Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maternal near miss: before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
Freitas, Cijara Leonice de; Sarmento, Ayane Cristine; Medeiros, Kleyton Santos de; Leonardo, Maria Emanuela Matos; Santos, Ythalo Hugo da Silva; Gonçalves, Ana Katherine.
Afiliação
  • Freitas, Cijara Leonice de; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Norte. Health Sciences Center. Natal. BR
  • Sarmento, Ayane Cristine; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Norte. Health Sciences Center. Natal. BR
  • Medeiros, Kleyton Santos de; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Norte. Health Sciences Center. Natal. BR
  • Leonardo, Maria Emanuela Matos; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Norte. Department of Psychology. Natal. BR
  • Santos, Ythalo Hugo da Silva; FIOCRUZ. Data and Knowledge Integration Center for Health. Salvador. BR
  • Gonçalves, Ana Katherine; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Norte. Health Sciences Center. Natal. BR
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.);69(10): e20230048, 2023. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514692
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare Maternal Near Miss prevalence and outcomes before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

METHODS:

This retrospective study was carried out in a university maternity hospital of high complexity. The population was divided into two groups G1, 1 year before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period (August 2018-July 2019) and G2, 1 year during the pandemic period (August 2020-July 2021). All pregnant/postpartum women hospitalized up to 42 days after the end of pregnancy/childbirth were included, and pregnant women who were admitted with coronavirus disease 2019/flu symptoms were excluded. The association of variables with "Maternal Near Miss" was estimated using logistic regression.

RESULTS:

A total of 568 women from G1 and 349 women from G2 fulfilled the Maternal Near Miss criteria. The prevalence of Maternal Near Miss in pre-pandemic was 144.1/1,000 live births and during the pandemic was 78.5/1,000 live births. In the analysis adjusted for G1, the factors of days of hospitalization (PR 1.02, CI 1.0-1.0, p<0.05), pre-eclampsia (PR 0.41, CI 1.4-2.2, p<0.05), and sepsis/severe systemic infection (PR 1.79, CI 0.3-0.4, p<0.05) were crucial for women with the Maternal Near Miss condition to have a greater chance of being admitted to the intensive care unit. In G2, low education (PR 0.45, CI 0.2-0.9, p<0.05), eclampsia (PR 5.28, CI 3.6-7.6, p<0.05), and use of blood products (PR 6.48, CI 4.7-8.8, p<0.05) increased the risk of admission to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION:

During the pandemic, there was a lower prevalence of Maternal Near Miss in high-risk pregnancies, fewer hospitalizations, and more deaths compared to the non-pandemic period.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: LILACS Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: LILACS Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article