Reducing tobacco use in substance use treatment: The California tobacco free initiative.

BACKGROUND: People in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have a smoking prevalence that is five times higher than the national average. California funded the Tobacco Free for Recovery Initiative, designed to support programs in implementing tobacco-free grounds and increasing smoking cessation services. In the first cohort of the initiative (2018-2020) client smoking prevalence decreased from 54.2% to 26.6%. The current study examined whether similar findings would be replicated with a later cohort of programs (2020-2022). METHOD: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from clients in 11 residential SUD treatment programs at baseline (n = 185) and at post intervention (n = 227). Multivariate logistic regression assessed change over time in smoking prevalence, tobacco use behaviors, and receipt of cessation services across the two timepoints. RESULTS: Client smoking prevalence decreased from 60.3 % to 40.5 % (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 0.46, 95 % CI = 0.27, 0.78; p = 0.004). Current smokers and those who quit while in treatment reported an increase in nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)/pharmacotherapy from baseline to post intervention (31.9 % vs 45.6 %; AOR = 2.22, 95 % CI = 1.08, 4.58; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Like the first cohort, the Tobacco Free for Recovery initiative was associated with decreased client smoking prevalence and an increase in NRT/pharmacotherapy. These findings strengthen the evidence that similar initiatives may be effective in reducing smoking prevalence among people in SUD treatment.

What Happens Next? Maintenance of Gains After Discharge From VA Residential PTSD Treatment.

ABSTRACT: Residential posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment in the Department of Veterans Affairs is helpful for many Veterans, yet the majority experience symptom rebound after discharge. This study examined a national cohort of Veterans (n = 1872) who completed VA residential PTSD treatment and identified factors associated with maintenance of gains from discharge to 4-month follow-up. We generated three logistic regression models based on response profiles during residential treatment. In the "marginal responders" group, 1-3 "booster" sessions of PTSD treatment were associated with decreased odds of maintenance of gains (odds ratio [OR], 0.42), whereas in the "clinically significant responders" group, these sessions were associated with increased odds of maintenance of gains (OR, 2.89). Greater pain severity was associated with decreased odds of maintenance of gains in the "clinically significant responder" group (OR, 0.90). Results demonstrate several avenues for intervention including targeting pain severity and matching aftercare psychotherapy to Veteran residential treatment response.

Family Accommodation in Intensive/Residential Treatment for Adults With OCD: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.

Many adults with OCD experience residual symptoms following CBT, with or without medication. A potential target for enhancing treatment effectiveness is family accommodation (FA). This study examined (1) possible sociodemographic and clinical correlates of FA in adults presenting for intensive/residential treatment, and (2) temporal relationships between FA and OCD symptom severity during acute treatment and follow-up phases. Adult patients (N = 315) completed baseline measures of FA and OCD symptom severity at admission to IRT. Follow-up data were collected from a subset of participants (n = 111) at discharge, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up. Cross-lagged panel analysis showed that changes in OCD symptom severity from admission to discharge predicted changes in FA from discharge to 1-month follow-up. Increases in FA from discharge to 1-month follow-up predicted increases in OCD symptom severity from 1-month to 6-month follow-up. Female patients reported greater baseline FA from their family members than did males, and there were no significant differences in FA by relationship type or marital status. Contamination, Responsibility for Harm, and Symmetry/Incompleteness symptoms were each found to uniquely predict FA at admission. Results from this study provide support for the temporal precedence of FA reduction in OCD symptom improvement as adults transition home following residential treatment.

Associations between smoking and pain in early recovery in residential substance use treatment-seekers.

INTRODUCTION: A growing literature indicates bidirectional associations between pain and tobacco use. Cigarette smokers are at increased risk for chronic pain, and observational and experimental studies indicate that pain increases motivation to smoke. Tobacco use disorder frequently co-occurs with other substance use disorders, which are also associated with chronic pain vulnerability. Despite evidence that pain significantly predicts smoking and relapse, associations between smoking history/trajectory and changes in pain over the course of treatment have not been characterized. The objective of the study was to determine the association between in-treatment smoking trajectory, pack-years (i.e., number of cigarette packs smoked per day multiplied by smoking duration), pain-related interference in daily activities, and pain intensity over the course of residential treatment. METHODS: In this study, 280 adult smokers in a residential SUD treatment center in North Central Florida completed questionnaires assessing cigarette use, pain intensity, and pain interference at treatment entry and discharge (Mean = 80.3 days, SD = 25.6). Most participants were diagnosed with alcohol use disorder (66.1 %). Opioid (27.9 %) and cannabis use disorders (29.6 %) were also common. Participants were grouped by whether their smoking increased (n = 36), decreased (n = 46), or stayed the same (n = 133) from entry to discharge. RESULTS: Analyses indicated a positive association between pack-years and pain intensity at both baseline (r = 0.185, p = 0.018) and discharge (r = 0.184, p = 0.019). Smoking trajectory was associated with pack-years, with those decreasing smoking having greater pack-years than those sustaining or increasing use [F(2,136) = 8.62, p < 0.01, η2p = 0.114]. Mixed general linear models indicated pain intensity [F(1,274) = 44.15, p < 0.0001, η2p = 0.138] and interference in day-to-day activities [F(1,276) = 31.79, p < 0.0001, η2p = 0.103] decreased significantly over time. However, there was no main effect of smoking trajectory on pain intensity [F(2,212) = 2.051, p = 0.131, η2p = 0.019] or of smoking trajectory by time interaction [F(2, 212) = 1.228, p = 0.295, η2p = 0.011]. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, findings provide evidence that smoking behavior influences pain within the context of residential substance use treatment. Given that pain is associated with urge to use substances and risk of return to use, more consistent and rigorous assessment of pain and proactive pain management is likely to enhance substance use treatment outcomes among people who smoke.

Virtual reality mindfulness training for veterans in residential substance use treatment: Pilot study of feasibility and acceptability.

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness training is effective in recovery from substance use disorders; however, adoption can be difficult due to environmental and personal distractions. Virtual reality (VR) may help overcome these challenges by providing an immersive environment for practicing mindfulness, but there is currently limited knowledge regarding patient and provider perceptions of VR-based tools. OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of VR mindfulness training for veterans in residential substance use treatment as well as potential benefits of VR mindfulness interventions in this population. We conducted a pilot feasibility/acceptability study as a first step toward conducting a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: The study recruited participants (N = 32) from a 30-day residential substance use program and collected both qualitative and quantitative feedback on the VR mindfulness intervention using a mixed-methods approach. Patients (n = 20) and providers (n = 12) rated the acceptability, usability, and satisfaction of the intervention. Using a within-subjects design, patients provided pre-post emotion ratings and reported on state mindfulness and VR presence after completing a single-session self-guided VR mindfulness intervention. Patients provided qualitative interview data on their overall impressions, while providers gave the same information via survey. RESULTS: Both patients and providers reported high satisfaction and confidence in the intervention. Moreover, within subjects t-tests showed that patients experienced significant reductions in negative affect and significant increases in positive affect from pre-post, along with high levels of state mindfulness and presence. Results of thematic analysis revealed that the intervention facilitated focused attention on the present moment, induced a state of calm and relaxation, and reduced negative thoughts and emotions. Participants requested improvements such as better integration of audiovisual elements, a more personalized and longer intervention, and more comfortable fitting headset. Finally, the intervention presented with several advantages compared to other mindfulness experiences including reduced distractions and a sense of safety and privacy. CONCLUSIONS: Self-guided VR mindfulness intervention is feasible and acceptable to patients and providers. VR mindfulness training provides an immersive experience that uplifts mood and reduces distractions. VR may provide a scaffolding tool to set the stage for deepening mindfulness skills. Results of the present study could inform further development and tailoring for future interventions.

Effectiveness of residential treatment services for veterans with substance use disorders: A propensity score matching evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Prior reviews of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have found mixed support for residential level of care but are limited by methodology problems and the ethical concerns of randomizing patients with severe SUD to lower levels of care. METHODS: The present study is the first to use a large archival SUD residential sample with a matched comparison group and one-year follow-up period to examine the benefits of residential treatment provided to adults clinically assessed as warranting SUD residential care. We used propensity score matching in our sample (N = 6177) of veterans with a SUD who were screened and accepted for Veterans Affairs (VA) SUD residential treatment between January 1st, 2019 and June 30th, 2019. RESULTS: We found evidence that VA SUD residential treatment saves veteran lives with an average 66% all-cause mortality risk reduction during the study period (b = -1.09, exp(b) = 0.34, p <0.001). Medium-to-large residential pre- to post-treatment self-reported mental health and SUD symptom improvements (|SMDrobust| = 0.54-0.93) were sustained by one-year post-screening. These residential treatment improvements were significantly larger than estimated counterfactual outcomes across self-reported SUD and stress disorder symptoms at one-year post-screening (ps <0.001). We found mixed behavioral, service utilization, and other self-reported mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that VA SUD residential treatment is an effective level of care for veterans warranting residential care particularly for SUD symptom improvements and reductions in mortality risk.

Medication Treatment for Youth in Substance Use Disorder Residential Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Residential is a common treatment setting for youth with high-severity substance use disorders (SUD). This study evaluated the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms and medication for youth in residential SUD treatment. METHODS: Youth in Massachusetts state licensed and funded SUD residential programs completed questionnaires assessing demographics, primary substance of use, and psychopathology symptoms (Youth Self Report [YSR]/Adult Self Report [ASR]). De-identified medication lists were provided by the programs. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. RESULTS: Among the 47 youth who participated, 51.1% were male, 72.3% white, 83% non-Hispanic, mean age 20.7 years. Opioids were the most common primary substance identified by youth (51.1%), and 75% had at least one clinically elevated subscale on the YSR/ASR. Most youth were prescribed at least one medication (89.4%) with a mean of 2.9 medications. CONCLUSION: Youth in SUD residential treatment frequently have clinically elevated psychiatric symptoms, and psychotropic medication was commonly prescribed.

Age moderates the association of optimism on craving during substance use disorder treatment.

BACKGROUND: Optimism, characterized by a positive expectancy toward future outcomes, has garnered attention for its potential role in influencing well-being and may be a protective factor in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. This study evaluated the relationship of optimism and craving among those in substance use disorder SUD treatment. METHODS: Drawing from a cohort of 4201 individuals in residential SUD treatment programs, this study used both cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment to examine tonic (steady-state) and cue-induced (phasic) cravings across individuals primarily using eight classes of substances. Previous research established that optimism increases during adulthood and peaks during an individual's 50s. This study sought to establish if the association between optimism and craving is moderated by age during the first week of treatment and if that relationship changes over the course of treatment both within and between-person. RESULTS: This study found a negative correlation between optimism and craving intensity. Elevated optimism scores correlated with substantially reduced levels of both tonic (ß = -0.31, p < 0.001) and cue-induced (ß = -0.29, p < 0.001) cravings. Age was a significant moderator of the relationship between optimism and craving such that as individuals age, the potency of optimism in mitigating cravings gradually attenuates (interaction for tonic craving: ß = 0.06, p < 0.001; interaction for cue-induced craving: ß = 0.05, p < 0.001). Reflected in the fact that in older individuals' cravings tended to converge toward lower or moderate levels, regardless of their optimism scores. CONCLUSIONS: By delineating the contemporaneous association between high optimism and lower cravings, the study suggests that interventions aimed at fostering optimism may represent an avenue to improve the effectiveness of SUD treatment, especially in emerging adults.

Pain Predicts Dropout From Substance Use Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to characterize the relationship between physical pain experienced at time of entry to residential treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) and the frequency of treatment dropout. We hypothesized that both endorsement of recent pain and higher magnitude of endorsed pain intensity would be associated with higher dropout rates. We further hypothesized that these effects would be exacerbated among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). METHOD: Participants included 1,095 individuals in residential treatment for SUD. Data were collected within 24 hours of treatment entry. Analyses were conducted using logistic regression with dropout as the dependent variable. Dropout was operationally defined as leaving treatment against medical advice or being discharged from treatment because of use of substances. Pain (including endorsement and intensity) was the primary independent variable in all analyses. Analyses included demographic and affective covariates and included both main effects of OUD and interaction terms between OUD and pain. RESULTS: Pain endorsement was associated with greater frequency of dropout (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, p = .04). Higher levels of pain intensity predicted increased rates of dropout (OR = 1.13, p < .01). In contrast with our hypothesis, no interactions between OUD and pain were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the import of integrating pain monitoring and pain interventions as core components of treatment for SUD. Our findings are highly consistent with a growing literature recognizing the impact of pain across a constellation of important treatment outcomes and provide novel data strongly suggesting that pain predicts early cessation of treatment.

Adolescent Residential Addiction Treatment In The US: Uneven Access, Waitlists, And High Costs.

Drug overdose deaths among adolescents are increasing in the United States. Residential treatment facilities are one treatment option for adolescents with substance use disorders, yet little is known about their accessibility or cost. Using the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's treatment locator and search engine advertising data, we identified 160 residential addiction treatment facilities that treated adolescents with opioid use disorder as of December 2022. We called facilities while role-playing as the aunt or uncle of a sixteen-year-old child with a recent nonfatal overdose, to inquire about policies and costs. Eighty-seven facilities (54.4 percent) had a bed immediately available. Among sites with a waitlist, the mean wait time for a bed was 28.4 days. Of facilities providing cost information, the mean cost of treatment per day was $878. Daily costs among for-profit facilities were triple those of nonprofit facilities. Half of facilities required up-front payment by self-pay patients. The mean up-front cost was $28,731. We were unable to identify any facilities for adolescents in ten states or Washington, D.C. Access to adolescent residential addiction treatment centers in the United States is limited and costly.

Residential Treatment Exclusively for Tobacco Use Disorder: A Narrative Review.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use disorder is a major public health issue, and novel smoking cessation approaches are urgently needed. Residential treatment programs have been suggested as a potentially effective treatment for tobacco use disorder. However, there is limited literature on residential treatment programs for patients who are exclusively dependent on nicotine. AIM: The aim of this study is to review the literature on residential treatment programs for patients admitted exclusively for tobacco use disorder. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed with the aim of identifying relevant articles on residential treatment exclusively for tobacco use disorder from inception until February 2023. References in retrieved articles were screened for additional relevant articles. RESULTS: Fourteen studies on residential treatment programs for tobacco use disorder were identified. The duration of the residential cessation programs ranged from 3 days to 3 weeks. Individualized or group cognitive behavioral therapy and tailored pharmacotherapy were the key components of the programs. Eligibility criteria for the programs included moderate to severe tobacco use disorder as measured by Fagerström or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), consistent relapses, smoking-related comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases), and daily use of (smokeless) tobacco. The 6- and 12-month 7-day point prevalence rate ranged from 58% to 26%, whereas the 6- and 12-month continuous abstinence rate ranged from 52% to 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the literature we reviewed, residential smoking cessation programs targeted exclusively at individuals with tobacco use disorder have shown effectiveness, particularly for those who are highly dependent on tobacco and have a history of relapse. However, more research is needed to further explore the effectiveness of these programs and to determine the optimal program components and duration.

The treatment of dissociative identity disorder in an eating disorder residential treatment setting.

OBJECTIVE: Child maltreatment, dissociation and dissociative disorders have been noted in relationship to eating disorders (EDs) for decades, and their co-occurrence generally is associated with greater morbidity, self-harm and mortality. The concomitant presentation of dissociative identity disorder (DID) with an ED (ED + DID) is especially challenging, and there is limited information on approaches to and the effects of integrated treatment for this serious comorbidity, especially in higher levels of care. There are also limited treatment resources for such patients, since they are often turned away from specialty units due to lack of expertise with or bias toward one or the other disorder. METHOD: We report our experience with a case series of 18 patients with DSM-5 defined ED + DID (mean age (SD) = 32.6 (11.8) years) admitted to residential treatment (RT) and assessed using validated measures for symptoms of ED, major depression (MD), PTSD, state-trait anxiety, quality of life (QOL), age of ED onset, and family involvement during treatment. All patients received integrated, multimodal, trauma-focused approaches including those based on DID practice guidelines, principles of cognitive processing therapy (CPT), and other evidence-based approaches. Fifteen of 18 patients also completed discharge reassessments, which were compared to admission values using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Following integrated, trauma-focused RT, patients with ED + DID demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all measures, with medium (anxiety) to high (ED, PTSD, MD, QOL) effect sizes. DISCUSSION: These results provide positive proof of concept that patients with ED + DID can be effectively treated in a specialty, trauma-focused ED program at higher levels of care. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: EDs and dissociative identity disorder (DID) are related conditions, but little is known about treating patients with both conditions. We describe the clinical features and integrated treatment of 18 such patients, 15 of whom completed discharge assessments. Significant clinical improvements were found in multiple domains (ED, PTSD, mood, anxiety, quality of life), which demonstrate positive proof of concept that ED + DID can be effectively treated in a specialty, trauma-focused ED program.

An environmental scan of residential treatment service provision in Ontario.

BACKGROUND: Ontario has one of the highest rates of substance-related harms in Canada. Residential treatment programs in the province provide a variety of in-house treatment services to support the needs of individuals with substance use disorders (SUD). However, these programs are not standardized, often varying in the type, quality, and availability of services offered, including evidence-based interventions such as Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT). Local treatment systems are also rather fragmented and complex to navigate, creating barriers for potential services users to identify and make informed choices on available treatment options. METHODS: Between May to August 2023, we conducted an environmental scan to capture available information on all publicly-funded residential treatment programs in Ontario using the ConnexOntario service portal, a government-funded, health services information platform. Data were captured on organization name, geographical location, program description, program type (residential addictions treatment or supportive recovery programs), eligibility criteria, target population, the program's OAT policies, number of available beds, minimum and maximum length of stay, projected wait times, funding source, and associated fees for program admission. Data were extracted and organized by geographic region, and findings were presented descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 102 residential addiction treatment programs and 36 residential supportive recovery programs in Ontario were identified. The scan noted substantial regional variations in program availability and wait times, along with a lack of programs tailored to unique populations such as women, youth, and Indigenous peoples. There is also a paucity of publicly-available information on program offerings, including detailed specifics on OAT policies within residential treatment programs that are crucial to ensuring that the services being offered are safe and grounded in evidence-based practice. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the scan highlight notable gaps in program types, offerings, and availability among residential treatment programs in the province, including a lack of standardization on OAT policies across programs. Efforts should be made to ensure access to treatment-specific program information relevant to potential service users and to enhance coordinated access to residential treatment services in the province.

A qualitative study on the implementation of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy for children in a child welfare residential treatment program.

BACKGROUND: Youth with severe emotional or behavioral issues who are involved with child welfare authorities are sometimes placed in intensive care services in a residential treatment program. Evidence-based psychotherapies are often used in residential treatments, but there is very little research on how to adapt psychotherapy for residential treatment. OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy (the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children) in a residential treatment program for children. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Staff (n = 20) at a residential facility in Calgary, Canada. METHODS: A combination of qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted before and after therapy to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data were analyzed and reported using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies. RESULTS: Modifications were made to the program including creating inclusive language, integrating relevant content targeting pediatric irritability, delivering sessions online for caregivers, and using additional staff to support youth to learn and practice the application of the content and behavioral interventions. Key barriers to implementation of the Unified Protocol included staff turnover and the difficulty of sustaining a critical mass of knowledge surrounding the Unified Protocol. The major facilitators to implementation were the perceived quality of the program and advantages of the program to children and their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the feasibility and acceptability of providing transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapies for children in residential treatment and provides a template for how to implement evidence-based practice in residential treatment.

Allied health service delivery in residential aged care and the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey of the allied health workforce.

Objectives Industry reports suggest that routine and essential care in Australian residential aged care (RAC), including allied health (AH) services, were disrupted during the coronavirus diseas 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to explore whether AH services in RAC were paused during the pandemic, factors associated with a pause in care delivery, and qualitative details on how COVID-19 impacted AH service delivery. Methods A 26-question survey was distributed via social media, health service providers, and AH networks between February and April 2022. Participation was restricted to AH professionals and assistants with experience in RAC during the pandemic. A mix of closed and open-ended response questions was used to collect demographic data and experiences of delivering care during the pandemic. Quantitative responses were analysed with descriptive statistics and a probit model. Content analysis was performed on open-ended questions. Results One hundred and four AH professionals and assistants responded to the survey. Fifty-five percent of participants (n = 51) were contractually or casually employed. AH services were negatively impacted by the pandemic with 52% of respondents experiencing a pause in service delivery and 78% reporting poorer AH care quality. In a probit model, contracted/casually employed respondents were more likely to experience a pause in care delivery (1.03, P < 0.05) compared to permanently employed AH professionals. Conclusion Insecure work arrangements may have exacerbated inconsistent care during the pandemic (impacting residents) and may have negative implications on the RAC AH workforce. In the future, an AH inclusive workforce policy including data collection and research is required to monitor and plan the RAC workforce.

The health of people attending residential treatment for alcohol and other drug use: Prevalence of and risks for major lifestyle diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease and cancers are the leading cause of mortality amongst people accessing treatment for alcohol and other drug use. The current study aimed to examine risk factors for chronic disease amongst people attending residential alcohol and other drug treatment services. METHODS: Participants (N = 325) were attending residential alcohol and other drug treatment services across Australia. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk scores were calculated using established risk estimation algorithms. Differences in existing health conditions, risk factors for chronic diseases and risk algorithms were calculated for males and females. RESULTS: In addition to alcohol and other drug use (including tobacco use), 95% of the sample had at least one other risk factor for chronic disease. Of participants not already diagnosed, 36% were at a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and 11% had a high risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The heart age of participants was 11 years older than actual age (Mage = 40.63, Mheart age = 52.41). Males had a higher cardiovascular disease risk than females. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of people accessing residential alcohol and other drug treatment were at risk of chronic disease. Future research is needed that uses objective indicators of physical health. Such research will help to develop our understanding of prevention and intervention initiatives that could be adopted by treatment providers to improve the physical health of their consumers.

Critical Success Factors of Street Haven's Residential Addictions Treatment Program for Women.

Street Haven's residential addictions treatment program offers a 90-day residential treatment program to highly vulnerable women who suffer from significant health and social care complexity, including homelessness, experience with gender-based violence, mental illness and chronic diseases. Despite the complexity of the needs of the clients, the program supports recovery, greater housing and enhanced overall well-being for the women it serves. The critical factors contributing to the success of the program include client readiness, pre-treatment programming, group-based programming, evidence-based programming, harm reduction approaches and a whole-person approach. These factors are essential for achieving programming outcomes and continuing the recovery journey post-discharge.

Key person-centered care domains for residential substance use disorder treatment facilities: former clients' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: While person-centered care (PCC) includes multiple domains, residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment clients may value certain domains over others. We sought to identify the PCC domains most valued by former residential SUD treatment clients. We also sought to explore conceptual distinctions between potential theoretical PCC subdomains. METHODS: We distributed an online survey via social media to a national convenience sample of former residential SUD treatment clients. Respondents were presented with ten PCC domains in an online survey: (a) access to evidence-based care; (b) integration of care; (c) diversity/respect for other cultures; (d) individualization of care; (e) emotional support; (f) family involvement in treatment; (g) transitional services; (h) aftercare; (i) physical comfort; and (j) information provision. Respondents were asked to select up to two domains they deemed most important to their residential SUD treatment experience. We used descriptive statistics to identify response frequencies and logistic regression to predict relationships between selected domains and respondents' race, gender, relationship status, parenting status, and housing stability. RESULTS: Our final sample included 435 former residential SUD treatment clients. Diversity and respect for different cultures was the most frequently selected domain (29%), followed by integration of care (26%), emotional support (26%), and individualization of care (26%). Provision of information was the least frequently chosen domain (3%). Race and ethnicity were not predictive of selecting respect for diversity. Also, parental status, relationship status and gender were not predictive of selecting family integration. Employment and housing status were not predictive of selecting transitional services. CONCLUSIONS: While residential SUD treatment facilities should seek to implement PCC across all domains, our results suggest facilities should prioritize (a) operationalizing diversity, (b) integration of care, and (c) emotional support. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding PCC domains deemed most important to clients. PCC domains valued by clients cannot be easily predicted based on client demographics.

Depression and Suicidal Behavior Comorbidity in Patients Admitted to Substance-Use Residential Treatment in Aguascalientes, Mexico.

PURPOSE: Epidemiological studies show that depressive and substance use disorders are salient risk factors for suicidal behavior. In residential centers in Mexico City, 75.72% of the patients are diagnosed with comorbidity of substance use and psychiatric disorders; however, the specific prevalence of depression and suicidal behavior in this population has not been reported. This study aims to inform the comorbidity of depression and suicidal behavior in crystal users in residential centers in the state of Aguascalientes, Mexico. METHOD: A brief survey was applied to measure substance use patterns, suicidal behavior, and depression symptoms using the Depression Scale of the Center of Epidemiological Studies (CES-D-R). The sample included 343 participants. RESULTS: The results show that of the 23.3% of participants who reported depressive symptoms, 65% showed suicidal ideation, 46% suicide planning, and 43% suicidal attempt. DISCUSSIONS: These results show the importance of implementing components that address depression and suicidal behavior in interventions for substance use. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no specialized interventions are developed to treat substance use disorders with crystal methamphetamine and, at the same time, treat others mental problems like depression and suicidal behavior. We conclude that the development of this intervention is necessary and urgent.