Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
1.
J Headache Pain ; 18(1): 58, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28547735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Headache disorders are the third-highest cause of disability worldwide, with migraine and medication-overuse headache (MOH) the major contributors. In Ethiopia we have shown these disorders to be highly prevalent: migraine 17.7%, TTH 20.6%, probable MOH (pMOH) 0.7%, any headache yesterday (HY) 6.4%. To inform local health policy, we now estimate disability and other burdens attributable to headache in this country. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey using cluster-randomized sampling, we visited households unannounced in four diverse regions (urban and rural) of Ethiopia. We interviewed one member (18-65 years old) of each household using the HARDSHIP structured questionnaire. Screening and diagnostic questions based on ICHD-II were followed by burden enquiry in multiple domains. We estimated disability using disability weights (DWs) from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. RESULTS: We interviewed 2385 participants (1064 [44.7%] male, 596 [25.0%] urban; participating proportion 99.8%). Reported mean intensity of migraine was 2.6 (scale 1-3). People with migraine spent 11.7% of their time in the ictal state (DW: 0.441); they were therefore 5.2% disabled overall. Pain and disability from TTH were much lower. Mean intensity of pMOH was 2.95. People with pMOH spent 60.2% of time with headache (DW: 0.223), and were 13.4% disabled. Average proportions of per-person lost productive time were, for migraine, 4.5% from paid work, 5.3% from household work; for pMOH they were 29.2% and 16.0%. There were highly-disabled minorities, and large gender differences, males losing more paid workdays, females more household workdays. All headache types were associated with impairments in quality of life. Across the population aged 18-65 years (effectively the working population), disability from headache was 1.4%, with 1.6% of workdays lost (half from migraine). Estimates from HY, eliminating recall error, were highly compatible. CONCLUSIONS: Ethiopia is a low-income country, and cannot afford these losses - including, perhaps, 1.6% of GDP. Political action is necessary, aimed at mitigating both the economic burden and the associated ill health. WHO has recommended structured headache services with their basis in primary care as the most efficient, effective, affordable and equitable solution, potentially cost-saving. We believe they can be implemented within Ethiopia's existing health-care infrastructure.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Vigilância da População , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/terapia , Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/tendências , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/economia , Dor/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Distribuição Aleatória , Fatores de Risco , População Rural/tendências , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Headache Pain ; 18(1): 53, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28474253

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Eurolight project assessed the impact of headache disorders in ten EU countries, using the same structured questionnaire but varying sampling methods. In Lithuania, sample selection employed methods in line with consensus recommendations for population-based burden-of-headache studies. METHODS: The survey was cross-sectional. We identified, from the Residents' Register Service, a sample of inhabitants of Kaunas city and surrounding Kaunas region reflecting age (in the range 18-65 years), gender and rural/urban distributions of Lithuania. Medical students called unannounced at their homes and conducted face-to-face interviews employing a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 1137 people in the pre-identified sample, 573 (male 237 [41.4%], female 336 [58.6%]; mean age 40.9 ± 13.8 years) completed interviews (participation proportion: 50.4%). Gender-adjusted 1-year prevalences were: any headache 74.7%; migraine 18.8%; tension-type headache (TTH) 42.2%; all headache on ≥15 days/month 8.6%; probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) 3.2%. Migraine (OR: 3.6) and pMOH (OR: 2.9) were associated with female gender. All headache types except TTH were associated with significantly diminished quality of life. Migraine caused a mean 4.5% loss in paid worktime per affected male and 3.5% per affected female. Lost per-person times due to TTH were much less, but to pMOH and other headache on ≥15 days/month much higher. Among the entire workforce, lost productivity to migraine was estimated at 0.7%, to TTH 0.3% and to pMOH or other headache on ≥15 days/month 0.5%. The total of 1.5% may translate directly into lost GDP. Alternative calculations based on headache yesterday (with little recall error) produced, for all headache, a corroborating 1.7%. Similar losses from household work would also drain the nation's economy. Our findings were comparable to those from earlier studies using similar methods in Russia and Georgia. CONCLUSIONS: The multiple burdens from headache in Lithuania indicate substantial ill-health and unmet need for health care. The heavy burdens on individuals are matched by heavy economic burden. Of particular concern is the high prevalence of headache on ≥15 days/month, seen also in Russia and Georgia. Health policy in Lithuania must heed WHO's advice that effective treatment of headache, clearly desirable for its health benefits, is also expected to be cost-saving.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Política de Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Vigilância da População , Saúde Pública/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/psicologia , Política de Saúde/economia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Lituânia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Prevalência , Saúde Pública/economia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Distribuição Aleatória , Adulto Jovem
3.
Pediatr Neurol ; 66: 76-81, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27847180

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine the cost and efficacy of admitting patients for intravenous dihydroergotamine treatment and to identify factors associated with a higher likelihood of response to treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all pediatric hospitalizations from 2001 to 2010 for intravenous dihydroergotamine therapy for headache. Data were collected using the REDcap database and consisted of multiple variables, including preadmission demographics, headache duration, use of prophylactic medications, inpatient therapies including dihydroergotamine dosing, procedures, consultations, total hospital cost, and headache severity at discharge and at follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of the 145 individuals who were hospitalized were female. Mean age was 14.9 years. Headache was described as chronic or daily in almost all patients and 28 (19%) had status migrainosus. Sixty-six percent had a first-degree relative with migraine. The average length of stay was 3.7 days, and the average cost was $7569 per hospitalization. Patients received an average of eight doses of dihydroergotamine. At the time of discharge, 63% of patients reported improvement. Follow-up information was available for 68% of the cohort at a median of 42 days after discharge, and 21 of 99 patients (21%) experienced sustained relief of headache. Response to dihydroergotamine was correlated with a lower rate of comorbid diagnoses, lumbar puncture, and outpatient neuroimaging. Response also correlated to less expensive hospitalizations with an average cost of $5379 per hospitalization versus $7105 per hospitalization without positive response. Response was also correlated with a patient receiving more doses of intravenous dihydroergotamine. CONCLUSIONS: Although intravenous dihydroergotamine is an effective abortive medication for intractable migraine, it may provide only short-term headache relief in many pediatric patients. Hospitalization is relatively costly with only modest long-term benefit, especially in patients with chronic migraine or chronic daily headache.


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Di-Hidroergotamina/administração & dosagem , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Administração Intravenosa/economia , Adolescente , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/economia , Criança , Di-Hidroergotamina/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/educação , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Headache Pain ; 15: 7, 2015 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25605131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the prevalence and impact of headache on the preceding day ("headache yesterday"; HY) is a new approach, allowing more precise estimation of headache-attributed burden without recall error. The aim of the study was to estimate the national burden attributable to headache disorders in Russia by applying measures of prevalence of HY and its impact on productivity and daily activities in the general population. METHODS: We interviewed a representative population-based sample face-to-face by visiting randomly selected households throughout Russia. We randomly selected one adult aged 18-65 years from each. We followed a structured questionnaire including diagnostic questions, enquiry into occurrence of HY and various aspects of attributed burden. RESULTS: Participation rate was 74.3%. One in seven participants (14.5%; men 9.1%: women 19.3%) reported HY. Approximately half of these had one of the subtypes of headache occurring on ≥15 days/month; the remainder had episodic migraine or tension-type headache almost equally. Mean duration of headache was 6.0 ± 4.4 hours. In 88.3% headache intensity was moderate or severe (mean 2.1 on a scale 1-3) and in 73.9% HY impaired daily activity. Loss of productivity at work due to headache totalled 2.6 million person-years/year, or 4.0% of workforce capacity. This estimate exceeded by 70% a previous estimate from the same survey based on recall over the preceding 3 months. There was greater impact on other daily activities. CONCLUSION: Recall-error-free estimation shows lost productivity every day due to headache in the Russian population is enormously high. Measures to redress these losses - effective structured health-care services supported by educational programmes - should be seen as a public-health priority while almost certainly being cost-saving.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Federação Russa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Affect Disord ; 170: 255-65, 2015 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25261631

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depression and headache are highly prevalent in clinical settings. The co-occurrence of headache may impact choice of antidepressants, healthcare utilisation, and outcomes in patients with depression. The current study aims to examine the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of different antidepressants for treating patients with depression and comorbid headache disorders. METHODS: Adult patients prescribed with antidepressants for depression (n=96,501) were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis was conducted comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and by the presence of comorbid headache disorders and other pain conditions. RESULTS: In this study, SSRIs dominated SNRIs in both cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. As revealed in the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, TCAs were likely to have a cost-utility advantage compared to SSRIs and SNRIs in improving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for patients with comorbid headache; SSRIs remained as the most cost-effective option for patients with other pain conditions. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the use of proxy definition of remission as effectiveness measure and the adoption of utility values from previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Given a pre-determined willingness-to-pay level, TCAs can be considered as a cost-effective option to improve QALYs for depressed patients with headache disorders. Future research is needed to further clarify factors influencing the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of pharmacological treatments in depressed patients with specific pain conditions.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/economia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/complicações , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/economia , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/economia , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Transtorno Depressivo/economia , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/economia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Versicherungsmedizin ; 66(2): 72-8, 2014 Jun 01.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25000627

RESUMO

Chronic pain has both high prevalence and a significant economic impact in Germany. The most common chronic pain types are low back pain and headache. On the one hand, the management of chronic pain patients is incomplete, yet it is often overtreated in orthopaedic surgical settings with interventional procedures. The reason for this is the structure of outpatient management and the way it is paid for in Germany. Pain management of patients with private insurance cover is no better because of "doctor shopping". Medical guidelines could be of some help in improving the situation, but they are widely unknown, and have still to demonstrate whether they have any impact on GP treatment pathways. The "gold standard" multimodal pain therapy shows significant improvement in many studies compared to monomodal therapy regimes and interventional regimes, but is too rarely recommended by the patients' physicians, whether GPs or specialists. Because of the huge number of institutions nowadays that, for the sake of form, offer such multimodal therapies, these need to be differentiated in terms of their structural and process quality. A first step is the "k edoq" project. It is essential to improve knowledge of the principles of modern pain management. This includes better networking and communication between doctors, physiotherapists and psychologists, and at the grassroots level, providing the public with more detailed and better information.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/reabilitação , Terapia Combinada , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Dor nas Costas/economia , Dor nas Costas/reabilitação , Dor Crônica/economia , Comportamento Cooperativo , Redução de Custos , Avaliação da Deficiência , Definição da Elegibilidade , Feminino , Alemanha , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/reabilitação , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Fatores de Risco
7.
J Clin Neurosci ; 21(10): 1750-4, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24878330

RESUMO

To our knowledge, studies concerning the prevalence and burden of primary headache in China are limited to specific regions without comparison of different districts. A survey in a different area with similar climate and culture may enhance our knowledge of the factors causing primary headache and the burden of headache. We conducted a 1 year survey on the prevalence and burden of primary headache in the Chinese provinces of Guangdong and Guangxi. Our study also evaluated the factors behind similarities and differences affecting prevalence in the two regions of study. The survey methodology, which was used in an Expanded Program on Immunization by the World Health Organization, was adopted to investigate the prevalence and burden of headache patients. Random samples of 372 local residents in Guangdong and 182 local residents in Guangxi aged 18-65 years were invited to a face-to-face interview. The education level and mean household income were higher in Guangdong (p<0.05). The 1 year prevalence of primary headache was 22.6% (84/372) in Guangdong and 41.2% (75/182) in Guangxi (p<0.001). The average financial burden of primary headache is 2.1% and 3.7% of the mean household income in Guangdong and Guangxi, respectively (p=0.001). The district with lower economic status had a higher prevalence of primary headache, and inevitably bears a heavier burden even with the same disease cost.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
9.
Ind Health ; 51(5): 482-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23892900

RESUMO

We aimed to determine the economic impact of absenteeism and presenteeism from five conditions potentially comorbid with depressive symptoms-back or neck disorders, depression, anxiety, or emotional disorders, chronic headaches, stomach or bowel disorders, and insomnia-among Japanese workers aged 18-59 yr. Participants from 19 workplaces anonymously completed Stanford Presenteeism Scale questionnaires. Participants identified one primary health condition and determined the resultant performance loss (0-100%) over the previous 4-wk period. We estimated the wage loss by gender, using 10-yr age bands. A total of 6,777 participants undertook the study. Of these, we extracted the data for those in the 18-59 yr age band who chose targeted primary health conditions (males, 2,535; females 2,465). The primary health condition identified was back or neck disorders. We found that wage loss due to presenteeism and absenteeism per 100 workers across all 10-yr age bands was high for back or neck disorders. Wage loss per person was relatively high among those identifying depression, anxiety, or emotional disorders. These findings offer insight into developing strategies for workplace interventions on increasing work performance.


Assuntos
Absenteísmo , Eficiência Organizacional/economia , Transtornos Mentais/economia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Dor nas Costas/economia , Dor nas Costas/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Enteropatias/economia , Enteropatias/epidemiologia , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cervicalgia/economia , Cervicalgia/epidemiologia , Fatores Sexuais , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/economia , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologia , Gastropatias/economia , Gastropatias/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
10.
Recenti Prog Med ; 104(3): 98-101, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23548952

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate how the management of children admitted with headache to a Pediatric Emergency Department, was modified by the introduction of the Second International Classification of Headache Disorders ( ICHD-II) published in 2004. The complexity and average costs of the services provided to patients in 2002 and 2011 were compared. The results revealed a decrease in the number of tests performed and in-hospital admissions. However, tests were more complex, and an increase in requests of specialist advice was observed. We hypothesized that this change may be related to the introduction of ICHD-II, which suggests a more rational approach to the child with headache and a better use of hospital resources.


Assuntos
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Transtornos da Cefaleia/classificação , Transtornos da Cefaleia/terapia , Pediatria , Criança , Custos e Análise de Custo , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália , Medicina , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/economia , Pediatria/organização & administração , Radiografia/economia , Radiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Alocação de Recursos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Desnecessários
11.
Schmerz ; 27(2): 149-65, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23549863

RESUMO

Migraine and other headaches affect 54 million people in Germany. They rank among the ten most severely disabling complaints and the three most expensive neurological disorders. Nevertheless, they are not adequately recognized in the healthcare system with sketchy diagnoses and inadequate treatment. This inadequate care is not primarily due to a lack of medical and scientific knowledge on the development and treatment of headaches but is predominantly due to organizational deficits in the healthcare system and in the implementation of current knowledge. To overcome the organizational barriers the national headache treatment network was initiated in Germany. For the first time it allows national cross-sectoral and multidisciplinary links between inpatient and outpatient care. A hand in hand treatment programme, better education, better information exchange between all partners and combined efforts using clearly defined treatment pathways and goals are the basis for state of the art and efficient treatment results. The treatment network is geared towards the specialized treatment of severely affected patients with chronic headache disorders. A national network of outpatient and inpatient pain therapists in both practices and hospitals works hand in hand to optimally alleviate pain in a comprehensive cross-sectoral and multidisciplinary manner. For therapy refractive disorders, a high-intensive supraregional fully inpatient treatment can be arranged. This concept offers for the first time a nationwide coordinated treatment without limitation by specialization and bureaucratic remuneration sectors.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Transtornos da Cefaleia/terapia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Clínicas de Dor/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Adulto , Comportamento Cooperativo , Comparação Transcultural , Estudos Transversais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Alemanha , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/economia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/economia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Clínicas de Dor/economia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Previdência Social/economia
12.
Headache ; 53(1): 196-204, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23126567

RESUMO

The immense burden of headache disorders in America has been very rarely considered during the formal deliberations of Congress. On February 14, 2012, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the United States Senate held a public hearing on Pain in America: Exploring Challenges to Relief. During that hearing, Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont entered into the Congressional Record testimony on the impact of headache disorders on behalf of the Alliance for Headache Disorders Advocacy.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Prova Pericial , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Legislação como Assunto , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
J Gen Intern Med ; 28(2): 176-83, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22648609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health information exchange (HIE) is advocated as an approach to reduce unnecessary testing and improve quality of emergency department (ED) care, but little evidence supports its use. Headache is a specific condition for which HIE has theoretical benefits. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether health information exchange (HIE) reduces potentially unnecessary neuroimaging, increases adherence with evidence-based guidelines, and decreases costs in the emergency department (ED) evaluation of headache. DESIGN: Longitudinal data analysis SUBJECTS: All repeat patient-visits (N = 2,102) by all 1,252 adults presenting with headache to a Memphis metropolitan area ED two or more times between August 1, 2007 and July 31, 2009. INTERVENTION: Use of a regional HIE connecting the 15 major adult hospitals and two regional clinic systems by authorized ED personnel to access the patient's record during the time period in which the patient was being seen in the ED. MAIN MEASURES: Diagnostic neuroimaging (CT, CT angiography, MRI or MRI angiography), evidence-based guideline adherence, and total patient-visit estimated cost. KEY RESULTS: HIE data were accessed for 21.8 % of ED patient-visits for headache. 69.8 % received neuroimaging. HIE was associated with decreased odds of diagnostic neuroimaging (odds ratio [OR] 0.38, confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.50) and increased adherence with evidence-based guidelines (OR 1.33, CI 1.02-1.73). Administrative/nursing staff HIE use (OR 0.24, CI 0.17-0.34) was also associated with decreased neuroimaging after adjustment for confounding factors. Overall HIE use was not associated with significant changes in costs. CONCLUSIONS: HIE is associated with decreased diagnostic imaging and increased evidence-based guideline adherence in the emergency evaluation of headache, but was not associated with improvements in overall costs. Controlled trials are needed to test whether specific HIE enhancements to increase HIE use can further reduce potentially unnecessary diagnostic imaging and improve adherence with guidelines while decreasing costs of care.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Transtornos da Cefaleia/etiologia , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde/organização & administração , Aplicações da Informática Médica , Neuroimagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Recidiva , Tennessee , Adulto Jovem
14.
Eur J Neurol ; 19(5): 703-11, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22136117

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Headache disorders are very common, but their monetary costs in Europe are unknown. We performed the first comprehensive estimation of how economic resources are lost to headache in Europe. METHODS: From November 2008 to August 2009, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in eight countries representing 55% of the adult EU population. Participation rates varied between 11% and 59%. In total, 8412 questionnaires contributed to this analysis. Using bottom-up methodology, we estimated direct (medications, outpatient health care, hospitalization and investigations) and indirect (work absenteeism and reduced productivity at work) annual per-person costs. Prevalence data, simultaneously collected and, for migraine, also derived from a systematic review, were used to impute national costs. RESULTS: Mean per-person annual costs were €1222 for migraine (95% CI 1055-1389; indirect costs 93%), €303 for tension-type headache (TTH, 95% CI 230-376; indirect costs 92%), €3561 for medication-overuse headache (MOH, 95% CI 2487-4635; indirect costs 92%), and €253 for other headaches (95% CI 99-407; indirect costs 82%). In the EU, the total annual cost of headache amongst adults aged 18-65 years was calculated, according to our prevalence estimates, at €173 billion, apportioned to migraine (€111 billion; 64%), TTH (€21 billion; 12%), MOH (€37 billion; 21%) and other headaches (€3 billion; 2%). Using the 15% systematic review prevalence of migraine, calculated costs were somewhat lower (migraine €50 billion, all headache €112 billion annually). CONCLUSIONS: Headache disorders are prominent health-related drivers of immense economic losses for the EU. This has immediate implications for healthcare policy. Health care for headache can be both improved and cost saving.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/terapia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Headache Pain ; 12(2): 141-6, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21452008

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to test the validity, in the Chinese population, of the Lifting The Burden diagnostic questionnaire for the purpose of a population-based survey of the burden of headache in China. From all regions of China, a population-based sample of 417 respondents had completed the structured questionnaire in a door-to-door survey conducted by neurologists from local hospitals calling unannounced. They were contacted for re-interview by telephone by headache specialists who were unaware of the questionnaire diagnoses. A screening question ascertained whether headache had occurred in the last year. If they had, the specialists applied their expertise and ICHD-II diagnostic criteria to make independent diagnoses which, as the gold standard, were later compared with the questionnaire diagnoses. There were 18 refusals; 399 interviews were conducted in 202 women and 197 men aged 18-65 years (mean age 44.4±12.6 years). In comparison to the specialists' diagnoses, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Cohen's kappa (95% CI) of the questionnaire for the diagnosis of migraine were 0.83, 0.99, 0.83, 0.99 and 0.82 (0.71-0.93), respectively; for the diagnosis of tension-type headache (TTH), they were 0.51, 0.99, 0.86, 0.92 and 0.59 (0.46-0.72), respectively. In conclusion, the questionnaire was accurate and reliable in diagnosing migraine (agreement level excellent), less so, but adequate, for TTH (sensitivity relatively low, false negative rate relatively high and agreement level fair to good). The non-specific features of TTH do not lend themselves well to diagnosis by questionnaire.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Povo Asiático , China/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Entrevistas como Assunto/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
16.
Cephalalgia ; 31(7): 837-50, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21464078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence for quality of life (QoL) impairment, disability, healthcare resource use and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache (CDH), focusing on chronic migraine (CM) with or without medication overuse. METHODS: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of studies of patients/subjects with CDH that included CM, occurring on at least 15 days per month. MAIN FINDINGS: Thirty-four studies were included for review (25 studies of patients and nine of subjects from the general population). CDH and CDH with medication overuse headache (MOH) were consistently associated with a lower QoL compared to control or episodic headache (EH) and CDH without MOH. CDH was consistently associated with greater disability and productivity loss, more consultations, more or longer hospitalizations and higher direct costs than EH. Data were not amenable to statistical pooling. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review underline the detriment to QoL and the disabling nature of CDH, and in particular CM and CDH with MOH, and negative impact on workplace productivity compared to other types of headache.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/psicologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/economia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/etiologia
19.
Br J Gen Pract ; 60(581): 897-901, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21144199

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic daily headache is a major healthcare problem, with significant resource implications for specialist services. Since 1999, GPs in Greater Glasgow have had direct access to computerised tomography (CT) for investigation of chronic daily headache. AIM: The purpose of this study is to assess the significance of pathology, impact of the service, and GP satisfaction. METHOD: The direct-access CT findings in patients between 1999 and 2007 were reviewed. Radiological reports were reviewed for abnormal findings by a radiologist. A neurologist reviewed those cases with abnormalities to assess their potential causation in presenting symptoms. A questionnaire was sent to the referring GP for every patient referred for direct-access CT. Data from the Information Services Division of NHS National Services Scotland was used to estimate potential cost benefits. RESULTS: A total of 4404 CT scans were performed. Abnormal findings were reported in 461 (10.5%), and the reported abnormalities were considered a potential causative factor for the presenting symptoms in 60 patients (1.4%). Other abnormalities mostly resulted from established cerebrovascular disease and atrophy; 986 GP questionnaires were analysed. The major body of GP opinion (n = 460, 47%) indicated that direct-access CT was their preferred choice for referral of chronic daily headache. If direct-access CT was not available, neurology (n = 448, 45%) and general medicine (n = 379, 38%) would be the commonest referral choices. This study also reveals that 86% did not require further specialist referral. Projecting the GP questionnaire data to the study group gave an approximate cost saving of at least £86 681.81. CONCLUSION: Direct-access CT is now the preferred choice of management for patients with chronic daily headache in primary care. Patients and GPs are reassured by a normal scan in the majority of cases. There may be cost savings, although confirmation of cost-effectiveness would require further study.


Assuntos
Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Transtornos da Cefaleia/diagnóstico por imagem , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Controle de Acesso , Medicina Geral/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Escócia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA