What is the effect of subepithelial lesions of the esophagus on esophageal motility?

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal motility is regulated both by coordinated stimulation and inhibition of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers of the esophagus. Although there are many diseases known to have an effect on esophageal motility, the effect of subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the esophagus on esophageal motility, which is often detected incidentally, remains still unclear. The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of SELs of the esophagus on esophageal motility evaluating it by high-resolution manometry (HRM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients with SELs in the esophagus and 12 healthy individuals were included. All patients and controls included in the study underwent HRM using a Unisensor UniTip High Resolution catheter (Laborie, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and endosonographic examination. RESULTS: The mean age was 52.60±15.56 years (range: 23-79) and the average body mass index (BMI) was 26.63±4.71 kg/m2. Gender, height, weight, and BMI measurements, smoking status, alcohol use, and DM status did not statistically differ significantly between the groups (p>0.05). Of 32 patients with SELs, 65.6% (n=21) had lesions originating in the muscularis propria, while 34.4% had lesions originating in the submucosa. The rate of abnormal motility both in the supine and in upright positions of patients with SELs was found to be significantly higher than in the control group (p=0.001, p<0.01, respectively). In patients with SELs, the incidence of infective motility was higher than the normal group (p=0.001, p<0.01, respectively). As the size of the lesion increases (>2 cm), the probability of abnormal HRM results increased. CONCLUSIONS: SELs of the esophagus have pathological effects on esophageal motility, mainly ineffective esophageal motility disorder.

Elevated average maximum intrabolus pressure on high-resolution manometry is associated with esophageal dysmotility and delayed esophageal emptying on timed barium esophagram.

BACKGROUND: Intrabolus pressure (IBP) recorded by high-resolution manometry (HRM) portrays the compartmentalized force on a bolus during esophageal peristalsis. HRM may be a reliable screening tool for esophageal dysmotility in patients with elevated average maximum IBP (AM-IBP). Timed barium esophagram (TBE) is a validated measure of esophageal emptying disorders, such as esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and achalasia. This study aimed to determine if an elevated AM-IBP correlates with esophageal dysmotility on HRM and/or delayed esophageal emptying on TBE. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all HRM (unweighted sample n = 155) performed at a tertiary referral center from 09/2015-03/2017 yielded a case group (n = 114) with abnormal AM-IBP and a control group (n = 41) with a normal AM-IBP (pressure < 17 mmHg) as consistent with Chicago Classification 3. All patients received a standardized TBE, with abnormalities classified as greater than 1 cm of retained residual liquid barium in the esophagus at 1 and 5 min or as tablet retention after 5 min. RESULTS: AM-IBP was significantly related to liquid barium retention (p = 0.003) and tablet arrest on timed barium esophagram (p = 0.011). A logistic regression model correctly predicted tablet arrest in 63% of cases. Tablet arrest on AM-IBP correlated with an optimal prediction point at 20.1 mmHg on HRM. Patients with elevated AM-IBP were more likely to have underlying esophageal dysmotility (95.6% vs. 70.7% respectively; p < 0.001), particularly esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction disorders. Elevated AM-IBP was associated with incomplete liquid bolus transit on impedance analysis (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that an elevated AM-IBP is associated with abnormal TBE findings of esophageal tablet retention and/or bolus stasis. An abnormal AM-IBP (greater than 20.1 mm Hg) was associated with a higher probability of retaining liquid bolus or barium tablet arrest on TBE and esophageal dysmotility on HRM. This finding supports the recent incorporation of IBP in Chicago Classification v4.0.

Factors associated with esophageal motility improvement after bilateral lung transplant in patients with an aperistaltic esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: We reported that esophageal peristalsis can improve after lung transplant (LTx), even in patients with pretransplant esophageal aperistalsis. This improvement was associated with better outcomes. We analyzed preoperative factors and sought to predict persistent aperistalsis or motility improvement in patients with pre-LTx esophageal aperistalsis. METHODS: Patients with esophageal aperistalsis who underwent LTx between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Preoperative barium esophagrams were blinded and re-examined; subjective scores were assigned to motility and dilation patterns. Postoperative high-resolution manometry was used to divide patients into 2 groups: persistent esophageal aperistalsis (PEA) or improved esophageal peristalsis (IEP). RESULTS: We identified 29 patients: 20 with restrictive lung disease, 7 with obstructive lung disease, and 2 with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Post-LTx, 10 patients had PEA and 19 had IEP (mean age, 53.3 ± 6.6 years and 61.2 ± 10.6 years, respectively; P = .04). All 9 patients (100%) with obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension but only 10 of 20 patients (50%) with restrictive lung disease had IEP post-LTx (P = .01). All 4 patients with scleroderma had PEA. Nearly absent contractility on preoperative esophagrams was more prevalent in the PEA group than in the IEP group (100% vs 58.8%; P = .06). No further differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with esophageal aperistalsis and obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not patients with restrictive lung disease and scleroderma, are likely to have IEP post-LTx. Additional studies may determine whether subjective esophagram assessment can help predict IEP post-LTx in patients with restrictive lung disease without scleroderma.

Utility of a new automated diagnostic program in high-resolution esophageal manometry.

BACKGROUND: A new automated diagnostic program for high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) has been developed. This diagnostic program could detect locations of landmarks and could make final diagnoses automatically. However, the accuracy of the program is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the automated diagnostic program for HREM. METHODS: A total of 445 studies were enrolled. An HREM system (Starlet®) was used, and esophageal motility was diagnosed using the Chicago classification v3.0. First, the locations of the upper esophageal sphincter, transition zone, lower esophageal sphincter, esophago-gastric junction, crural diaphragm and stomach were determined, and each swallow was checked manually. Then, the parameters of the Chicago classification were calculated using an analytic program of the Starlet, and diagnoses were made by three experts. Second, all study raw data were analyzed again by the automated diagnostic program. Diagnoses made by the program were compared to those made by experts to evaluate the accuracy of the diagnoses. RESULTS: The new diagnostic program could identify the landmarks of each swallow, calculate the parameters and make a final diagnosis within 10 s. The diagnoses made by the automated diagnostic program were not matched to those made by experts in only 10 studies, and the overall accuracy of the new automated diagnostic program thus reached 97.8% (435/445). CONCLUSIONS: The new automated diagnostic program for HREM is clinically useful in terms of high diagnostic accuracy and time-saving.

Normal Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Panometry Findings Associate With Lack of Major Esophageal Motility Disorder on High-Resolution Manometry.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A normal esophageal response to distension on functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry during endoscopy might indicate normal esophageal motor function. We aimed to investigate the correlation of normal FLIP panometry findings with esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and outcomes of discrepant patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using data from a registry of patients who completed FLIP during sedated endoscopy. We identified 111 patients with normal FLIP panometry findings (mean age, 42 y; 69% female) and corresponding HRM data. A normal FLIP panometry was defined as an esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility index greater than 3.0 mm2/mm Hg, an absence of repetitive retrograde contractions, and a repetitive antegrade contraction pattern that met the Rule-of-6s: ≥6 consecutive antegrade contractions of ≥6-cm in length, at a rate of 6 ± 3 contractions per minute. HRM findings were classified by the Chicago classification system version 3.0. RESULTS: HRM results were classified as normal motility in 78 patients (70%), ineffective esophageal motility in 10 patients (9%), EGJ outflow obstruction in 20 patients (18%), and 3 patients (3%) as other. In patients with EGJ outflow obstruction based on HRM, the integrated relaxation pressure normalized on adjunctive swallows in 16 of 20 patients (80%), and in 8 of 9 patients (88%) who completed a barium esophagram and had normal barium clearance. Thus, although 23 of 111 patients (21%) with normal FLIP panometry had abnormal HRM findings, these HRMs often were considered to be false-positive or equivocal results. All patients with an abnormal result from HRM were treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective cohort study, we found that patients with normal FLIP panometry results did not have a clinical impression of a major esophageal motor disorder. Normal FLIP panometry results can exclude esophageal motility disorders at the time of endoscopy, possibly negating the need for HRM in select patients.

Experience with Esophagogastrointestinal Transit Scintigraphy in the Initial 229 Patients: Multiple Regions of Dysmotility Are Common.

The purpose of this investigation was to review our experience with our comprehensive esophagogastrointestinal transit study in the first 229 patients. This scintigraphic study analyzes the motility of the entire gut, from the esophagus through the rectosigmoid colon. Methods: Data were reviewed for our first 2 y of experience with this examination (184 women and 45 men aged 20-79 y [mean ± SD, 44 ± 16 y]). Patients were referred with symptoms suggestive of a motility disorder. They first swallowed 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in water for the esophageal-swallow study and then 300 mL for a 30-min 111In water-only study, followed by 120 mL of 111In water simultaneously with the solid standardized 99mTc egg-substitute meal. Images and quantification were obtained for esophageal transit, water-only gastric emptying, water-with-solid gastric emptying, small-bowel transit, and colonic transit. Results: Of the 229 patient studies, 45 (20%) were normal. The remaining 184 (80%) had at least 1 region of dysmotility, for a total of 336 regions of abnormal motility. A single region of dysmotility was seen in 92 patients (50%), 2 regions in 50 (27%), 3 regions in 26 (14%), 4 regions in 12 (7%), and 5 regions in 4 (2%). There was a poor correlation between the results of the water-only study and water with the solid meal. Three different patterns of delayed colonic transit were seen. Patient symptoms were often not predictive of the scintigraphic findings. Conclusion: This study highlights the frequent occurrence of dysmotility in more than 1 region of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with a suspected motility disorder and the frequent concurrence of both upper- and lower-tract dysmotility in the same patients. It provides information to referring physicians regarding which motility disorders may be causing the patient symptoms, why the patient is or is not responding to the present therapy, and if and what additional workup and therapy may be needed.

Assessment of esophageal motility disorders by real-time MRI.

PURPOSE: To investigate imaging findings of esophageal motility disorders on dynamic real-time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 102 patients with GERD-like symptoms were included in this retrospective study between 2015-2018. Dynamic real-time MRI visualized the transit of a 10 mL pineapple juice bolus through the esophagus and EGJ with a temporal resolution of 40 ms. Dynamic and anatomic parameters were measured by consensus reading. Imaging findings were compared to HRM utilizing the Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. RESULTS: All 102 patients completed real-time MRI in a median examination time of 15 min. On HRM, 14 patients presented with disorders with EGJ outlet obstruction (EGJOO) (13.7 %), 7 patients with major disorders of peristalsis (6.9 %), and 32 patients with minor disorders of peristalsis (31.4 %). HRM was normal in 49 patients (48.0 %). Incomplete bolus clearance was significantly more frequent in patients with esophageal motility disorders on HRM than in patients with normal HRM (p = 0.0002). In patients with motility disorders with EGJOO and major disorders of peristalsis, the esophageal diameter tended to be wider (23.6 ±â€¯8.0 vs. 21.2 ±â€¯3.5 mm, p = 0.089) and the sphincter length longer (19.7 ±â€¯7.3 vs. 16.7 ±â€¯3.0 mm, p = 0.091) compared to patients with normal HRM. 3/7 patients with achalasia type II were correctly identified by real-time MRI and one further achalasia type II patient was diagnosed with a motility disorder on MRI films. The other 3/7 patients presented no specific imaging features. CONCLUSION: Real-time MRI is an auxiliary diagnostic tool for the assessment of swallowing events. Imaging parameters may assist in the detection of esophageal motility disorders.

Updates on diagnostic modalities for esophageal dysphagia.

Esophageal dysphagia is a common symptom in adults. Fluoroscopic contrast studies, endoscopy, and esophageal manometry have been used in the diagnosis of esophageal dysphagia for many years. The diagnostic yield has been improved with new test protocols that highlight abnormal bolus transit in the esophagus and outflow obstruction, as well as new high-definition and high-resolution technical advances in equipment. Functional luminal impedance planimetry and the addition of impedance to high-resolution esophageal manometry have also allowed the assessment of new parameters to better understand esophageal structure and function. In this concise review, we describe the role and utility of various diagnostic modalities in the assessment of patients with esophageal dysphagia.

Imaging in the Evaluation of Chest Pain in the Primary Care Setting, Part 2: Sources of Noncardiac Chest Pain.

Chest pain is a common presenting complaint in the primary care setting. Imaging plays a key role in the evaluation of the multiple organ systems that can be responsible for chest pain. With numerous imaging modalities available, determination of the most appropriate test and interpretation of the findings can be a challenge for the clinician. In this 2-part series, we offer resources to guide primary care physicians in the selection of imaging studies and present the imaging findings of various causes of nonemergent chest pain. In Part 2, we focus on the radiologic appearance of common noncardiac sources of chest pain, including gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal etiologies.

Esophageal manometry in systemic sclerosis: findings and association with clinical manifestations.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is an autoimmune disorder that affects several organs of unknown etiology, characterized by vascular damage and fibrosis of the skin and organs. Among the organs involved are the esophagus and the lung. OBJECTIVES: To relate the profile of changes in esophageal electromanometry (EM), the profile of skin involvement, interstitial pneumopathy (ILD), and esophageal symptoms in SSC patients. METHODS: This is an observational, cross-sectional study carried out at the SSC outpatient clinic of the Hospital de Clínicas of the Federal University of Uberlândia. After approval by the Ethics Committee and signed the terms of consent, 50 patients were initially enrolled, from 04/12/2014 to 06/25/2015. They were submitted to the usual investigations according to the clinical picture. The statistical analysis was descriptive in percentage, means, and standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between EM, high-resolution tomography, and esophageal symptoms. RESULTS: 91.9% of the patients had some manometric alterations. 37.8% had involvement of the esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter. 37.8% had ILD. 24.3% presented the diffuse form of SSC. No association was found between manometric changes and clinical manifestations (cutaneous, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal symptoms). CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that esophageal motility alterations detected by EM are frequent in SSC patients, but may not be related to cutaneous extension involvement, the presence of ILD, or the gastrointestinal complaints of patients.

Meglumine diatrizoate esophagogram after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): identification of imaging findings associated with clinical complications and longer hospital stay.

OBJECTIVES: Esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is the treatment of reference of major obstructive esophageal motility disorders but the detection of early complications remains challenging. Our aim was to report the radiological findings on meglumine diatrizoate esophagograms after esophageal POEM and identify variables associated with patient outcomes. METHODS: The imaging and clinical files of 106 patients who underwent POEM for achalasia or other major obstructive esophageal motility disorders were retrospectively analyzed. Post POEM esophagograms were reviewed for the presence of pneumoperitoneum, pleural effusion, extraesophageal contrast leakage, and dislocated clips. Associations between length of hospital stay and radiological findings were searched for using a Cox multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients (M/F = 56/50; mean age = 50 ± 2 [SD] years) underwent 106 POEM procedures with a meglumine diatrizoate esophagogram on postoperative day 1. Overall median hospital stay was 3 days (range 1-20 days). Pneumoperitoneum, pleural effusion, extraesophageal contrast leakage, and dislocated clips were observed in 90/106 (84.9%), 12/106 (11.3%), 4/106 (3.8%), and 0/106 (0%) patients, respectively. At multivariate analysis, pleural effusion (p = 0.005; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.35 [95% CI 0.17-0.73]) and extraesophageal contrast leakage (p = 0.039; aHR = 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.94]) were associated with a prolonged hospital stay. Pneumoperitoneum was not associated with unfavorable outcome (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumoperitoneum is a common finding after POEM and is not indicative of unfavorable patient outcome. Conversely, post POEM pleural effusion and extraesophageal contrast leakage are associated with a longer hospital stay. KEY POINTS: • Water-soluble esophagogram is a valid diagnostic modality to diagnose early complications after esophageal endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders. • At multivariate analysis, pleural effusion and extraesophageal contrast leakage are associated with a prolonged hospital stay after peroral endoscopic myotomy. • Pneumoperitoneum is not associated with unfavorable outcome after peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Pressure-impedance analysis: Assist the diagnosis and classification of ineffective esophageal motility disorder.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We elucidated the clinical significance of distal contractile integral-to-esophageal impedance integral (EII) ratio (DCIIR) in ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) adult patients. METHODS: We recruited 101 patients with IEM (48.38 ± 1.58 years) and 42 matched healthy volunteers (44.28 ± 1.85 years) in this case-control study. All subjects underwent esophageal high-resolution impedance manometry from October 2014 to May 2018. The diagnosis of IEM was based on the Chicago Classification version 3.0. The EII, EII ratio, and DCIIR were analyzed by matlab software. RESULTS: The EII, EII ratio, and DCIIR calculated at an impedance threshold of 1500 Ω (EII1500, EII ratio1500, and DCIIR1500, respectively) were significantly lower in the IEM group than in healthy controls (P < 0.0001, < 0.0001, and < 0.0001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that DCIIR1500 < 0.008 mmHg/Ω, EII1500 > 71 000 Ω.s.cm, and EII ratio1500 > 0.43 were all predictive of IEM. Only DCIIR1500 < 0.008 mmHg/Ω remained significant in diagnosing IEM in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio = 72.13, P < 0.001). The DCIIR1500 is negatively correlated with Eckardt score and the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (correlation coefficient = -0.2844 and -0.3136; P = 0.0006 and 0.0002, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis further showed that a DCIIR1500 cut-off of 0.002 mmHg/Ω achieved the best differentiation between the IEM-alternans and IEM-persistens subtypes among IEM patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The novel pressure-impedance parameter of high-resolution impedance manometry, DCIIR1500, may assist in the diagnosis and classification of IEM and correlated with clinical symptoms.

Videofluoroscopic and Manometric Evaluation of Oropharyngeal and Esophageal Motility Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility studies are performed in patients who have dysphagia that is not explained by stenosis. Diagnosis can be challenging and requires expertise in the interpretation of tests and symptoms. AIMS: Our aim is to investigate the diagnostic value of videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) in combination with esophageal manometry. STUDY DESIGN: This study has a prospective study design. METHODS: 73 patients with dysphagia underwent videofluoroscopy in a standing position. Each subject swallowed barium boluses and findings were correlated with manometry findings. RESULTS: The study cohort was categorized into five groups according to their disease as achalasia (31.1%), presbyesophagus (4.1%), scleroderma (5.5%), neurogenic dysphagia (6.8%), and other diseases (54.4%), which included gastroesophageal reflux, diffuse esophageal spasm, cricopharyngeal achalasia, and diseases with nonspecific VFSS patterns. When evaluating VFSS, the perfect agreement was observed between two observers in the final diagnosis. (kappa: 0.91, p<0,001). CONCLUSION: Although it does not replace manometry, VFSS is important as an additional useful imaging method in EMDs.

Esophageal manometry in systemic sclerosis: findings and association with clinical manifestations

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is an autoimmune disorder that affects several organs of unknown etiology, characterized by vascular damage and fibrosis of the skin and organs. Among the organs involved are the esophagus and the lung. OBJECTIVES To relate the profile of changes in esophageal electromanometry (EM), the profile of skin involvement, interstitial pneumopathy (ILD), and esophageal symptoms in SSC patients. METHODS This is an observational, cross-sectional study carried out at the SSC outpatient clinic of the Hospital de Clínicas of the Federal University of Uberlândia. After approval by the Ethics Committee and signed the terms of consent, 50 patients were initially enrolled, from 04/12/2014 to 06/25/2015. They were submitted to the usual investigations according to the clinical picture. The statistical analysis was descriptive in percentage, means, and standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between EM, high-resolution tomography, and esophageal symptoms. RESULTS 91.9% of the patients had some manometric alterations. 37.8% had involvement of the esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter. 37.8% had ILD. 24.3% presented the diffuse form of SSC. No association was found between manometric changes and clinical manifestations (cutaneous, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal symptoms). CONCLUSION The present study confirms that esophageal motility alterations detected by EM are frequent in SSC patients, but may not be related to cutaneous extension involvement, the presence of ILD, or the gastrointestinal complaints of patients.

RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO A esclerose sistêmica (ES) é uma doença autoimune que afeta vários órgãos de etiologia desconhecida, caracterizada por dano vascular e fibrose da pele e órgãos. Entre os órgãos envolvidos estão o esôfago e o pulmão. OBJETIVOS Relacionar o perfil das alterações na eletromanometria (ME), o perfil de acometimento da pele, a pneumopatia intersticial (PI) e os sintomas esofágicos em pacientes com ES. MÉTODO Trata-se de um estudo observacional, transversal, realizado no ambulatório de SSC do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Após aprovação pelo Comitê de Ética e assinatura dos termos de consentimento, 50 pacientes foram inicialmente convidados, de 04/12/2014 a 25/06/2015. Eles foram submetidos às investigações usuais de acordo com o quadro clínico. A análise estatística foi descritiva em porcentagem, média e desvio padrão. O teste Qui-quadrado foi utilizado para avaliar a relação entre ME, tomografia de alta resolução e sintomas esofágicos. RESULTADOS 91,9% dos pacientes apresentaram alterações manométricas. 37,8% tinham envolvimento do corpo esofágico e do esfíncter esofágico inferior. 37,8% tinham IP. 24,3% apresentaram a forma difusa da ES. Não há associação entre alterações manométricas e manifestações clínicas (sintomas cutâneos, pulmonares e gastrointestinais). CONCLUSÃO O presente estudo confirma que as alterações da motilidade esofágica detectadas pela EM são frequentes em pacientes com SSC, mas podem não estar relacionadas ao envolvimento cutâneo, à de DPI ou às queixas gastrointestinais dos pacientes.

Retrospective analysis of esophageal imaging features in brachycephalic versus non-brachycephalic dogs based on videofluoroscopic swallowing studies.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic esophageal dysmotility (ED) is increasingly recognized in young dogs of brachycephalic breeds. Few studies have objectively associated specific videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) features with brachycephaly, leading to under-recognition of ED in brachycephalic breeds. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare VFSS in brachycephalic dogs versus non-brachycephalic dogs presented for dysphagia or regurgitation, and to investigate associations between these imaging findings and patient signalment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of VFSS of dogs presented for dysphagia or regurgitation (not megaesophagus) from 2006 to 2017. Cases were divided into brachycephalic and mesaticephalic breeds. The VFSS were reviewed using a standardized protocol by 2 examiners. Esophageal motility was assessed using specific criteria, and particular imaging features were noted and graded. Fisher's exact test was used to determine associations among signalment (including brachycephaly), final diagnosis, outcomes, and ED features. RESULTS: Thirty-six dogs were included (n = 10 normal, n = 26 presumed ED). Twenty dogs (77%) with presumed ED were brachycephalic with a median age of 1 year (range, 0.2-10.5 years). Most common were prolonged esophageal transit time (ETT; n = 21/26), decreased propagation of secondary peristaltic waves (n = 20/26), and gastroesophageal reflux (GER; n = 18/28). Eight dogs (all brachycephalic) had hiatal herniation (HH). Morphological esophageal variations were only observed in brachycephalic dogs. Brachycephaly was significantly associated with ED (P = .005), prolonged ETT (P = .41), GER (P = .02), and HH (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The majority of dogs with presumed ED was young and brachycephalic and had specific abnormalities that were less frequent in mesaticephalic dogs with regurgitation or dysphagia.

Do we need endoscopic ultrasonography for the workup of patients with esophageal motility disorder?

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is advised in the workup of achalasia patients to rule out secondary achalasia or pseudoachalasia, and search for a typical esophageal wall thickening. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical contribution of EUS findings in achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders (EMD). METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective study at a tertiary referral centre. We included all patients with an EUS for the workup of a suspected EMD from January 2012 to December 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included, 52% were men, with a median (±SD) age of 61 ± 14 years. Median (±SD) Eckardt Score was 7 ± 2. EUS was normal in 26 (38%) patients, and showed an esophageal wall thickening in 43 (62%) patients. Three cases of secondary achalasia were diagnosed at mucosal biopsies: 2 esophageal carcinomas and one eosinophilic esophagitis. Esophageal wall thickening was not significantly associated with the type of EMD or achalasia subtype and there was no statistical correlation between the presence of a wall thickening at EUS and therapeutic outcomes. CONCLUSION: In our work, the presence of an esophageal wall thickening was not predictive of the type of EMD nor achalasia subtype or treatment outcome. The contribution of endoscopic ultrasonography in achalasia and other EMD seems limited.

Recurrent bacterial pneumonia in Irish Wolfhounds: Clinical findings and etiological studies.

BACKGROUND: Increased incidence of bacterial pneumonia (BP) has been reported in Irish Wolfhounds (IWHs), and recurrence of BP is common. The etiology of recurrent pneumonia in IWHs is largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical findings in IWHs with recurrent BP and investigate possible etiologies. ANIMALS: Eleven affected IWHs, 25 healthy IWHs, 28 healthy dogs of other Sighthound breeds, and 16 healthy dogs of other breeds. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional observational study. All affected IWHs underwent thorough clinical examinations including thoracic radiographs, thoracic computed tomography, electron microscopic evaluation of ciliary structure, and bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology and culture. Serum and BALF immunoglobulin concentrations were measured using an ELISA method, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations were analyzed using flow cytometry. Esophageal function was assessed by fluoroscopy (n = 2). RESULTS: Median age of onset was 5.0 years (range, 0.4-6.5 years), and when presented for study, dogs had experienced a median of 5 previous episodes of BP (range, 2-6). The following predisposing factors to BP were detected: focal bronchiectasis (10/11), unilateral (2/9) and bilateral (1/9) laryngeal paralysis, and esophageal hypomotility (2/2). Local or systemic immunoglobulin deficiencies or primary ciliary defects were not detected. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Recurrent BP affects mostly middle-aged and older IWHs without any evident immune deficit or primary ciliary defects. Focal BE was a frequent finding in affected dogs and likely contributed to the development of recurrent respiratory infections. Laryngeal and esophageal dysfunction identified in a minority of dogs may contribute to recurrent BP.

Routine esophageal manometry is not useful in patients with normal videoesophagram.

BACKGROUND: Videoesophagram (VEG) and esophageal manometry (EM) are components of the preoperative evaluation for foregut surgery. EM is able to identify motility disorders and diminished contractility that may alter surgical planning. However, there are no clearly defined criteria to guide this. Reliable manometry is not always easily obtained, and therefore its necessity in routine preoperative evaluation is unclear. We hypothesized that if a patient has normal videoesophagram, manometry does not reveal clinically significant esophageal dysfunction. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent protocolized videoesophagram and manometry at our institution. Measures of esophageal motility including the mean distal contractile integral (DCI), mean wave amplitude (MWA), and percent of peristaltic swallows (PPS) were analyzed. The Chicago Classification was used for diagnostic criteria of motility disorders. Normal VEG was defined as stasis of liquid barium on less than three of five swallows. RESULTS: There were 418 patients included. 231 patients (55%) had a normal VEG, and 187 patients (45%) had an abnormal VEG. In the normal VEG group, only 2/231 (0.9%) patients had both abnormal DCI and PPS, 1/231 (0.4%) patients had both abnormal DCI and MWA and no patients had both abnormal MWA and PPS. There were no patients with achalasia or absent contractility and 1 patient with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in the normal VEG group. This was significantly different from the abnormal VEG group which included 4 patients with achalasia, 1 with absent contractility and 22 with IEM (p < 0.0001). The negative predictive value of VEG was 99.6% and the sensitivity was 96.4%. CONCLUSIONS: A normal videoesophagram reliably excluded the presence of clinically significant esophageal dysmotility that would alter surgical planning. Routine manometry is not warranted in patients with normal videoesophagram, and should be reserved for patients with abnormal VEG.

Swallowing MRI-a reliable method for the evaluation of the postoperative gastroesophageal situs after Nissen fundoplication.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of swallowing MRI of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) in the postoperative care of patients after laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, 79 symptomatic patients (mean age, 52.3 years; range, 26-80 years) were evaluated after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. MRI findings were correlated with revision surgery, endoscopy, and high-resolution manometry (HRM) as standard of reference. MRI was performed on a 3.0-T unit using T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequences for anatomical assessment of the GEJ followed by dynamic MR swallowing (fast low-angle shot sequences). Four independent readers (two radiologists, two surgeons) rated 83 MR scans according to defined criteria, such as wrap disruption, slipping, recurrent hiatal hernia, and esophageal motility disorder. RESULTS: Wrap disruption was correctly diagnosed concordantly with the standard of reference in 87.8%, slipping in 81.5%, and recurrent hiatal hernia in 84.9% of the cases. For esophageal motility disorder, MRI interpretation was consistent with manometry in 66.2% of the subjects. Interobserver analysis showed substantial agreement for recurrent hiatal hernia (k = 0.703), moderate agreement for wrap disruption (k = 0.585), and fair agreement for motility disorder and slipping (k = 0.234 and k = 0.200, respectively). CONCLUSION: MR swallowing readily depicts the major failure mechanisms of LARS and has good reliability even in non-experienced readers. KEY POINTS: • MR swallowing accurately readily depicts the major failure mechanisms of laparoscopic antireflux surgery and has good reliability even in non-experienced readers. • It should be included in the preoperative workup for revision surgery after fundoplication. • It will be of great benefit to surgeons in considering and planning a reoperation.

Esophageal transit scintigraphy in children: a user's guide and pictorial review.

Technical and clinical aspects of esophageal transit scintigraphy in pediatric patients are reviewed via several illustrative cases that highlight its utility in evaluating primary and secondary esophageal motility disorders.