Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio predict the response to BCG in high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer?
Racioppi, Marco; Gianfrancesco, Luca Di; Ragonese, Mauro; Palermo, Giuseppe; Sacco, Emilio; Bassi, Pier Francesco.
Afiliação
  • Racioppi, Marco; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario. Department of Urology. IT
  • Gianfrancesco, Luca Di; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario. Department of Urology. IT
  • Ragonese, Mauro; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario. Department of Urology. IT
  • Palermo, Giuseppe; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario. Department of Urology. IT
  • Sacco, Emilio; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario. Department of Urology. IT
  • Bassi, Pier Francesco; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario. Department of Urology. IT
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(2): 315-324, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS | ID: biblio-1002193
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic factor for response of high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (HRNMIBC) treated with BCG therapy. Materials and

Methods:

Between March 2010 and February 2014 in a tertiary center 100 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed HRNMIBC were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided according to NLR value 46 patients with NLR value less than 3 (NLR < 3 group), and 54 patients with NLR value more than 3 (NLR ≥ 3 group). At the end of follow-up 52 patients were high grade disease free (BCG-responder group) and 48 patients underwent radical cystectomy for high grade recurrence or progression to muscle invasive disease (BCG non-responder group). The average follow-up was 60 months. Intervention analysis and correlation of preoperative NLR value with response to BCG in terms of recurrence and progression.

Results:

The optimal cut-off for NLR was ≥ 3 according to the receiver operating characteristics analysis (AUC 0.760, 95% CI, 0.669-0.850). Mean NLR value was 3.65 ± 1.16 in BCG non-responder group and 2.61 ± 0.77 in BCG responder group (p = 0.01). NLR correlated with recurrence (r = 0.55, p = 0.01) and progression risk scores (r = 0.49, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, NLR (p = 0.02) and EORTC recurrence risk groups (p = 0.01) were associated to the primary endpoint. The log-rank test showed statistically significant difference between NLR < 3 and NLR ≥ 3 curves (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

NLR value preoperatively evaluated could be a useful tool to predict BCG response of HRNMIBC. These results could lead to the development of prospective studies to assess the real prognostic value of NLR in HRNMIBC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Vacina BCG / Linfócitos / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Adjuvantes Imunológicos / Neutrófilos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Vacina BCG / Linfócitos / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Adjuvantes Imunológicos / Neutrófilos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article