaps first nationwide cohort study to demonstrate TRD phenotype transmission across families and coaggregation with other major psychiatric disorders. Patients with a family history of TRD had an increased risk of suicide mortality and tendency toward antidepressant resistance; therefore, more intensive treatments for depressive symptoms might be considered earlier, rather than antidepressant monotherapy.

Exploring the incidence of inadequate response to antidepressants in the primary care of depression.

Data from the UK suggests 13-55 % of depression patients experience some level of treatment resistance. However, little is known about how physicians manage inadequate response to antidepressants in primary care. This study aimed to explore the incidence of inadequate response to antidepressants in UK primary care. One-hundred-eighty-four medication-free patients with low mood initiated antidepressant treatment and monitored severity of depression symptoms, using the QIDS-SR16, for 48 weeks. Medication changes, visits to healthcare providers, and health-related quality of life were also recorded. Patients were classified into one of four response types based on their QIDS scores at three study timepoints: persistent inadequate responders (<50 % reduction in baseline QIDS at all timepoints), successful responders (≥50 % reduction in baseline QIDS at all timepoints), slow responders (≥50 % reduction in QIDS at week 48, despite earlier inadequate responses), and relapse (initial ≥50 % reduction in baseline QIDS, but inadequate response by week 48). Forty-eight weeks after initiating treatment 47 % of patients continued to experience symptoms of depression (QIDS >5), and 20 % of patients had a persistent inadequate response. Regardless of treatment response, 96 % (n = 176) of patients did not visit their primary care physician over the 40-week follow-up period. These results suggest that despite receiving treatment, a considerable proportion of patients with low mood remain unwell and fail to recover. Monitoring depression symptoms remotely can enable physicians to identify inadequate responders, allowing patients to be reassessed or referred to secondary services, likely improving patients' quality of life and reducing the socioeconomic impacts of chronic mental illness.

The cost-of-illness and burden-of-disease of treatment-resistant depression in Austria.

BACKGROUND: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in major depressive disorder (MDD) is most commonly defined as the failure to respond to at least two antidepressant (AD) treatments of adequate duration and adherence. While the health care utilization (RU) and costs of patients with MDD are well documented, little is known about patients with TRD. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the direct medical RU of complex therapy pathways and to analyze the total cost-of-illness and the burden-of-disease in Austria. METHODS: In order to quantify the cost-of-illness and burden-of-disease of TRD, the analysis was designed with two steps. First, RU data were collected through an extensive survey of Austrian experts and a systematic literature review. Second, direct, indirect, and intangible costs were calculated using the micro-costing method. The results are presented per patient and based on a patient flow for the entire cohort of TRD patients. RESULTS: In Austria, the derived prevalence of TRD is 43,732 patients or 583 per 100,000 population. For 2021, the annual direct costs of TRD were estimated at 345.0 million €. At 684.7 million €, the estimated indirect costs were higher than the direct costs, representing 66.5% of the total cost-of-illness. The average annual cost per TRD patient is 23,547 €, of which direct costs are 7,890 €. Adding the years lived with a disability to the years lost due to premature death attributed to TRD resulted in a total of 29,884 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for the Austrian society. CONCLUSION: Although TRD accounts for only 0.7% (range: 0.6%-1%) of the total health care budget, it represents a significant burden-of-disease. In addition, TRD is associated with a high level of lost productivity in the Austrian economy. These findings support efforts to prioritize TRD as a focus area to achieve health-related goals.

Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study.

Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, has recently emerged as a therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), showing both rapid antidepressant action and good efficacy and high safety. It is also indicated for the acute short-term treatment of psychiatric emergency due to major depressive disorder (MDD) and for depressive symptoms in adults with MDD with acute suicidal thoughts/behavior. We here provide preliminary insights on esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) effectiveness and safety among patients with a substance use disorder (SUD) within the sample of patients with TRD collected for the observational, retrospective, multicentre REAL-ESK study. Twenty-six subjects were retrospectively selected according to the presence of a SUD in comorbidity. Subjects enrolled completed the three different follow-up phases (T0/baseline, T1/after one month, and T2/after three months) and there were no dropouts. A decrease in Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) scores was recorded, thus highlighting the antidepressant efficacy of ESK-NS (MADRS decreased from T0 to T1, t = 6.533, df=23, p<0.001, and from T1 to T2, t = 2.029, df=20, p = 0.056). Considering tolerability and safety issues, one or more side effects were reported by 19/26 subjects (73%) after treatment administration. All reported side effects were time-dependent and did not cause significant sequelae; among them, dissociative symptoms (38%) and sedation (26%) were the most frequently reported. Finally, no cases of abuse or misuse of ESK-NS were reported. Despite study limitations related to the inherent nature of the study, a limited number of patients, and a short follow-up period, ESK-NS showed to be effective and safe in patients diagnosed with TRD comorbid with a SUD.

Real world effectiveness of repeated ketamine infusions for treatment-resistant depression with comorbid borderline personality disorder.

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has high rates of comorbidity with mood disorders, including treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Comorbidity of BPD with depression is associated with poorer response to antidepressants. Intravenous ketamine is a novel treatment for TRD that has not been specifically evaluated in patients with comorbid BPD. In this retrospective analysis of data collected from participants who received care at the Canadian Rapid Treatment Centre of Excellence (CRTCE; Braxia Health; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04209296), we evaluated the effectiveness of intravenous ketamine in a TRD population with comorbid BPD (N=100; n=50 BPD-positive compared with n=50 BPD-negative). Participants were administered four doses of intravenous ketamine (0.5-0.75mg/kg over 40 minutes) over two weeks. The primary outcome measures were changes in depressive symptom severity (as measured by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16-item (QIDS-SR16)) and borderline symptom severity (as measured by Borderline Symptom List 23-item (BSL-23)). Both BPD-positive and BPD-negative groups improved significantly on the QIDS-SR16, QIDS-SR16 suicide ideation item, anxiety, and functionality scales with large effect sizes. There was no significant difference between groups. The BPD-positive group exhibited significant reduction of 0.64 on BSL-23 scores and a significant reduction of 5.95 on QIDS-SR16 scores. Patients with TRD and comorbid BPD receiving ketamine exhibited a significant reduction in symptoms of depression, borderline personality, suicidality, and anxiety.

Comorbidity and healthcare utilization in patients with treatment resistant depression: A large-scale retrospective cohort analysis using electronic health records.

BACKGROUND: Medical comorbidity and healthcare utilization in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD) is usually reported in convenience samples, making estimates unreliable. There is only limited large-scale clinical research on comorbidities and healthcare utilization in TRD patients. METHODS: Electronic Health Record data from over 3.3 million patients from the INSIGHT Clinical Research Network in New York City was used to define TRD as initiation of a third antidepressant regimen in a 12-month period among patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). Age and sex matched TRD and non-TRD MDD patients were compared for anxiety disorder, 27 comorbid medical conditions, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Out of 30,218 individuals diagnosed with MDD, 15.2 % of patients met the criteria for TRD (n = 4605). Compared to MDD patients without TRD, the TRD patients had higher rates of anxiety disorder and physical comorbidities. They also had higher odds of ischemic heart disease (OR = 1.38), stroke/transient ischemic attack (OR = 1.57), chronic kidney diseases (OR = 1.53), arthritis (OR = 1.52), hip/pelvic fractures (OR = 2.14), and cancers (OR = 1.41). As compared to non-TRD MDD, TRD patients had higher rates of emergency room visits, and inpatient stays. In relation to patients without MDD, both TRD and non-TRD MDD patients had significantly higher levels of anxiety disorder and physical comorbidities. LIMITATIONS: The INSIGHT-CRN data lack information on depression severity and medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: TRD patients compared to non-TRD MDD patients have a substantially higher prevalence of various psychiatric and medical comorbidities and higher health care utilization. These findings highlight the challenges of developing interventions and care coordination strategies to meet the complex clinical needs of TRD patients.

Association of Treatment-Resistant Depression With Patient Outcomes and Health Care Resource Utilization in a Population-Wide Study.

Importance: The totality of the societal and individual impact of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is unknown, as is the potential to prognosticate TRD. The generalizability of many observational studies on TRD is limited. Objective: To estimate the burden of TRD in a large population-wide cohort in an area with universal health care by including data from both health care types (psychiatric and nonpsychiatric) and, further, to develop a prognostic model for clinical use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study, a population-based observational study, assessed data from the Stockholm MDD Cohort for episodes of major depressive disorder (MDD) between 2010 and 2017 that fulfilled predefined criteria for TRD (≥3 consecutive antidepressant treatments). Data analysis was performed from August 2020 to May 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were psychiatric and nonpsychiatric comorbid conditions, antidepressant treatments, health care resource utilization, lost workdays, all-cause mortality, and intentional self-harm and, in the prognostic model, TRD. Results: A total of 158 169 unipolar MDD episodes (in 145 577 patients) were identified between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017 (64.7% women; median [IQR] age, 42 years [30-56]). Of these, 12 793 episodes (11%) fulfilled criteria for TRD. The median (IQR) time from the start of MDD episode to TRD was 552 days (294-932). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor was the most common class of antidepressant treatment in all treatment steps, and 5907 patients (46.2%) received psychotherapy at some point before initiation of the third pharmacological antidepressant treatment. Compared with matched non-TRD episodes, TRD episodes had more inpatient bed-days (mean, 3.9 days; 95% CI, 3.6-4.1, vs 1.3 days; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4) and more lost workdays (mean, 132.3 days; 95% CI, 129.5-135.1, vs 58.7 days; 95% CI, 56.8-60.6) 12 months after the index date. Anxiety, stress, sleep disorder, and substance use disorder were all more common comorbid conditions in TRD episodes. Intentional self-harm was more than 4 times more common in TRD episodes. The all-cause mortality rate for patients with MDD with TRD episodes was 10.7/1000 person-years at risk, compared with 8.7/1000 person-years at risk for patients with MDD without TRD episodes (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41). Median time from start of the first antidepressant treatment to start of the second, and from start of the second antidepressant treatment to start of the third, was 165 and 197 days, respectively. The severity of MDD, defined using the self-rating Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) at time of MDD diagnosis, was found to be the most important prognostic factor for TRD (C index = 0.69). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, TRD was a common variant of MDD when including patients from both health care types, which is associated with a high disease burden for both patients and society. The median time between initiation of new antidepressant treatments was longer than recommended in current treatment guidelines, suggesting room for more structured and timely depression care.

Treatment patterns and healthcare utilization of patients with treatment-resistant depression estimated using health insurance database: A population-based study from Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Determining the proportion of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) among patients with unipolar depression receiving adequate pharmacological treatment (pharmaceutically treated depression [PTD]) is clinically important and may affect health care utilization. In Taiwan, these issues can be assessed by analyzing population-based data. METHODS: The present study included data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2010 to 2017. Among patients with depression, PTD was defined by the receipt of at least one adequate antidepressant treatment, and TRD was defined as receiving a third adequate antidepressant treatment after failure to respond to two prior treatments. Time of progression from PTD to TRD was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier function. A propensity-matched case-comparison cohort approach was used to compare resource utilization between patients with non-TRD PTD and TRD. RESULTS: TRD was defined in 11.2 % of patients with unipolar depression and 37.1 % of PTD patients. The time of progression from PTD to TRD was approximately 1 year. Most TRD patients were women, middle-aged, and treated in general practice clinics. Antidepressant monotherapy, followed by antidepressant with augmentation, was the most common treatment strategy applied to TRD patients. Medical utilization was significantly higher in patients with TRD than those with non-TRD PTD across most aspects. LIMITATIONS: TRD was defined based on pharmacological treatment patterns, as the reasons for changes in antidepressant regimens were not available. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients with PTD developed TRD, often soon after receiving adequate pharmacological treatment. Patients with TRD used more medical resources than patients with non-TRD PTD.

Courses of treatment and risk factors for treatment-resistant depression in Finnish primary and special healthcare: A nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate incidence, risk factors and courses of treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in primary and special healthcare. METHODS: All patients identified from nationwide registers, aged 16-65 years, diagnosed with depression in Finland during 2004-2016 were included. New antidepressant users were identified with six-month washout period and followed-up for two years to observe for presence of TRD, which was defined as initiation of a third trial after having failed two pharmacological treatment trials with adequate duration. RESULTS: During follow-up, 177,144 persons had their first registered antidepressant treated depression (mean age: 39.5, 62.5% women). Of them, 10.9% (N = 19,322) met TRD criteria. Among the TRD patients, most common first and second antidepressants trials were: SSRIs (44.6%), mirtazapine (19.0%) and SNRIs (16.5%). As the third treatment line, antidepressant monotherapy (44.2% of TRD patients) was most common, followed by a combination of ≥2 antidepressants (32.1%), antipsychotic or mood stabilizer augmentation and an antidepressant (15.8%), both combination of antidepressants and an augmentation with a mood stabilizer or antipsychotic (4.9%), antipsychotic or mood stabilizer monotherapy (2.7%) and ECT (0.3%). Of TRD patients, 16.5% (N = 3188) progressed to the fifth treatment line, in which the most common treatments were antidepressant monotherapy (33.4%), antidepressant combinations (27.5%) and augmentation (24.2%). Factors associated with higher risk of TRD included male gender, younger age, higher initial disease severity and hospitalization at initial onset of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant monotherapies were still the most common fifth line of depression treatment. Severe depression, hospitalization due to depression, young age and male gender may predispose to TRD.

One-year incidence rate of Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) and treatment characteristics in China.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the characteristics of Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) in China. In previous studies various identification approaches have led to a wide range of results, and it is unclear how Chinese patients compare to those in other studies. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records (EHR) from two major psychiatric hospitals in China. Adult major depressive disorder (MDD) patients who initiated pharmaceutical treatment during 2010-2018 were enrolled and follow-up was 1 year. TRD was primarily identified by consensus definition of two failures of adequate (≥4 weeks) regimens. Alternative regimens of 2-weeks and 6-weeks duration, and a data-driven definition were also applied. RESULTS: In the two hospitals, 12,257 (mean age: 40.8y, 63.6% female) and 8314 (mean age: 42.4y, 68.4% female) eligible patients were included. The 1-year incidence rate of TRD was estimated to be 5.2%-7.7% using the primary definition. TRD patients had mean treatment duration of 302.5 days and 285.7 days; had 3.6 and 3.7 treatment steps on average; 94.0% and 72.6% were prescribed polypharmacy regimens, which were all marginally greater than that of non-TRD patients. Alternative definitions resulted in a wide range of incidence estimates (0.5%-20.0%). LIMITATIONS: Medications were assumed to be consumed as prescribed and lack of rating scales from EHRs may limit our TRD identification. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRD among Chinese MDD patients was comparable to other countries under similar settings and more complex treatment characteristics were observed among TRD patients. Alternative TRD definitions revealed the need for better treatment management in practices.

A piece of the puzzle: Does bipolarity partly explain the high prevalence of treatment resistance in depression?

In this cross-sectional study we examined whether the prevalence of treatment resistant depression (TRD) can be partly attributed to level of bipolarity. We included data of 201 patients with either episodic depression or TRD, who received treatment for their depression at either an outpatient or 2nd opinion/daytime setting, within a specialised mental healthcare department in the Netherlands. Whether level of TRD, assessed by the 'Dutch Measure for quantification of Treatment Resistance in Depression', can be partly explained by level of bipolarity, assessed by 'the Bipolarity Index', was examined using linear regression. We found no direct association between level of TRD and level of bipolarity, nor did comorbid anxiety disorders obscure an existing association. In this study we found no evidence for overlooked bipolarity contributing to the high prevalence of TRD. If replicated, we could state that additional screening on bipolarity with an instrument such as the 'Bipolarity Index' in the specialised mental health care is unnecessary.

Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Depression Among Intracerebral Hemorrhage Survivors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an acute manifestation of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), usually cerebral amyloid angiopathy or hypertensive arteriopathy. CSVD-related imaging findings are associated with increased depression incidence in the general population. Neuroimaging may, therefore, provide insight on depression risk among ICH survivors. We sought to determine whether CSVD CT and magnetic resonance imaging markers are associated with depression risk (before and after ICH), depression remission, and effectiveness of antidepressant treatment. METHODS: We analyzed data from the single-center longitudinal ICH study conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital. Participants underwent CT and magnetic resonance imaging imaging and were followed longitudinally. We extracted information for neuroimaging markers of CSVD subtype and severity. Outcomes of interest included pre-ICH depression, new-onset depression after ICH, resolution of depressive symptoms, and response to antidepressant treatment. RESULTS: We followed 612 ICH survivors for a median of 47.2 months. Multiple CSVD-related markers were associated with depression risk. Survivors of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related lobar ICH were more likely to be diagnosed with depression before ICH (odds ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.14-2.48]) and after ICH (sub-hazard ratio, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.12-2.07]), less likely to achieve remission of depressive symptoms (sub-hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.51-0.94]), and to benefit from antidepressant therapy (P=0.041). Cerebral amyloid angiopathy disease burden on magnetic resonance imaging was associated with depression incidence and treatment resistance (interaction P=0.037), whereas hypertensive arteriopathy disease burden was only associated with depression incidence after ICH. CONCLUSIONS: CSVD severity is associated with depression diagnosis, both before and after ICH. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related ICH survivors are more likely to experience depression (both before and after ICH) than patients diagnosed with hypertensive arteriopathy-related ICH, and more likely to report persistent depressive symptoms and display resistance to antidepressant treatment.

Epidemiology of Treatment-Resistant Depression in the United States.

Background: The prevalence of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) among patients with pharmaceutically treated depression (PTD) varies greatly in publications. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of TRD using 2 large claims databases in the US.Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the Humana and Optum databases. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who had at least 1 diagnosis of major depressive disorder (ICD-10-CM codes: F32.xx, F33.xx) and 1 antidepressant prescription filled in 2018 were identified as having PTD. Among patients with PTD, TRD was defined as experiencing failure of treatment with at least 2 antidepressants with ≥ 4 weeks of adequate treatment. We estimated the age- and gender-standardized prevalence of TRD and then used logistic regression to investigate if TRD risk varies by age, sex, race, and geographic region. Finally, we described the timeline of TRD development in incident PTD patients.Results: We identified 296,055 and 277,941 patients with PTD in the Humana and Optum databases, among whom 17,640 (6.0%) and 16,131 (5.8%) had TRD. After age and sex standardization, TRD prevalence among PTD patients was 6.8% in Humana vs 5.8% in Optum. Females, middle-aged adults, and White patients had higher risk of TRD. The median time from index antidepressant use to TRD was about 6 months in incident PTD patients.Conclusions: The prevalence of TRD among patients with PTD was similar in the 2 databases. TRD prevalence varies by sex, race, and age, with a higher prevalence in females, White patients, and those in the age group of 45-64 years. However, the absolute differences were small.

Remission and Treatment Augmentation of Depression in the United States.

Objective: To determine the proportion of adults treated for depression in the US who achieve remission and, among those not achieving remission, the proportion receiving augmentation treatment.Methods: Using data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for years 2013-2014, 2015-2016, and 2017-2018, we identified 869 adults who reported using antidepressant medications for depression for at least 3 months. This sample was partitioned into remitted (score < 5) and non-remitted (score ≥ 5) respondents based on 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score-a questionnaire based on the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Among the non-remitted group, the proportion receiving antidepressant augmentation with another antidepressant medication of a different class or other medications was also assessed.Results: An estimated 43.5% of adults receiving antidepressant medications for depression were in remission when assessed. Among those not in remission, 28.1% were using augmentation treatment, which in most cases was another antidepressant medication from a different class. As compared to depressed adults without any mental health contact in the past year, those with such contact had significantly higher odds of using augmentation treatment (adjusted odds ratio = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.56-4.76; P = .001).Conclusions: The low percentage of US adults treated with antidepressants for depression that achieves remission represents a missed clinical and public health opportunity to optimize depression treatment. Closer monitoring of symptoms through measurement-based care and setting symptom remission as a goal can help improve outcomes for adults with depression.

Economic impact of treatment-resistant depression: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the incidence of Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) in Spain and to estimate its economic burden, using real world data. METHODS: A retrospective, observational-study was carried out using data from the BIG-PAC database®. Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of major depressive-disorder (MDD) who initiated a new antidepressant treatment in 2015-2017 were included. The patients were classified as TRD and non-TRD. Patients were classified as TRD if they had, during the first year of antidepressant treatment: a) failure with ≥2 antidepressants including the prescription of ≥3 antidepressants (N06A) or ≥2 antidepressant and ≥1 antipsychotic (N05A; including lithium) b) antidepressants administered for ≥ 4 weeks each, and c) the time between the end of one treatment and the initiation of the next was ≤ 90 days. Inherent limitations of data collection from databases should also be considered in this analysis (e.g., lack of information about adherence to treatment). Follow-up period: 18 months. The incidence rate was calculated as the number of TRD patients per 1,000 persons-year divided by the population attended. OUTCOMES: direct healthcare and indirect costs. Two sensitivity analyses were performed varying the index date and the period used to define TRD patients (6 vs.12 months). RESULTS: 21,630 patients with MDD aged ≥ 18 years (mean age: 53.2 years; female: 67.2%) were analyzed, of whom 3,559 met TRD criteria, yielding a 3-year cumulative incidence of 16.5% (95%CI: 16%-17%) among MDD patients. The annual population incidence rate of TRD in 2015-2017, was 0.59, 1.02 and 1.18/1,000 person-years, respectively (mean: 0.93/1,000 person-year). Overall, mean total costs per MDD patient were €4,147.9, being higher for TRD than for non-TRD patients (€6,096 vs. €3,846; p<0.001): a) direct costs (€1,341 vs. €624; p<0.001), b) lost productivity (€1,274 vs. €821; p<0.001) and c) permanent disability (€3,481 vs. €2,401; p<0.001, adjusted). Sensitivity analyses showed no differences with the reported results. CONCLUSIONS: The population based TRD incidence in Spain was similar to recent data from other European countries. TRD is associated with greater resource use and higher costs compared with non-TRD patients.

The effect of esketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression with and without comorbid anxiety symptoms or disorder.

BACKGROUND: Comorbid anxiety is generally associated with poorer response to antidepressant treatment. This post hoc analysis explored the efficacy of esketamine plus an antidepressant in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) with or without comorbid anxiety. METHODS: TRANSFORM-2, a double-blind, flexible-dose, 4-week study (NCT02418585), randomized adults with TRD to placebo or esketamine nasal spray, each with a newly-initiated oral antidepressant. Comorbid anxiety was defined as clinically noteworthy anxiety symptoms (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale [GAD-7] score ≥10) at screening and baseline or comorbid anxiety disorder diagnosis at screening. Treatment effect based on change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score, and response and remission were examined by presence/absence of comorbid anxiety using analysis of covariance and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Approximately 72% (162/223) of patients had baseline comorbid anxiety. Esketamine-treated patients with and without anxiety demonstrated significant reductions in MADRS (mean [SD] change from baseline at day 28: -21.0 [12.51] and -22.7 [11.98], respectively). Higher rates of response and remission, and a significantly greater decrease in MADRS score at day 28 were observed compared to antidepressant/placebo, regardless of comorbid anxiety (with anxiety: difference in LS means [95% CI] -4.2 [-8.1, -0.3]; without anxiety: -7.5 [-13.7, -1.3]). There was no significant interaction of treatment and comorbid anxiety (p = .371). Notably, in the antidepressant/placebo group improvement was similar in those with and without comorbid anxiety. CONCLUSION: Post hoc data support efficacy of esketamine plus an oral antidepressant in patients with TRD, regardless of comorbid anxiety.

Sex-related effects in major depressive disorder: Results of the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression.

BACKGROUND: Sex-related effects on the evolution and phenotype of major depressive disorder (MDD) were reported previously. METHODS: This European multicenter cross-sectional study compared sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment patterns between males and females in a real-world sample of 1410 in- and outpatients with current MDD. RESULTS: Male MDD patients (33.1%) were rather inpatients, suffered from moderate to high suicidality levels, received noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (ADs) as first-line AD treatment, generally higher mean AD daily doses, and showed a trend towards a more frequent administration of add-on treatments. Female MDD patients (66.9%) were rather outpatients, experienced lower suicidality levels, comorbid thyroid dysfunction, migraine, asthma, and a trend towards earlier disease onset. CONCLUSIONS: The identified divergencies may contribute to the concept of male and female depressive syndromes and serve as predictors of disease severity and course, as they reflect phenomena that were repeatedly related to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Especially the greater necessity of inpatient treatment and more complex psychopharmacotherapy in men may reflect increased therapeutic efforts undertaken to treat suicidality and to avoid TRD. Hence, considering sex may guide the diagnostic and treatment processes towards targeting challenging clinical manifestations including comorbidities and suicidality, and prevention of TRD and chronicity.