Local treatment of pulmonary metastases: from open resection to minimally invasive approach? Less morbidity, comparable local control.

BACKGROUND: The level of evidence for efficacy of local treatment of pulmonary metastases is low; therefore, complication rates should be minimized. Minimally invasive techniques may have the potential to reduce morbidity but potentially lead to more local and/or ipsilateral recurrences. The objective of this study was to evaluate the introduction of a new treatment strategy incorporating the increased use of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), weighing complications against recurrence rates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed results of all local treatment of pulmonary metastases in the Netherlands Cancer Institute from 2002 to 2007. Each of 158 identified interventions was analyzed separately to retrieve procedure-related data. Overall survival data were analyzed per patient. To evaluate the introduction of a strategy incorporating minimally invasive techniques, the study period was split in two (before and after the introduction of this strategy in July 2004). RESULTS: In Strategy I, 47 interventions (2 VATS, no RFA) were performed in 37 patients; in Strategy II 111 interventions (51 VATS and RFA) in 86 patients. Metastases of a variety of primary tumors were treated. Median hospital stay was shorter (5 vs. 7 days) and procedure-related morbidity was less with Strategy II (p < 0.01). Time-to-recurrence rates were comparable (p = 0.18), as were local and ipsilateral recurrence rates within 3 years (p = 0.72). Estimated overall 3-year survival was 59% for patients treated with Strategy I and 54% with Strategy II. CONCLUSIONS: Increased use of minimally invasive techniques for local treatment of pulmonary metastatic disease is associated with low morbidity, without apparent reduction in (local) disease control.