Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.837
Filtrar
1.
JCI Insight ; 9(9)2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716734

RESUMO

mRNA vaccines are likely to become widely used for the prevention of infectious diseases in the future. Nevertheless, a notable gap exists in mechanistic data, particularly concerning the potential effects of sequential mRNA immunization or preexisting immunity on the early innate immune response triggered by vaccination. In this study, healthy adults, with or without documented prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, were vaccinated with the BNT162b2/Comirnaty mRNA vaccine. Prior infection conferred significantly stronger induction of proinflammatory and type I IFN-related gene signatures, serum cytokines, and monocyte expansion after the prime vaccination. The response to the second vaccination further increased the magnitude of the early innate response in both study groups. The third vaccination did not further increase vaccine-induced inflammation. In vitro stimulation of PBMCs with TLR ligands showed no difference in cytokine responses between groups, or before or after prime vaccination, indicating absence of a trained immunity effect. We observed that levels of preexisting antigen-specific CD4 T cells, antibody, and memory B cells correlated with elements of the early innate response to the first vaccination. Our data thereby indicate that preexisting memory formed by infection may augment the innate immune activation induced by mRNA vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Citocinas , Imunidade Inata , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Humanos , Imunidade Inata/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Masculino , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/métodos , Citocinas/imunologia , Vacinas de mRNA/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2342592, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714327

RESUMO

Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology has been rapidly applied for the development of the COVID-19 vaccine. However, naked mRNA itself is inherently unstable. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) protect mRNAs from extracellular ribonucleases and facilitate mRNA trafficking. For mRNA vaccines, antigen-presenting cells utilize LNPs through uptake to elicit antigen-specific immunity. There are reports on the impact of various physical characteristics of LNPs, particularly those with sizes less than 200 nm, especially 50 to 150 nm, on the overall stability and protective efficacy of mRNA vaccines. To address this, a single change in the size of LNPs using the same mRNA stock solution was assessed for the physicochemical characterization of the resulting mRNA-LNPs vaccine, along with the evaluation of their protective efficacy. Particles of smaller sizes generally disperse more effectively in solutions, with minimized occurrence of particle precipitation and aggregation. Here, we demonstrate that the vaccine containing 80-100 nm mRNA-LNPs showed the best stability and protection at 4°C and -20°C. Furthermore, we can conclude that freezing the vaccine at -20°C is more appropriate for maintaining stability over the long term. This effort is poised to provide a scientific basis for improving the quality of ongoing mRNA vaccine endeavors and providing information on the development of novel products.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Lipídeos , Nanopartículas , Tamanho da Partícula , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de mRNA , Nanopartículas/química , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Lipídeos/química , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Animais , Camundongos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Feminino , RNA Mensageiro/imunologia , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Humanos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Lipossomos
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2350091, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757631

RESUMO

Although previous studies have shown no increased mortality risk after the primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, reports on booster doses are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate mortality risk after the mRNA vaccine boosters in addition to the primary series. This nested case-control study included two age-specific cohorts (18-64 and ≥65 years as of February 1, 2021) in two municipalities. All deaths were identified and matched five controls for each case at each date of death (index date) with risk set sampling according to municipality, age, and sex. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mRNA vaccines (first to fifth doses) were estimated by comparing with no vaccination within 21 and 42 days before the index date using a conditional logistic regression model. The 18-64-years cohort comprised 431 cases (mean age, 57.0 years; men, 58.2%) and 2,155 controls (mean age, 56.0; men, 58.2%), whereas the ≥65-years cohort comprised 12,166 cases (84.0; 50.2%) and 60,830 controls (84.0, 50.2%). The aORs (95% CI) in 0-21 days after the third and fourth doses in the 18-64-years cohort were 0.62 (0.24, 1.62) and 0.38 (0.08, 1.84), respectively. The aORs (95% CI) after the third to fifth doses in the ≥65 years cohort were 0.36 (0.31, 0.43), 0.30 (0.25, 0.37), and 0.26 (0.20, 0.33), respectively. In conclusion, booster doses of mRNA vaccines do not increase mortality risk. These findings could help subsequent vaccine campaigns and alleviate vaccine hesitancy.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Imunização Secundária , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de mRNA , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/mortalidade , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Adulto Jovem , Japão/epidemiologia , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 4081, 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744844

RESUMO

Combination of waning immunity and lower effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 variants of approved COVID-19 vaccines necessitates new vaccines. We evaluated two doses, 28 days apart, of ARCT-154, a self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, compared with saline placebo in an integrated phase 1/2/3a/3b controlled, observer-blind trial in Vietnamese adults (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT05012943). Primary safety and reactogenicity outcomes were unsolicited adverse events (AE) 28 days after each dose, solicited local and systemic AE 7 days after each dose, and serious AEs throughout the study. Primary immunogenicity outcome was the immune response as neutralizing antibodies 28 days after the second dose. Efficacy against COVID-19 was assessed as primary and secondary outcomes in phase 3b. ARCT-154 was well tolerated with generally mild-moderate transient AEs. Four weeks after the second dose 94.1% (95% CI: 92.1-95.8) of vaccinees seroconverted for neutralizing antibodies, with a geometric mean-fold rise from baseline of 14.5 (95% CI: 13.6-15.5). Of 640 cases of confirmed COVID-19 eligible for efficacy analysis most were due to the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant. Efficacy of ARCT-154 was 56.6% (95% CI: 48.7- 63.3) against any COVID-19, and 95.3% (80.5-98.9) against severe COVID-19. ARCT-154 vaccination is well tolerated, immunogenic and efficacious, particularly against severe COVID-19 disease.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Adulto , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Adulto Jovem , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vietnã , Adolescente , Vacinas de mRNA , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem
5.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3522-3528, 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704251

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Recombinant Omicron BA.4/5-Delta COVID-19 Vaccine (ZF2202-A) is primarily designed for the Delta and Omicron BA.4/5 variants. Our objective was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of ZF2202-A in Chinese adults. METHODS: A total of 450 participants aged ≥ 18 years, who had completed primary or booster vaccination with a COVID-19 vaccine more than 6 months prior, were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial. Participants in the study and control groups were administered one dose of ZF2202-A and ZF2001, respectively. Immunogenicity subgroups were established in each group. RESULTS: At 14 days after vaccination, the seroconversion rates of Omicron BA.4/5, BF.7, and XBB.1 in the ZF2022-A group were 67.7 %, 58.6 %, and 62.6 %, with geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies at 350.2, 491.8, and 49.5, respectively. The main adverse reactions (ARs) were vaccination site pain, pruritus, fatigue, and asthenia in both the ZF2022-A group and ZF2001 group. CONCLUSIONS: The novel bivalent vaccine ZF2202-A demonstrated satisfactory immunogenicity and safety against Omicron variants as booster dose in adults with prior vaccination of COVID-19 vaccines.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas Sintéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , China , Adulto Jovem , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Vacinação/métodos , Idoso , População do Leste Asiático
6.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3505-3513, 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714444

RESUMO

It is necessary to develop universal vaccines that act broadly and continuously to combat regular seasonal epidemics of influenza and rare pandemics. The aim of this study was to find the optimal dose regimen for the efficacy and safety of a mixture of previously developed recombinant adenovirus-based vaccines that expressed influenza nucleoprotein, hemagglutinin, and ectodomain of matrix protein 2 (rAd/NP and rAd/HA-M2e). The vaccine efficacy and safety were measured in the immunized mice with the mixture of rAd/NP and rAd/HA-M2e intranasally or intramuscularly. The minimum dose that would be efficacious in a single intranasal administration of the vaccine mixture and cross-protective efficacy against various influenza strains were examined. In addition, the immune responses that may affect the cross-protective efficacy were measured. We found that intranasal administration is an optimal route for 107 pfu of vaccine mixture, which is effective against pre-existing immunity against adenovirus. In a study to find the minimum dose with vaccine efficacy, the 106 pfu of vaccine mixture showed higher antibody titers to the nucleoprotein than did the same dose of rAd/NP alone in the serum of immunized mice. The 106 pfu of vaccine mixture overcame the morbidity and mortality of mice against the lethal dose of pH1N1, H3N2, and H5N1 influenza infections. No noticeable side effects were observed in single and repeated toxicity studies. We found that the mucosal administration of adenovirus-based universal influenza vaccine has both efficacy and safety, and can provide cross-protection against various influenza infections even at doses lower than those previously known to be effective.


Assuntos
Adenoviridae , Administração Intranasal , Anticorpos Antivirais , Proteção Cruzada , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza , Vacinas contra Influenza , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae , Proteínas da Matriz Viral , Animais , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/genética , Proteínas da Matriz Viral/imunologia , Proteínas da Matriz Viral/genética , Adenoviridae/genética , Adenoviridae/imunologia , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/imunologia , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/genética , Camundongos , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/imunologia , Feminino , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/genética , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/imunologia , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/genética , Eficácia de Vacinas , Nucleoproteínas/imunologia , Nucleoproteínas/genética , Proteínas do Core Viral/imunologia , Proteínas do Core Viral/genética , Injeções Intramusculares , Proteínas Viroporinas
7.
Signal Transduct Target Ther ; 9(1): 129, 2024 May 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740763

RESUMO

The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly, a high-risk group for severe COVID-19 infection, have not been fully understood. To clarify these issues, this prospective study followed up 157 elderly and 73 young participants for 16 months and compared the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of two doses of the inactivated vaccine BBIBP-CorV followed by a booster dose of the recombinant protein vaccine ZF2001. The results showed that this vaccination protocol was safe and tolerable in the elderly. After administering two doses of the BBIBP-CorV, the positivity rates and titers of neutralizing and anti-RBD antibodies in the elderly were significantly lower than those in the young individuals. After the ZF2001 booster dose, the antibody-positive rates in the elderly were comparable to those in the young; however, the antibody titers remained lower. Gender, age, and underlying diseases were independently associated with vaccine immunogenicity in elderly individuals. The pseudovirus neutralization assay showed that, compared with those after receiving two doses of BBIBP-CorV priming, some participants obtained immunological protection against BA.5 and BF.7 after receiving the ZF2001 booster. Breakthrough infection symptoms last longer in the infected elderly and pre-infection antibody titers were negatively associated with the severity of post-infection symptoms. The antibody levels in the elderly increased significantly after breakthrough infection but were still lower than those in the young. Our data suggest that multiple booster vaccinations at short intervals to maintain high antibody levels may be an effective strategy for protecting the elderly against COVID-19.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto , Vacinação , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Imunização Secundária
8.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1374486, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745651

RESUMO

A universal recombinant adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) vaccine against COVID19 (Ad-US) was constructed, and immunogenicity and broad-spectrum of Ad5-US were evaluated with both intranasal and intramuscular immunization routes. The humoral immune response of Ad5-US in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were evaluated by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus based pseudovirus neutralization assay, and angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) -binding inhibition assay. The cellular immune response and Th1/Th2 biased immune response of Ad5-US were evaluated by the IFN-γ ELISpot assay, intracellular cytokine staining, and Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) profiling of Th1/Th2 cytokines. Intramuscular priming followed by an intranasal booster with Ad5-US elicited the broad-spectrum and high levels of IgG, IgA, pseudovirus neutralizing antibody (PNAb), and Th1-skewing of the T-cell response. Overall, the adenovirus type-5 vectored universal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine Ad5-US was successfully constructed, and Ad5-US was highly immunogenic and broad spectrum. Intramuscular priming followed by an intranasal booster with Ad5-US induced the high and broad spectrum systemic immune responses and local mucosal immune responses.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vetores Genéticos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Camundongos , Humanos , Feminino , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Adenoviridae/genética , Adenoviridae/imunologia , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Administração Intranasal , Injeções Intramusculares , Imunidade Humoral , Citocinas/metabolismo , Imunidade Celular
9.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 149: 109572, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636739

RESUMO

Streptococcosis outbreaks caused by Streptococcus agalactiae infection in tilapia aquaculture have been consistently reported and associated with high mortality and morbidity leading to significant economic losses. Existing vaccine candidates against Streptococcus spp. are designed for intraperitoneal injections that are not practical and labor-intensive which have prompted farmers to protect aquatic animals with antibiotics, thus encouraging the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria. In this study, a live recombinant L. lactis vaccine expressing a 1403 bp surface immunogenic protein (SIP) and a 1100 bp truncated SIP (tSIP) gene was developed and evaluated against S. agalactiae infection in tilapia. Both SIP and tSIP sequences were cloned and transformed into L. lactis. The recombinant L.lactis vaccine was orally administered to juvenile tilapia for a month. Detection of SIP-specific serum IgM in vaccinated groups compared to control groups indicated that recombinant proteins expressed from L. lactis could elicit immunogenic reactions in tilapia. Fish immunized with the tSIP vaccine also showed the highest level of protection compared to other test groups, and the mortality rate was significantly reduced compared to both control groups. The relative percentage of survival (RPS) against S. agalactiae for both SIP and tSIP-vaccinated groups was 50 % and 89 %, respectively, at 14 days post-challenge. Significant up-regulation of IgM, IL-1ß, IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ were observed at day 34 between the vaccinated and control groups. These results indicated that the recombinant lactococcal tSIP vaccine can elicit both cell-mediated and humoral responses and is recommended as a potential oral vaccine against S. agalactiae infection. Future work will include further in vivo challenge assessments of this vaccine candidate fused with adjuvants to boost immunogenicity levels in tilapia.


Assuntos
Ciclídeos , Doenças dos Peixes , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus agalactiae , Animais , Streptococcus agalactiae/imunologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/veterinária , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estreptocócicas/imunologia , Doenças dos Peixes/prevenção & controle , Doenças dos Peixes/imunologia , Ciclídeos/imunologia , Administração Oral , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Lactococcus lactis/genética , Lactococcus lactis/imunologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética
10.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1308238, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660313

RESUMO

Introduction: Limited data were available on the effectivenessfour years after Homo or Hetero prime-boost with 10 µg Hansenulapolymorpha recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HepB-HP) and 20 µgChinese hamster ovary cell HepB (HepB-CHO). Methods: A crosssectional study was performed in maternalhepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative children whoreceived one dose of 10 µg HepB-HP at birth, Homo or Heteroprime-boost with 10 µg HepB-HP and 20 µg HepB-CHO at 1 and 6months. HBsAg and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) fouryears after immunization were quantitatively detected by achemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). Results: A total of 359 children were included; 119 childrenreceived two doses of 10 µg HepB-HP and 120 children receivedtwo doses of 20 µg HepB-CHO, called Homo prime-boost; 120children received Hetero prime-boost with 10 µg HepB-HP and 20µg HepB-CHO. All children were HBsAg negative. The geometricmean concentration (GMC) and overall seropositivity rate (SPR) ofanti-HBs were 59.47 (95%CI: 49.00 - 72.16) mIU/ml and 85.51%(307/359). Nearly 15% of the study subjects had an anti-HBsconcentration < 10 mIU/ml and 5.01% had an anti-HBsconcentration ≤ 2.5 mIU/ml. The GMC of the 20 µg CHO Homoprime-boost group [76.05 (95%CI: 54.97 - 105.19) mIU/ml] washigher than that of the 10 µg HP Homo group [45.86 (95%CI:31.94 - 65.84) mIU/ml] (p = 0.035). The GMCs of the Heteroprime-boost groups (10 µg HP-20 µg CHO and 20 µg CHO-10 µgHP) were 75.86 (95% CI: 48.98 - 107.15) mIU/ml and 43.65(95%CI: 27.54 - 69.18) mIU/ml, respectively (p = 0.041). Aftercontrolling for sex influence, the SPR of the 20 µg CHO Homoprime-boost group was 2.087 times than that of the 10 µg HPHomo group. Discussion: The HepB booster was not necessary in the generalchildren, Homo/Hetero prime-boost with 20 µg HepB-CHO wouldincrease the anti-HBs concentration four years after immunization,timely testing and improved knowledge about the self-pay vaccinewould be good for controlling hepatitis B.


Assuntos
Cricetulus , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B , Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Hepatite B , Imunização Secundária , Vacinas Sintéticas , Humanos , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/imunologia , Feminino , Animais , Masculino , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Hepatite B/imunologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/imunologia , Células CHO , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Estudos Transversais , Criança , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Vírus da Hepatite B/imunologia
11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2341456, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650460

RESUMO

Few papers focus their attention on VZV vaccination effectiveness among people living with HIV (PLWH). Flanking the live attenuated vaccine (VZL) available, a newly recombinant vaccine (RZV) was recently introduced and approved for HZ prevention among adults. PLWH represents a population on which a particular attention should be applied, in order to guarantee the vaccine efficacy and safety. We performed a literature search in USNLM, PubMed, PubMed Central, PMC and Cochrane Library. From all the publications found eligible, data were extracted and processed per population, vaccine type, immunogenicity and ADRs. The review of the 13 included studies shows that both RZV and VZL are immunogenic and have an acceptable safety profile in adults and children living with HIV. However, given the lack of research available about vaccine efficacy in preventing VZV and HZ in PLWH, additional studies need to be performed, in order to achieve a full completeness of data.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Herpes Zoster , Vacinas Atenuadas , Vacinas Sintéticas , Humanos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Eficácia de Vacinas , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Adulto , Criança , Vacinação , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9830, 2024 04 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684712

RESUMO

We assessed S-268019-b, a recombinant spike protein vaccine with a squalene-based adjuvant, for superiority in its immunogenicity over ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine among adults in Japan. In this multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, phase 3 study, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-naïve participants (aged ≥ 18 years, without prior infection or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2) were randomized (1:1) to receive either S-268019-b or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 as two intramuscular injections given 28 days apart. Participants who provided consent for a booster administration received S-268019-b at Day 211. The primary endpoint was SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NAb) titer on Day 57; the key secondary endpoint was the seroconversion rate for SARS-CoV-2 NAb titer on Day 57. Other endpoints included anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-protein immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody titer and safety. The demographic and baseline characteristics were generally comparable between S-268019-b (n = 611) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 610) groups. S-268019-b showed superior immunogenicity over ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, based on their geometric mean titers (GMTs) and GMT ratios of SARS-CoV-2 NAb on Day 57 by cytopathic effect assay (GMT [95% confidence interval {CI}] 19.92 [18.68, 21.23] versus 3.63 [3.41, 3.87]; GMT ratio [95% CI] 5.48 [5.01, 6.00], respectively; two-sided p-values < 0.0001). Additionally, NAb measured using a cell viability assay also showed similar results (GMT [95% CI] 183.25 [168.04, 199.84] versus 24.79 [22.77, 27.00]; GMT ratio [95% CI] 7.39 [6.55, 8.35] for S-268019-b versus ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, respectively; p < 0.0001). The GMT of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-protein IgG antibody was 370.05 for S-268019-b versus 77.92 for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 on Day 57 (GMT ratio [95% CI] 4.75 [4.34, 5.20]). Notably, immune responses were durable through the end of the study. S-268019-b elicited T-helper 1 skewed T-cell response, comparable to that of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. After the first dose, the incidence of solicited systemic treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was higher in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, but after the second dose, the incidence was higher in the S-268019-b group. Headache, fatigue, and myalgia were the most commonly reported solicited systemic TRAEs, while pain at the injection site was the most frequently reported solicited local TRAE following both doses in both groups. No serious treatment-related adverse serious TRAEs events were reported in the two groups. S-268019-b was more immunogenic than ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and was well tolerated (jRCT2051210151).


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , População do Leste Asiático , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Japão , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem
15.
J Virol ; 98(5): e0021224, 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591886

RESUMO

Porcine rotaviruses (PoRVs) cause severe economic losses in the swine industry. P[7] and P[23] are the predominant genotypes circulating on farms, but no vaccine is yet available. Here, we developed a bivalent subunit PoRV vaccine using truncated versions (VP4*) of the VP4 proteins from P[7] and P[23]. The vaccination of mice with the bivalent subunit vaccine elicited more robust neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and cellular immune responses than its components, even at high doses. The bivalent subunit vaccine and inactivated bivalent vaccine prepared from strains PoRVs G9P[7] and G9P[23] were used to examine their protective efficacy in sows and suckling piglets after passive immunization. The immunized sows showed significantly elevated NAbs in the serum and colostrum, and the suckling piglets acquired high levels of sIgA antibodies from the colostrum. Challenging subunit-vaccinated or inactivated-vaccinated piglets with homologous virulent strains did not induce diarrhea, except in one or two piglets, which had mild diarrhea. Immunization with the bivalent subunit vaccine and inactivated vaccine also alleviated the microscopic lesions in the intestinal tissues caused by the challenge with the corresponding homologous virulent strain. However, all the piglets in the challenged group displayed mild to watery diarrhea and high levels of viral shedding, whereas the feces and intestines of the piglets in the bivalent subunit vaccine and inactivated vaccine groups had lower viral loads. In summary, our data show for the first time that a bivalent subunit vaccine combining VP4*P[7] and VP4*P[23] effectively protects piglets against the diarrhea caused by homologous virulent strains.IMPORTANCEPoRVs are the main causes of diarrhea in piglets worldwide. The multisegmented genome of PoRVs allows the reassortment of VP4 and VP7 genes from different RV species and strains. The P[7] and P[23] are the predominant genotypes circulating in pig farms, but no vaccine is available at present in China. Subunit vaccines, as nonreplicating vaccines, are an option to cope with variable genotypes. Here, we have developed a bivalent subunit candidate vaccine based on a truncated VP4 protein, which induced robust humoral and cellular immune responses and protected piglets against challenge with homologous PoRV. It also appears to be safe. These data show that the truncated VP4-protein-based subunit vaccine is a promising candidate for the prevention of PoRV diarrhea.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Proteínas do Capsídeo , Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Doenças dos Suínos , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas , Animais , Suínos , Rotavirus/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Doenças dos Suínos/prevenção & controle , Doenças dos Suínos/virologia , Doenças dos Suínos/imunologia , Proteínas do Capsídeo/imunologia , Proteínas do Capsídeo/genética , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/imunologia , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Rotavirus/veterinária , Infecções por Rotavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Camundongos , Feminino , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Diarreia/prevenção & controle , Diarreia/virologia , Diarreia/veterinária , Diarreia/imunologia , Genótipo , Imunidade Celular , Vacinação
16.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 03 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675881

RESUMO

Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2) emerged in the United States in 2018 and has spread in both domestic and wild rabbits nationwide. The virus has a high mortality rate and can spread rapidly once introduced in a rabbit population. Vaccination against RHDV2 provides the best protection against disease and should be considered by all rabbit owners. Here, we investigate the duration of immunity provided by vaccination with the Medgene Platform conditionally licensed commercial vaccine 6 months following the initial series. Rabbits received either the vaccination or a placebo and were challenged with RHDV2 6 months later. All vaccinated rabbits survived challenge whereas 18/19 non-vaccinated controls succumbed to infection within 10 or fewer days post-challenge. These results demonstrate lasting immunity following vaccination with the Medgene RHDV2 vaccine.


Assuntos
Baculoviridae , Infecções por Caliciviridae , Vírus da Doença Hemorrágica de Coelhos , Vacinação , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas Virais , Animais , Vírus da Doença Hemorrágica de Coelhos/imunologia , Vírus da Doença Hemorrágica de Coelhos/genética , Coelhos , Infecções por Caliciviridae/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Caliciviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Caliciviridae/virologia , Infecções por Caliciviridae/veterinária , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Virais/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/genética , Baculoviridae/genética , Baculoviridae/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia
17.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3410-3419, 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641498

RESUMO

The application of recombinant herpesvirus of turkey, expressing the H9 hemagglutinin gene from low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV) H9N2 and the avian orthoavulavirus-1 (AOAV-1) (commonly known as Newcastle Disease virus (NDV)) fusion protein (F) as an rHVT-H9-F vaccine, is an alternative to currently used classical vaccines. This study investigated H9- and ND-specific humoral and mucosal responses, H9-specific cell-mediated immunity, and protection conferred by the rHVT-H9-F vaccine in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens. Vaccination elicited systemic NDV F- and AIV H9-specific antibody response but also local antibodies in eye wash fluid and oropharyngeal swabs. The ex vivo H9-specific stimulation of splenic and pulmonary T cells in the vaccinated group demonstrated the ability of vaccination to induce systemic and local cellular responses. The clinical protection against a challenge using a LPAIV H9N2 strain of the G1 lineage isolated in Morocco in 2016 was associated with a shorter duration of shedding along with reduced viral genome load in the upper respiratory tract and reduced cloacal shedding compared to unvaccinated controls.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Galinhas , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H9N2 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Aviária , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Animais , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H9N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H9N2/genética , Galinhas/imunologia , Influenza Aviária/prevenção & controle , Influenza Aviária/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Eliminação de Partículas Virais/imunologia , Organismos Livres de Patógenos Específicos , Vírus da Doença de Newcastle/imunologia , Vírus da Doença de Newcastle/genética , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/prevenção & controle , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/imunologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/virologia , Imunidade Celular , Herpesvirus Meleagrídeo 1/imunologia , Herpesvirus Meleagrídeo 1/genética , Vacinação/métodos , Imunidade Humoral , Vetores Genéticos/imunologia , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/imunologia , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/genética
18.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3389-3396, 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653679

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A global shift to bivalent mRNA vaccines is ongoing to counterbalance the diminishing effectiveness of the original monovalent vaccines due to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants, yet substantial variation in the bivalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) exists across studies and a complete picture is lacking. METHODS: We searched papers evaluating absolute or relative effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 type or BA.4/5 type bivalent mRNA vaccines on eight publication databases published from September 1st, 2022, to November 8th, 2023. Pooled VE against Omicron-associated infection and severe events (hospitalization and/or death) was estimated in reference to unvaccinated, ≥2 original monovalent doses, and ≥ 3 original monovalent doses. RESULTS: From 630 citations identified, 28 studies were included, involving 55,393,303 individuals. Bivalent boosters demonstrated higher effectiveness against symptomatic or any infection for all ages combined, with an absolute VE of 53.5 % (95 % CI: -22.2-82.3 %) when compared to unvaccinated and relative VE of 30.8 % (95 % CI: 22.5-38.2 %) and 28.4 % (95 % CI: 10.2-42.9 %) when compared to ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. The corresponding VE estimates for adults ≥ 60 years old were 22.5 % (95 % CI: 16.8-39.8 %), 31.4 % (95 % CI: 27.7-35.0 %), and 30.6 % (95 % CI: -13.2-57.5 %). Pooled bivalent VE estimates against severe events were higher, 72.9 % (95 % CI: 60.5-82.4 %), 57.6 % (95 % CI: 42.4-68.8 %), and 62.1 % (95 % CI: 54.6-68.3 %) for all ages, and 72.0 % (95 % CI: 51.4-83.9 %), 63.4 % (95 % CI: 41.0-77.3 %), and 60.7 % (95 % CI: 52.4-67.6 %) for adults ≥ 60 years old, compared to unvaccinated, ≥2 original monovalent doses, and ≥ 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The bivalent boosters demonstrated superior protection against severe outcomes than the original monovalent boosters across age groups, highlighting the critical need for improving vaccine coverage, especially among the vulnerable older subpopulation.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Imunização Secundária , SARS-CoV-2 , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinas de mRNA , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto
19.
J Virol ; 98(3): e0112923, 2024 Mar 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305155

RESUMO

The global circulation of clade 2.3.4.4b H5Ny highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) in poultry and wild birds, increasing mammal infections, continues to pose a public health threat and may even form a pandemic. An efficacious vaccine against H5Ny HPAIVs is crucial for emergency use and pandemic preparedness. In this study, we developed a parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5)-based vaccine candidate expressing hemagglutinin (HA) protein of clade 2.3.4.4b H5 HPAIV, termed rPIV5-H5, and evaluated its safety and efficacy in mice and ferrets. Our results demonstrated that intranasal immunization with a single dose of rPIV5-H5 could stimulate H5-specific antibody responses, moreover, a prime-boost regimen using rPIV5-H5 stimulated robust humoral, cellular, and mucosal immune responses in mice. Challenge study showed that rPIV5-H5 prime-boost regimen provided sterile immunity against lethal clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus infection in mice and ferrets. Notably, rPIV5-H5 prime-boost regimen provided protection in mice against challenge with lethal doses of heterologous clades 2.2, 2.3.2, and 2.3.4 H5N1, and clade 2.3.4.4h H5N6 viruses. These results revealed that rPIV5-H5 can elicit protective immunity against a diverse clade of highly pathogenic H5Ny virus infection in mammals, highlighting the potential of rPIV5-H5 as a pan-H5 influenza vaccine candidate for emergency use.IMPORTANCEClade 2.3.4.4b H5Ny highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) have been widely circulating in wild birds and domestic poultry all over the world, leading to infections in mammals, including humans. Here, we developed a recombinant PIV5-vectored vaccine candidate expressing the HA protein of clade 2.3.4.4b H5 virus. Intranasal immunization with rPIV5-H5 in mice induced airway mucosal IgA responses, high levels of antibodies, and robust T-cell responses. Importantly, rPIV5-H5 conferred complete protection in mice and ferrets against clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus challenge, the protective immunity was extended against heterologous H5Ny viruses. Taken together, our data demonstrate that rPIV5-H5 is a promising vaccine candidate against diverse H5Ny influenza viruses in mammals.


Assuntos
Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1 , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N6 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae , Vírus da Parainfluenza 5 , Animais , Humanos , Camundongos , Furões/imunologia , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/genética , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/imunologia , Imunidade Celular , Imunidade Humoral , Imunidade nas Mucosas , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/química , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/classificação , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/genética , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/imunologia , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N6/química , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N6/classificação , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N6/genética , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N6/imunologia , Influenza Aviária/imunologia , Influenza Aviária/prevenção & controle , Influenza Aviária/transmissão , Influenza Aviária/virologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/genética , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/transmissão , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/virologia , Preparação para Pandemia/métodos , Vírus da Parainfluenza 5/genética , Vírus da Parainfluenza 5/imunologia , Vírus da Parainfluenza 5/metabolismo , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Administração Intranasal , Aves Domésticas/virologia , Imunoglobulina A/imunologia , Linfócitos T/imunologia
20.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(5): 646-652, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38101473

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This nationwide cohort study compared the incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) between adenoviral vector-based (ChAdOx1) and mRNA-based (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. METHODS: A targeted trial emulation study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service database. Vaccinees aged 18-85 years who had received at least one dose of ChAdOx1 or an mRNA-based vaccine were identified. The 42-day risks of AESIs were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1 767 539 ChAdOx1 vaccinees were matched exactly with mRNA vaccinees according to their risk factors. The 42-day risks of adverse events were low (∼0 to 176 events per 100 000 persons in both vaccine groups), and the incidence rates of AESIs were comparable between the two platforms, except for a higher occurrence of acute cardiac injury (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.35), myocarditis or pericarditis (IRR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.14-4.04), and arrhythmia (IRR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24-1.71) in mRNA vaccinees. The incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (IRR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69), vasovagal syncope (IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), radiculopathy (IRR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), and aseptic arthritis (IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93) was significantly lower in mRNA-based vaccinees compared with ChAdOx1 vaccinees. DISCUSSION: A remarkable platform-dependent difference was observed in the safety profiles of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for myocarditis or pericarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. However, the overall risk of AESIs was low for both vaccine platforms.


Assuntos
Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Estudos de Coortes , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinas de mRNA , Incidência , Adenoviridae/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA