Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[The Mexican consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Part II]. / Consenso mexicano de enfermedad por relujo gastroesofágico. Parte II.
Huerta-Iga, F; Tamayo-de la Cuesta, J L; Noble-Lugo, A; Hernández-Guerrero, A; Torres-Villalobos, G; Ramos-de la Medina, A; Pantoja-Millán, J P.
Afiliação
  • Huerta-Iga F; Encargado del Servicio de Endoscopia, Hospital Ángeles Torreón, Coahuila, México. Electronic address: fhuertaiga@prodigy.net.mx.
  • Tamayo-de la Cuesta JL; Jefe de Gastroenterología, Hospital Civil de Culiacán, Sinaloa, México.
  • Noble-Lugo A; Departamento de Enseñanza, Hospital Español de México, México D.F., México.
  • Hernández-Guerrero A; Jefe del Servicio de Endoscopia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, México D.F., México.
  • Torres-Villalobos G; Servicio de Cirugía, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México D.F., México.
  • Ramos-de la Medina A; Director Médico, Hospital Español de Veracruz, Veracruz, México.
  • Pantoja-Millán JP; Cirugía del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal, México D.F., México.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex ; 78(4): 231-9, 2013.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24290724
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To update the themes of endoscopic and surgical treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) from the Mexican Consensus published in 2002.

METHODS:

Part I of the 2011 Consensus dealt with the general concepts, diagnosis, and medical treatment of this disease. Part II covers the topics of the endoscopic and surgical treatment of GERD. In this second part, an expert in endoscopy and an expert in GERD surgery, along with the three general coordinators of the consensus, carried out an extensive bibliographic review using the Embase, Cochrane, and Medline databases. Statements referring to the main aspects of endoscopic and surgical treatment of this disease were elaborated and submitted to specialists for their consideration and vote, utilizing the modified Delphi method. The statements were accepted into the consensus if the level of agreement was 67% or higher.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five statements corresponding to the endoscopic and surgical treatment of GERD resulted from the voting process, and they are presented herein as Part II of the consensus. The majority of the statements had an average level of agreement approaching 90%.

CONCLUSION:

Currently, endoscopic treatment of GERD should not be regarded as an option, given that the clinical results at 3 and 5 years have not demonstrated durability or sustained symptom remission. The surgical indications for GERD are well established; only those patients meeting the full criteria should be candidates and their surgery should be performed by experts.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refluxo Gastroesofágico Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refluxo Gastroesofágico Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article