Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity measurements derived from the non-insulin-assisted minimal model and the clamp techniques are concordant.
Henriksen, Jan Erik; Alford, Frank; Ward, Glenn; Thye-Rønn, Peter; Levin, Klaus; Hother-Nielsen, Ole; Rantzau, Christian; Boston, Ray; Beck-Nielsen, Henning.
Afiliação
  • Henriksen JE; Department of Endocrinology M, Diabetes Research Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark. jan.erik.henriksen@ouh.regionsyddanmark.dk
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 26(7): 569-78, 2010 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20830736
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We investigated the concordance between glucose effectiveness (SG) and insulin sensitivity (SI), derived from the unmodified dynamic non-insulin-assisted intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) implemented by SG(MM) and SI(MM); simulation analysis and modelling/conversational interaction (SAAM/CONSAM) versus the eu/hyperglycaemic basal insulinaemic and the euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (SG(CLAMP) and SI(CLAMP)).

METHODS:

Twenty-seven of 30 normoglycaemic subjects completed a (1) euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp, (2) 6-h eu/hyperglycaemic near-normoinsulinaemic pancreatic clamp with hyperglycaemia present over the final 2 h of the clamp (Day 2 study), (3) identical clamp to (2) but with euglycaemia maintained over the entire 6 h (Day 3 study) and (4) IVGTT. SG(CLAMP) was calculated in two ways based on data from study (2) alone (Day 2 SG(CLAMP210-240')) or from data from study day (2) and (3) (Day 2-3 SG(CLAMP330-360')).

RESULTS:

SG(MM) was unrelated to the magnitude of endogenous insulin release (AIR). The single-day (Day 2) and two-day (Day 2 and 3) SG(CLAMP) protocols correlated (r = 0.72, p = 0.003), but SG(CLAMP210-240') was significantly (p = 0.001) higher than SG(CLAMP330-360'). Employing the Day 2 and 3 SG(CLAMP) protocol, the whole body SG(CLAMP330-360') was similar to SG(MM) (1.80 ± 0.82 versus 1.73 ± 0.58 dL/min) and correlated (r = 0.45, p < 0.02). SG(CLAMP210-240') did not correlate with SG(MM) (r = 0.24). SI(MM) and SI(CLAMP) were similar (0.093 ± 0.060 versus 0.087 ± 0.029 dL/min per mU/L) and correlated (r = 0.76, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The time-dependent increase in glucose disposal observed during a prolonged 6-h clamp significantly influences the estimation of SG(CLAMP), and significant concordance coefficients are observed between SG(MM), and SG(CLAMP330-360'), and SI(MM) and SI(CLAMP).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Resistência à Insulina / Técnica Clamp de Glucose / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Glucose / Teste de Tolerância a Glucose / Insulina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Resistência à Insulina / Técnica Clamp de Glucose / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Glucose / Teste de Tolerância a Glucose / Insulina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article