Evaluation of dressings used with local anaesthetic cream and for peripheral venous cannulation.

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare four polyurethane dressings manufactured by two different companies for use in children. METHOD: Seventy-eight dressings were applied to secure either local anaesthetic creams (n = 62) or intravenous cannulae (n = 16). Each dressing was evaluated for ease of application, security and ease of removal, using a simple scoring system. RESULTS: 84 per cent of Opsite flexigrid and 90 per cent of Tegaderm local anaesthetic cream dressings were rated as easy or very easy to apply. Opsite flexigrid was felt to be more secure, whereas Tegaderm was easier to remove. The Tegaderm cannula dressing was easier to apply than the iv3000 dressing. CONCLUSION: There was little difference between the two brands, including costs.