Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparison of three anti-aquaporin 4 antibody detection methods in neuromyelitis optical].
Ye, Jing; Liao, Zhang-yuan; Sun, Hui; You, Xiao-fan; Wu, Xiao-li; Li, Cun-jiang.
Afiliação
  • Ye J; Department of Neurology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi ; 50(10): 848-50, 2011 Oct.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22321326
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate three methods of detecting anti-aquaporin 4(AQP4) antibody in neuromyelitis optical(NMO), including indirect immunofluorescence assay organization (IIF), cell immunofluorescence method (CBA) and ELISA.

METHODS:

The patients were divided into NMO group (n = 29), multiple sclerosis (MS) group (n = 23), and healthy controls group (n = 50). IIF, CBA and ELISA were used in 3 groups to detect serum anti-AQP4 antibody. The sensitivity and specificity as well as the consistency of positive results were compared.

RESULTS:

In the aspect of the sensitivity of the three anti-AQP4 antibody to diagnosis NMO, CBA (72.4%) > IIF (62.1%) > ELISA (51.7%); in the aspect of specificity, CBA (100.0%) > ELISA (98.6%) > IIF (97.3%). Kappa testing and evaluation method showed that the three detection methods were all in good consistency, particular in CBA and ELISA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

CBA method showed a highest specificity and sensitivity in all these three anti-AQP4 antibody detection methods. CBA and ELISA are in better consistency of positive results.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autoanticorpos / Neuromielite Óptica / Aquaporina 4 Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autoanticorpos / Neuromielite Óptica / Aquaporina 4 Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article