Inpatient versus outpatient management of prenatally diagnosed vasa praevia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Vasa praevia is a serious pregnancy complication that is potentially life-threatening for the fetus. The possible benefits of prophylactic hospital admission of asymptomatic women diagnosed with vasa praevia antenatally remain unclear. This study aims to compare the pregnancy outcomes of inpatient versus outpatient management in women with a prenatal diagnosis of vasa praevia. METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted and two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility. The inclusion criteria incorporated studies with prenatally diagnosed vasa praevia, a distinction on whether women were managed as inpatients and/or outpatients and where perinatal mortality was recorded as an outcome. The primary outcome of the study was perinatal mortality with additional outcomes of perinatal morbidity, need for emergency caesarean and antenatal steroid administration. Reporting of the results followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: The search produced 2,300 studies with ten of these studies included in the qualitative synthesis and four included in the quantitative analysis. There was no significant difference in perinatal mortality (OR 1.12, 95 % CI 0.10-12.07, p = 0.93, I2 = 0 %) or morbidity between women managed as inpatients or outpatients. The prophylactic inpatient group had higher rates of earlier gestational delivery and antenatal corticosteroid administration (OR 10.78, 95 % CI 1.07-108.74, p = 0.04, I2 = 82 %), but lower rates of emergency caesareans (OR 0.35, 95 % CI 0.17-0.72, p = 0.004, I2 = 0 %). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in perinatal mortality or morbidity rates observed between inpatient and outpatient management of asymptomatic women with antenatally diagnosed vasa praevia. However, outpatient management is associated with prolonged gestation, a decrease in antenatal corticosteroid administration, and higher odds of emergency caesarean. Outpatient management of prenatally diagnosed vasa praevia seems appropriate for carefully selected asymptomatic women.

Individualized management of vasa previa and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our individualized management protocol for women with an antenatal diagnosis of vasa previa (VP) and to report maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients managed according to our protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of antenatally diagnosed VP managed at our hospital between 2014 and 2021. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen cases of antenatally diagnosed VP in 5150 total deliveries were analyzed (0.3%) Five cases (36%) of VP were diagnosed during the routine fetal morphological ultrasound screening, and nine cases (64%) were referred to our hospital due to perinatal complications. There were nine cases that required hospitalization (due to fetal growth restriction [FGR] [1], preterm labor [3], patients' request [5]). The other five were asymptomatic. Eight patients were delivered by scheduled cesarean section at around 36 weeks and only three neonates were admitted to NICU with transient tachypnea of newborn. However, six patients required CS before the scheduled dates because of other complications (preterm labor [3], abnormal cardiotocogram patterns [1], FGR [1] and twin pregnancy [1]). Four neonates born by CS before their scheduled dates were admitted to NICU. No cases required prolonged hospitalization and there were no serious neonatal complications. CONCLUSION: Individualized management may lead to favorable outcomes with VP. Outpatient management may be considered in patients without risk factors. However, maternal hospitalization and earlier scheduled CS should be considered in symptomatic patients or those at risk for preterm delivery.

Inpatient vs outpatient management of pregnancies with vasa previa: A historical cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Vasa previa, a condition where unprotected fetal blood vessels lie in proximity to the internal cervical opening, is a potentially lethal obstetric complication. The precarious situation of these vessels increases the risk of fetal hemorrhage with spontaneous or artificial rupture of membranes, frequently causing fetal/neonatal demise or severe morbidity. As a result, in many centers, inpatient management forms the mainstay when vasa previa is diagnosed antenatally. This study aimed to determine whether a subpopulation of pregnancies diagnosed antenatally with vasa previa could be safely managed as outpatients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed all cases of vasa previa in singleton pregnancies, with no fetal anomalies, diagnosed at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, from January 2008 to December 2017. Cases were categorized into three arms for analysis: outpatients (OP), asymptomatic hospitalized (ASH) and symptomatic hospitalized (SH). The SH arm included patients admitted with any antepartum bleeding or suspicious fetal non-stress test. Those that presented with symptomatic uterine activity/threatened preterm labor and delivered within 7 days of diagnosis were excluded from the study. Records were analyzed for details on hospitalization, antenatal corticosteroid administration, cervical length measurements, and fetal/neonatal mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Of the 84 antenatally-diagnosed cases of vasa previa, 47 fulfilled eligibility criteria. A total of 15 cases were managed as OP, 22 as ASH and 10 as SH. Unplanned cesareans were highest in the SH arm (40% vs. 0% ASH vs. 13.3% OP). Those in the SH arm delivered earliest (median 33.8 weeks, interquartile range (IQR) 33.2-34.3 weeks). Of the asymptomatic patients, those in the ASH arm delivered earlier than those in the OP arm (35.3 [34.6-36.2] weeks vs. 36.7 [35.6-37.2] weeks, p = 0.037). There were no cases of fetal/neonatal death, anemia or severe neonatal morbidity and no significant differences between groups based on cervical length or antenatal corticosteroid administration. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that asymptomatic women with an antenatal diagnosis of vasa previa, singleton pregnancies, and at low risk for preterm birth may safely managed as outpatients, as long as they are able to access hospital promptly in the event of antepartum bleeding or early labor.

Guideline No. 439: Diagnosis and Management of Vasa Previa.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current evidence and to make recommendations for diagnosis and classification of vasa previa and for management of women with this diagnosis. TARGET POPULATION: Pregnant women with vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels. OPTIONS: To manage vasa previa in hospital or at home, and to perform a cesarean delivery preterm or at term, or to allow a trial of labour when a diagnosis of vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels is suspected or confirmed. OUTCOMES: Prolonged hospitalization, preterm birth, rate of cesarean delivery, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Women with vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels are at an increased risk of maternal and fetal or postnatal adverse outcomes. These outcomes include a potentially incorrect diagnosis, need for hospitalization, unnecessary restriction of activities, an early delivery, and an unnecessary cesarean delivery. Optimization of diagnostic and management protocols can improve maternal and fetal or postnatal outcomes. EVIDENCE: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2022, using medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords related to pregnancy, vasa previa, low-lying fetal vessels, antepartum hemorrhage, short cervix, preterm labour, and cesarean delivery. This document presents an abstraction of the evidence rather than a methodological review. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Obstetric care providers, including obstetricians, family physicians, nurses, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and radiologists. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Unprotected fetal vessels in placental membranes and cord that are close to the cervix, including vasa previa, need careful characterization by sonographic examination and evidence-based management to reduce risks to the baby and the mother during pregnancy and delivery. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Vasa previa: when antenatal diagnosis can change fetal prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate ultrasound diagnostic accuracy, maternal-fetal characteristics and outcomes in case of vasa previa diagnosed antenatally, postnatally or with spontaneous resolution before delivery. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study enrolling women with antenatal or postnatal diagnosis of vasa previa at Sant'Anna Hospital in Turin from 2007 to 2018. Vasa previa were defined as fetal vessels that lay 2 cm within the uterine internal os using 2D and Color Doppler transvaginal ultrasound. Diagnosis was confirmed at delivery and on histopathological exam. Vasa previa with spontaneous resolutions were defined as fetal vessels that migrate >2 cm from uterine internal os during scheduled ultrasound follow-ups in pregnancy. RESULTS: We enrolled 29 patients (incidence of 0.03%). Ultrasound antenatally diagnosed 25 vasa previa (five had a spontaneous resolution) while four were diagnosed postnatally, with an overall sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 96.2%, and negative predictive value of 100%. Early gestational age at diagnosis is significally associate with spontaneously resolution (p 0.023; aOR 1.63; 95% IC 1.18-2.89). Nearly 93% of our patient had a risk factor for vasa previa: placenta previa at second trimester or low-lying placenta, bilobated placenta, succenturiate cotyledon, velametous cord insertion or assisted reproduction technologies. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal and fetal outcomes in case of vasa previa antenatally diagnosed are significally improved. Our data support the evaluation of umbilical cord insertion during routine second trimester ultrasound and a targeted screening for vasa previa in women with risk factor: it allows identification of fetus at high risk, reducing fetal mortality in otherwise healthy newborns.

Diagnosis and Management of Vasa Previa: A Comparison of 4 National Guidelines.

IMPORTANCE: Vasa previa represents an uncommon and life-threatening condition for the fetus. The prenatal identification of the condition may improve the outcome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to synthesize and compare published evidence of 4 national guidelines on diagnosis and management of vasa previa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A descriptive review of 4 recently published national guidelines on vasa previa was conducted: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists on "Vasa Praevia: Diagnosis and Management," Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine on "Diagnosis and Management of Vasa Previa," Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada on "Guidelines for the Management of Vasa Previa," and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists on "Vasa Praevia." These guidelines were compared regarding recommendations on diagnosis and management, while the quality of evidence was also reviewed based on each method of reporting. RESULTS: There were many similar recommendations in the compared guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Early prenatal diagnosis using ultrasound and color Doppler imaging, hospitalization or management as outpatients, and cesarean delivery in a tertiary center with experienced clinicians are the main recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based guidelines may increase the awareness of the diagnosis and management of vasa previa among health care professionals and lead to more favorable perinatal outcomes.

Risk-adapted management for vasa praevia: a retrospective study about individualized timing of caesarean section.

PURPOSE: Vasa praevia is a rare condition with high foetal mortality if not detected prenatally. There is limited evidence available to determine the ideal timing of delivery and management recommendations. The aim of this study was to critically review our experience with vasa praevia, with a focus on diagnosis and management. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, all cases of vasa praevia identified in our department from January 2003 to December 2017 were included. All cases were diagnosed antenatally during sonographic inspection of the placenta, and individualized management for each patient was performed based on individual risk factors. 19 cases of vasa praevia were identified (15 singletons, four twins). 13 patients (79%) presented placental anomalies. In patients at high risk for preterm birth, caesarean delivery was performed between 34-35 weeks after early hospitalization and administration of corticosteroids, whereas in patients at low risk for preterm birth, caesarean section could be delayed to 35-37 weeks of gestation. Administration of corticosteroids was not obligatory in the latter cases. RESULTS: There were two acute caesarean sections, due to premature abruption of the placenta and vaginal bleeding. There was no maternal or foetal/neonatal death. None of the neonates required blood transfusion. There is limited evidence available with which to determine the ideal timing of delivery. CONCLUSION: However, our individualized, risk-adapted management, which attempts to delay the timing of caesarean section up to two weeks beyond the standard recommendation, seems feasible, with just two emergency caesarean sections and no case of foetal or maternal death.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Vasa Previa: Outpatient versus Inpatient Management.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy outcome of two different management strategies: outpatient versus inpatient in women with prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center. Women with a prenatally diagnosed vasa previa between January 2007 and June 2017 were included. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between two management strategies: elective admission at 34 weeks of gestation or outpatient management unless there were signs of labor or premature contractions. RESULTS: A total of 109 women met the inclusion criteria: 75 (68.8%) women in the inpatient group and 34 (31.2%) in the outpatient group. Women in the inpatient group were more likely to receive antenatal steroids (57.3 vs. 26.4%, p = 0.002) and were less likely to have an urgent cesarean section (34.6 vs. 58.8%, respectively, p < 0.001) compared with outpatient group. There was no difference in the rate of neonatal complications (inpatient: 64.6% vs. outpatient: 52.7%, p = 0.27) or neonatal anemia requiring transfusion (2.7 vs. 5.8%, respectively, p = 0.5) between the groups. CONCLUSION: The rate of elective cesarean section and exposure to antenatal steroids was higher in patients with vasa previa who were admitted electively at 34 weeks of gestation compared with patients who were managed as outpatient.

Prenatal diagnosis and management of vasa previa in twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancies are at higher risks of velamentous cord insertion and vasa previa. In vitro fertilization is an additional risk factor of abnormal cord insertion and thus the incidence of vasa previa is likely to increase over the next decades. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the role of ultrasound imaging in optimizing the management of twins diagnosed with vasa previa antenatally. STUDY DESIGN: We searched our database for twin pregnancies diagnosed with vasa previa and managed antenatally using measurements of cervical length and performed a systematic review of articles that correlated prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa in twins and pregnancy outcome. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched for studies published from 1987 through October 20, 2016, using specific medical subject heading terms, key words, and their combination. The primary eligibility criteria were articles that correlated prenatal ultrasound imaging of vasa previa and pregnancy outcome in twins. The secondary eligibility criteria was the use of cervical length in the management of twin pregnancies diagnosed antenatally with vasa previa. Two authors independently assessed inclusion criteria, data extraction, and analysis. The final selection included 3 case report series, 9 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 retrospective case-control study of vasa previa diagnosed prenatally and confirmed at birth in twin pregnancies. RESULTS: The search of our databases identified 6 cases of dichorionic-diamniotic twins and 1 case of monochorionic-diamniotic twins diagnosed prenatally with vasa previa between 22-29 weeks and managed using cervical length. Two cases were delivered by emergency because of rapid changes in cervical length in one and bleeding on placenta previa in the other at 33 and 30 weeks, respectively. The systematic review identified data on 56 cases. The incidence of twin pregnancies diagnosed antenatally with vasa previa in the cohort and case-control studies was 11.0%. Data on chorionicity were available in only 34 cases and cervical length measurements were used by only the authors of 2 case reports and 4 cohort studies. Velamentous cord insertion was the most common additional ultrasound findings in twins presenting with vasa previa in both our series and the systematic review. CONCLUSION: Vasa previa is associated with specific prenatal and obstetric complications with different outcomes in singletons compared to twins. Data on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa in twin pregnancies are limited but there is enough evidence to warrant guidelines for targeted screening. To enable the development of efficient management protocols tailored to the need of individual cases, future studies of the screening, diagnosis, and management of vasa previa should be prospective and multicentric with detailed data on twins including chorionicity and use of cervical length.

In vitro fertilization represents a risk factor for vasa praevia.

Vasa praevia is a rare but very dangerous obstetrical condition. The purpose of our article is to evaluate data available in literature that indicate in vitro fertilization as a risk factor for vasa praevia. PubMed Library and Cochrane Database were searched using the keywords vasa praevia, in vitro fertilization, velamentous cord insertion, placenta praevia. The conditions related to in vitro fertilization that increase the risk of vasa praevia formation were identified and discussed. Also, the diagnosis and management options were reviewed. In vitro fertilization represents a risk factor for vasa praevia and all such pregnancies should be screened by transvaginal ultrasound for vasa praevia.

Vasa previa: diagnosis and management.

BACKGROUND: Vasa previa is a rare condition that is associated with a high rate of fetal or neonatal death when not diagnosed antenatally. The majority of available studies are either small, do not include antepartum data, limited to single institutions, or are biased by inclusion of patients from registries and online vasa previa support groups. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and management strategies for this potentially catastrophic entity and to describe further maternal and placental risk factors that may aid in the establishment of a screening protocol for vasa previa. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective multicenter descriptive study that included all pregnancies that were complicated by vasa previa that delivered between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012. Nine maternal fetal medicine practices and the hospitals in which they practice participated in data collection of diagnosis, treatment, and maternal-neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-eight pregnancies were identified that included the diagnosis of vasa previa or "possible vasa previa" either in the ultrasound record or in the hospital record at the time of delivery. Four cases (5.8%) appeared to resolve on repeat ultrasound examination. Fifteen of the 64 cases that were suspected of having vasa previa could not be verified or were not documented at delivery. Of the remaining 49 cases, where vasa previa was documented, 47 cases (96%) were diagnosed by ultrasound scanning antenatally. Known risk factors for vasa previa were present in 41 of 47 cases (87%). Of the 49 cases, 41 were delivered by planned cesarean delivery at a mean gestational age of 34.7 weeks, and 8 cases required emergent cesarean delivery at a mean gestational age of 34.6 weeks (range, 32.4-36.0 weeks gestation). Seven of these emergent cesarean deliveries had been diagnosed previously; 1 case had not. All of the emergent cesarean deliveries were for vaginal bleeding; 1 case was also for a concerning fetal heart rate, but only 1 of the known cases had a documented ruptured fetal vessel. None of these cases were found to have cervical shortening before the onset of bleeding. One of the undiagnosed cases resulted in a ruptured fetal vessel and a baby with no heart beat at birth who survived but had periventricular leukomalacia at 1 month of age with mild white-matter atrophy. Of the remaining neonates in this group, there were no deaths and no major complications beyond mild respiratory distress syndrome in 9 cases. There were no other major neonatal complications, which included no cases of periventricular leukomalacia, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, or any grade of intraventricular hemorrhage in the confirmed cases of vasa previa. CONCLUSION: This study confirms most current recommendations that include risk-based ultrasound screening, early hospitalization at 30-34 weeks gestation, antenatal corticosteroids at 30-32 weeks gestation, and elective delivery at 33-34 weeks gestation. Thus, with these recommendations for current identification and management of vasa previa in this series of geographically diverse mostly private practice maternal fetal medicine practices, we have confirmed recent reports that show a dramatic improvement in neonatal survival and complications compared with earlier reports.

Using ultrasound in the clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities.

Placental implantation abnormalities, including placenta previa, placenta accreta, vasa previa, and velamentous cord insertion, can have catastrophic consequences for both mother and fetus, especially as pregnancy progresses to term. In these situations, current recommendations for management usually call for an indicated preterm delivery even in asymptomatic patients. However, the recommended gestational age(s) for delivery in asymptomatic patients are empirically determined without consideration of the recent literature regarding the usefulness of specific ultrasound findings to help individualize management. The purpose of this article is to propose literature-supported guidelines to the current opinion-based management of asymptomatic patients with placental implantation abnormalities based on relevant and specific ultrasound findings such as cervical length, distance between the internal cervical os and placenta, and placental edge thickness.

#37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa.

Vasa previa occurs when fetal blood vessels that are unprotected by the umbilical cord or placenta run through the amniotic membranes and traverse the cervix. If membranes rupture, these vessels may rupture, with resultant fetal hemorrhage, exsanguination, or even death. Prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa by ultrasound scans is approximately 98%. Approximately 28% of prenatally diagnosed cases result in emergent preterm delivery. Management of prenatally diagnosed vasa previa includes antenatal corticosteroids between 28-32 weeks of gestation, considerations for preterm hospitalization at 30-34 weeks of gestation, and scheduled delivery at 34-37 weeks of gestation.

[Case report: Vasa previa diagnosis and management. How to prevent Benckiser's hemorrhage?]. / Cas clinique : diagnostic et prise en charge d'un vasa praevia. Comment prévenir l'hémorragie de Benckiser ?

Benckiser's haemorrhage is a serious obstetrical complication, following a vasa previa rupture. Incidence of vasa previa is estimated between 1/1150 and 1/5000 pregnancies. This case report illustrates the consequences of a suspected vasa previa rupture. There is no French recommendation of how to treat vasa previa. Different methods of prevention are described and examined thanks to a literature review.

Placental and cord insertion pathologies: screening, diagnosis, and management.

Placenta previa, low-lying placenta, and placenta accreta are aberrations in the normal development of the placenta. Diagnosis in the prenatal period is essential because each of these pathologies can have a profound impact on the management of labor, birth, and the third stage. In recent years, there has been an increase in the occurrence of these placental abnormalities, with the increase in the cesarean rate considered to be a main cause of this phenomenon. Comprehensive risk assessment, combined with recent advances in ultrasonography, can provide earlier detection of impaired placental implantation. Umbilical cord insertion pathologies are also of concern. Velamentous cord insertion is a defect in the insertion site of the umbilical cord resulting from the atrophy of portions of the developing placenta. In this condition, the blood vessels of the umbilical cord are not protected by Wharton's jelly, resulting in a potential for increased risk of breakage when the amniotic membranes rupture. Vasa previa is a velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord in which the blood vessels are present over the cervical os. If these blood vessels rupture during labor, it can have catastrophic effects on the fetus. Prenatal diagnosis of this condition can allow the certified nurse-midwife/certified midwife (CNM/CM) to plan for the safe birth of the newborn and avoid fetal hemorrhage. This article provides a review of risk factors, diagnosis pathophysiology, and management options for these conditions, thus enabling the CNM/CM to provide safe, effective care and management.

Ultrasound in placental disorders.

The definition of placenta previa based on ultrasound findings is more practical, and the traditional definition (implantation of the placenta in the lower uterine segment) needs to be revised. The term 'placenta previa' should only be used when the placental edge overlaps or is within 2 cm of the internal cervical orifice in late pregnancy. If the placental edge is located further than 2 cm but within 3.5 cm from the internal cervical orifice, the placenta should be termed 'low-lying'. Unless the placental edge at least reaches the internal orifice at mid-trimester, symptomatic placenta previa in the third trimester will not be encountered. Caesarean section is the recommended mode of delivery for placenta previa at term. Attempt at vaginal delivery is appropriate for low-lying placenta, but the possibility of post-partum haemorrhage should be kept in mind. The incidence of invasive placentation, such as placenta accrete, has progressively risen in the past 3 decades, possibly as a consequence of increasing caesarean section rates. Ultrasound has a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 97% for the identification of all forms of invasive placentation. Chorioangiomas are benign non-trophoblastic placental tumours with excessive vascular proliferation within the stroma of chronic villi. They are usually asymptomatic, although occasionally can be associated with adverse fetal outcomes. Chorioangiomas usually appear as well-circumscribed, rounded, hypo-echoic lesions next to the chorionic surface. Iatrogenic delivery or prenatal intervention are two options, if fetal compromise is present. Prenatal detection leads to a dramatic increase in survival compared with those cases unsuspected antenatally.