Influence of treatment modality on angiographic outcome after coronary stenting in diabetic patients: a controlled study.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study was designed to determine the six-month angiographic outcome after stenting of native coronary arteries in insulin-treated (ITDM) and non-ITDM patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and compare the results with those in non-DM patients. BACKGROUND: The influence of the treatment modality for DM on restenosis in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting has not been elucidated sufficiently. METHODS: A total of 1,439 (70%) of 2,061 patients underwent repeated angiography within six months of coronary stenting. The ITDM and non-ITDM (oral hypoglycemic drugs or diet) were documented in 48 (3.3%) and 177 patients (12.3%), respectively, leaving 1,214 non-DM patients. RESULTS: Baseline reference vessel diameter tended to be smaller in ITDM patients (mean, 2.73 mm) than in non-DM and non-ITDM patients (2.88 mm and 2.85 mm, respectively). However, percent diameter stenosis was not different. The median number of stents deployed was 1; median stent length was 15 mm. Statistically significant differences were present after stenting for the means of minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and acute gain between ITDM patients (MLD 2.67 mm, acute gain 1.98 mm) and non-DM patients (MLD 2.81 mm, acute gain 2.16 mm). At follow-up, percent diameter stenosis, late lumen loss and loss index were significantly higher in both non-ITDM lesions (42%, 1.14 mm and 0.56, respectively) and ITDM lesions (48%, 1.26 mm and 0.65, respectively) than in non-DM lesions (35%, 0.96 mm and 0.45, respectively). The corresponding differences between non-ITDM and ITDM lesions did not reach statistical significance. Restenosis rates in non-DM, non-ITDM and ITDM lesions were 23.8%, 32.8% (p = 0.013 vs. non-DM) and 39.6% (p = 0.02 vs. non-DM, p = 0.477 vs. non-ITDM), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that compared with stenting in non-DM patients, stenting of native coronary arteries in DM patients is associated with significantly increased lumen renarrowing, regardless of the treatment modality for DM.