Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Home-based intermediate care program vs hospitalization: Cost comparison study.
Armstrong, Catherine Deri; Hogg, William E; Lemelin, Jacques; Dahrouge, Simone; Martin, Carmel; Viner, Gary S; Saginur, Raphael.
Afiliação
  • Armstrong CD; Department of Economics at the University of Ottawa in Ontario.
Can Fam Physician ; 54(1): 66-73, 2008 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18208958
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a home-based intermediate care program in a large Canadian city lowers the cost of care and to look at whether such home-based programs could be a solution to the increasing demands on Canadian hospitals. DESIGN: Single-arm study with historical controls. SETTING: Department of Family Medicine at the Ottawa Hospital (Civic campus) in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Patients requiring hospitalization for acute care. Participants were matched with historical controls based on case-mix, most responsible diagnosis, and level of complexity. INTERVENTIONS: Placement in the home-based intermediate care program. Daily home visits from the nurse practitioner and 24-hour access to care by telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariate regression models were used to estimate the effect of the program on 5 outcomes: length of stay in hospital, cost of care substituted for hospitalization (Canadian dollars), readmission for a related diagnosis, readmission for any diagnosis, and costs incurred by community home-care services for patients following discharge from hospital. RESULTS: The outcomes of 43 hospital admissions were matched with those of 363 controls. Patients enrolled in the program stayed longer in hospital (coefficient 3.3 days, P < .001), used more community care services following discharge (coefficient $729, P = .007), and were more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 3 months of discharge (coefficient 17%, P = .012) than patients treated in hospital. Total substituted costs of home-based care were not significantly different from the costs of hospitalization (coefficient -$501, P = .11). CONCLUSION: While estimated cost savings were not statistically significant, the limitations of our study suggest that we underestimated these savings. In particular, the economic inefficiencies of a small immature program and the inability to control for certain factors when selecting historical controls affected our results. Further research is needed to determine the economic effect of mature home-based programs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Crônica / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar / Hospitalização Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Crônica / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar / Hospitalização Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article