Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does higher gadolinium concentration play a role in the morphologic assessment of brain tumors? Results of a multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobutrol versus gadobenate dimeglumine (the MERIT Study).
Seidl, Z; Vymazal, J; Mechl, M; Goyal, M; Herman, M; Colosimo, C; Pasowicz, M; Yeung, R; Paraniak-Gieszczyk, B; Yemen, B; Anzalone, N; Citterio, A; Schneider, G; Bastianello, S; Ruscalleda, J.
Afiliação
  • Seidl Z; Lekarska Fakulta, Neurologicka Klinika, Prague, Czech Republic. zseid@lf1.cuni.cz
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 33(6): 1050-8, 2012 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22383237
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Gadobenate dimeglumine has proved advantageous compared with other gadolinium-based contrast agents for contrast-enhanced brain MR imaging. Gadobutrol is a more highly concentrated agent (1.0 mol/L). This study intraindividually compared 0.1-mmol/kg doses of these agents for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of brain tumors. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Adult patients with suspected or known brain tumors underwent 2 identical MR imaging examinations at 1.5T, 1 with gadobenate dimeglumine and the other with gadobutrol, both at a dose of 0.1-mmol/kg body weight. The agents were injected in randomized order separated by 3-14 days. Imaging sequences and acquisition timing were identical for the 2 examinations. Three blinded readers evaluated images qualitatively for diagnostic information (lesion extent, delineation, morphology, enhancement, global preference) and quantitatively for CNR and LBR.

RESULTS:

One hundred fourteen of 123 enrolled patients successfully underwent both examinations. Final diagnoses were intra-axial tumors, metastases, extra-axial tumors, "other" tumors, and "nontumor" (49, 46, 8, 7, and 4 subjects, respectively). Readers 1, 2, and 3 demonstrated preference for gadobenate dimeglumine in 46 (40.7%), 54 (47.4%), and 49 (43.0%) patients, respectively, compared with 6, 7, and 7 patients for gadobutrol (P < .0001, all readers). Highly significant (P < .0001, all readers) preference for gadobenate dimeglumine was demonstrated for all other qualitative end points. Inter-reader agreement was good for all evaluations (κ = 0.414-0.629). Significantly superior CNR and LBR were determined for gadobenate dimeglumine (P < .019, all readers).

CONCLUSIONS:

Significantly greater morphologic information and lesion enhancement are achieved on brain MR imaging with 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine compared with gadobutrol at an equivalent dose.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos Organometálicos / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meglumina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos Organometálicos / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meglumina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article