Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methadone maintenance at different dosages for opioid dependence.
Faggiano, F; Vigna-Taglianti, F; Versino, E; Lemma, P.
Afiliação
  • Faggiano F; Department of Public Health, University of Torino, Via Santena 5bis, Torino, Italy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD002208, 2003.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12917925
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is a long term opioid replacement therapy, recognised as effective in the management of opioid dependence. Even if MMT at high dosage is recommended as therapy for reducing illicit opioid use and promoting longer retention in treatment, at present day "the organisation and regulation of the methadone maintenance treatment varies widely".

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the efficacy of different dosages of MMT for opioid dependence in modifying health and social outcomes and in promoting patients' familial, occupational and relational functioning. SEARCH STRATEGY The following sources were scanned - MEDLINE (OVID 1966-2001)- EMBASE (1988-2001)- ERIC (1988-2001)- Psychinfo (1947-2001)- Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) (1947-2001)- Register of the Cochrane Drug and Alcohol Group (CDAG) (1947-2001)The CDAG search strategy was applied together with a specific MESH strategy. Further studies were searched through letters to the authors of selected trials or to experts in order to obtain unpublished data. check of references of relevant reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) and Controlled Prospective Studies (CPS) evaluating methadone maintenance at different dosages in the management of opioid dependence were included in the review. Non-randomised trials were included when proper adjustment for confounding factors was performed at the analysis stage. DATA COLLECTION AND

ANALYSIS:

Extraction of data was performed separately by two reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. RevMan software was used for analysis. Quality assessments of the methodology of studies were carried out using CDAG checklist. MAIN

RESULTS:

22 studies were excluded from the review. 21 studies were included; of them, 11 were RCTs with 2279 people randomised and 10 were CPSs with 3715 people followed-up.

OUTCOMES:

Retention rate - RCTs High vs low doses at shorter follow-ups RR=1.36 [1.13,1.63], and at longer ones RR=1.62 [0.95,2.77]. Opioid use (self reported), times/w - RCTs high vs low doses WMD= -2.00 [-4.77,0.77] high vs middle doses WMD= -1.89[-3.43, -0.35] Opioid abstinence, (urine based) at >3-4 w - RCTs high vs low ones RR=1.59 [1.16,2.18] high vs middle doses RR=1.51[0.63,3.61] Cocaine abstinence (urine based) at >3-4 w - RCTs high vs low doses RR=1.81 [1.15,2.85]Overdose mortality - CPSs high dose vs low dose at 6 years follow up RR=0.29 [0.02-5.34] high dose vs middle dose at 6 years follow up RR=0.38 [0.02-9.34] middle dose vs low dose at 6 years follow up RR=0.57 [0.06-5.06] REVIEWER'S

CONCLUSIONS:

Methadone dosages ranging from 60 to 100 mg/day are more effective than lower dosages in retaining patients and in reducing use of heroin and cocaine during treatment. To find the optimal dose is a clinical ability, but clinician must consider these conclusions in treatment strategies.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metadona / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides / Entorpecentes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2003 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metadona / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides / Entorpecentes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2003 Tipo de documento: Article