Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chlamydia pneumoniae serology: interlaboratory variation in microimmunofluorescence assay results.
Peeling, R W; Wang, S P; Grayston, J T; Blasi, F; Boman, J; Clad, A; Freidank, H; Gaydos, C A; Gnarpe, J; Hagiwara, T; Jones, R B; Orfila, J; Persson, K; Puolakkainen, M; Saikku, P; Schachter, J.
Afiliação
  • Peeling RW; Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2. rosanna_peeling@hc-sc.gc.ca
J Infect Dis ; 181 Suppl 3: S426-9, 2000 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10839729
The lack of standardization in chlamydia serology has made interpretation of published data difficult. This study was initiated to determine the extent of interlaboratory variation of microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test results for the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infections. Identical panels of 22 sera were sent to 14 laboratories in eight countries for the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by MIF. Although there was extensive variation in the numeric titer values, the overall percentage agreement with the reference standard titers from the University of Washington was 80%. For results by serodiagnostic category, the best agreement was for four-fold rise in IgG titers, while the lowest agreement was for negative or low IgG titers. Agreement for IgM titers was 50%-95%. Four laboratories failed to discern false-positive IgM titers possibly because of the presence of rheumatoid factor. Further studies are underway to determine the source of interlaboratory variation for the MIF test.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Chlamydia / Imunofluorescência / Chlamydophila pneumoniae / Anticorpos Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Chlamydia / Imunofluorescência / Chlamydophila pneumoniae / Anticorpos Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article