Long-term survival for patients with preoperative renal failure undergoing bioprosthetic or mechanical valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess short-term and long-term outcomes after valve replacement with biologic or mechanical prostheses in patients with preoperative end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing valve replacement from January 1996 through March 2008 at Emory Healthcare Hospitals was performed. Outcomes were compared using χ(2) tests and 2-sample t tests. Adjusted long-term survival up to 10 years was assessed with Kaplan-Meier plots and compared between biologic and mechanical replacements using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients underwent 211 valve replacement operations. Patient age was 20 to 83 years (mean age, 54.8 ± 14.0); 115 of 211 (54.5%) were male. Operations included the following: 100 of 211 (47.4%) isolated aortic; 49 of 211 (23.2%) isolated mitral; 4 of 211 (1.9%) isolated tricuspid; and 58 of 211 (27.5%) combined replacements. Thirteen (6.2%) patients underwent reoperative valve replacements. Most patients received bioprosthetic valves (143 of 211, 67.8%), while 68 of 211 (32.2%) received mechanical valves. Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in 53 of 211 (25.1%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was in 42 of 211 patients (19.9%) and was not different between bioprosthetic and mechanical replacements. Overall 10-year survival was 18.1% for all patients and was not influenced by valve type implanted. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with end-stage renal disease treated with dialysis, valve replacement carries acceptable operative mortality. Long-term survival is similar among patients receiving bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve replacement. Careful risk assessment and choice of valve prosthesis should be performed prior to surgical intervention in this high-risk patient population.