Measuring meaning and peace with the FACIT-spiritual well-being scale: distinction without a difference?
Psychol Assess
; 26(1): 127-37, 2014 Mar.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24188147
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp; Peterman, Fitchett, Brady, Hernandez, & Cella, 2002) has become a widely used measure of spirituality; however, there remain questions about its specific factor structure and the validity of scores from its separate scales. Specifically, it remains unclear whether the Meaning and Peace scales denote distinct factors. The present study addresses previous limitations by examining the extent to which the Meaning and Peace scales relate differentially to a variety of physical and mental health variables across 4 sets of data from adults with a number of chronic health conditions. Although a model with separate but correlated factors fit the data better, discriminant validity analyses indicated limited differences in the pattern of associations each scale showed with a wide array of commonly used health and quality-of-life measures. In total, the results suggest that people may distinguish between the concepts of Meaning and Peace, but the observed relations with health outcomes are primarily due to variance shared between the 2 factors. Additional research is needed to better understand the separate and joint role of Meaning and Peace in the quality of life of people with chronic illness.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Doença Crônica
/
Espiritualidade
/
Senso de Coerência
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Article