Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of predictive factors for the outcome of complete lymph node dissection in melanoma patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes.
Kunte, Christian; Geimer, Till; Baumert, Jens; Konz, Birger; Volkenandt, Matthias; Flaig, Michael; Ruzicka, Thomas; Berking, Carola; Schmid-Wendtner, Monika-H.
Afiliação
  • Kunte C; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany. Christian.Kunte@med.uni-muenchen.de
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 64(4): 655-62; quiz 637, 2011 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21315477
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted procedure to accurately stage patients with melanoma. However, there is no consensus concerning the practical consequences of a positive SLN, since a survival benefit of a complete lymph node dissection (CLND) has not yet been demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE:

We wondered whether we could identify a subgroup of patients with metastatic involvement of the SLN who could be excluded from the recommendation to undergo CLND.

METHODS:

At the Department of Dermatology at the University of Munich, a total of 213 patients with metastatic SLNs (24.9%) were identified among 854 patients who had undergone SLNB between 1996 and 2007. All SLN-positive patients had been advised to have CLND. Survival analyses were performed by using the Kaplan-Meier approach.

RESULTS:

A total of 176 (82.6%) of 213 SLN-positive patients underwent CLND. In this group, 26 patients (14.8%) showed metastatic disease in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 26.1% in NSLN-positive patients and 74% in NSLN-negative patients. SLN-positive patients who refused CLND had a better prognosis than patients with CLND. Breslow tumor thickness was significantly associated with positive CLND status with higher median values in CLND-positive than CLND-negative patients (3.03 vs 2.22 mm).

LIMITATIONS:

The subgroup of patients with metastatic disease in CLND may have been too small to reach statistical significance for other tumor- or patient-related parameters. Mitotic indices of the primary melanomas had not been determined in this retrospective study; thus a possible correlation with lymph node status could not be tested.

CONCLUSION:

Among SLN-positive patients, the presence of metastatic NSLN is a highly significant poor prognostic factor. Tumor thickness is a significant prognostic parameter for positive CLND status and might be considered in the decision to perform CLND in case of metastatic SLN.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela / Excisão de Linfonodo / Melanoma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela / Excisão de Linfonodo / Melanoma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article