Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD receiving dialysis: a 54-week randomized trial.
Arjona Ferreira, Juan C; Corry, Dalila; Mogensen, Carl E; Sloan, Lance; Xu, Lei; Golm, Gregory T; Gonzalez, Edward J; Davies, Michael J; Kaufman, Keith D; Goldstein, Barry J.
Afiliação
  • Arjona Ferreira JC; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ 07065, USA. juan_arjona@merck.com
Am J Kidney Dis ; 61(4): 579-87, 2013 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23352379
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. STUDY

DESIGN:

54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. SETTING &

PARTICIPANTS:

From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 11 to treatment. INTERVENTION Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia).

OUTCOMES:

Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia.

RESULTS:

Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was -0.72% (95% CI, -0.95% to -0.48%) with sitagliptin and -0.87% (95% CI, -1.11% to -0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, -0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, -4.8% [95% CI, -15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, -7.8% [95% CI, -17.1% to -1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both).

LIMITATIONS:

Small sample size limits between-group comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pirazinas / Triazóis / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Nefropatias Diabéticas / Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pirazinas / Triazóis / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Nefropatias Diabéticas / Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article