Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regional differences in quality of care and outcomes for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the get with the guidelines coronary artery disease program.
Laskey, Warren; Spence, Nathan; Zhao, Xin; Mayo, Rebecca; Taylor, Robert; Cannon, Christopher P; Hernandez, Adrian F; Peterson, Eric D; Fonarow, Gregg C.
Afiliação
  • Laskey W; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, MSC10-5550, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. wlaskey@salud.unm.edu
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 9(1): 1-7, 2010 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20215903
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Geographic differences in the delivery of guideline-driven care following acute myocardial infarction have been described. The effect of hospital participation in a national performance improvement program on regional variation in quality of care and in-hospital outcomes for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown.

METHODS:

We evaluated the variation in conformity to the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease Program quality measures across 4 geographic regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and East) in 161,236 patients admitted for ACS to 436 Get With The Guidelines hospitals. We evaluated 6 measures (aspirin within 24 hours, aspirin at discharge, ACEI or ARB therapy for left ventricular systolic dysfunction, beta-blocker at discharge, lipid-lowering medication for qualified patients, smoking cessation advice); a binary "all-or-none" process performance measure (primary outcome); an "opportunity-based" overall composite score (secondary outcome); in-hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to test the associations between performance measures and short-term outcomes and geographic region.

RESULTS:

Data were collected from January 2, 2000 to January 2, 2008. There was no significant regional variation in either the "all-or-none" (Northeast 79.3%; Midwest 83.2%; South 78.9%; West 81.6%) or "opportunity-based" (Northeast 91.9%; Midwest 93.6%; South 91.5%; West 92.6%) composite performance measures. Both performance measures exhibited significant improvement with participation time irrespective of region. In-hospital mortality was similar among regions. Adjusted hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the Midwest.

CONCLUSION:

Quality improvement program participation may help to facilitate high quality, consistent care for patients with ACS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Síndrome Coronariana Aguda Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Síndrome Coronariana Aguda Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article