Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: the perspective of a middle-income country's public health system.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms and survival in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the devices used to deliver it are costly and can impose a significant burden to the relatively constrained health budgets of middle-income countries such as Brazil. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed, representing the follow-up of a hypothetical cohort of HF patients, with a 20-year time horizon. Input data were based on information from a Brazilian cohort of 316 HF patients, as well as meta-analyses of data on devices' effectiveness and risks. Stochastic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed for all important variables in the model. Costs were expressed as International Dollars (Int$), by application of current purchasing power parity conversion rate. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CRT over medical therapy was Int$ 15,723 per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. For CRT combined with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), ICER was Int$ 36,940/QALY over ICD alone, and Int$ 84,345/QALY over CRT alone. Sensitivity analyses showed that the model was generally robust, though susceptible to the cost of the devices, their impact on HF mortality, and battery longevity. CONCLUSIONS: CRT is cost-effective for HF patients in the Brazilian public health system scenario. In patients eligible for CRT, upgrade to CRT+ICD has an ICER above the World Health Organization willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the nation's Gross Domestic Product per Capita (Int$ 31,689 for Brazil). However, for ICD eligible patients, upgrade to CRT+ICD is marginally cost-effective.